· Private foundation
Dweck Charitable Fund Inc
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k8 grants · $26k
- $10k–50k10 grants · $159k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Individual grant recipient | $46,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $18,000 |
| FMW NONPROFIT SOLUTIONS | $16,400 |
| THE TREVOR PROJECT | $15,000 |
| JEWISH FEDERATION OF SOUTH PALM BEACH COUNTY | $12,755 |
| JEWISH FEDERATION GREATER WASHINGTON | $11,000 |
| FEEDING SOUTH FLORIDA | $10,000 |
| RUTH & NORMAN RALES JEWISH FAMILY SERVICES | $10,000 |
| CHARITY WATER | $10,000 |
| BREAD FOR THE CITY | $10,000 |
| LILLIAN & ALBERT SMALL CAP JM | $5,000 |
| CENTER FOR TRANSGENDER | $5,000 |
| HILLEL OF BROWARD & PALM BEACH | $4,000 |
| GIFT OF LIFE | $3,600 |
| GUNSTER | $3,191 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $143k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 80% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +70% since the first grant, against +34% for the ones you funded once.
17 repeat relationships — 9 still active in FY2024, 8 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 49% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $82k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- BFBREAD FOR THE CITY INC7× · 2018–2024 · $114k · revenue +70%
- FSFEEDING SOUTH FLORIDA INC8× · 2017–2024 · $89k · revenue +107%
THE HOWARD UNIVERSITY2× · 2020–2021 · $54k · revenue +40%
Funded once
- FOFRIENDS OF UNITED HATZALAH INCone grant, 2023 · $72k · revenue -45%
- MKMIRIAM'S KITCHENgraduatedone grant, 2020 · $15k · revenue +48%
The Houston Food Bankgraduatedone grant, 2017 · $10k · revenue +107%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Jewish family services of greenwich (jfs) is a nonprofit social service agency dedicated to strengthening individuals and families in fairfield and new london counties. jfs provides behavioral health counseling, food security programs,…
The mission of the greater miami jewish federation is to mobilize human and financial resources to care for those in need, strengthen jewish life and advance the unity, values and shared purpose of the jewish people in miami, in israel and…
The jewish agency binds jews across ideologies and civilizations together in a worldwide jewish family with israel at its center. it provides the global framework for aliyah, ensures global jewish safety, strengthens jewish identity and…
Mission: Inspired by their history and values, Jewish Family Service supports the needs of Jewish individuals and families, refugees and immigrants, and the broader community to achieve well-being, health, and stability. From food security…
Federation amplifies our collective strength to make the world a better place for everyone. we assist people in need, impact chicagoans of all faiths; support israel and the jewish people worldwide; respond swiftly to crises; cultivate…
Jewish family services of greater orlando (jfs orlando) provides services to stabilize individuals and families in crisis and enhances the quality of life across generations to all members of the central florida community. annually, our…
Inspired by the jewish commitment to justice, american jewish world service works to realize human rights and end poverty in africa, asia, latin america and the caribbean. (see schedule o)
Inspired by Jewish values and ideals, MAZON is a national advocacy organization working to end hunger among people of all faiths and backgrounds in the United States and Israel. See Schedule O for more details.
To advance human rights and social justice in the americas.
Hunger free america (hfa) is a nonpartisan, national nonprofit organization building the movement to enact the policies and programs needed to end domestic hunger and ensure that all americans have sufficient access to nutritious food.
Guided by jewish values and in collaboration with the diverse communities we serve, jfcs east bay contributes to the resilience of communities, families, and individuals through advocacy and comprehensive support services at every stage of…
To improve the lives and protect the rights of women, children and youth displaced by conflict and crisis. the women's refugee commission envisions a world in which refugees are safe, healthy and reliant and seeks to drive change in…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Children International and the most unlike its peers is Generosity-Global Incorporated. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 33 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 3% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
35 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 35 of the 48 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds JEWISH FEDERATION OF SOUTH PALM BEACH COUNTY INC ↗
- Who funds BREAD FOR THE CITY INC ↗
- Who funds FEEDING SOUTH FLORIDA INC ↗
- Who funds FRIENDS OF UNITED HATZALAH INC ↗
- Who funds THE HOWARD UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds CHARITY GLOBAL INC ↗
- Who funds TREVOR PROJECT INC ↗
- Who funds THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTER ↗
- Who funds Jewish Family Services Inc ↗
- Who funds RUTH & NORMAN RALES JEWISH FAMILY SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds SITAR ARTS CENTER ↗
- Who funds THE JEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER WASHINGTON INC ↗
- Who funds HIAS INC ↗
- Who funds FMW NONPROFIT SOLUTIONS ↗
- Who funds Legal Aid Foundation of Los Angeles ↗
- Who funds ADVOCATES FOR TRANS EQUALITY EDUCATION FUND ↗
- Who funds MIRIAM'S KITCHEN ↗
- Who funds THE GIFT OF LIFE CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds FISHER HOUSE FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds The Houston Food Bank ↗
- Who funds GLOBALGIVING FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL MILITARY FAMILY ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds HIGHER ACHIEVEMENT PROGRAM INC ↗
- Who funds JOYFUL HEART FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds HILLEL OF BROWARD AND PALM BEACH INC ↗
- Who funds Children International ↗
- Who funds 826 National Inc ↗
- Who funds EQUAL JUSTICE INITIATIVE ↗
- Who funds Adopt a Family Inc ↗
- Who funds 4 PAWS FOR ABILITY INC ↗
- Who funds WASHINGTON HUMANE SOCIETY ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: National Philanthropic Trust · Network for Good · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Dweck Charitable Fund Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Hias Inc — 88% of income from government
- Child Rescue Coalition Inc — 20% of income from government
- Feeding South Florida Inc — 5% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Dweck Charitable Fund Inc?
Find your warmest path to Dweck Charitable Fund Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.