Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

Early Learning New Hampshire

The furthering of quality, affordable child care services for chioldren in new hampshire

$636k
Granted FY2020
10
Grants FY2020
2
States reached
$116k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20192020.

Philanthropy$579kEducation$347kHuman Services$231kHealth$116k
02FY2020 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$57,860
Median grant
2
States reached
$118k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
United Way of Massachusetts Bay Inc$115,720
Lakes Region Community Service$57,860
Coos Coalition -Young Children & Families$57,860
Greater Tilton Area Family Resource Ctr$57,860
Monadnock United Way$57,860
Claremont Learning Partnership$57,860
Concord School District$57,860
United Way of Greater Nashua$57,860
Children's Unlimited Inc$57,860
Manchester Community Health Center$57,860
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY19–20, $231k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%Greater Tilton Area Family Resource Ctr: $58k → 7%Children's Unlimited Inc: $58k → 9%Greater Tilton Area Family Resource Ctr: $58k → 7%Children's Unlimited Inc: $58k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

100%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$1.3M · 10 repeat orgs$0 to everyone else

10 repeat relationships — 10 still active in FY2020, 0 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

10
0

Total granted

$1.3M
$0

Still filing today

90%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2020, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20
PhilanthropyHuman ServicesEducationHealthOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CL
    CLAREMONT LEARNING PARTNERSHIP
    2× · 2019–2020 · $116k · revenue +24%
  • AH
    Amoskeag Health
    2× · 2019–2020 · $116k · revenue +24%
  • UW
    UNITED WAY OF GREATER NASHUA INC
    2× · 2019–2020 · $116k · revenue +31%

Funded once

    Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

    04Your field

    The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

    1
    New Hampshire Children's Health Foundation
    Health
    2
    Nek Community Growth Center

    Education of childcare workers

    Education
    3
    Colebrook Community Child Care

    The mission is to improve and expand the availability of child care services to the parents and children in northern Coos County.

    Education
    4
    Northshire Day School

    The Northshire Day School is a 5 STAR, licensed non-profit early childhood education program which serves regional families with children zero to five.

    5
    Empower Children for Success

    To promote the overall healthy development of children within the north central massachusetts region and worcester county by workingin collaboration with school systems, childcare providers, government agencies and other organizations.

    Human Services
    6
    Health Strategies of New Hampshire Inc
    Health
    7
    United Way of Northwest Vermont Inc

    Our mission is to build a stronger northwest vermont by mobilizing our community to improve people's lives. united way isn't just our name - it's how we work. we bring together individuals, nonprofits, businesses, and government entities…

    Philanthropy
    8
    Southern New Hampshire Health System Inc

    Southern New Hampshire Health is dedicated to providing exceptional care that improves the health and well-being of individuals and communities we serve.

    Health
    9
    Making Opportunity Count Inc

    Moc's mission is to empower families to achieve economic security by eliminating barriers and creating opportunities.

    Human Services
    10
    Foundation for Healthy Communities

    The mission of the Foundation for Healthy Communities is to build healthier communities for all by leading partnerships, fostering collaboration, and creating innovative solutions to advance health and health care.

    Health
    11
    Early Care and Education Association

    Support for Child Care Centers and professionals in the Upper Valley Region of New Hampshire and Vermont.

    Education
    12
    United Way of North Idaho Inc

    United Way of North Idaho's mission it to improve lives in our community by engaging individuals and organizations in a way that is meaningful to them through volunteerism, financial contributions or leadership.

    For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Monadnock United Way Inc and the most unlike its peers is Amoskeag Health. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

    04the grantee network

    9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

    Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

    Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 10 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

    1
    Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
    2
    Early backer (in before they grew)
    9/9
    Grantees still filing
    5/9
    Grew since you first funded

    Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

    United Way Of Massachusetts Bay Inc — $231,440 · PhilanthropyUnited Way Of Massachusetts Bay IncLAKES REGION COMMUNITY SERVICES FOUNDATION — $115,720 · PhilanthropyLAKES REGION COMMUNITY SERVICES FOUNDATIO…UNITED WAY OF GREATER NASHUA INC — $115,720 · PhilanthropyUNITED WAY OF GREATER NASHUA INCNORTH COUNTRY EDUCATION SERVICES AGENCY — $115,720 · OtherNORTH COUNTRY EDUCATION SERVIC…MONADNOCK UNITED WAY INC — $115,720 · OtherMONADNOCK UNITED WAY INCConcord School District — $115,720 · OtherConcord School DistrictARCHWAYS — $115,720 · Human ServicesARCHWAYSCHILDREN UNLIMITED INC — $115,720 · Human ServicesCHILDREN UNLIMITED I…CLAREMONT LEARNING PARTNERSHIP — $115,720 · EducationCLAREMONT …Amoskeag Health — $115,720 · HealthAmoskeag H…
    Philanthropy$462,880Other$347,160Human Services$231,440Education$115,720Health$115,720

    Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

    25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetUnited Way Of Massachusetts Bay Inc — $231,440 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetLAKES REGION COMMUNITY SERVICES FOUNDATION — $115,720 over 2y, 85% of budgetAmoskeag Health — $115,720 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetUNITED WAY OF GREATER NASHUA INC — $115,720 over 2y, 3.8% of budgetARCHWAYS — $115,720 over 2y, 11% of budgetCHILDREN UNLIMITED INC — $115,720 over 2y, 5.0% of budgetMONADNOCK UNITED WAY INC — $115,720 over 2y, 3.4% of budget
    Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

    A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

    The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

    New Hampshire Charitable FoundationNH21.4× affinity8 shared granteesties to 7 of 7Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

    Open a dossier: New Hampshire Charitable Foundation · New Hampshire Children's Trust Inc · Endowment For Health Inc · Mary Hitchcock Memorial Hospital · Granite United Way · Cogswell Benevolent Trust · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

    Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

    Government reliance of your grantees

    Every dot is one organization Early Learning New Hampshire funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

    2024
    202122232425
    no gov · 00%2%8%17%30%your share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 23%
    • United Way of Massachusetts Bay Inc23% of income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Early Learning New Hampshire?

    Find your warmest path to Early Learning New Hampshire through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 10 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2020, released 2020. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2024) is on record but names no grant recipient (grants abroad are filed by region only, and grants under $5,000 are not itemized), so the figures above are from FY2020, the most recent year this funder named its grantees.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph