Skip to content
Dr George H Kilpatrick Memorial Trust at a glance

· Private foundation

Dr George H Kilpatrick Memorial Trust

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$55k
Granted FY2024still arriving
5
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$13k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2024.

Housing & Shelter$85kHuman Services$58kYouth Development$50kFood & Nutrition$50kEducation$48kHealth$41kArts & Culture$41k
02FY2024 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$10,186
Median grant
1
States reached
$857k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
COMMUNITIES IN SCHOOLS OF SAN ANTONIO$12,500
SAN ANTONIO METROPOLITAN MINISTRY$12,500
TEXAS DIAPER BANK$10,186
HOUSE OF NEIGHBORLY SERVICE OF$10,000
SAN ANTONIO FOOD BANK$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–24, $40k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 14%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 14%HOUSE OF NEIGHBORLY SERVICE OF: $10k → 16%GIRLS INCORPORATED OF SAN ANTONIO: $10k → 16%GIRLS INCORPORATED OF SAN ANTONIO: $10k → 16%GIRLS INCORPORATED OF SAN ANTONIO: $10k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

94%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$351k · 9 repeat orgs$21k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +31% since the first grant, against +17% for those funded once.

9 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2024, 5 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

9
1

Total granted

$351k
$11k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+31%
+17%

Still filing today

89%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 82% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $10k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthHuman ServicesEducationYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SA
    SAN ANTONIO METROPOLITAN MINISTRIES INC
    7× · 2018–2024 · $85k · revenue +119%
  • SA
    SAN ANTONIO FOOD BANK
    5× · 2020–2024 · $50k · revenue +18%
  • CI
    COMMUNITIES IN SCHOOLS OF SAN ANTONIO
    5× · 2020–2024 · $48k · revenue +90%

Funded once

  • CC
    CHRISTUS CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2023 · $11k · revenue +17%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
San Antonio Report

Publishing a local online news source. We believe a well informed and connected community is essential to making San Antonio a better place to live, work and play.

Arts & Culture
2
San Antonio Automobile Dealers Association Foundation Inc
—
3
San Antonio Christian School

Partner with families to provide students a christ-centered education while fostering a life of faith and service. the school desires to associate with like-minded teachers, administrators, staff, parents, and students to communicate the…

—
4
Southwest Winners Foundation Inc

The mission of Southwest Winners Foundation is to provide an adaptive and effective learning environment that prepares students for success in the workplace and/or college.

Education
5
Tennis Officials of San Antonio Association
Recreation & Sports
6
Discovery School of San Antonio

At Discovery School, our mission is to inspire and nurture the love of learning in young children and their families. The School offers an enhanced early childhood education for children 2 through 7 years to provide them with the skills…

Education
7
San Antonio Council On Alcohol and Drug Awareness

To provide alcohol and drug use prevention, intervention and recovery services to children, youth and adults in the community.

—
8
San Antonio Tennis Association

Develop and promote the lifetime sport

—
9
Advocates Social Services of San Antonio Texas

To educate qualified individuals of public benefits that they may be entitled to. we accomplish this by working with local city, state, and federal agencies for the purpose of outreach and verification work. recently we have focused mainly…

—
10
Ronald Mcdonald House Charities of San Antonio Inc

To provide a safe, caring, and temporary home away from home for the families of children receiving essential medical services in san antonio, texas.

Health
11
Kipp San Antonio Inc

The mission of kipp san antonio is to enable students from underserved communities to develop the knowledge, skills, and character necessary to graduate from college, lead in their communities and command their future.

—
12
Sa Talent Inc Sa Works

The mission of sa talent, inc. is to educate and develop youth and adults into the talent needs of san antonio's current and future employers and provide services for the regional employers for the retention and growth of their local…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Communities in Schools of San Antonio; the most unlike its peers is Texas Diaper Bank. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/11
Grantees still filing
9/11
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

SAN ANTONIO METROPOLITAN MINISTRIES INC: $84,500 · OtherSAN ANTONIO METROPOLITAN MINISTRIES INCSAN ANTONIO FOOD BANK: $50,000 · OtherSAN ANTONIO FOOD BANKSOUTHWEST SCHOOL OF ART: $41,000 · OtherSOUTHWEST SCHOOL OF ARTYOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF GREATER SAN ANTONIO: $20,000 · OtherYOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF GREATER SAN ANTONIORISE RECOVERY: $30,000 · HealthRISE RECOVERYTEXAS DIAPER BANK: $27,994 · HealthTEXAS DIAPER BANKCHRISTUS CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION: $11,321 · HealthCHRISTUS CHILDREN'S F…COMMUNITIES IN SCHOOLS OF SAN ANTONIO: $47,500 · EducationCOMMUNITIES IN…GIRLS INCORPORATED OF SAN ANTONIO: $30,000 · Human ServicesGIRLS INCORP…House of Neighborly Service of San Antonio Texas: $10,000 · Human ServicesHouse of Nei…BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF SAN ANTONIO: $20,000 · Youth Development
Other$195,500Health$69,315Education$47,500Human Services$40,000Youth Development$20,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSAN ANTONIO METROPOLITAN MINISTRIES INC: $84,500 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetSAN ANTONIO FOOD BANK: $50,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetCOMMUNITIES IN SCHOOLS OF SAN ANTONIO: $47,500 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetSOUTHWEST SCHOOL OF ART: $41,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetGIRLS INCORPORATED OF SAN ANTONIO: $30,000 over 3y, 0.7% of budgetRISE RECOVERY: $30,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetTEXAS DIAPER BANK: $27,994 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetYOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF GREATER SAN ANTONIO: $20,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF SAN ANTONIO: $20,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetCHRISTUS CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION: $11,321 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHouse of Neighborly Service of San Antonio Texas: $10,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Texas Cavaliers C…St Luke's Lutheran He…Nancy Smith Hurd Foun…Faye L & William L Co…San Antonio Area Foun…Marcia & Otto Koehler…The Charity Ball Asso…Pryor Myra Stafford C…Elizabeth Huth Coates…John L Santikos Chari…Harvey E Najim Charit…United Way of San Ant…
The Texas Cavaliers Charitable FoundationTX24.2× affinity9 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Texas Cavaliers Charitable Foundation · St Luke's Lutheran Health Ministries Inc · Nancy Smith Hurd Foundation · Faye L & William L Cowden Charitable Foundation · San Antonio Area Foundation · Marcia & Otto Koehler Foundation · The Charity Ball Association of San Antonio Inc · Pryor Myra Stafford Char Tr F0030100 · Elizabeth Huth Coates Charitable Foundation of 1992 · John L Santikos Charitable Foundation · Harvey E Najim Charitable Foundation · United Way of San Antonio and Bexar County

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Dr George H Kilpatrick Memorial Trust funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Dr George H Kilpatrick Memorial Trust. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 11 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Dr George H Kilpatrick Memorial’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home