· Private foundation
Dr Lloyd and Kay Chapman Charitable Trust
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What it funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.
Where the money goes
Grants by size, and the largest recipients.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k44 grants · $41k
- $10k–50k2 grants · $46k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Chinese Military Museum | $25,700 |
| Stanford University | $20,000 |
| Planned Parenthood | $5,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $3,500 |
| BC Childrens Hospital | $3,000 |
| Western Washington University Found | $2,000 |
| American Foundation for UBC | $2,000 |
| University of WA | $2,000 |
| Tuskegee Airmen | $2,000 |
| Organization of Black Aerospace Pro | $2,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $1,500 |
| NB Film Cooperative | $1,500 |
| People for the American Way | $1,000 |
| Vancouver Heritage Foundation | $1,000 |
| Diabetes and Me | $1,000 |
Does the money reach high-need areas?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.
US giving: 60% of grant dollars ($407k). The need read here covers only this US portion; the 40% that went abroad ($266k) is mapped below.
Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $300) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
How this is measured
Which US states its grants reach
Beyond the US: 40% of all-years giving ($266k)
1 country, by the recipient’s country on the filing.
How this is measured
Who it funds again
Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.
Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +50% since the first grant, against +46% for those funded once.
65 repeat relationships: 36 still active in FY2024, 29 since wound down; 9 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 48% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $35k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
How this is measured
Backed again, and grew
- FFFOUNDATION FOR WESTERN WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY AND ALUMNI8× · 2017–2024 · $27k · revenue +6%
- CPCASCADE PUBLIC MEDIA7× · 2017–2023 · $14k · revenue +158%
PRO PUBLICA INC8× · 2017–2024 · $7k · revenue +48%
Funded once
- RDRESPONSIBLE DEVELOPMENTone grant, 2023 · $4k
- CRCanadian Red Crossone grant, 2021 · $1k
- VSVancouver Shambhala Centreone grant, 2017 · $1k
How this is measured
Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
Closest unfunded matches
The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.
The Academy's mission is to enhance member career fulfillment and promote brain health for all.
National public radio, inc. ("npr") works collaboratively with member public radio station licensees ("member stations") to create a more informed public, one that is challenged and invigorated by a deeper understanding and appreciation of…
The fsmb serves as the voice for state medical boards, supporting them through education, assessment, research and advocacy while providing services and initiatives that promote patient safety, quality health care and regulatory best…
Advance science, engineering, and innovation throughout the world for the benefit of all. the world's largest multidisciplinary scientific society and a leading publisher of cutting-edge research through its science family of journals,…
The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.
Sfn's mission is to: 1. advance the understanding of the brain and the nervous system by bringing together scientists of all segments of neuroscience, by facilitating the integration of research directed at all levels of biological…
American foreign service association (afsa) is both the principal advocate for the long-term institutional wellbeing of the professional career foreign service and responsible for safeguarding the interest of afsa members. (continued on…
See schedule ouniversity corporation for atmospheric research (ucar), on behalf of, and in cooperation with its member university members, is engaged in the management of long-term atmospheric and related research and educational…
Our mission is to accelerate scientific progress, understand the root causes of disease, and narrow the gap between discoveries and impact on patients.
Research, education and general - princeton university is a private not-for-profit, non-sectarian institution of higher learning with approximately 5,700 undergraduate and 3,300 graduate students. 2,500 students graduated in the 2024-2025…
Agu's mission is to advance and support an inclusive community of earth and space scientists and partners dedicated to discovery and solutions to societal challenges. agu seeks to catalyze discovery and solutions to scientific and societal…
How this is measured
38 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.
How this is measured
Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 38 of the 91 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.
Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee
Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding
A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds FOUNDATION FOR WESTERN WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY AND ALUMNI ↗
- Who funds CASCADE PUBLIC MEDIA ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC ↗
- Who funds PRO PUBLICA INC ↗
- Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC ↗
- Who funds SEATTLE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL ↗
- Who funds Alternatives to Hunger Bellingham Food Bank ↗
- Who funds PEOPLE FOR THE AMERICAN WAY ↗
- Who funds OCEANA INC ↗
- Who funds NPR FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds CAMP NOT-A-WHEEZE ↗
- Who funds CEDARS-SINAI MEDICAL CENTER ↗
Co-funders
Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Whatcom Community Foundation · Mary H Storer Foundation · Shell USA Company Foundation · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · American Endowment Foundation · Network for Good · National Philanthropic Trust · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation
How this is measured
How much its grantees rely on government
Each dot is one organization Dr Lloyd and Kay Chapman Charitable Trust funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Dr Lloyd and Kay Chapman Charitable Trust. Bigger dots raise more.
How this is measured
Play a game based on Dr Lloyd and Kay Chapman’s filings →