Skip to content

· Private foundation

Dr Nancy O'Reilly Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$577k
Granted FY2025still arriving
22
Grants FY2025still arriving
7
States reached
$150k
Largest
01What it funds
0191% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Health$837kArts & Culture$475kAnimals$378kFood & Nutrition$375kHuman Services$287kCommunity Improvement$207kReligion$187kPhilanthropy$180kOther$0
02FY2025 · 22 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k8 grants · $35k
  • $10k–50k10 grants · $184k
  • $50k–250k4 grants · $357k
$10,000
Median grant
7
States reached
$1.6M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
THE WILD BEAUTY FOUNDATION$150,000
UNITY OF SANTA BARBARA$100,000
Individual grant recipient$57,246
ART OF ELYSIUM$50,000
LET IT RIPPLE$47,100
ARABIAN HORSE ASSOCIATION$25,000
COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF THE OZARKS$25,000
HUMANE SOCIETY OF SOUTHWEST MISSOURI$20,000
NEW WEST SYMPHONY ASSOCIATION$15,000
SPRINGFIELD BLACK TIE INC$12,000
COUNCIL OF CHURCHES OF THE OZARKS$10,000
DYNAMIC STRIDES THERAPY$10,000
Individual grant recipient$10,000
UNITED MINISTRIES IN HIGHER EDUCATION$10,000
SOVEREIGN MILITARY ORDER OF JERUSALEM$5,210
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $264k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 94% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%HARVEST HOME: $55k → 14%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $500 → 14%LEAST OF THESE: $500 → 8%Foster Adopt Connect: $5k → 15%BRAVEHEARTS: $5k → 6%HARVEST HOME: $25k → 14%LEAST OF THESE: $250 → 8%BRAVEHEARTS: $5k → 6%HARVEST HOME: $20k → 14%LEAST OF THESE: $200 → 8%BRAVEHEARTS: $3k → 6%HARVEST HOME: $15k → 14%BRAVEHEARTS: $2k → 6%HARVEST HOME: $15k → 14%BRAVEHEARTS: $1k → 6%HARVEST HOME: $15k → 14%HARVEST HOME: $5k → 14%HARVEST HOME: $5k → 14%TAKING THE REINS: $63k → 14%SPRINGFIELD BLACK TIE INC: $5k → 15%SPRINGFIELD BLACK TIE INC: $5k → 15%SPRINGFIELD BLACK TIE INC: $5k → 15%CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF SOUTHERN MISSOURI: $5k → 15%CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF SOUTHERN MISSOUI: $5k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MN
IL
NY
MA
SD
IN
OH
CT
CA
UT
CO
MO
VA
MD
NC
SC
DC
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

76%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.5M · 48 repeat orgs$797k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +31% since the first grant, against +11% for those funded once.

48 repeat relationships: 13 still active in FY2025, 35 since wound down; 8 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

48
44

Total granted

$2.5M
$455k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+31%
+11%

Still filing today

65%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 38% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $342k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthHuman ServicesEducationArts & CultureAnimalsPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • DS
    Dynamic Strides Therapy Inc
    9× · 2017–2025 · $364k · revenue +125%
  • TT
    TAKE THE LEAD INC
    4× · 2019–2023 · $230k · revenue +64%
  • HH
    Harvest Home Inc
    8× · 2017–2024 · $155k · revenue +223%

Funded once

  • NW
    NATIONAL WOMEN'S HISTORY MUSEUM
    one grant, 2021 · $125k · revenue +25%
  • CEDARS-SINAI MEDICAL CENTER
    one grant, 2024 · $100k · revenue +11%
  • TT
    TAKING THE REINS
    one grant, 2021 · $63k · revenue +10%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Foundation for Women's Cancer

To support and empower all affected by gynecologic cancers through education, research, and public awareness.

Health
2
University of the Ozarks

True to our christian heritage, we prepare students from diverse religious, cultural, educational and economic backgrounds to live life fully.

Education
3
Marin Humane Society

Marin humane transforms lives through exceptional animal care, humane education, and advocacy. every day, marin humane inspires compassion and positive relationships between people and animals.

Animals
4
Animal Care Sanctuary

Animal care sanctuary's lifesaving mission as a no kill organization envisions a community that promotes turning compassion into action for companion animals by: 1.) adopting healthy pet companions into loving homes. 2.) promoting the…

Animals
5
CureCervicalCancer

Dedicated to the early detection and prevention of cervical cancer around the globe for the women who need it most.

International
6
Mary's Shelter

Believing in the value of every life, mary's path empowers vulnerable teen mothers in foster care and their babies to create lives of dignity, hope and self-sufficiency.

Human Services
7
Colorado Gives Foundation

We connect people, ideas, and nonprofits to make good happen. our vision is that all of jeffco is thriving.

Philanthropy
8
Jefferson Regional Foundation

The mission of the foundation is to improve the health and well-being of the communities served by jefferson hospital through engagement, community-driven research and grantmaking. there are three grantmaking priorities focused on the…

Health
9
Missouri Western State University Foundation Inc

The missouri western state university foundation is a not-for-profit charitable organization that functions solely to support the mission of missouri western state university, as stated in the university's mission statement. the foundation…

—
10
Sacramento Zoological Society

The sacramento zoo inspires appreciation, respect and a connection with wildlife and nature through education, recreation and conservation.

Animals
11
Pasado's Safe Haven

Fighting to end animal cruelty and create a more compassionate world.(continued in schedule o)fiscal year 2024-2025 highlights include:investigated/resourced 71 animal cruelty cases, provided care andrehabilitations for 398 animals at our…

Animals
12
Mid-America Transplant Services

To save lives through excellence in organ and tissue donation.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Convoy of Hope; the most unlike its peers is The Caring People. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

60 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 60 of the 104 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
15
Early backer (in before they grew)
57/60
Grantees still filing
42/60
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Individual grant recipient: $213,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientI AM A LEADERORG: $200,000 · OtherI AM A LEADERORGWILD BEAUTY FOUNDATION INC: $150,000 · OtherWILD BEAUTY FOUNDATION INCARABIAN HORSE ASSOCIATION: $126,000 · OtherARABIAN HORSE ASSOCIATIONUNITY CHURCH OF SANTA BARBARA: $100,000 · OtherUNITY CHURCH OF SANTA BARBARAIndividual grant recipient: $57,246 · OtherDrury University: $77,500 · OtherHUMANE SOCIETY OF SOUTHWEST MISSOURI: $90,000 · OtherHUMANE SOCIETY OF SOUTHWEST MISSOURI+63 more: $505,135 · Other+63 moreDynamic Strides Therapy Inc: $364,000 · HealthDynamic Strides Therap…SANSUM CLINIC: $125,000 · HealthSANSUM CLINICCEDARS-SINAI MEDICAL CENTER: $100,000 · HealthCEDARS-SINAI MEDICAL C…BREAKTHROUGH T1D: $60,000 · HealthBREAKTHROUGH T1DTHE VICTIM CENTER: $37,500 · Health+4 more: $20,750 · HealthTHE ART OF ELYSIUM: $139,500 · Arts & CultureTHE ART OF E…NATIONAL WOMEN'S HISTORY MUSEUM: $125,000 · Arts & CultureNATIONAL WOM…Let It Ripple Inc: $95,550 · Arts & CultureLet It Rippl…NEW WEST SYMPHONY ASSOCIATION: $35,000 · Arts & CultureNEW WEST SYM…+1 more: $5,000 · Arts & CultureHarvest Home Inc: $155,000 · Human ServicesHarvest Ho…SPRINGFIELD BLACK TIE INC: $73,200 · Human ServicesSPRINGFIEL…TAKING THE REINS: $62,500 · Human ServicesTAKING THE…BRAVEHEARTS THERAPEUTIC RIDING AND EDUCATIONAL CENTER: $15,000 · Human Services+4 more: $16,450 · Human ServicesPLAYERS PHILANTHROPY FUND INC: $130,000 · PhilanthropyBREAST CANCER FOUNDATION OF THE OZARKS: $101,000 · PhilanthropyCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF THE OZARKS INC: $25,000 · PhilanthropyCAL POLY POMONA PHILANTHROPIC FOUNDATION: $15,000 · PhilanthropyOZARKS TECHNICAL COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $10,000 · Philanthropy+1 more: $5,000 · PhilanthropyTAKE THE LEAD INC: $230,000 · Food & Nutrition+1 more: $3,300 · Food & NutritionCONVOY OF HOPE: $140,250 · InternationalGIRL UP INITIATIVE UGANDA: $5,000 · International+1 more: $1,000 · International
Other$1,518,881Health$707,250Arts & Culture$400,050Human Services$322,150Philanthropy$286,000Food & Nutrition$233,300International$146,250

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetDynamic Strides Therapy Inc: $364,000 over 9y, 17% of budgetTAKE THE LEAD INC: $230,000 over 4y, 11% of budgetHarvest Home Inc: $155,000 over 8y, 3.6% of budgetCONVOY OF HOPE: $140,250 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTHE ART OF ELYSIUM: $139,500 over 6y, 5.6% of budgetPLAYERS PHILANTHROPY FUND INC: $130,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetARABIAN HORSE ASSOCIATION: $126,000 over 4y, 0.5% of budgetNATIONAL WOMEN'S HISTORY MUSEUM: $125,000 over 1y, 4.2% of budgetSANSUM CLINIC: $125,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBREAST CANCER FOUNDATION OF THE OZARKS: $101,000 over 4y, 1.3% of budgetCEDARS-SINAI MEDICAL CENTER: $100,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLet It Ripple Inc: $95,550 over 2y, 24% of budgetHUMANE SOCIETY OF SOUTHWEST MISSOURI: $90,000 over 6y, 1.0% of budgetDrury University: $77,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetSPRINGFIELD BLACK TIE INC: $73,200 over 8y, 6.6% of budgetTAKING THE REINS: $62,500 over 1y, 6.4% of budgetBREAKTHROUGH T1D: $60,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetTHE VICTIM CENTER: $37,500 over 8y, 0.9% of budgetNEW WEST SYMPHONY ASSOCIATION: $35,000 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF THE OZARKS INC: $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSpringfield Symphony Association: $23,000 over 6y, 0.7% of budgetGIRLS INCORPORATED OF GREATER SANTA BARBARA: $20,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetPARKINSONS GROUP OF THE OZARKS: $15,000 over 3y, 4.8% of budgetPARK CENTURY SCHOOL: $15,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCAL POLY POMONA PHILANTHROPIC FOUNDATION: $15,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetBRAVEHEARTS THERAPEUTIC RIDING AND EDUCATIONAL CENTER: $15,000 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetCRISIS NURSERY OF THE OZARKS INC: $12,500 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetCATHOLIC CHARITIES OF SOUTHERN MISSOURI INC: $10,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetMCDONALD COUNTY SCHOOLS FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 1y, 10% of budgetOZARKS TECHNICAL COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetOZARK GREENWAYS INC: $7,500 over 4y, 0.9% of budgetJUNIOR LEAGUE OF SPRINGFIELD MISSOURI INC: $6,500 over 1y, 2.7% of budgetGIRL UP INITIATIVE UGANDA: $5,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetGREATER MISSOURI LEADERSHIP FOUNDATION INC: $5,000 over 1y, 2.7% of budgetPUPPIES UNDER PROTECTION INC: $5,000 over 1y, 4.9% of budgetMontecito Community Foundation: $5,000 over 1y, 6.7% of budgetMAPLE PARK CEMETERY ASSOCIATION: $5,000 over 1y, 2.0% of budgetBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFOSTERADOPT CONNECT INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE CHILD ADVOCACY CENTER INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetFILM INDEPENDENT: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOZARKS FOOD HARVEST INC: $3,300 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCOURT APPOINTED SPECIAL ADVOCATES OF SOUTHWEST MISSOURI: $3,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetCARE RESCUE LA: $2,500 over 1y, 3.9% of budgetTHE HILAROO FOUNDATION: $2,000 over 1y, 16% of budgetMISSOURI STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $1,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCASTLETON RANCH HORSE RESCUE INC: $1,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTHE CARING PEOPLE: $1,500 over 2y, 0.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Dynamic Strides Therapy Inc ↗
  • Who funds TAKE THE LEAD INC ↗
  • Who funds Harvest Home Inc ↗
  • Who funds CONVOY OF HOPE ↗
  • Who funds THE ART OF ELYSIUM ↗
  • Who funds PLAYERS PHILANTHROPY FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds ARABIAN HORSE ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL WOMEN'S HISTORY MUSEUM ↗
  • Who funds SANSUM CLINIC ↗
  • Who funds BREAST CANCER FOUNDATION OF THE OZARKS ↗
  • Who funds CEDARS-SINAI MEDICAL CENTER ↗
  • Who funds Let It Ripple Inc ↗
  • Who funds HUMANE SOCIETY OF SOUTHWEST MISSOURI ↗
  • Who funds Drury University ↗
  • Who funds SPRINGFIELD BLACK TIE INC ↗
  • Who funds TAKING THE REINS ↗
  • Who funds BREAKTHROUGH T1D ↗
  • Who funds THE VICTIM CENTER ↗
  • Who funds NEW WEST SYMPHONY ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF THE OZARKS INC ↗
  • Who funds Springfield Symphony Association ↗
  • Who funds GIRLS INCORPORATED OF GREATER SANTA BARBARA ↗
  • Who funds PARKINSONS GROUP OF THE OZARKS ↗
  • Who funds PARK CENTURY SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds CAL POLY POMONA PHILANTHROPIC FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds BRAVEHEARTS THERAPEUTIC RIDING AND EDUCATIONAL CENTER ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Community Foundation of the Ozarks IncMO37.9× affinity18 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Community Foundation of the Ozarks Inc · Womenconnect4good Inc · Larry P O'Reilly and Family Foundation · The Charlie & Mary Beth O'Reilly Family Foundation · Musgrave Foundation · Commerce Bancshares Foundation · Stanley & Elaine Ball Charitable Tr · Arvest Foundation · Ozarks Health Advocacy Foundation · United Way of the Ozarks Inc · Roy W Slusher Charitable Foundation · Cook Family Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Dr Nancy O'Reilly Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Dr Nancy O'Reilly Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%2%6%14%25%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 40%
  • Child Advocacy Center Inc: 40% of income from government
  • Wounded Warrior Project Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
12report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Dr Nancy O'Reilly Family Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Dr Nancy O'Reilly Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 104 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Dr Nancy O'Reilly Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph