Skip to content

· Private foundation

Dziuban Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$25k
Granted FY2025still arriving
20
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$7k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Human Services$42kHealth$16kHousing & Shelter$8kYouth Development$8kAnimals$7kRecreation & Sports$7kFood & Nutrition$7kReligion$5kOther$0
02FY2025 · 20 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$500
Median grant
5
States reached
$600k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
M Lamb$6,500
STREET DOG HERO$2,500
YOUTH OUTLOOK$2,000
MEDICAL DEBT RESOLUTION INC$2,000
CHASING THE RAINBOWS$2,000
OFFICER DOWN MEMORIAL PAGE INC$2,000
GIVING PLATE$1,000
CENTRAL OREGON TRAIL ALLIANCE$1,000
BETHLEHEM INN$1,000
CASA OF CENTRAL OREGON$500
DESCHUTES RIVER CONSERVANCY$500
BEND ENDURANCE ACADEMY$500
HUMANE SOCIETY OF CENTRAL OREGON SPCA$500
J BAR J YOUTH SERVICES INC$500
KOR COMMUNITY LAND TRUST$500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–25, $17k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 12% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%CHASING THE RAINBOWS: $2k → 9%MEDICAL DEBT RESOLUTION INC: $2k → 13%CASA OF CENTRAL OREGON: $3k → 10%CASA OF CENTRAL OREGON: $1k → 10%CASA OF CENTRAL OREGON: $1k → 10%CASA OF CENTRAL OREGON: $500 → 10%CASA OF CENTRAL OREGON: $500 → 10%ST VINCENT DE PAUL SOCIETY BEND ST FRANCIS CONFERE: $3k → 10%ST VINCENT DE PAUL SOCIETY BEND ST FRANCIS CONFERE: $1k → 10%ST VINCENT DE PAUL SOCIETY BEND ST FRANCIS CONFERE: $1k → 10%FURNISH HOPE: $500 → 10%FURNISH HOPE: $500 → 10%FURNISH HOPE: $500 → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

ME
VT
MN
IL
NY
OR
NV
PA
CA
VA
TN
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

56%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$59k · 18 repeat orgs$47k to everyone else

18 repeat relationships: 14 still active in FY2025, 4 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

18
17

Total granted

$59k
$32k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

0%
+22%

Still filing today

100%
59%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 42% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $15k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHealthEnvironmentPhilanthropyFood & NutritionHousing & ShelterOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC
    2× · 2021–2022 · $11k · revenue +74%
  • J BAR J YOUTH SERVICES INC
    5× · 2021–2025 · $6k · revenue +48%
  • SD
    STREET DOG HERO
    4× · 2022–2025 · $5k · revenue +124%

Funded once

  • SM
    S Mortensen
    one grant, 2023 · $7k
  • TK
    T Kealey
    one grant, 2024 · $7k
  • JL
    J Lamb
    one grant, 2024 · $7k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Oregon Dog Rescue

Conduct rescue of dogs, facilitate adoptions of same. provide emergency vet services for dogs needing rescue

Animals
2
Oregon Agricultural Trust

Oregon agricultural trust partners with farmers and ranchers to protect agricultural lands for the benefit of oregons economy, communities, and landscapes.

Environment
3
Herding Dog Rescue of Central Oregon

Our mission is to help herding dogs who are abandoned, neglected and abused or simply in the wrong home into a loving appropriate home.

Animals
4
Oregon Council for Behavioral Health

We provide a voice for an effective and accessible behavioral health system of care for Oregonians.

Community Improvement
5
Oregon Justice Network

Oregon Justice Network is an alliance built and staffed by criminal legal system impacted people advocating for the well-being of people affected or at-risk of being affected by carceral systems. Our work centers around restorative…

Human Services
6
Oregon Dachshund Rescue Inc

The mission of Oregon Dachshund Rescue Inc is to locate the best homes possible for Dachshunds who have been neglected, abused, injured or surrendered to shelters at which there is risk of being euthanized.

Animals
7
Bend Visitor & Convention Bureau Dba Visit Bend

Develop tourism industry in bend,oregon

—
8
Oregon Natural Resources Council Fund Oregon Wild

Oregon Wild works to protect and restore Oregon's wildlands, wildlife and waters as an enduring legacy for future generations.

Environment
9
Oregon Desert Land Trust

To conserve and restore wild and working lands in oregons high desert for wildlife and people, and provide common ground to improve climate resilience, wildlife connectivity, habitat restoration, innovative grazing practices, cultural…

Environment
10
Bend Spay & Neuter Project

The mission of bend spay and neuter project is to provide affordable, preventative veterinary care to at risk cats and dogs in central oregon in order to create a more humane community.

—
11
Oregon Cancer Foundation

Our mission is to empower, strengthen and sustain those impacted by cancer in our community through education, support and financial assistance.

