· Private foundation
DPR Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- $10k–50k11 grants · $277k
- $50k–250k31 grants · $2.5M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| ABUSED & HOMELESS CHILDRENS REFUGE | $125,500 |
| HELPING ADVANCE AND NURTURE THE DEVELOPMENT OF YOU | $125,000 |
| THE CENTER FOR CHILDREN AND YOUNG ADULTS INC | $125,000 |
| SAWHORSE REVOLUTION | $125,000 |
| GIRLSTART | $125,000 |
| MILAGRO FOUNDATION INC | $125,000 |
| BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF TAMPA BAY INC | $125,000 |
| YOUTH ASSISTANCE COALITION INC | $101,000 |
| PENDLETON PLACE INC | $100,000 |
| BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF OAKLAND INC | $100,000 |
| GALLATIN SHALOM ZONE INC | $100,000 |
| BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF METRO ATLANTA INC | $100,000 |
| BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF PLACER COUNTY | $100,000 |
| BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF NORTHWEST SAN DIEGO COUNTY I | $91,000 |
| WALTHAM BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB INC | $78,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $3.3M) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 60% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +53% since the first grant, against +41% for the ones you funded once.
49 repeat relationships — 33 still active in FY2025, 16 since wound down; 9 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 88% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $327k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- BGBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF TAMPA BAY INC9× · 2017–2025 · $588k · revenue +42%
- AAABUSED AND HOMELESS CHILDREN'S REFUGE INC8× · 2018–2025 · $538k · revenue +75%
- BABoys and Girls Club of Placer County9× · 2017–2025 · $535k · revenue +104%
Funded once
- AHABUSED & HOMELESS CHILDRENS REFUGE - ALTERNATIVE Hone grant, 2017 · $50k
ALL HANDS AND HEARTS SMART RESPONSE INCgraduatedone grant, 2018 · $42k · revenue +129%
The Houston Food Bankgraduatedone grant, 2017 · $42k · revenue +107%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To inspire and enable all young people, especially those who need us most, to realize their full potential as productive, responsible and caring citizens
To inspire and enable all young people, especially those most in need of our services, to realize and develop their full potential as productive, responsible and caring citizens in a global society.
Boys & girls clubs of boston (bgcb) stands as a transformative force in boston and chelsea, where high expectations unlock greatness. we believe that every young person who walks through our doors carries limitless potential. through our…
Enable young people, especially those from disadvantaged circumstances to realize their full potential as productive, responsible & caring citizens.
At the boys & girls clubs of the red river valley, we offer innovative out-of-school time programs designed to help youth excel in school, develop strong leadership skills, and lead healthy, productive lives. our mission is to provide a…
To inspire and empower all young people, especially those who need us most, to realize their full potential as productive, responsible and caring adults.
The mission of the clubs is to enable and inspire the youth of our area to reach their full potential as productive, responsible and caring citizens. the clubs offers core programs designed to engage youth with peers and caring adults to…
To enable young people, especially those who need us most, to reach their full potential as productive, caring, responsible citizens. for more information visit www.boysandgirls.org.
The boys & girls clubs of the greater chippewa valley's mission is to inspire and enable all young people, especially those who need us most, to realize their full potential as productive, responsible, caring citizens.
To enable all young people, especially those who need us most, to reach their full potential as productive, caring and responsible citizens.
The mission of the boys & girls club of palm beach county is to inspire and assist all young people, especially those who need them most, to realize their full potential as productive, responsible and caring citizens.
To enable and inspire all young people, ages five to eighteen, especially those who need us most, to realize their full potential as productive, responsible, and caring citizens.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Boys and Girls Clubs of Middle Tennessee and the most unlike its peers is The Roc Charlotte Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 42 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 1% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
83 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 83 of the 87 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF TAMPA BAY INC ↗
- Who funds ABUSED AND HOMELESS CHILDREN'S REFUGE INC ↗
- Who funds Boys and Girls Club of Placer County ↗
- Who funds MILAGRO FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds PENDLETON PLACE INC ↗
- Who funds Boys and Girls Clubs of Greater Houston Inc ↗
- Who funds THE CENTER FOR CHILDREN & YOUNG ADULTS ↗
- Who funds GIRLSTART ↗
- Who funds THE PENINSULA BRIDGE PROGRAM ↗
- Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF METRO RICHMOND ↗
- Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF NORTHWEST SAN DIEGO COUNTY INC ↗
- Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF DURHAM AND ORANGE COUNTIES ↗
- Who funds Boys & Girls Clubs of Metro Atlanta Inc ↗
- Who funds GIRLS INCORPORATED OF ALAMEDA COUNTY ↗
- Who funds Sawhorse Revolution ↗
- Who funds New Pathways For Youth ↗
- Who funds GIRLS INCORPORATED OF METROPOLITAN DALLAS ↗
- Who funds YOUTH ASSISTANCE COALITION INC ↗
- Who funds HELPING ADVANCE AND NURTURE THE DEVELOPMENT OF YOUTH INC (HANDY INC) ↗
- Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF GREATER DALLAS INC ↗
- Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS NORTH SAN MATEO COUNTY ↗
- Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF OAKLAND ↗
- Who funds BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF METRO DENVER INC ↗
- Who funds GALLATIN SHALOM ZONE INC ↗
- Who funds ST FRANCIS NEIGHBORHOOD CENTER ↗
- Who funds FUTURE FOR KIDS ↗
- Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS IN NEW JERSEY INC ↗
- Who funds YOUTH AND FAMILY ALLIANCE ↗
- Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF GREATER SAN DIEGO ↗
- Who funds The YouthVantage Alliance ↗
- Who funds LIFEWORKS ENTERPRISES LLC ↗
- Who funds UNITED FRIENDS OF THE CHILDREN ↗
- Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF GREATER TARRANT COUNTY INC ↗
- Who funds MARGARET FULLER NEIGHBORHOOD HOUSE ↗
- Who funds YOUTHCARE ↗
- Who funds WALTHAM BOYS & GIRLS CLUB INC ↗
- Who funds ACE MENTOR PROGRAM OF AMERICA INC ↗
- Who funds SEVEN TEPEES YOUTH PROGRAM ↗
- Who funds The ROC Charlotte Inc ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Boys & Girls Clubs of America · Boys & Girls Clubs of America (Group Return) · The Gap Foundation · Dollar General Literacy Foundation · Charles Schwab Foundation · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Good360 · Rite Aid Healthy Futures · Union Pacific Foundation · Girls Inc · The Rosendin Foundation · Charities Aid Foundation America
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization DPR Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Waltham Boys & Girls Club Inc — 29% of income from government
- Helping Advance and Nurture the Development of Youth Inc (Handy Inc) — 21% of income from government
- The Children's Home Society of Florida — 6% of income from government
- Pace Center for Girlsinc — 2% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to DPR Foundation?
Find your warmest path to DPR Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.