Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Drw Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$3.2M
Granted FY2025still arriving
36
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$750k
Largest
01What you fund
0197% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Education$7.8MEmployment$1.9MScience & Tech$1.3MHuman Services$954kYouth Development$708kFood & Nutrition$614kRecreation & Sports$477kHealth$423kOther$0
02FY2025 · 36 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k2 grants · $10k
  • $10k–50k13 grants · $350k
  • $50k–250k19 grants · $1.8M
  • $250k+2 grants · $1.0M
$50,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$4.9M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY$750,000
NOBLE NETWORK OF CHARTER SCHOOLS$285,000
CODE PLATOON$200,000
GREENWOOD PROJECT$150,000
UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO$121,500
OWLS LACROSSE$110,000
BOTTOM LINE$100,000
CHICAGO TECH ACADEMY HIGH SCHOOL$100,000
THE BLOC$100,000
KIDS FIRST CHICAGO FOR EDUCATION$100,000
EVERYTOWN FOR GUN SAFETY SUPPORT FUND INC$100,000
BEAT THE STREETS CHICAGO$100,000
METROSQUASH NFP$85,000
AFTER SCHOOL MATTERS$75,000
COLLEGE POSSIBLE$75,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $2.0M) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%THE WOMEN'S HOME: $50k → 16%MARKLUND CHILDREN'S HOME: $3k → 8%THE WOMEN'S HOME: $30k → 16%FRIENDS OF THE WORLD FOOD PROGRAM: $100k → 14%MARKLUND CHILDREN'S HOME: $3k → 8%THE WOMEN'S HOME: $5k → 16%MARKLUND CHILDREN'S HOME: $3k → 8%100 WOMEN IN FINANCE FOUNDATION: $3k → 17%100 WOMEN IN FINANCE FOUNDATION: $500 → 17%GIRLS WHO CODE: $1k → 17%INSPIRATION CORPORATION: $50k → 14%INSPIRATION CORPORATION: $40k → 14%INSPIRATION CORPORATION: $40k → 14%INSPIRATION CORPORATION: $40k → 14%OPEN HEART MAGIC: $3k → 14%INSPIRATION CORPORATION: $40k → 14%ASPIRE OF ILLINOIS: $100k → 14%OPEN HEART MAGIC: $3k → 14%GREENWOOD PROJECT: $150k → 14%INVEST FOR KIDS: $35k → 14%INVEST FOR KIDS INC: $35k → 14%INVEST FOR KIDS INC: $25k → 14%INVEST FOR KIDS: $25k → 14%INVEST FOR KIDS INC: $25k → 14%ASPIRE OF ILLINOIS: $80k → 14%INVEST FOR KIDS: $25k → 14%ASPIRE OF ILLINOIS: $53k → 14%INVEST FOR KIDS INC: $25k → 14%ASPIRE OF ILLINOIS: $50k → 14%GREENWOOD PROJECT: $150k → 14%GREENWOOD PROJECT: $150k → 14%GREENWOOD PROJECT: $150k → 14%GREENWOOD PROJECT: $101k → 14%MISERICORDIA FOUNDATION: $20k → 14%THE BLOC: $110k → 14%THE BLOC: $100k → 14%THE BLOC: $75k → 14%BRAVE SPACE ALLIANCE: $10k → 14%ORCHARD VILLAGE: $2k → 14%BRAVE SPACE ALLIANCE: $10k → 14%ORCHARD VILLAGE: $2k → 14%ORCHARD VILLAGE: $1k → 14%A BETTER CHICAGO: $15k → 14%THE BLOC: $100k → 14%ORCHARD VILLAGE: $1k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

VT
NH
MN
IL
WI
MI
NY
MA
NV
IN
PA
NJ
CA
MO
MD
AZ
KS
TN
NC
DC
OK
LA
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

91%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$15M · 61 repeat orgs$1.4M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +35% since the first grant, against +10% for the ones you funded once.

