Skip to content

· Private foundation

Dunagan Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$407k
Granted FY2024still arriving
14
Grants FY2024still arriving
7
States reached
$286k
Largest
01What it funds
0197% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2024.

Philanthropy$1.5MArts & Culture$641kHealth$455kEducation$297kFood & Nutrition$176kReligion$138kEnvironment$98kHuman Services$95kOther$0
02FY2024 · 14 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k7 grants · $31k
  • $10k–50k6 grants · $89k
  • $250k+1 grant · $286k
$10,000
Median grant
7
States reached
$3.8M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
FIDELITY CHARITABLE DONOR ADVISED FUNDS$286,400
SHATTERED GLOBE THEATRE$20,000
LOOKING GLASS THEATRE$20,000
STEPPENWOLF THEATRE$15,000
PLAY FOR PINK$14,360
SILENT SPRING INSTITUTE$10,000
REMY BUMPO THEATRE COMPANY$10,000
MAYO CLINIC$9,940
UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS FOUNDATIONSCHOOL OF ART & DESIGN$7,000
GULLIVER PREPARATORY SCHOOL$5,000
ANGELS OF LIGHT$3,250
INNISFREE GARDEN$2,500
HORSE RESCUE REHAB AND RETIREMENT FOUNDATION$2,500
THE WORTHY AND FRAN JOHNSON TRUST$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–24, $85k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 43% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 11%HOPE HOSPICE: $10k → 10%OPPORTUNITY INC: $24k → 22%HOPE HOSPICE: $5k → 10%OPPORTUNITY INC: $100 → 22%HOPE HOSPICE: $3k → 10%WHAM AN INITIATIVE OF ACCESS CIRCLES: $20k → 9%ACCESSCIRCLES: $5k → 9%ACCESSCIRCLES: $2k → 9%THE VILLAGE CHICAGO: $12k → 14%ANGELS OF LIGHT: $3k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

ME
IL
NY
MA
OR
OH
PA
CT
CA
MO
MD
AZ
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

89%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$3.3M · 57 repeat orgs$404k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +41% since the first grant, against +39% for those funded once.

57 repeat relationships: 12 still active in FY2024, 45 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

57
46

Total granted

$3.3M
$394k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+41%
+39%

Still filing today

63%
67%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 97% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $10k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Arts & CultureEducationHuman ServicesHealthAnimalsEnvironmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SS
    SILENT SPRING INSTITUTE INC
    7× · 2018–2024 · $220k · revenue +142%
  • SG
    Shattered Globe Theatre
    6× · 2018–2024 · $145k · revenue +104%
  • PF
    PLAY FOR PINK INC
    7× · 2018–2024 · $107k · revenue +41%

Funded once

  • TI
    THE ISLAND SCHOOL
    one grant, 2020 · $100k
  • UW
    UNITED WAY OF ST LOUIS
    one grant, 2022 · $20k
  • LP
    LINCOLN PARK CONSERVANCY
    one grant, 2019 · $20k · revenue -44%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Nashville Public Radio

Nashville public radio's mission is to be the most trusted & independent nashville voice, connecting our communities through non-partisan journalism, compelling storytelling, civil conversation and music discovery.

Arts & Culture
2
Central Indiana Corporate Partnership Inc

Central indiana corporate partnership (cicp) is an alliance of indiana's business and research university leaders coming together to foster long-term prosperity for the region. cicp's mission is to transform the economy of indiana in order…

Community Improvement
3
Chicago Theatre Group Inc

The chicago theatre group is committed to producing both classic and contemporary works giving full voice to a wide range of artists and visions. by dedicating itself to three guiding principles - quality, equity, and community - the…

Arts & Culture
4
Columbia College Chicago

The organization's mission is to educate students for creative occupations in diverse fields of arts and media.

Education
5
Museum of Arts and Design

To collect, display and interpret objects in craft art and design.

Arts & Culture
6
Lyric Opera of Chicago

We believe in the life-changing, transformational, revelatory power of great art and opera. Lyric Opera of Chicago exists to provide a broad, deep, and relevant cultural service to the Chicago region and the nation, and to advance the…

Arts & Culture
7
American Gas Association

American gas association's (the association) mission is to develop and advocate for informed, innovative, and durable policy that fulfills our nation's energy needs, environmental aspirations and economic potential. we are committed to…

—
8
Denver Botanic Gardens Inc

The mission of denver botanic gardens is to connect people with plants, especially plants from the rocky mountain region and similar regions around the world, providing delight and enlightenment to everyone.

Environment
9
The American Theatre Guild

The american theatre guild is dedicated to providing the experience of live theatre to foster passion, inspire creativity and empower youth within our communities.

Arts & Culture
10
University Family Physicians Inc

Engage actively and continuously in medical research, education and training in the practice of medicine in conjunction with the department of family medicine of the indiana university school of medicine and indiana university…

—
11
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
12
United States Naval Institute

Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Missouri Botanical Garden Board of Trustees; the most unlike its peers is Opport-Unity. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

68 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 68 of the 105 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
17
Early backer (in before they grew)
68/68
Grantees still filing
46/68
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

FIDELITY CHARITABLE DONOR ADVISED FUNDS: $1,398,425 · OtherFIDELITY CHARITABLE DONOR ADVISED FUNDSLOOKING GLASS THEATRE: $158,750 · OtherLOOKING GLASS THEATRETHE ISLAND SCHOOL: $100,000 · Other+63 more: $941,214 · Other+63 moreShattered Globe Theatre: $145,000 · Arts & CultureShattered G…STEPPENWOLF THEATRE COMPANY: $97,250 · Arts & CultureSTEPPENWOLF…Remy Bumppo Theatre Company: $67,000 · Arts & CultureRemy Bumppo…San Marcos Art League: $15,300 · Arts & Culture+10 more: $57,260 · Arts & Culture+10 moreSILENT SPRING INSTITUTE INC: $220,124 · HealthTHE FOUNDATION FOR BARNES-JEWISH HOSPITAL: $20,000 · HealthDana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc: $12,500 · Health+2 more: $7,000 · HealthWASHINGTON UNIVERSITY: $76,000 · EducationUniversity of Illinois Foundation: $40,740 · EducationGULLIVER PREPARATORY SCHOOL INC: $10,000 · EducationWESLEYAN UNIVERSITY: $6,000 · EducationREADY READERS: $6,000 · Education+3 more: $5,000 · EducationPLAY FOR PINK INC: $107,168 · Crime & LegalACCESSCIRCLES INC: $27,000 · Human ServicesOPPORT-UNITY: $24,100 · Human ServicesHOPE HOSPICE INC: $18,300 · Human ServicesHAYS-CALDWELL WOMEN'S CENTER: $14,800 · Human ServicesLINCOLN PARK VILLAGE INC: $12,000 · Human Services+1 more: $3,250 · Human ServicesDUTCHESS LAND CONSERVANCY INC: $78,333 · EnvironmentZILKER BOTANICAL GARDEN CONSERVANCY NON-PROFIT CORPORATION: $10,000 · EnvironmentTOXICS ACTION CENTER INC: $6,000 · Environment+2 more: $4,000 · Environment
Other$2,598,389Arts & Culture$381,810Health$259,624Education$143,740Crime & Legal$107,168Human Services$99,450Environment$98,333

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSILENT SPRING INSTITUTE INC: $220,124 over 7y, 2.2% of budgetShattered Globe Theatre: $145,000 over 6y, 7.4% of budgetPLAY FOR PINK INC: $107,168 over 7y, 1.0% of budgetSTEPPENWOLF THEATRE COMPANY: $97,250 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetDUTCHESS LAND CONSERVANCY INC: $78,333 over 5y, 1.2% of budgetWASHINGTON UNIVERSITY: $76,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetRemy Bumppo Theatre Company: $67,000 over 5y, 1.9% of budgetTHE HUMANE SOCIETY OF AUSTIN & TRAVIS COUNTY INC: $42,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetUniversity of Illinois Foundation: $40,740 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED WAY OF GREATER ST LOUIS INC: $40,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCAPITOL BROADCASTING ASSOCIATION INC: $30,000 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetAUSTIN PETS ALIVE INC: $27,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetACCESSCIRCLES INC: $27,000 over 3y, 2.4% of budgetOPPORT-UNITY: $24,100 over 2y, 1.6% of budgetLINCOLN PARK CONSERVANCY: $20,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetCentral Texas Food Bank Inc: $20,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE FOUNDATION FOR BARNES-JEWISH HOSPITAL: $20,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHOPE HOSPICE INC: $18,300 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetHays County Food Bank: $15,680 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetTHE SAFE ALLIANCE: $15,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetHAYS-CALDWELL WOMEN'S CENTER: $14,800 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetAUSTIN HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INC: $14,250 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetDana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc: $12,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCAPE ELEUTHERA FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetTHE CHICAGO ACADEMY OF SCIENCES: $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetNOURISHING HOPE: $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetLINCOLN PARK ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHICAGO COALITION TO END HOMELESSNESS: $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetGREATER CHICAGO FOOD DEPOSITORY: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetZILKER BOTANICAL GARDEN CONSERVANCY NON-PROFIT CORPORATION: $10,000 over 1y, 6.8% of budgetGULLIVER PREPARATORY SCHOOL INC: $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetST LOUIS SHAKESPEARE FESTIVAL: $7,500 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetCentral Texas SPCA: $6,520 over 1y, 1.0% of budget626 LANDMARK FOUNDATION: $6,260 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetOut Youth Inc: $6,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetTOXICS ACTION CENTER INC: $6,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetWESLEYAN UNIVERSITY: $6,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetREADY READERS: $6,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF GREATER ST LOUIS INC: $5,800 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetPolo For Life Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetDOCUMENTARY EDUCATIONAL RESOURCES INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetFREESTORE FOODBANK INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCincinnati Institute of Fine Arts: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE HAVEN OF GRACE: $5,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS FOUNDATION INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL UNDERGROUND RAILROAD FREEDOM CENTER INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCincinnati Playhouse in the Park: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds SILENT SPRING INSTITUTE INC ↗
  • Who funds Shattered Globe Theatre ↗
  • Who funds PLAY FOR PINK INC ↗
  • Who funds STEPPENWOLF THEATRE COMPANY ↗
  • Who funds DUTCHESS LAND CONSERVANCY INC ↗
  • Who funds WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds Remy Bumppo Theatre Company ↗
  • Who funds THE HUMANE SOCIETY OF AUSTIN & TRAVIS COUNTY INC ↗
  • Who funds University of Illinois Foundation ↗
  • Who funds UNITED WAY OF GREATER ST LOUIS INC ↗
  • Who funds CAPITOL BROADCASTING ASSOCIATION INC ↗
  • Who funds AUSTIN PETS ALIVE INC ↗
  • Who funds ACCESSCIRCLES INC ↗
  • Who funds OPPORT-UNITY ↗
  • Who funds LINCOLN PARK CONSERVANCY ↗
  • Who funds Central Texas Food Bank Inc ↗
  • Who funds THE FOUNDATION FOR BARNES-JEWISH HOSPITAL ↗
  • Who funds HOPE HOSPICE INC ↗
  • Who funds Hays County Food Bank ↗
  • Who funds San Marcos Art League ↗
  • Who funds SAN MARCOS PERFORMING ARTS ASSN INC ↗
  • Who funds THE SAFE ALLIANCE ↗
  • Who funds Friends of the San Marcos Public Library ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

St David's FoundationTX17.3× affinity6 shared granteesties to 4 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: St David's Foundation · The Burdine Johnson Foundation · Austin Community Foundation Inc · Trio Foundation of St Louis · Moneta Group Charitable Foundation · St Louis Community Foundation Inc · Hathaway Family Foundation · Jordan Mary R & Ettie a Charitable · Ibm International Foundation · United Way for Greater Austin · Regional Cultural and Performing Arts Development Commission · Edward Jones Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Dunagan Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Dunagan Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 50%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from government →median 1%
  • Silent Spring Institute Inc: 12% of income from government
  • Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc: 7% of income from government
  • Wesleyan University: 1% of income from government
  • Documentary Educational Resources Inc: 1% of income from government
  • Choate Rosemary Hall Foundation Incorporated: 0% of income from government
  • Gulliver Preparatory School Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
5get no government money at all
22report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Dunagan Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to Dunagan Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 105 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Dunagan’s filings →

More from the funding graph