Skip to content
Early Learning New Hampshire at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Early Learning New Hampshire

The furthering of quality, affordable child care services for chioldren in new hampshire

$636k
Granted FY2020
10
Grants FY2020
2
States reached
$116k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2020.

Philanthropy$579kEducation$347kHuman Services$231kHealth$116k
02FY2020 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$57,860
Median grant
2
States reached
$118k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
United Way of Massachusetts Bay Inc$115,720
Children's Unlimited Inc$57,860
Monadnock United Way$57,860
Claremont Learning Partnership$57,860
Greater Tilton Area Family Resource Ctr$57,860
Lakes Region Community Service$57,860
Coos Coalition -Young Children & Families$57,860
Manchester Community Health Center$57,860
Concord School District$57,860
United Way of Greater Nashua$57,860
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–20, $231k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%Greater Tilton Area Family Resource Ctr: $58k → 7%Children's Unlimited Inc: $58k → 9%Greater Tilton Area Family Resource Ctr: $58k → 7%Children's Unlimited Inc: $58k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

100%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.3M · 10 repeat orgs$0 to everyone else

10 repeat relationships: 10 still active in FY2020, 0 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

10
0

Total granted

$1.3M
$0

Still filing today

90%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2020, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20
PhilanthropyHuman ServicesEducationHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CL
    CLAREMONT LEARNING PARTNERSHIP
    2× · 2019–2020 · $116k · revenue +24%
  • AH
    Amoskeag Health
    2× · 2019–2020 · $116k · revenue +24%
  • UW
    UNITED WAY OF GREATER NASHUA INC
    2× · 2019–2020 · $116k · revenue +31%

Funded once

    How this is measured

    Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

    04Its field

    Closest unfunded matches

    The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

    1
    New Hampshire Children's Health Foundation
    Health
    2
    Nek Community Growth Center

    Education of childcare workers

    Education
    3
    Colebrook Community Child Care

    The mission is to improve and expand the availability of child care services to the parents and children in northern Coos County.

    Education
    4
    Northshire Day School

    The Northshire Day School is a 5 STAR, licensed non-profit early childhood education program which serves regional families with children zero to five.

    —
    5
    Empower Children for Success

    To promote the overall healthy development of children within the north central massachusetts region and worcester county by workingin collaboration with school systems, childcare providers, government agencies and other organizations.

    Human Services
    6
    Health Strategies of New Hampshire Inc
    Health
    7
    United Way of Northwest Vermont Inc

    Our mission is to build a stronger northwest vermont by mobilizing our community to improve people's lives. united way isn't just our name - it's how we work. we bring together individuals, nonprofits, businesses, and government entities…

    Philanthropy
    8
    Southern New Hampshire Health System Inc

    Southern New Hampshire Health is dedicated to providing exceptional care that improves the health and well-being of individuals and communities we serve.

    Health
    9
    Making Opportunity Count Inc

    Moc's mission is to empower families to achieve economic security by eliminating barriers and creating opportunities.

    Human Services
    10
    Foundation for Healthy Communities

    The mission of the Foundation for Healthy Communities is to build healthier communities for all by leading partnerships, fostering collaboration, and creating innovative solutions to advance health and health care.

    Health
    11
    Early Care and Education Association

    Support for Child Care Centers and professionals in the Upper Valley Region of New Hampshire and Vermont.

    Education
    12
    United Way of North Idaho Inc

    United Way of North Idaho's mission it to improve lives in our community by engaging individuals and organizations in a way that is meaningful to them through volunteerism, financial contributions or leadership.

    —
    How this is measured
    The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Monadnock United Way Inc; the most unlike its peers is Amoskeag Health. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
    04the grantee network

    9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

    Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

    How this is measured

    Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 10 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

    Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

    1
    Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
    2
    Early backer (in before they grew)
    9/9
    Grantees still filing
    6/9
    Grew since first funded

    Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

    United Way Of Massachusetts Bay Inc: $231,440 · PhilanthropyUnited Way Of Massachusetts Bay IncLAKES REGION COMMUNITY SERVICES FOUNDATION: $115,720 · PhilanthropyLAKES REGION COMMUNITY SERVICES FOUNDATIO…UNITED WAY OF GREATER NASHUA INC: $115,720 · PhilanthropyUNITED WAY OF GREATER NASHUA INCNORTH COUNTRY EDUCATION SERVICES AGENCY: $115,720 · OtherNORTH COUNTRY EDUCATION SERVIC…MONADNOCK UNITED WAY INC: $115,720 · OtherMONADNOCK UNITED WAY INCConcord School District: $115,720 · OtherConcord School DistrictARCHWAYS: $115,720 · Human ServicesARCHWAYSCHILDREN UNLIMITED INC: $115,720 · Human ServicesCHILDREN UNLIMITED I…CLAREMONT LEARNING PARTNERSHIP: $115,720 · EducationCLAREMONT …Amoskeag Health: $115,720 · HealthAmoskeag H…
    Philanthropy$462,880Other$347,160Human Services$231,440Education$115,720Health$115,720

    Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

    25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetUnited Way Of Massachusetts Bay Inc: $231,440 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetLAKES REGION COMMUNITY SERVICES FOUNDATION: $115,720 over 2y, 85% of budgetAmoskeag Health: $115,720 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetUNITED WAY OF GREATER NASHUA INC: $115,720 over 2y, 3.8% of budgetARCHWAYS: $115,720 over 2y, 11% of budgetCHILDREN UNLIMITED INC: $115,720 over 2y, 5.0% of budgetMONADNOCK UNITED WAY INC: $115,720 over 2y, 3.4% of budget
    Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

    A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

    Co-funders

    Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

    New Hampshire Charita…New Hampshire Childre…Endowment For Health …Mary Hitchcock Memori…Granite United WayCogswell Benevolent T…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
    New Hampshire Charitable FoundationNH21.4× affinity8 shared granteesties to 7 of 7Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

    Open a dossier: New Hampshire Charitable Foundation · New Hampshire Children's Trust Inc · Endowment For Health Inc · Mary Hitchcock Memorial Hospital · Granite United Way · Cogswell Benevolent Trust · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

    How this is measured
    Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

    How much its grantees rely on government

    Each dot is one organization Early Learning New Hampshire funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Early Learning New Hampshire. Bigger dots raise more.

    2024
    ’20’21’22’23’24’25
    no gov · 00%2%8%17%30%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →median 23%
    • United Way of Massachusetts Bay Inc: 23% of income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Early Learning New Hampshire?

    Find your warmest path to Early Learning New Hampshire through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 10 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2020, released 2020. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2024) is on record but names no grant recipient (grants abroad are filed by region only, and grants under $5,000 are not itemized), so the figures above are from FY2020, the most recent year this funder named its grantees.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Early Learning New Hampshire’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home