61 repeat relationships — 34 still active in FY2025, 27 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

61
76

Total granted

$15M
$1.4M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+35%
+10%

Still filing today

89%
57%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 99% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $25k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHuman ServicesYouth DevelopmentHealthArts & CultureRecreation & SportsOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • NN
    NOBLE NETWORK OF CHARTER SCHOOLS
    9× · 2017–2025 · $3.3M · revenue +47%
  • CP
    CODE PLATOON NFP
    8× · 2018–2025 · $891k · revenue +448%
  • GP
    GREENWOOD PROJECT
    5× · 2021–2025 · $701k · revenue +22%

Funded once

  • NM
    NORTHWESTERN MEMORIAL FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2020 · $200k
  • AI
    ACCION INTERNATIONALgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $150k · revenue +385%
  • FRIENDS OF THE WORLD FOOD PROGRAM INC
    one grant, 2022 · $100k · revenue +4%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Kipp Chicago Schools

The team at kipp chicago schools is guided by a simple, yet powerful mission: to create a network of excellent schools in chicago that teach our students the character and academic skills necessary to succeed in college and beyond, and to…

Education
2
Junior Achievement of Chicago

To inspire and prepare young people to succeed in a global economy

International
3
Chicago Public Education Fund

The chicago public education fund (the fund) is a nonprofit organization that improves public schools in chicago by investing in the talented educators who lead them.

Education
4
Tutoring Chicago

Tutoring chicago delivers the power of education through one-to-one tutoring.

Arts & Culture
5
Chicago Collegiate Inc

To equip all students in grades six through twelve with the academic skills, intellectual habits and character traits to succeed in the college of their choice, strenghten their communities and change the world.

Education
6
Alternatives Inc

Alternatives, inc.'s mission is to facilitate personal development,strengthen family relationships and enhance the community's well being. serving over 3,000 youth and families annually, the organization offers a range of counseling and…

Health
7
Columbia College Chicago

The organization's mission is to educate students for creative occupations in diverse fields of arts and media.

Education
8
The University of Chicago Charter School Corporation

To Prepare Students for Success in Four-Year Colleges.

Education
9
AI4ALL

Ai4all's mission is to ensure that the next generation of ai leaders reflects humanity. ai4all is transforming the pipeline of ai practitioners who will shape ai for the benefit of humanity.

Youth Development
10
Thrive Chicago Nfp

Thrive chicago's mission is to prepare chicago's youth for a vibrant future by aligning efforts and outcomes from cradle to career.

Human Services
11
Chicago United

To achieve parity in economic opportunity for people of color by advancing multiracial leadership in corporate governance, expanding the talent pipline for executive-level management, and growing minority businesses.

Philanthropy
12
The Common Application Inc

The common application is a not-for-profit membership organization of over 1,100 colleges and universities across the globe committed to access, equity, and integrity in the college admission process. every year, over 1.5 million students…

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Kids First Chicago for Education and the most unlike its peers is Rosamary Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 27 years old; the field is 20. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number18%2%<5yr13%7%5–10yr18%23%10–20yr15%30%20–35yr14%18%35–55yr22%20%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value18%5%<5yr13%2%5–10yr18%26%10–20yr15%43%20–35yr14%7%35–55yr22%17%55yr+

The field is 18% startups (under 5 years old) — 2% of your grantees by number, and just 5% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 12% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/105
the rest of the field
12%
8,891/72,254

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

103 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 103 of the 139 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
19
Early backer (in before they grew)
99/103
Grantees still filing
69/103
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

NOBLE NETWORK OF CHARTER SCHOOLS — $3,261,426 · EducationNOBLE NETWORK OF CHARTER SCHOOLSCALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY — $1,250,000 · EducationCALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGYKIDS FIRST CHICAGO FOR EDUCATION — $568,230 · EducationKIDS FIRST CHICAGO FOR EDUCATIONCHICAGO TECH ACADEMY — $533,900 · EducationCHICAGO TECH ACADEMYUniversity of Chicago — $486,000 · EducationUniversity of ChicagoCOLLEGE POSSIBLE INC — $252,000 · EducationSCRIPTED INC DBA CODE NATION — $247,040 · Education+12 more — $767,890 · Education+12 moreGREENWOOD PROJECT — $701,313 · Human ServicesGREENWOOD PROJ…THE BLOC — $385,000 · Human ServicesTHE BLOCASPIRE OF ILLINOIS — $282,961 · Human ServicesASPIRE OF ILLI…Inspiration Corporation — $210,000 · Human ServicesInspiration Co…Invest for Kids Inc — $195,000 · Human ServicesInvest for Kid…FRIENDS OF THE WORLD FOOD PROGRAM INC — $100,000 · Human ServicesTHE WOMEN'S HOME — $85,000 · Human Services+8 more — $79,100 · Human ServicesSTART EARLY — $343,340 · OtherSTART EARLYBOTTOM LINE — $218,400 · OtherBOTTOM LINENORTHWESTERN MEMORIAL FOUNDATION — $200,000 · OtherNORTHWESTERN MEMORIAL F…NOURISHING HOPE DBA LAKEVIEW PANTRY — $185,000 · OtherNOURISHING HOPE DBA LAK…EVERYTOWN FOR GUN SAFETY SUPPORT FUND INC — $400,000 · OtherEVERYTOWN FOR GUN SAFET…RESILIENCE — $150,000 · OtherREADING IN MOTION — $125,000 · OtherACCION INTERNATIONAL — $150,000 · OtherGREATER CHICAGO FOOD DEPOSITORY — $165,000 · Other+75 more — $1,343,472 · Other+75 moreCODE PLATOON NFP — $890,670 · EmploymentCURT'S CAFE — $206,500 · EmploymentALLIANCE 98 — $110,000 · EmploymentMETROSQUASH NFP — $492,535 · Recreation & SportsOutreach with Lacrosse Schools — $385,000 · Recreation & Sports+2 more — $3,500 · Recreation & SportsBEAT THE STREETS CHICAGO — $330,000 · Youth DevelopmentVocel Viewing our Children as Emerging Leaders — $130,654 · Youth DevelopmentCODE2COLLEGE — $100,000 · Youth DevelopmentONEGOAL — $90,000 · Youth DevelopmentMAKE MOMMA PROUD — $46,760 · Youth DevelopmentMINDS MATTER OF NYC INC — $35,000 · Youth Development+5 more — $73,500 · Youth DevelopmentTHE BOTTOM LINE INC — $392,689 · Community ImprovementWORLD BUSINESS CHICAGO — $50,000 · Community Improvement+1 more — $5,000 · Community Improvement
Education$7,366,486Human Services$2,038,374Other$3,280,212Employment$1,207,170Recreation & Sports$881,035Youth Development$805,914Community Improvement$447,689

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetNOBLE NETWORK OF CHARTER SCHOOLS — $3,261,426 over 9y, 0.4% of budgetCALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY — $1,250,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCODE PLATOON NFP — $890,670 over 8y, 6.2% of budgetGREENWOOD PROJECT — $701,313 over 5y, 6.7% of budgetKIDS FIRST CHICAGO FOR EDUCATION — $568,230 over 8y, 3.1% of budgetCHICAGO TECH ACADEMY — $533,900 over 9y, 1.6% of budgetMETROSQUASH NFP — $492,535 over 8y, 3.5% of budgetUniversity of Chicago — $486,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetEVERYTOWN FOR GUN SAFETY SUPPORT FUND INC — $400,000 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetTHE BOTTOM LINE INC — $392,689 over 6y, 0.5% of budgetTHE BLOC — $385,000 over 4y, 11% of budgetOutreach with Lacrosse Schools — $385,000 over 4y, 21% of budgetSTART EARLY — $343,340 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetBEAT THE STREETS CHICAGO — $330,000 over 4y, 4.3% of budgetASPIRE OF ILLINOIS — $282,961 over 4y, 0.6% of budgetCOLLEGE POSSIBLE INC — $252,000 over 7y, 0.2% of budgetSCRIPTED INC DBA CODE NATION — $247,040 over 4y, 2.3% of budgetAMERICA NEEDS YOU — $220,000 over 5y, 1.7% of budgetTHE CHICAGO SCHOLARS FOUNDATION — $211,946 over 5y, 0.9% of budgetInspiration Corporation — $210,000 over 5y, 1.3% of budgetCURT'S CAFE — $206,500 over 6y, 3.6% of budgetInvest for Kids Inc — $195,000 over 7y, 1.7% of budgetOPEN BOOKS LTD — $175,500 over 7y, 1.2% of budgetGREATER CHICAGO FOOD DEPOSITORY — $165,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetACCION INTERNATIONAL — $150,000 over 1y, 3.1% of budgetRESILIENCE — $150,000 over 5y, 1.6% of budgetVocel Viewing our Children as Emerging Leaders — $130,654 over 6y, 1.6% of budgetREADING IN MOTION — $125,000 over 7y, 2.0% of budgetALLIANCE 98 — $110,000 over 4y, 7.4% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE WORLD FOOD PROGRAM INC — $100,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCODE2COLLEGE — $100,000 over 3y, 1.6% of budgetCOOK COUNTY HEALTH FOUNDATION — $100,000 over 1y, 7.8% of budgetONEGOAL — $90,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetTHE WOMEN'S HOME — $85,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetEVANSTON REBUILDING WAREHOUSE — $80,000 over 4y, 0.7% of budgetAFTER SCHOOL MATTERS INC — $77,500 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetHYDE PARK ART CENTER — $70,000 over 3y, 0.9% of budgetTHE COMMERCIAL CLUB FOUNDATION — $66,000 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetTHRIVE SCHOLARS — $55,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetWORLD BUSINESS CHICAGO — $50,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetNOURISHING HOPE — $50,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetBig Brothers Big Sisters Of America — $50,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetFRIENDS OF UNITED HATZALAH INC — $50,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMAKE MOMMA PROUD — $46,760 over 5y, 57% of budgetNEIGHBORHOOD BOYS & GIRLS CLUB — $37,000 over 3y, 0.7% of budgetMINDS MATTER OF NYC INC — $35,000 over 3y, 1.4% of budgetBRIDGE TO TURKIYE — $30,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF NATAL INC — $25,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds NOBLE NETWORK OF CHARTER SCHOOLS
  • Who funds CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY
  • Who funds CODE PLATOON NFP
  • Who funds GREENWOOD PROJECT
  • Who funds KIDS FIRST CHICAGO FOR EDUCATION
  • Who funds CHICAGO TECH ACADEMY
  • Who funds METROSQUASH NFP
  • Who funds University of Chicago
  • Who funds EVERYTOWN FOR GUN SAFETY SUPPORT FUND INC
  • Who funds THE BOTTOM LINE INC
  • Who funds THE BLOC
  • Who funds Outreach with Lacrosse Schools
  • Who funds START EARLY
  • Who funds BEAT THE STREETS CHICAGO
  • Who funds ASPIRE OF ILLINOIS
  • Who funds COLLEGE POSSIBLE INC
  • Who funds SCRIPTED INC DBA CODE NATION
  • Who funds AMERICA NEEDS YOU
  • Who funds THE CHICAGO SCHOLARS FOUNDATION
  • Who funds Inspiration Corporation
  • Who funds CURT'S CAFE
  • Who funds Invest for Kids Inc
  • Who funds OPEN BOOKS LTD
  • Who funds GREATER CHICAGO FOOD DEPOSITORY
  • Who funds ACCION INTERNATIONAL
  • Who funds RESILIENCE
  • Who funds Vocel Viewing our Children as Emerging Leaders
  • Who funds READING IN MOTION
  • Who funds ALLIANCE 98
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF THE WORLD FOOD PROGRAM INC
  • Who funds CODE2COLLEGE
  • Who funds COOK COUNTY HEALTH FOUNDATION
  • Who funds ONEGOAL
  • Who funds THE WOMEN'S HOME
  • Who funds EVANSTON REBUILDING WAREHOUSE
  • Who funds AFTER SCHOOL MATTERS INC

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Circle of Service FoundationIL32.5× affinity14 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Circle of Service Foundation · The Chicago Community Trust · John D and Catherine T Macarthur Foundation · Cme Group Community Foundation F/K/A Nymex Foundation · Imc Chicago Charitable Foundation · Arie and Ida Crown Memorial · United Way of Metropolitan Chicago Inc · Finnegan Family Foundation · Polk Bros Foundation Inc · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · Fulk Family Foundation Inc · Motorola Solutions Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Drw Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 10%4%15%34%60%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 12%
  • Big Brothers Big Sisters of America21% of income from government
  • Johns Hopkins University12% of income from government
  • The Bottom Line Inc0% of income from government
  • Year Up Inc0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
28report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Drw Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Drw Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 139 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph