Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation Dossiers
Plinth

· Private foundation

Dupkin Educational and Charitable Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$5.5M
Granted FY2024still arriving
1
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$5.5M
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What you fund
01

What you funded, over time

By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 99% of DUPKIN EDUCATIONAL AND CHARITABLE FOUNDATION INC’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.

02FY2024 · 1 grant

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$5,480,094
Median grant
1
States reached
$73M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
THE SCHWAB CHARITABLE DUPKIN FAMILY FUND$5,480,094
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–19, $2k) land where the poverty rate runs at 19%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%HOUSE OF RUTH MARYLAND: $1k → 19%HOUSE OF RUTH MARYLAND: $1k → 19%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

100%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$19M · 16 repeat orgs$19k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +37% since the first grant, against +27% for the ones you funded once.

16 repeat relationships — 1 still active in FY2024, 15 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

16
7

Total granted

$19M
$19k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+37%
+27%

Still filing today

81%
29%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’19’20’21’22’23’24
Arts & CultureEducationHealthReligionEnvironmentHuman ServicesOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BS
    BALTIMORE SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA INC
    5× · 2017–2022 · $75k · revenue +68%
  • BARNARD COLLEGE
    5× · 2017–2022 · $14k · revenue +60%
  • EP
    ENOCH PRATT FREE LIBRARY OF BALTIMORE CITY
    4× · 2017–2022 · $8k · revenue +37%

Funded once

  • IO
    INSTITUTE OF CHRISTIAN AND JEWISH STUDIES
    one grant, 2019 · $5k
  • BALTIMORE MUSEUM OF ART
    one grant, 2020 · $5k · revenue +2%
  • BC
    BMA COUNCIL
    one grant, 2017 · $3k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
University of Maryland Physicians Pa

Under the medical service plan of the university of maryland school of medicine, medical services are rendered by the members of the faculty on behalf of the school of medicine in connection with their duties to provide clinical…

—
2
University of Maryland Oncology Associates Pa

Under the medical service plan of the university of maryland school of medicine, medical services are rendered by the members of the faculty on behalf of the school of medicine in connection with their duties to provide clinical…

Health
3
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

—
4
University of Maryland Surgical Associates Pa

Under the medical service plan of the university of maryland school of medicine, medical services are rendered by the members of the faculty on behalf of the school of medicine in connection with their duties to provide clinical…

Health
5
University of Maryland Otorhino-Laryngology-Head & Neck Surgery Pa

Under the medical service plan of the university of maryland school of medicine, medical services are rendered by the members of the faculty on behalf of the school of medicine in connection with their duties to provide clinical…

Health
6
University of Maryland Neurosurgeryassociates Pa

Under the medical service plan of the university of maryland school of medicine, medical services are rendered by the members of the faculty on behalf of the school of medicine in connection with their duties to provide clinical…

Education
7
University of Maryland Anesthesiology Associates Pa

Under the medical service plan of the university of maryland school of medicine, medical services are rendered by the members of the faculty on behalf of the school of medicine in connection with their duties to provide clinical…

—
8
University of Maryland Dermatologists Pa

Under the medical service plan of the university of maryland school of medicine, medical services are rendered by the members of the faculty on behalf of the school of medicine in connection with their duties to provide clinical…

Health
9
University of Maryland Eye Associates Pa

Under the medical service plan of the university of maryland school of medicine, medical services are rendered by the members of the faculty on behalf of the school of medicine in connection with their duties to provide clinical…

Health
10
University of Maryland Family Medicine Associates Pa

Under the medical service plan of the university of maryland school of medicine, medical services are rendered by the members of the faculty on behalf of the school of medicine in connection with their duties to provide clinical…

—
11
University of Maryland Pediatric Associates Pa

Under the medical service plan of the university of maryland school of medicine, medical services are rendered by the members of the faculty on behalf of the school of medicine in connection with their duties to provide clinical…

Health
12
University of Maryland Neurology Associates Pa

Under the medical service plan of the university of maryland school of medicine, medical services are rendered by the members of the faculty on behalf of the school of medicine in connection with their duties to provide clinical…

