Skip to content

· Private foundation

Dunbar Family Charitable Trust

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$139k
Granted FY2025still arriving
9
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$120k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Human Services$284kRecreation & Sports$103kEducation$80kHousing & Shelter$59kArts & Culture$19kFood & Nutrition$13kReligion$9kAnimals$8kOther$0
02FY2025 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k8 grants · $19k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $120k
$1,500
Median grant
5
States reached
$2.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
DUNELAND YMCA INC$120,000
CHESTERTON ART CENTER$7,000
REBUILDING TOGETHER - DUNELAND$5,000
CATHOLIC CHARITIES DIOCESE OF PITT$2,500
CEDARS HOME FOR CHILDREN FOUNDATION$1,500
DUNELAND EDUCATION FOUNDATION$1,000
GARY SINISE FOUNDATION$750
RED RIVER GORGE CLIMBER'S COALITION$500
GREATER PITTSBURGH COMMUNITY FOODBA$250
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–25, $299k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 4% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF PITTSBURGH: $3k → 11%THE CEDARS HOME FOR CHILDREN FOUNDA: $3k → 13%DUNES HOSPICE FOUNDATION: $500 → 9%DUNELAND YMCA INC: $120k → 9%THE CEDARS HOME FOR CHILDREN FOUNDA: $2k → 13%CEDARS HOME FOR CHILDREN FOUNDATION: $2k → 13%DUNELAND YMCA INC: $70k → 9%THE CEDARS HOME FOR CHILDREN FOUNDA: $1k → 13%DUNELAND YMCA INC: $60k → 9%THE CEDARS HOME FOR CHILDREN FOUNDA: $1k → 13%THE CEDARS HOME FOR CHILDREN FOUNDA: $800 → 13%DUNELAND FAMILY YMCA: $10k → 9%REBUILDING TOGETHER-DUNELAND: $5k → 9%REBUILDING TOGETHER - DUNELAND: $5k → 9%REBUILDING TOGETHER-DUNELAND: $5k → 9%REBUILDING TOGETHER-DUNELAND: $5k → 9%REBUILDING TOGETHER - DUNELAND: $3k → 9%NEIGHBORLINK OF PORTER COUNTY: $3k → 9%REBUILDIG TOGETHER - DUNELAND: $2k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
WI
IN
OH
PA
CA
NE
KY
TN
NC
SC
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

77%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$457k · 15 repeat orgs$136k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +39% since the first grant, against +1% for those funded once.

15 repeat relationships: 8 still active in FY2025, 7 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

15
30

Total granted

$457k
$133k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+39%
+1%

Still filing today

47%
37%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 98% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $3k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesEducationHousing & ShelterPhilanthropyEnvironmentFood & NutritionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • DY
    DUNELAND YMCA INC
    4× · 2018–2025 · $260k · revenue +128%
  • TC
    THE CEDARS HOME FOR CHILDREN FOUNDATION
    6× · 2019–2025 · $9k · revenue +52%
  • GP
    GREATER PITTSBURGH COMMUNITY FOOD BANK
    2× · 2020–2025 · $1k · revenue +13%

Funded once

  • SP
    STATE PARK LITTLE LEAGUE - CHESTERT
    one grant, 2022 · $70k
  • OF
    OPERATION FINALLY HOME
    one grant, 2017 · $8k · revenue -13%
  • CE
    CATSNIP ETCgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $8k · revenue +75%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Habitat for Humanity of Sumner Coun

Seeking to put god's love into action, habitat for humanity brings people together to build homes, communities and hope to relive our vision of a world where everyone has a decent place to live. habitat for humanity of sumner county…

—
2
Dorchester Habitat for Humanity Inc

Dorchester habitat for humanity, inc.'s ("dhfh") mission statement is "putting god's love into action by bringing people together building homes and hope." dhfh was founded in 1993 and has built seventy-five (75) homes and three (3)…

—
3
Homes for Veterans a Nj Non Profit Corporation

Our mission is to provide a holistic approach to support veterans with disabilities by removing barriers in every aspect of their lives. this includes funding customized, barrier-free home modificationssuch as wheelchair-accessible…

Housing & Shelter
4
Sandusky County Habitat for Humanity International

Seeking to put god's love into action, habitat for humanity brings people together to build homes, communities and hope to realize our vision of a world where everyone has a decent place to live. habitat for humanity sandusky county…

Housing & Shelter
5
Cedar Falls Lutheran Home

Christian caring - enhancing lives through a commitment to individualized care in a home empowered by god's love.

Housing & Shelter
6
Dunham House Inc

To provide long term care for combat wounded veterans with spinal cord and/or moderate to severe traumatic brain injuries in order for them to enjoy a high quality of life with exceptional care.

Public Benefit
7
Samaritan Fellowship

To provide emergency short-term financial assistance for families/individuals experiencing unexpected/sudden loss of income.

—
8
Penland Foundation
Philanthropy
9
Dunwoody Village

The mission of dunwoody village is to provide a welcoming and engaging community that excels in offering a comprehensive approach to health and wellness, a sense of belonging, and the highest quality of life for all.

Human Services
10
Seacoast Family Promise

Seacoast family promise provides overnight shelter to families, providing bed-nights and serving meals. the average length of stay for families is 120 days. these outcomes were acheived with the assistance of some 1200 community volunteers…

Housing & Shelter
11
God's Pantry Food Bank Inc

The mission of god's pantry food bank is reducing hunger by working together to feed kentucky communities. god's pantry food bank envisions a nourished life for every kentuckian.

—
12
Job Haines Home for Aged People
—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Operation Finally Home; the most unlike its peers is Duneland Education Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

19 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 19 of the 47 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
19/19
Grantees still filing
12/19
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

DUNELAND YMCA INC: $260,000 · Human ServicesDUNELAND YMCA INCREBUILDING TOGETHER DUNELAND INC: $24,500 · Human ServicesREBUILDING TOGETHER DUNELAND INC+4 more: $14,430 · Human ServicesSTATE PARK LITTLE LEAGUE - CHESTERT: $70,000 · OtherSTATE PARK LITTLE LEAGUE - CHESTERTIndividual grant recipient: $46,410 · OtherIndividual grant recipientCHESTERTON ART CENTER: $13,000 · OtherCHESTERTON ART CENTERCATHOLIC CHARITIES DIOCESE OF PITTS: $7,500 · Other+28 more: $57,934 · Other+28 moreDUNELAND EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC: $76,000 · EducationDUNELAND EDUCAT…Indiana University Foundation: $3,000 · Education+1 more: $1,000 · EducationOPERATION FINALLY HOME: $7,500 · Housing & ShelterPEOPLE'S CITY MISSION: $2,000 · Housing & ShelterCATSNIP ETC: $7,500 · AnimalsGARY SINISE FOUNDATION: $1,000 · PhilanthropyPORTER COUNTY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC: $1,000 · PhilanthropyGREATER PITTSBURGH COMMUNITY FOOD BANK: $1,250 · Food & Nutrition
Human Services$298,930Other$194,844Education$80,000Housing & Shelter$9,500Animals$7,500Philanthropy$2,000Food & Nutrition$1,250

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetDUNELAND YMCA INC: $260,000 over 4y, 1.6% of budgetDUNELAND EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC: $76,000 over 5y, 31% of budgetREBUILDING TOGETHER DUNELAND INC: $24,500 over 5y, 10% of budgetTHE CEDARS HOME FOR CHILDREN FOUNDATION: $8,930 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetOPERATION FINALLY HOME: $7,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCATSNIP ETC: $7,500 over 1y, 4.2% of budgetIndiana University Foundation: $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNEIGHBORLINK PORTER COUNTY: $2,500 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetCATHOLIC CHARITIES OF THE DIOCESE OF PGH: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPEOPLE'S CITY MISSION: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetART BARN SCHOOL OF ART INC: $1,500 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetGREATER PITTSBURGH COMMUNITY FOOD BANK: $1,250 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSAMARITAN'S PURSE: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetINSTITUTE FOR QUALITY EDUCATION INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGARY SINISE FOUNDATION: $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetRed River Gorge Climbers' Coalition Inc: $1,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetPORTER COUNTY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDunes Foundation Inc: $500 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetSEMPER FI & AMERICA'S FUND: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds DUNELAND YMCA INC ↗
  • Who funds DUNELAND EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds REBUILDING TOGETHER DUNELAND INC ↗
  • Who funds THE CEDARS HOME FOR CHILDREN FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds OPERATION FINALLY HOME ↗
  • Who funds CATSNIP ETC ↗
  • Who funds Indiana University Foundation ↗
  • Who funds NEIGHBORLINK PORTER COUNTY ↗
  • Who funds CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF THE DIOCESE OF PGH ↗
  • Who funds PEOPLE'S CITY MISSION ↗
  • Who funds ART BARN SCHOOL OF ART INC ↗
  • Who funds GREATER PITTSBURGH COMMUNITY FOOD BANK ↗
  • Who funds SAMARITAN'S PURSE ↗
  • Who funds INSTITUTE FOR QUALITY EDUCATION INC ↗
  • Who funds GARY SINISE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Red River Gorge Climbers' Coalition Inc ↗
  • Who funds PORTER COUNTY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Nisource Charitable FoundationOH17× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Nisource Charitable Foundation · Porter County Community Foundation Inc · John W Anderson Foundation · The Cleveland-Cliffs Foundation · Baird Foundation Inc · Renaissance Charitable Foundation Inc · Charities Aid Foundation America · American Endowment Foundation · Network for Good · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Dunbar Family Charitable Trust funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Dunbar Family Charitable Trust. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%3%10%23%40%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Dunbar Family Charitable Trust?

    Find your warmest path to Dunbar Family Charitable Trust through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 47 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Dunbar Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph