Skip to content

· Public charity

Eaglebank Foundation Inc

The foundation's mission is to raise money for other 501(c)(3) entities that provide services to those suffering from cancer, with an emphasis on organizations that serve breast cancer patients and their families, as well as other organizations that share eaglebank foundation's values.

$287k
Granted FY2024still arriving
12
Grants FY2024still arriving
3
States reached
$50k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Health$2.2MFood & Nutrition$65kCrime & Legal$10kPublic Safety & Disaster$10kReligion$10k
02FY2024 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 12 grants below total $272,000, the rows itemized in this filing. The $287,000 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $15,000 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k1 grant · $7k
  • $10k–50k10 grants · $215k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
$25,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$31k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
THE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL FOUNDATION$50,000
HOLY CROSS HEALTH FOUNDATION INC$25,000
THE CHILDREN'S INN AT NIH$25,000
BREM FOUNDATION TO DEFEAT BREAST CANCER INC$25,000
CHILDREN'S CANCER FOUNDATION$25,000
SUBURBAN HOSPITAL FOUNDATION$25,000
SHADY GROVE ADVENTIST HOSPITAL FOUNDATION$25,000
DRIVEN TO THE CURE$20,000
AMERICAN BRAIN TUMOR ASSOCIATION$20,000
HOPE CONNECTIONS$15,000
FOOD & FRIENDS$10,000
PRIMARY COALITION OF MONTGOMERY COUNTY$7,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $115k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%DRIVEN TO THE CURE: $20k → 8%DRIVEN TO THE CURE: $20k → 8%DRIVEN TO THE CURE: $20k → 8%DRIVEN TO THE CURE: $15k → 8%DRIVEN TO THE CURE: $10k → 8%DRIVEN TO THE CURE: $10k → 8%DRIVEN TO THE CURE: $10k → 8%DRIVEN TO CURE: $10k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

85%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.0M · 16 repeat orgs$335k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +44% since the first grant, against +21% for those funded once.

16 repeat relationships: 12 still active in FY2024, 4 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

16
9

Total granted

$2.0M
$335k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+44%
+21%

Still filing today

100%
89%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthEducationHuman ServicesScience & TechFood & NutritionInternationalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CI
    CHILDREN'S INN AT NIH INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $218k · revenue +242%
  • SG
    SHADY GROVE ADVENTIST HOSPITAL FOUNDATION INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $210k · revenue +280%
  • SH
    SUBURBAN HOSPITAL FOUNDATION INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $205k · revenue +44%

Funded once

  • TG
    The George Washington Universitygraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $250k · revenue +30%
  • PH
    PROVIDENCE HEALTH FOUNDATION INC
    one grant, 2017 · $25k · revenue -91%
  • IH
    INOVA HEALTH SYSTEM FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2020 · $10k · revenue +8%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Children's Hospital Corporation

Provider of pediatric healthcare, education, research & community service

Health
2
The Johns Hopkins Hospital

For more than 125 years, the mission of the johns hopkins hospital has been to lead the world in the diagnosis and treatment of disease and to train tomorrow's great physicians, nurses and scientists. above all, we aim to provide the…

Health
3
Children's Hospital

Organization's mission to improve health outcomes for children; be a leader in creating innovative solutions to pediatric healthcare problems; and excel in care, advocacy, research. as the nation's children's hospital, the mission of…

Health
4
Hh Medstar Health Inc

Plan, develop, coordinate, direct and manage an integrated healthcare system.

Health
5
Medstar Health Inc

Plan, develop, coordinate, direct and manage an integrated healthcare system.

Health
6
University of Maryland Medical System Corporation

Umms provides a variety of inpatient/outpatient services to people in the maryland area regardless of their ability to pay. revenues are used to help defray the costs of services.

Health
7
City of Hope National Medical Center

City of Hope National Medical Center's mission is to make hope a reality for all touched by cancer and diabetes. PLEASE SEE SCHEDULE O FOR A CONTINUATION OF OUR MISSION

Health
8
Upmc Western Maryland Corporation

The mission of upmc western maryland is to serve our community by providing outstanding patient care and to shape tomorrow's health system through clinical & technological innovation, research and education.

Health
9
Johns Hopkins Health System Corporation

Johns hopkins health system corporation provides centralized management of a multi-hospital healthcare system. it is a key component of johns hopkins medicine, a collaboration with the johns hopkins university school of medicine.

Health
10
Adventist Healthcare Fort Washington Medical Center Inc

We extend god's care through the ministry of physical, mental and spiritual healing.

—
11
Holy Cross Health Inc

We, holy cross health and trinity health, serve together in the spirit of the gospel as a compassionate and transforming healing presence within our communities. we carry out this mission in our communities through our commitment to be the…

—
12
Community Memorial Hospital

To provide excellence in the delivery of healthcare.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Children's Hospital Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Wwbbc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

26 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
25/26
Grantees still filing
20/26
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CHILDREN'S INN AT NIH INC: $218,000 · HealthCHILDREN'S INN AT NIH INCSUBURBAN HOSPITAL FOUNDATION INC: $205,000 · HealthSUBURBAN HOSPITAL FOUNDATION INCHOLY CROSS HEALTH FOUNDATION INC: $185,000 · HealthHOLY CROSS HEALTH FOUNDATION INCWASHINGTON HOSPITAL CENTER CORPORATION: $185,000 · HealthWASHINGTON HOSPITAL CENTER CORPORATIONCHILDREN'S HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $150,000 · HealthCHILDREN'S HOSPITAL FOUNDATIONBREM FOUNDATION TO DEFEAT BREAST CANCER: $134,000 · HealthBREM FOUNDATION TO DEFEAT BREAST CANCERHOPE CONNECTIONS FOR CANCER SUPPORT INC: $106,500 · HealthHOPE CONNECTIONS FOR CANCER SUPPORT INCThe Virginia Hospital Center Foundation: $95,000 · HealthThe Virginia Hospital Center FoundationPRIMARY CARE COALITION OF MONTGOMERY COUNTY MARYLAND INC: $92,000 · HealthPRIMARY CARE COALITION OF MONTGOMERY COUNTY MARYLAND INCFOOD & FRIENDS INC: $55,000 · Health+4 more: $65,000 · HealthSHADY GROVE ADVENTIST HOSPITAL FOUNDATION INC: $210,000 · OtherSHADY GROVE ADVENTI…American Brain Tumor Association: $90,000 · OtherAmerican Brain Tumo…The Childrens Cancer Foundation Inc: $75,000 · OtherThe Childrens Cance…+2 more: $20,000 · OtherThe George Washington University: $250,000 · EducationThe George Wa…GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY: $20,000 · EducationGEORGETOWN UN…DRIVEN TO CURE INC: $115,000 · Human ServicesCAPITAL AREA FOOD BANK INC: $10,000 · Food & NutritionNational Law Enforcement and Firefighters Childrens Foundation: $10,000 · Crime & LegalWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $10,000 · InternationalWWBBC: $200 · Science & Tech
Health$1,490,500Other$395,000Education$270,000Human Services$115,000Food & Nutrition$10,000Crime & Legal$10,000International$10,000Science & Tech$200

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetThe George Washington University: $250,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHILDREN'S INN AT NIH INC: $218,000 over 8y, 0.3% of budgetSHADY GROVE ADVENTIST HOSPITAL FOUNDATION INC: $210,000 over 8y, 2.8% of budgetSUBURBAN HOSPITAL FOUNDATION INC: $205,000 over 8y, 0.6% of budgetHOLY CROSS HEALTH FOUNDATION INC: $185,000 over 7y, 3.1% of budgetWASHINGTON HOSPITAL CENTER CORPORATION: $185,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetCHILDREN'S HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $150,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetBREM FOUNDATION TO DEFEAT BREAST CANCER: $134,000 over 7y, 2.2% of budgetDRIVEN TO CURE INC: $115,000 over 8y, 15% of budgetHOPE CONNECTIONS FOR CANCER SUPPORT INC: $106,500 over 8y, 1.4% of budgetThe Virginia Hospital Center Foundation: $95,000 over 7y, 1.3% of budgetPRIMARY CARE COALITION OF MONTGOMERY COUNTY MARYLAND INC: $92,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetAmerican Brain Tumor Association: $90,000 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetThe Childrens Cancer Foundation Inc: $75,000 over 4y, 3.0% of budgetFOOD & FRIENDS INC: $55,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetPROVIDENCE HEALTH FOUNDATION INC: $25,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetGEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY: $20,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE MEDSTAR-GEORGETOWN MEDICAL CENTER INC: $20,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetINOVA HEALTH SYSTEM FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe Shepherds Table Inc: $10,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetCAPITAL AREA FOOD BANK INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLOLLY'S LOCKS: $10,000 over 1y, 4.3% of budgetNational Law Enforcement and Firefighters Childrens Foundation: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWWBBC: $200 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Clark-Winchcole FoundationMD15.6× affinity5 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Clark-Winchcole Foundation · Nora Roberts Foundation · Greater Washington Community Foundation · Louis & Helen Fanaroff Char Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · American Endowment Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Eaglebank Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Eaglebank Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 60%1%5%11%20%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →median 10%
  • Children's Inn at Nih Inc: 10% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
6get no government money at all
5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Eaglebank Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to Eaglebank Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 26 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Eaglebank’s filings →

More from the funding graph