Health
12
Oregon Restaurant and Lodging Association

Orla serves as the leading industry advocate, striving to protect, improve and promote oregon hospitality.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Assistance League of Bend; the most unlike its peers is Aveni Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

33 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 33 of the 41 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
9
Early backer (in before they grew)
33/33
Grantees still filing
15/33
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

S Mortensen: $6,500 · OtherS MortensenT Kealey: $6,500 · OtherT KealeyJ Lamb: $6,500 · OtherJ LambM Lamb: $6,500 · OtherM LambJ BAR J YOUTH SERVICES INC: $5,500 · OtherJ BAR J YOUTH SERVICES INCTHE CROSSING A CHRISTIAN CHURCH: $5,000 · OtherTHE CROSSING A CHRISTIAN CHURCHMEISSNER NORDIC SKI CLUB: $1,900 · OtherTHE OFFICER DOWN MEMORIAL PAGE INC: $2,000 · OtherYOUTH OUTLOOK: $2,000 · Other+12 more: $8,700 · Other+12 moreCASA OF CENTRAL OREGON: $6,000 · Human ServicesCASA OF CENTRAL O…ST VINCENT DE PAUL SOCIETY BEND - ST FRANCIS CONFERENCE: $5,000 · Human ServicesST VINCENT DE PAU…MEDICAL DEBT RESOLUTION INC: $2,000 · Human ServicesMEDICAL DEBT RESO…CHASING THE RAINBOWS: $2,000 · Human ServicesCHASING THE RAINB…FURNISH HOPE INC: $1,500 · Human ServicesFURNISH HOPE INCST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $10,500 · HealthST JUDE CHIL…HEALING REINS EQUINE ASSISTED SERVICES INC: $1,000 · HealthHEALING REIN…CaringBridge: $500 · Health+1 more: $100 · HealthBETHLEHEM INN: $6,000 · Housing & ShelterKOR COMMUNITY LAND TRUST DBA ROOTEDHOMES: $2,000 · Housing & ShelterTHE GIVING PLATE: $4,000 · Food & NutritionHigh Desert Food & Farm Alliance: $1,600 · Food & NutritionTHREE SQUARE: $1,000 · Food & NutritionSTREET DOG HERO: $4,500 · AnimalsHUMANE SOCIETY OF CENTRAL OREGON: $2,000 · AnimalsCentral Oregon Trail Alliance: $2,500 · EnvironmentDESCHUTES RIVER CONSERVANCY: $1,250 · EnvironmentDeschutes Land Trust: $1,000 · Environment1 FOR THE PLANET INC: $250 · Environment
Other$51,100Human Services$16,500Health$12,100Housing & Shelter$8,000Food & Nutrition$6,600Animals$6,500Environment$5,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $10,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBETHLEHEM INN: $6,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetCASA OF CENTRAL OREGON: $6,000 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetJ BAR J YOUTH SERVICES INC: $5,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetST VINCENT DE PAUL SOCIETY BEND - ST FRANCIS CONFERENCE: $5,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetSTREET DOG HERO: $4,500 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetTHE GIVING PLATE: $4,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetCentral Oregon Trail Alliance: $2,500 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetKOR COMMUNITY LAND TRUST DBA ROOTEDHOMES: $2,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetMEDICAL DEBT RESOLUTION INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHUMANE SOCIETY OF CENTRAL OREGON: $2,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCHASING THE RAINBOWS: $2,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetTHE OFFICER DOWN MEMORIAL PAGE INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetMEISSNER NORDIC SKI CLUB: $1,900 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetHigh Desert Food & Farm Alliance: $1,600 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetBend Endurance Academy: $1,500 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetFURNISH HOPE INC: $1,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetASSISTANCE LEAGUE OF BEND: $1,300 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetDESCHUTES RIVER CONSERVANCY: $1,250 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetBend Heroes Foundation: $1,100 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetTHREE SQUARE: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCENTRAL OREGON VETERANS RANCH: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetOREGON NORDIC CLUB: $1,000 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetHEALING REINS EQUINE ASSISTED SERVICES INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDeschutes Land Trust: $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHIGH DESERT MUSEUM: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCaringBridge: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget1 FOR THE PLANET INC: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGolden Bond Rescue of Oregon Inc: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBIKES FOR KIDS FOUNDATION: $250 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetAVENI FOUNDATION: $100 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Oregon Community FoundationOR32.7× affinity17 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Oregon Community Foundation · First Interstate BancSystem Foundation Inc · The Anjulicia Foundation · The Autzen Foundation · United Way of Deschutes County · The Roundhouse Foundation · Bend Foundation · The Crevier Family Foundation · Willard L & Ruth P Eccles Foundation · St Charles Health System Inc · Barbara Emily Knudson Foundation · Maybelle Clark Macdonald Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Dziuban Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Dziuban Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 110%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 45%
  • Deschutes River Conservancy: 100% of income from government
  • J Bar J Youth Services Inc: 71% of income from government
  • Kor Community Land Trust Dba Rootedhomes: 63% of income from government
  • Deschutes Land Trust: 46% of income from government
  • High Desert Food & Farm Alliance: 45% of income from government
  • Central Oregon Veterans Ranch: 45% of income from government
  • High Desert Museum: 11% of income from government
  • Healing Reins Equine Assisted Services Inc: 11% of income from government
  • Casa of Central Oregon: 2% of income from government
  • Central Oregon Trail Alliance: 1% of income from government
  • Bethlehem Inn: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
11get no government money at all
4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
3rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Dziuban Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Dziuban Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 41 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Dziuban’s filings →

More from the funding graph