Skip to content
Edgerton Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

Edgerton Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$7.5M
Granted FY2025still arriving
45
Grants FY2025still arriving
9
States reached
$4.5M
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead

Read this first · the figures below need context

60% of Edgerton Foundation’s FY2025 grant dollars went to California Community Foundation, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2025 names 33 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it.

Organizations named directly on the return

25
’21
37
’22
33
’23
25
’24
33
’25

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

01What it funds
0196% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2021 to 2025.

Philanthropy$22MArts & Culture$7.8MInternational$1.8MEducation$1.6MEnvironment$326kHuman Services$258kHealth$145kYouth Development$96kOther$0
02FY2025 · 45 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k8 grants · $26k
  • $10k–50k16 grants · $418k
  • $50k–250k17 grants · $1.4M
  • $250k+4 grants · $5.6M
$39,000
Median grant
9
States reached
$107M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CALIFORNIA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION$4,477,900
INTERNATIONAL MEDICAL CORPS$516,000
NATIONAL THEATER$326,000
ALLIANCE COLLEGE-READY PUBLIC SCHOOLS FOUNDATION$250,000
GEFFEN PLAYHOUSE$168,000
MANHATTAN THEATRE CLUB$126,000
ROUNDABOUT THEATER CO$120,000
LOS ANGELES PHILHARMONIC ASSOCIATION$110,000
THEATRE COMMUNICATIONS GROUP$110,000
NATURAL HISTORY MUSEUM OF LOS ANGELES COUNTY$105,000
BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF METRO LOS ANGELES$96,000
LA JOLLA PLAYHOUSE$78,000
ALLIANCE THEATRE$78,000
LINCOLN CENTER THEATER$72,000
Individual grant recipient$68,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–25, $258k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%THE COLLEAGUES: $25k → 14%EXETER KIWANIS CLUB FOUNDATION: $1k → 18%SPENCE-CHAPIN: $50k → 17%SPENCE-CHAPIN: $50k → 17%SPENCE-CHAPIN: $50k → 17%SPENCE-CHAPIN: $50k → 17%SPENCE-CHAPIN: $25k → 17%LES AMIES: $3k → 14%LES AMIES: $2k → 14%LES AMIES: $2k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

AK
WA
IL
WI
NY
MA
IA
PA
NJ
CT
CA
CO
KY
VA
MD
AZ
TN
DC
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 100% of Edgerton Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 83% of the giving stays in CA; by stated purpose, 0%.

Edgerton Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

86%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$11M · 47 repeat orgs$1.8M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +35% since the first grant, against +20% for those funded once.

47 repeat relationships: 33 still active in FY2025, 14 since wound down; 11 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

47
43

Total granted

$11M
$1.3M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+35%
+20%

Still filing today

66%
47%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 84% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $475k went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureEducationHuman ServicesEnvironmentInternationalHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • IM
    INTERNATIONAL MEDICAL CORPS
    5× · 2021–2025 · $1.4M · revenue +35%
  • GP
    GEFFEN PLAYHOUSE INC
    5× · 2021–2025 · $1.0M · revenue +43%
  • LA
    LOS ANGELES PHILHARMONIC ASSOCIATION
    5× · 2021–2025 · $626k · revenue +64%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2024 · $160k
  • CF
    CENTER FOR RESPONSIBLE TRAVEL
    one grant, 2021 · $103k · revenue -11%
  • CM
    CEDARS-SINAI MEDICAL CARE FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $100k · revenue +72%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Women's Project & Productions Inc

Wp theater is the nation's oldest and largest theater company dedicated to developing, producing, and promoting the work of women+ at every stage of their careers. for over four decades we have served as leaders of a global movement…

Arts & Culture
2
Latino Theater Company

The latino theater company operates the los angeles theatre center, whose mission is to provide a world class arts center for those pursuing artistic excellence; a laboratory where both tradition and innovation are honored and honed; a…

Arts & Culture
3
Los Angeles Opera Company

To serve the public by producing world-class opera that preserves, promotes and advances the art form while embodying the diversity, spirit and artistic sensibility unique to los angeles. we envision an engaged and enlightened community in…

Arts & Culture
4
Stages

Stages makes plays and tells stories that invite everyone to live more deeply and love more boldly.

Arts & Culture
5
Guthrie Theater Foundation

The guthrie theater engages exceptional theater artists in the exploration of both classic and contemporary plays, connecting the community we serve to one another and to the world. through its extraordinary artists, staff and facility,…

Arts & Culture
6
Long Beach Community Players Inc

To celebrate the human experience while encouraging the participation of artist and audience in theatre productions.

Arts & Culture
7
Chicago Opera Theater

Chicago opera theater expands the tradition of opera as a living art form by engaging lovers of music and storytelling through innovative experiences, predominantly of new and rarely performed works.

Arts & Culture
8
A Contemporary Theatre Inc

Organization mission: act is a contemporary theatre where artistic ambition and civic engagement unite. organization vision: act envisions a world where the power of theatre expands our collective understanding of community and our own…

Arts & Culture
9
Apollo Theater Foundation Inc

The apollo theater is a commissioner and presenter; catalyst for new artists, audiences, and creative workforce; and partner in the projection of the african american narrative and its role in the development of american and global…

Arts & Culture
10
The Shakespeare Theatre

The shakespeare theatre company creates, preserves and promotes classic theatre-ambitious, enduring plays with universal themes-for all audiences. through the creation of provocative, imaginative, and accessible theatre, stc ignites a…

Arts & Culture
11
Academy of Television Arts and Sciences

The Television Academy is dedicated to celebrating excellence, innovation and the advancement of the telecommunications arts and sciences through recognition, education and leadership, while fostering a diverse, inclusive and accessible…

—
12
Chicago Shakespeare Theater

To create vivid, entertaining theatrical experiences that invigorate and engage people of all ages and identities by illuminating the complexity, ambiguity, and wonder of our world. shared humanity and unforgettable stories - now this is…

Arts & Culture
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Chicago Theatre Group Inc; the most unlike its peers is Exeter Kiwanis Club Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

65 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 65 of the 104 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
64/65
Grantees still filing
44/65
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CALIFORNIA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $21,801,225 · PhilanthropyCALIFORNIA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION+1 more: $2,800 · PhilanthropyGEFFEN PLAYHOUSE INC: $1,003,750 · Arts & CultureGEFFEN PLAYHOUS…LOS ANGELES PHILHARMONIC ASSOCIATION: $625,800 · Arts & CultureLOS ANGELES PHI…THEATER & ARTS FOUNDATION OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY DBA LA JOLLA PLAYHOUSE: $438,000 · Arts & CultureTHEATER & ARTS …MANHATTAN THEATRE CLUB INC: $406,000 · Arts & CultureMANHATTAN THEAT…NEW YORK SHAKESPEARE FESTIVAL: $312,000 · Arts & CultureNEW YORK SHAKES…BERKELEY REPERTORY THEATRE: $281,000 · Arts & CultureBERKELEY REPERT…ATLANTIC THEATER COMPANY: $279,000 · Arts & CultureATLANTIC THEATE…CHICAGO THEATRE GROUP INC: $176,000 · Arts & Culture+26 more: $1,337,578 · Arts & Culture+26 moreNATIONAL THEATER: $904,406 · OtherNATIONAL THEA…THEATRE COMMUNICATIONS GROUP INC: $521,500 · OtherTHEATRE COMMU…LACMA-LA COUNTY MUSEUM OF ART: $355,000 · OtherLACMA-LA COUN…Individual grant recipient: $327,000 · OtherIndividual gr…ALLIANCE THEATRE: $172,000 · OtherROUNDABOUT THEATER CO: $167,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $160,000 · OtherMUSIC CENTER: $150,000 · Other+40 more: $1,334,414 · Other+40 moreINTERNATIONAL MEDICAL CORPS: $1,440,000 · InternationalPACIFIC COUNCIL ON INTERNATIONAL POLICY: $359,000 · InternationalOCCIDENTAL COLLEGE: $421,250 · EducationALLIANCE COLLEGE-READY PUBLIC SCHOOLS FOUNDATION: $350,000 · EducationHARVARD-WESTLAKE SCHOOL: $257,500 · EducationFoxcroft School: $200,000 · EducationTHE CENTER FOR EARLY EDUCATION: $145,000 · EducationMount Saint Mary College: $50,000 · Education+5 more: $15,000 · EducationSPENCE-CHAPIN SERVICES TO FAMILIES AND CHILDREN: $225,000 · Human ServicesTHE COLLEAGUES INC: $25,000 · Human Services+2 more: $8,000 · Human ServicesAMAZON AID FOUNDATION: $115,000 · EnvironmentCENTER FOR RESPONSIBLE TRAVEL: $103,000 · EnvironmentALASKA CONSERVATION FOUNDATION: $21,000 · Environment
Philanthropy$21,804,025Arts & Culture$4,859,128Other$4,091,320International$1,799,000Education$1,438,750Human Services$258,000Environment$239,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCALIFORNIA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $21,801,225 over 5y, 1.8% of budgetINTERNATIONAL MEDICAL CORPS: $1,440,000 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetGEFFEN PLAYHOUSE INC: $1,003,750 over 5y, 2.5% of budgetLOS ANGELES PHILHARMONIC ASSOCIATION: $625,800 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetTHEATRE COMMUNICATIONS GROUP INC: $521,500 over 5y, 3.1% of budgetTHEATER & ARTS FOUNDATION OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY DBA LA JOLLA PLAYHOUSE: $438,000 over 4y, 1.2% of budgetOCCIDENTAL COLLEGE: $421,250 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetMANHATTAN THEATRE CLUB INC: $406,000 over 4y, 0.6% of budgetPACIFIC COUNCIL ON INTERNATIONAL POLICY: $359,000 over 5y, 3.8% of budgetALLIANCE COLLEGE-READY PUBLIC SCHOOLS FOUNDATION: $350,000 over 3y, 3.0% of budgetNEW YORK SHAKESPEARE FESTIVAL: $312,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetBERKELEY REPERTORY THEATRE: $281,000 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetATLANTIC THEATER COMPANY: $279,000 over 3y, 0.7% of budgetHARVARD-WESTLAKE SCHOOL: $257,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetSPENCE-CHAPIN SERVICES TO FAMILIES AND CHILDREN: $225,000 over 5y, 0.9% of budgetFoxcroft School: $200,000 over 4y, 0.6% of budgetCHICAGO THEATRE GROUP INC: $176,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetALLEY THEATRE: $151,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetTHE CENTER FOR EARLY EDUCATION: $145,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetCENTER THEATRE GROUP OF LOS ANGELES: $139,500 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetWASHINGTON DRAMA SOCIETY INC: $128,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetSTEPPENWOLF THEATRE COMPANY: $126,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetAMAZON AID FOUNDATION: $115,000 over 5y, 32% of budgetLOS ANGELES COUNTY MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY FOUNDATION: $105,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCENTER FOR RESPONSIBLE TRAVEL: $103,000 over 1y, 16% of budgetCEDARS-SINAI MEDICAL CARE FOUNDATION: $100,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMUSIC CENTER FOUNDATION: $100,000 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetSEATTLE REPERTORY THEATRE: $78,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetTHE VIVIAN BEAUMONT THEATERINC D/B/A LINCOLN CENTER THEATER: $72,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMount Saint Mary College: $50,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD LOS ANGELES: $45,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetDENVER CENTER FOR THE PERFORMING ARTS: $42,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMAGIC THEATRE INC: $37,000 over 2y, 1.5% of budgetAMERICAN REPERTORY THEATRE CO INC: $36,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetTHE WILMA THEATER: $33,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetTWO RIVER THEATRE COMPANY INC: $33,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetArizona Theatre Company: $31,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetTHEATREWORKS SILICON VALLEY: $29,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetTHE SECOND STAGE THEATRE INC: $29,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetPLAYWRIGHTS HORIZONS INC: $28,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetJUNIOR LEAGUE OF LOS ANGELES INC: $25,000 over 1y, 2.4% of budgetTHE COLLEAGUES INC: $25,000 over 1y, 3.1% of budgetALASKA CONSERVATION FOUNDATION: $21,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetNORTHLIGHT THEATRE INC: $21,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetWALLIS ANNENBERG CENTER FOR THE PERFORMING ARTS: $20,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCONSULTATIVE GROUP ON BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY INC Biodiversity Funders Grp: $17,250 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetOLD GLOBE THEATRE: $16,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCENTER STAGE ASSOCIATES INC: $13,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Shubert Foundatio…California Community …Ibm International Fou…The Ralph M Parsons F…The Ayco Charitable F…The Annenberg Foundat…Wm Keck FoundationMorgan Stanley Global…Weingart FoundationJewish Community Foun…The Fletcher Jones Fo…Klm Foundation
The Shubert Foundation IncNY27.1× affinity11 shared granteesties to 10 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Shubert Foundation Inc · California Community Foundation · Ibm International Foundation · The Ralph M Parsons Foundation · The Ayco Charitable Foundation · The Annenberg Foundation · Wm Keck Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Weingart Foundation · Jewish Community Foundation of Los Angeles · The Fletcher Jones Foundation · Klm Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Edgerton Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Edgerton Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%3%10%23%40%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →median 5%
  • Center Stage Associates Inc: 7% of income from government
  • Round House Theatre Inc: 5% of income from government
  • Two River Theatre Company Inc: 0% of income from government
  • American Repertory Theatre Co Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
16report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 104 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Edgerton’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home