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Park School of Baltimore Inc and the most unlike its peers is Baltimore Museum of Art. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

17 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 17 of the 25 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
17/17
Grantees still filing
15/17
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

THE SCHWAB CHARITABLE DUPKIN FAMILY FUND — $14,899,431 · OtherTHE SCHWAB CHARITABLE DUPKIN FAMILY FUNDTHE ASSOCIATED JEWISH CHARITIES — $3,804,000 · OtherTHE ASSOCIATED JEWISH CHARITIES+7 more — $17,500 · OtherBALTIMORE SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA INC — $75,000 · Arts & CultureBALTIMORE MUSEUM OF ART — $5,000 · Arts & CultureMARYLAND HISTORICAL SOCIETY INC — $3,000 · Arts & Culture+1 more — $2,000 · Arts & CultureBARNARD COLLEGE — $13,500 · EducationENOCH PRATT FREE LIBRARY OF BALTIMORE CITY — $7,500 · EducationTHE PARK SCHOOL OF BALTIMORE INC — $6,000 · EducationMaryland Institute — $2,000 · EducationTrustees of Dartmouth College — $1,000 · EducationTHE RYR-1 FOUNDATION — $11,000 · HealthPLANNED PARENTHOOD OF MARYLAND INC — $4,000 · HealthBALTIMORE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC — $4,150 · PhilanthropyTHE UNITED WAY OF CENTRAL MARYLAND INC — $1,000 · PhilanthropyFRIENDS OF THE JEWISH CHAPEL INC — $4,000 · ReligionCHESAPEAKE BAY FOUNDATION INC — $4,000 · EnvironmentTHE HOUSE OF RUTH MARYLAND INC — $2,000 · Human Services
Other$18,720,931Arts & Culture$85,000Education$30,000Health$15,000Philanthropy$5,150Religion$4,000Environment$4,000Human Services$2,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetBALTIMORE SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA INC — $75,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetBARNARD COLLEGE — $13,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetTHE RYR-1 FOUNDATION — $11,000 over 4y, 0.6% of budgetENOCH PRATT FREE LIBRARY OF BALTIMORE CITY — $7,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTHE PARK SCHOOL OF BALTIMORE INC — $6,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetBALTIMORE MUSEUM OF ART — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBALTIMORE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC — $4,150 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD OF MARYLAND INC — $4,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCHESAPEAKE BAY FOUNDATION INC — $4,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTHE NAVAL INSTITUTE FOUNDATION INC — $3,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetMARYLAND HISTORICAL SOCIETY INC — $3,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetMARYLAND ACADEMY OF SCIENCES — $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMaryland Institute — $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE HOUSE OF RUTH MARYLAND INC — $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTrustees of Dartmouth College — $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE UNITED WAY OF CENTRAL MARYLAND INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

T Rowe Price Program …Jacob S Shapiro Found…Eliasberg Family Foun…Morgan Stanley Global…National Philanthropi…Vanguard Charitable E…American Online Givin…Donor Advised Charita…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
T Rowe Price Program for Charitable Giving IncMD14.8× affinity5 shared granteesties to 9 of 9Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: T Rowe Price Program for Charitable Giving Inc · Jacob S Shapiro Foundation · Eliasberg Family Foundation Inc · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Dupkin Educational and Charitable Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 30%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →median 9%
  • The House of Ruth Maryland Inc — 19% of income from government
  • Baltimore Symphony Orchestra Inc — 11% of income from government
  • Maryland Historical Society Inc — 9% of income from government
  • Maryland Academy of Sciences — 9% of income from government
  • Baltimore Museum of Art — 4% of income from government
  • Chesapeake Bay Foundation Inc — 2% of income from government
  • The United Way of Central Maryland Inc — 2% of income from government
  • Planned Parenthood of Maryland Inc — 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
3get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Dupkin Educational and Charitable Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to Dupkin Educational and Charitable Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 25 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines