Skip to content
DPR Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

DPR Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$2.8M
Granted FY2025still arriving
42
Grants FY2025still arriving
15
States reached
$126k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Youth Development$8.8MHousing & Shelter$1.6MHuman Services$1.6MEducation$817kArts & Culture$501kPhilanthropy$149kFood & Nutrition$42kPublic Safety & Disaster$42kOther$0
02FY2025 · 42 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k11 grants · $277k
  • $50k–250k31 grants · $2.5M
$50,000
Median grant
15
States reached
$28M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ABUSED & HOMELESS CHILDRENS REFUGE$125,500
BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF TAMPA BAY INC$125,000
THE CENTER FOR CHILDREN AND YOUNG ADULTS INC$125,000
SAWHORSE REVOLUTION$125,000
HELPING ADVANCE AND NURTURE THE DEVELOPMENT OF YOU$125,000
GIRLSTART$125,000
MILAGRO FOUNDATION INC$125,000
YOUTH ASSISTANCE COALITION INC$101,000
PENDLETON PLACE INC$100,000
BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF METRO ATLANTA INC$100,000
BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF OAKLAND INC$100,000
BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF PLACER COUNTY$100,000
GALLATIN SHALOM ZONE INC$100,000
BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF NORTHWEST SAN DIEGO COUNTY I$91,000
WALTHAM BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB INC$78,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $3.3M) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 60% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%MARGARET FULLER-NEIGHBORHOOD HOUSE INC: $40k → 8%PENDLETON PLACE INC: $101k → 10%HELPING ADVANCE AND NURTURE THE DEVELOPMENT OF YOU: $125k → 13%OURBRIDGE INC: $50k → 10%THE CENTER FOR CHILDREN AND YOUNG ADULTS INC: $125k → 8%BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS IN NEW JERSEY: $60k → 12%ABUSED & HOMELESS CHILDRENS REFUGE: $126k → 6%MARGARET FULLER-NEIGHBORHOOD HOUSE INC: $40k → 8%GIRLS INCORPORATED OF ALAMEDA COUNTY: $50k → 10%PENDLETON PLACE INC: $100k → 10%THE CENTER FOR CHILDREN AND YOUNG ADULTS INC: $100k → 8%BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS IN NEW JERSEY: $55k → 12%ABUSED & HOMELESS CHILDRENS REFUGE: $100k → 6%MARGARET FULLER-NEIGHBORHOOD HOUSE INC: $35k → 8%GIRLS INCORPORATED OF ALAMEDA COUNTY: $50k → 10%UNITED FRIENDS OF THE CHILDREN: $43k → 14%PENDLETON PLACE INC: $50k → 10%THE CENTER FOR CHILDREN AND YOUNG ADULTS INC: $52k → 8%YOUTHCARE: $75k → 9%BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS IN NEW JERSEY: $30k → 12%ABUSED & HOMELESS CHILDRENS REFUGE: $60k → 6%GIRLS INCORPORATED OF ALAMEDA COUNTY: $50k → 10%UNITED FRIENDS OF THE CHILDREN: $40k → 14%PENDLETON PLACE INC: $50k → 10%HELPING HANDS NEGLECTED DISADVANTAG ED YOUTH-HANDY: $40k → 13%THE CENTER FOR CHILDREN AND YOUNG ADULTS INC: $50k → 8%YOUTHCARE: $30k → 9%ABUSED & HOMELESS CHILDRENS REFUGE: $52k → 6%GIRLS INCORPORATED OF ALAMEDA COUNTY: $50k → 10%PENDLETON PLACE INC: $45k → 10%HELPING ABUSED NEGLECTED DISADVANTAGED YOUTH-HANDY: $35k → 13%THE CENTER FOR CHILDREN AND YOUNG ADULTS INC: $50k → 8%ABUSED & HOMELESS CHILDRENS REFUGE: $50k → 6%GIRLS INCORPORATED OF ALAMEDA COUNTY: $48k → 10%PENDLETON PLACE INC: $45k → 10%THE CENTER FOR CHILDREN AND YOUNG ADULTS INC: $33k → 8%ABUSED & HOMELESS CHILDRENS REFUGE: $50k → 6%GIRLS INCORPORATED OF ALAMEDA COUNTY: $40k → 10%PENDLETON PLACE INC: $45k → 10%ABUSED & HOMELESS CHILDRENS REFUGE: $50k → 6%GIRLS INCORPORATED OF ALAMEDA COUNTY: $40k → 10%PENDLETON PLACE INC: $40k → 10%ABUSED & HOMELESS CHILDRENS REFUGE: $50k → 6%YOUTHCARE: $35k → 9%YOUTH AND FAMILY ALLIANCE: $50k → 10%YOUTH AND FAMILY ALLIANCE: $50k → 10%YOUTH AND FAMILY ALLIANCE: $50k → 10%YOUTH AND FAMILY ALLIANCE: $40k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
NY
MA
PA
NJ
CA
CO
VA
MD
AZ
TN
NC
SC
AL
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

95%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$13M · 49 repeat orgs$710k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +53% since the first grant, against +41% for those funded once.

49 repeat relationships: 33 still active in FY2025, 16 since wound down; 9 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

49
26

Total granted

$13M
$383k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+53%
+41%

Still filing today

96%
92%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 88% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $327k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Youth DevelopmentHuman ServicesEducationArts & CultureCrime & LegalRecreation & SportsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BG
    BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF TAMPA BAY INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $588k · revenue +127%
  • AA
    ABUSED AND HOMELESS CHILDREN'S REFUGE INC
    8× · 2018–2025 · $538k · revenue +75%
  • BA
    Boys and Girls Club of Placer County
    9× · 2017–2025 · $535k · revenue +104%

Funded once

  • AH
    ABUSED & HOMELESS CHILDRENS REFUGE - ALTERNATIVE H
    one grant, 2017 · $50k
  • The Houston Food Bankgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $42k · revenue +107%
  • ALL HANDS AND HEARTS SMART RESPONSE INCgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $42k · revenue +129%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Boys and Girls Clubs of Metropolitan Baltimore

To inspire and enable all young people, especially those who need us most, to realize their full potential as productive, responsible and caring citizens

Youth Development
2
The Boys & Girls Clubs Inc

To inspire and enable all young people, especially those most in need of our services, to realize and develop their full potential as productive, responsible and caring citizens in a global society.

—
3
Boys & Girls Clubs of Boston Inc

Boys & girls clubs of boston (bgcb) stands as a transformative force in boston and chelsea, where high expectations unlock greatness. we believe that every young person who walks through our doors carries limitless potential. through our…

Youth Development
4
Boys & Girls Clubs of Bandera County

Enable young people, especially those from disadvantaged circumstances to realize their full potential as productive, responsible & caring citizens.

Recreation & Sports
5
Boys & Girls Clubs of the Red River Valley

At the boys & girls clubs of the red river valley, we offer innovative out-of-school time programs designed to help youth excel in school, develop strong leadership skills, and lead healthy, productive lives. our mission is to provide a…

Youth Development
6
Boys and Girls Clubs of Silicon Valley

To inspire and empower all young people, especially those who need us most, to realize their full potential as productive, responsible and caring adults.

Youth Development
7
Boys & Girls Club of Northwest Colo

The mission of the clubs is to enable and inspire the youth of our area to reach their full potential as productive, responsible and caring citizens. the clubs offers core programs designed to engage youth with peers and caring adults to…

Youth Development
8
Boys and Girls Clubs of the Twin Cities

To enable young people, especially those who need us most, to reach their full potential as productive, caring, responsible citizens. for more information visit www.boysandgirls.org.

Youth Development
9
Boys & Girls Club of the Greater Chippewa Valley Inc

The boys & girls clubs of the greater chippewa valley's mission is to inspire and enable all young people, especially those who need us most, to realize their full potential as productive, responsible, caring citizens.

Youth Development
10
Boys and Girls Club of Augusta/Waynesboro

To enable all young people, especially those who need us most, to reach their full potential as productive, caring and responsible citizens.

Youth Development
11
Boys & Girls Club of Pbc

The mission of the boys & girls club of palm beach county is to inspire and assist all young people, especially those who need them most, to realize their full potential as productive, responsible and caring citizens.

Youth Development
12
Boys & Girls Clubs of Southwest Virginia Inc

To enable and inspire all young people, ages five to eighteen, especially those who need us most, to realize their full potential as productive, responsible, and caring citizens.

Youth Development
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Boys and Girls Clubs of Middle Tennessee; the most unlike its peers is The Roc Charlotte Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

84 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 84 of the 87 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
28
Early backer (in before they grew)
83/84
Grantees still filing
56/84
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF TAMPA BAY INC: $587,500 · Youth DevelopmentBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF TAMPA BAY INCBoys and Girls Clubs of Greater Houston Inc: $472,500 · Youth DevelopmentBoys and Girls Clubs of Greater Ho…BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF METRO RICHMOND: $440,900 · Youth DevelopmentBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF METRO RICHMO…BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF NORTHWEST SAN DIEGO COUNTY INC: $436,000 · Youth DevelopmentBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF NORTHWEST SA…Boys & Girls Clubs of Metro Atlanta Inc: $400,000 · Youth DevelopmentBoys & Girls Clubs of Metro Atlant…BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF GREATER DALLAS INC: $280,000 · Youth DevelopmentBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF GREATER DALL…BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS NORTH SAN MATEO COUNTY: $275,000 · Youth DevelopmentBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS NORTH SAN MATEO…FUTURE FOR KIDS: $228,000 · Youth DevelopmentFUTURE FOR KIDSBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF GREATER SAN DIEGO: $211,000 · Youth DevelopmentBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF GREATER TARRANT COUNTY INC: $180,000 · Youth DevelopmentSEVEN TEPEES YOUTH PROGRAM: $140,000 · Youth Development+16 more: $457,459 · Youth Development+16 moreABUSED AND HOMELESS CHILDREN'S REFUGE INC: $537,500 · Human ServicesABUSED AND HOMELESS CHILDRE…PENDLETON PLACE INC: $476,000 · Human ServicesPENDLETON PLACE INCTHE CENTER FOR CHILDREN & YOUNG ADULTS: $469,000 · Human ServicesTHE CENTER FOR CHILDREN & Y…GIRLS INCORPORATED OF ALAMEDA COUNTY: $377,500 · Human ServicesGIRLS INCORPORATED OF ALAME…HELPING ADVANCE AND NURTURE THE DEVELOPMENT OF YOUTH INC (HANDY INC): $282,500 · Human ServicesHELPING ADVANCE AND NURTURE…BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS IN NEW JERSEY INC: $225,500 · Human ServicesBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS IN NEW J…YOUTH AND FAMILY ALLIANCE: $215,000 · Human ServicesYOUTH AND FAMILY ALLIANCEUNITED FRIENDS OF THE CHILDREN: $187,500 · Human ServicesUNITED FRIENDS OF THE CHILD…MARGARET FULLER NEIGHBORHOOD HOUSE: $160,000 · Human ServicesYOUTHCARE: $160,000 · Human Services+7 more: $213,000 · Human Services+7 moreBoys and Girls Club of Placer County: $535,000 · OtherBoys and Girls Club of Placer Count…THE PENINSULA BRIDGE PROGRAM: $445,500 · OtherTHE PENINSULA BRIDGE PROGRAMBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF DURHAM AND ORANGE COUNTIES: $419,000 · OtherBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF DURHAM AND OR…GIRLS INCORPORATED OF METROPOLITAN DALLAS: $316,000 · OtherGIRLS INCORPORATED OF METROPOLITAN …BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF OAKLAND: $270,000 · OtherBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF OAKLANDBOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF METRO DENVER INC: $260,500 · OtherBOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF METRO DENVE…ST FRANCIS NEIGHBORHOOD CENTER: $237,500 · OtherST FRANCIS NEIGHBORHOOD CENTERThe YouthVantage Alliance: $200,500 · OtherHELPING ADVANCE AND NURTURE THE DEVELOPMENT OF YOU: $175,000 · OtherWALTHAM BOYS & GIRLS CLUB INC: $148,000 · OtherYOUTH ASSISTANCE COALITION INC: $286,000 · OtherYOUTH ASSISTANCE COALITION INCGALLATIN SHALOM ZONE INC: $257,000 · OtherGALLATIN SHALOM ZONE INCLIFEWORKS ENTERPRISES LLC: $200,000 · Other+16 more: $476,500 · Other+16 moreSawhorse Revolution: $345,000 · EducationACE MENTOR PROGRAM OF AMERICA INC: $145,000 · EducationThe ROC Charlotte Inc: $140,000 · EducationFRIENDS OF BALTIMORE CITY PUBLIC SCHOOLS GREAT KIDS FARM FOUNDTN IN: $50,000 · Education+4 more: $37,000 · EducationMILAGRO FOUNDATION INC: $476,000 · Arts & CultureGirls Rock Charlotte DBA We Rock Charlotte: $25,000 · Arts & CultureGIRLSTART: $457,000 · Recreation & Sports+1 more: $2,000 · Recreation & SportsNew Pathways For Youth: $325,000 · Crime & LegalPROJECT PAVE INC: $25,000 · Crime & Legal
Youth Development$4,108,359Human Services$3,303,500Other$4,226,500Education$717,000Arts & Culture$501,000Recreation & Sports$459,000Crime & Legal$350,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF TAMPA BAY INC: $587,500 over 9y, 1.6% of budgetABUSED AND HOMELESS CHILDREN'S REFUGE INC: $537,500 over 8y, 2.4% of budgetBoys and Girls Club of Placer County: $535,000 over 9y, 6.1% of budgetMILAGRO FOUNDATION INC: $476,000 over 9y, 6.4% of budgetPENDLETON PLACE INC: $476,000 over 8y, 3.2% of budgetBoys and Girls Clubs of Greater Houston Inc: $472,500 over 9y, 1.5% of budgetTHE CENTER FOR CHILDREN & YOUNG ADULTS: $469,000 over 9y, 3.6% of budgetGIRLSTART: $457,000 over 7y, 5.4% of budgetTHE PENINSULA BRIDGE PROGRAM: $445,500 over 9y, 1.7% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF METRO RICHMOND: $440,900 over 9y, 1.8% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF NORTHWEST SAN DIEGO COUNTY INC: $436,000 over 9y, 1.1% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF DURHAM AND ORANGE COUNTIES: $419,000 over 9y, 7.4% of budgetBoys & Girls Clubs of Metro Atlanta Inc: $400,000 over 9y, 0.2% of budgetGIRLS INCORPORATED OF ALAMEDA COUNTY: $377,500 over 9y, 0.8% of budgetSawhorse Revolution: $345,000 over 7y, 10% of budgetNew Pathways For Youth: $325,000 over 9y, 1.4% of budgetGIRLS INCORPORATED OF METROPOLITAN DALLAS: $316,000 over 9y, 2.6% of budgetYOUTH ASSISTANCE COALITION INC: $286,000 over 5y, 12% of budgetHELPING ADVANCE AND NURTURE THE DEVELOPMENT OF YOUTH INC (HANDY INC): $282,500 over 7y, 1.1% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF GREATER DALLAS INC: $280,000 over 9y, 0.6% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS NORTH SAN MATEO COUNTY: $275,000 over 6y, 3.3% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF OAKLAND: $270,000 over 4y, 2.8% of budgetBOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF METRO DENVER INC: $260,500 over 8y, 0.2% of budgetGALLATIN SHALOM ZONE INC: $257,000 over 4y, 26% of budgetST FRANCIS NEIGHBORHOOD CENTER: $237,500 over 7y, 2.2% of budgetFUTURE FOR KIDS: $228,000 over 8y, 6.1% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS IN NEW JERSEY INC: $225,500 over 7y, 6.7% of budgetYOUTH AND FAMILY ALLIANCE: $215,000 over 5y, 0.5% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF GREATER SAN DIEGO: $211,000 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetThe YouthVantage Alliance: $200,500 over 7y, 1.3% of budgetLIFEWORKS ENTERPRISES LLC: $200,000 over 4y, 17% of budgetUNITED FRIENDS OF THE CHILDREN: $187,500 over 6y, 0.6% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF GREATER TARRANT COUNTY INC: $180,000 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetMARGARET FULLER NEIGHBORHOOD HOUSE: $160,000 over 5y, 5.7% of budgetYOUTHCARE: $160,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetWALTHAM BOYS & GIRLS CLUB INC: $148,000 over 3y, 1.4% of budgetACE MENTOR PROGRAM OF AMERICA INC: $145,000 over 4y, 58% of budgetThe ROC Charlotte Inc: $140,000 over 6y, 5.1% of budgetSEVEN TEPEES YOUTH PROGRAM: $140,000 over 4y, 4.4% of budgetNEW IMAGE YOUTH CENTER: $120,000 over 3y, 3.9% of budgetTHE CHILDREN'S HOME SOCIETY OF FLORIDA: $100,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetGIRLS INCORPORATED OF ORANGE COUNTY: $85,000 over 2y, 2.3% of budgetBOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF MIDDLE TENNESSEE: $60,000 over 3y, 0.7% of budgetourBRIDGE Inc: $50,000 over 1y, 1.8% of budgetBOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF TRACY: $50,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetFRIENDS OF BALTIMORE CITY PUBLIC SCHOOLS GREAT KIDS FARM FOUNDTN IN: $50,000 over 1y, 11% of budgetSilicon Valley Community Foundation: $43,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe Houston Food Bank: $42,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF TAMPA BAY INC ↗
  • Who funds ABUSED AND HOMELESS CHILDREN'S REFUGE INC ↗
  • Who funds Boys and Girls Club of Placer County ↗
  • Who funds MILAGRO FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds PENDLETON PLACE INC ↗
  • Who funds Boys and Girls Clubs of Greater Houston Inc ↗
  • Who funds THE CENTER FOR CHILDREN & YOUNG ADULTS ↗
  • Who funds GIRLSTART ↗
  • Who funds THE PENINSULA BRIDGE PROGRAM ↗
  • Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF METRO RICHMOND ↗
  • Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF NORTHWEST SAN DIEGO COUNTY INC ↗
  • Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF DURHAM AND ORANGE COUNTIES ↗
  • Who funds Boys & Girls Clubs of Metro Atlanta Inc ↗
  • Who funds GIRLS INCORPORATED OF ALAMEDA COUNTY ↗
  • Who funds Sawhorse Revolution ↗
  • Who funds New Pathways For Youth ↗
  • Who funds GIRLS INCORPORATED OF METROPOLITAN DALLAS ↗
  • Who funds YOUTH ASSISTANCE COALITION INC ↗
  • Who funds HELPING ADVANCE AND NURTURE THE DEVELOPMENT OF YOUTH INC (HANDY INC) ↗
  • Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF GREATER DALLAS INC ↗
  • Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS NORTH SAN MATEO COUNTY ↗
  • Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF OAKLAND ↗
  • Who funds BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF METRO DENVER INC ↗
  • Who funds GALLATIN SHALOM ZONE INC ↗
  • Who funds ST FRANCIS NEIGHBORHOOD CENTER ↗
  • Who funds FUTURE FOR KIDS ↗
  • Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS IN NEW JERSEY INC ↗
  • Who funds YOUTH AND FAMILY ALLIANCE ↗
  • Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF GREATER SAN DIEGO ↗
  • Who funds The YouthVantage Alliance ↗
  • Who funds LIFEWORKS ENTERPRISES LLC ↗
  • Who funds UNITED FRIENDS OF THE CHILDREN ↗
  • Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF GREATER TARRANT COUNTY INC ↗
  • Who funds MARGARET FULLER NEIGHBORHOOD HOUSE ↗
  • Who funds YOUTHCARE ↗
  • Who funds WALTHAM BOYS & GIRLS CLUB INC ↗
  • Who funds ACE MENTOR PROGRAM OF AMERICA INC ↗
  • Who funds The ROC Charlotte Inc ↗
  • Who funds SEVEN TEPEES YOUTH PROGRAM ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Boys & Girls Clubs of…Boys & Girls Clubs of…The Gap FoundationDollar General Litera…Charles Schwab Founda…The Blackbaud Giving …Good360Rite Aid Healthy Futu…Union Pacific Foundat…Girls IncThe Rosendin Foundati…Charities Aid Foundat…
Boys & Girls Clubs of AmericaGA38.4× affinity18 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Boys & Girls Clubs of America · Boys & Girls Clubs of America (Group Return) · The Gap Foundation · Dollar General Literacy Foundation · Charles Schwab Foundation · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Good360 · Rite Aid Healthy Futures · Union Pacific Foundation · Girls Inc · The Rosendin Foundation · Charities Aid Foundation America

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization DPR Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from DPR Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%2%8%17%30%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →median 21%
  • Waltham Boys & Girls Club Inc: 29% of income from government
  • Helping Advance and Nurture the Development of Youth Inc (Handy Inc): 21% of income from government
  • The Children's Home Society of Florida: 6% of income from government
  • Pace Center for Girlsinc: 2% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
47report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to DPR Foundation?

Find your warmest path to DPR Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 87 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on DPR’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home