Skip to content

· Public charity

Downtown Business Improvement District Corporation

To enhance the economic vitality of the members of the downtown bid area by providing additional safety and maintenance services, and other services.

$1.1M
Granted FY2021
121
Grants FY2021
2
States reached
$15k
Largest
01What it funds
01FY2021 · 121 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 121 grants below total $1,008,000, the rows itemized in this filing. The $1,105,511 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $97,511 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2021

  • Under $10k87 grants · $583k
  • $10k–50k34 grants · $425k
$7,500
Median grant
2
States reached
$19M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
FORD'S THEATRE$15,000
OYAMEL DC LLC$15,000
CUBA LIBRE DC LLC$15,000
NATIONAL THEATRE$15,000
PARK PLACE INC$15,000
SHAKESPEARE THEATRE COMPANY$15,000
WHITE HOUSE GIFT CENTER WHGC LLC$15,000
JOE'S SEAFOOD PRIME$15,000
COMPASS COFFEE$15,000
RPM DC LLC CO LETTUCE ENTERTAIN YOU ENTERPRISES$15,000
MEZZE AND MORE LLC DBA ZAYTINYA$15,000
1201 K STREET F&B TENANT LLC DBA AMERICAN SON WILD DAYS KINTSUGI & ALLEG$15,000
TYM MERGER COMPANY LLC DBA JALEO$15,000
WARNER THEATRE$15,000
FARMERS AND DISTILLERS DC LLC$15,000
02The need
02

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY21–21) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%SHAKESPEARE THEATRE COMPANY: $15k → 14%COMPASS COFFEE: $15k → 14%WHITE HOUSE GIFT CENTER WHGC LLC: $15k → 14%1201 K STREET F&B TENANT LLC DBA AMERICAN SON WILD DAYS KINTSUGI & ALLEG: $15k → 14%JOE'S SEAFOOD PRIME: $15k → 14%STEAKHOUSE DC LLC: $11k → 14%BOBBY VAN'S STEAKHOUSE: $11k → 14%BIBIANA LLC: $11k → 14%RPM RESTAURANT LLC TA SHELLY'S BACK ROOM: $11k → 14%D&A NAILS SPA LLC: $9k → 14%PDC NY AVE INC: $9k → 14%TJ ENTERPRISE LLC: $9k → 14%P&D VENTURES INC (OPERATING AS EYE STREET GRILL): $9k → 14%PAUL FRENCH BAKERY AND CAFE - PAUL 1275 K LLC: $9k → 14%MIKES CAFE INC: $9k → 14%LA TRATTORIA LLC CO SIROC RESTAURANT: $9k → 14%FARMERS AND DISTILLERS DC LLC: $15k → 14%RPM DC LLC CO LETTUCE ENTERTAIN YOU ENTERPRISES: $15k → 14%CUBA LIBRE DC LLC: $15k → 14%CHEF AMY B LLCCENTROLINAPICCOLINA: $12k → 14%TWICE-BAKED LLC: $11k → 14%WINNERS CHINATOWN INC: $11k → 14%BANTAM KING: $11k → 14%CHINATOWN GARDEN INC: $11k → 14%THE DUBLINER RESTAURANT & PUB: $11k → 14%DESTINATIONDC: $10k → 14%SMITHSONIAN AMERICAN ART MUSEUM: $10k → 14%TAMAK SPN LLC: $10k → 14%STARLIGHT INC: $9k → 14%SOOK AND HO INC: $9k → 14%PUBLIC HOUSE: $9k → 14%TONY CHENG'S RESTAURANT: $9k → 14%BP GROUP INC DBA ROYAL THAI CUISINE: $9k → 14%TYM MERGER COMPANY LLC DBA JALEO: $15k → 14%FORD'S THEATRE: $15k → 14%OYAMEL DC LLC: $15k → 14%MEZZE AND MORE LLC DBA ZAYTINYA: $15k → 14%NATIONAL THEATRE: $15k → 14%WARNER THEATRE: $15k → 14%RASIKA LLC: $12k → 14%BENTO BOX INC TRADING AS TEAISM PENN QUARTER RESTAURANT: $11k → 14%TOP SHELF LLC: $11k → 14%WOOLLY MAMMOTH THEATRE: $10k → 14%ELLA'S WOOD FIRED PIZZA LLC: $9k → 14%POTOMAC RIVER RUNNING INC: $9k → 14%CENTERPOINT NINE INC: $9k → 14%505 NINTH STREET PARTNERS LLC DBA MINIBARBARMINI: $11k → 14%SELDAR DC HOLDINGS LLC: $10k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Center for International Theatre Development
Arts & Culture
2
The Studio Theatre Inc

Studio Theatre produces exceptional contemporary theatre in deliberately intimate spaces, fostering a more thoughtful, more empathetic, and more connected community, in Washington DC and beyond.

Arts & Culture
3
Theater Alliance of Washington Dc

It is the mission of the Theater Alliance of Washington DC to develop, produce, and present socially conscious, thought-provoking work that fully engages the community in active dialogue.

Arts & Culture
4
Staretthe Directors Company Inc

The Directors Company is an award-winning not-for-profit theatre company with an extraordinary record in its mission to develop and produce groundbreaking new plays and musicals initiated and generated by outstanding directorial talent,…

Arts & Culture
5
Women's Project & Productions Inc

Wp theater is the nation's oldest and largest theater company dedicated to developing, producing, and promoting the work of women+ at every stage of their careers. for over four decades we have served as leaders of a global movement…

Arts & Culture
6
Washington Community Theatre

Provide a low cost theatre options for the community of washington

Arts & Culture
7
The Andrew Keegan Theatre Company the Keegan Theatre

To take audiences to the vital heart of the theatre experience. Extraordinary artists in an intimate setting exploring the human condition. To foster connections and positive change in our community through vigorous, inclusive, empowering…

Arts & Culture
8
Center Stage Associates Inc

See schedule o.inspired by our home city, baltimore center stage acts as a cultural catalyst for all communities to access theater in every form and engage in compelling conversations. programming: capture the collective imagination and…

Arts & Culture
9
Classic Theatre of Maryland Inc

Classic Theatre of Marylands mission is to produce bold re-imagined entertaining and accessible interpretations of classical works contemporary plays and musicals with a core commitment to the works of Shakespeare and other major…

Arts & Culture
10
A Contemporary Theatre Inc

Organization mission: act is a contemporary theatre where artistic ambition and civic engagement unite. organization vision: act envisions a world where the power of theatre expands our collective understanding of community and our own…

Arts & Culture
11
Synetic Theater Inc

Washington DCs premier contemporary physical theater seeks to redefine theatre by devising a unique and innoivative blend of stage movement, dance, text, and music while investing in artists growth, and creating unforgettable visceral…

Arts & Culture
12
Theatre for a New Audience Inc

The mission of theatre for a new audience is to develop and vitalize the performance and study of shakespeare and classic drama. the theatre is dedicated to the language and ideas of writers - to a dialogue over centuries between…

Arts & Culture
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Theatrewashington; the most unlike its peers is Smithsonian Institution. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
03the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 119 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/11
Grantees still filing
10/11
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

+109 more: $911,000 · Other+109 moreTHE SHAKESPEARE THEATRE: $15,000 · Arts & CultureFORD'S THEATRE SOCIETY: $15,000 · Arts & CultureTHE NATIONAL THEATRE FOUNDATION: $15,000 · Arts & CultureSMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION: $10,000 · Arts & CultureWoolly Mammoth Theatre Company Inc: $10,000 · Arts & CultureTHEATRE DOWNTOWN INC: $5,000 · Arts & CultureTHE THEATRE LAB INC: $5,000 · Arts & CultureCHAMBER DANCE PROJECT: $5,000 · Arts & CultureWASHINGTON DC CONVENTION & TOURISM CORPORATION: $10,000 · Community ImprovementSIXTH & I SYNAGOGUE INC: $7,000 · Religion
Other$911,000Arts & Culture$80,000Community Improvement$10,000Religion$7,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE SHAKESPEARE THEATRE: $15,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFORD'S THEATRE SOCIETY: $15,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetTHE NATIONAL THEATRE FOUNDATION: $15,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetTHEATREWASHINGTON: $10,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetWASHINGTON DC CONVENTION & TOURISM CORPORATION: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWoolly Mammoth Theatre Company Inc: $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetSIXTH & I SYNAGOGUE INC: $7,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHEATRE DOWNTOWN INC: $5,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetTHE THEATRE LAB INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetCHAMBER DANCE PROJECT: $5,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE SHAKESPEARE THEATRE ↗
  • Who funds FORD'S THEATRE SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds THE NATIONAL THEATRE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds THEATREWASHINGTON ↗
  • Who funds WASHINGTON DC CONVENTION & TOURISM CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION ↗
  • Who funds Woolly Mammoth Theatre Company Inc ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

City First Enterprises IncDC75.1× affinity43 shared granteesties to 1 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: City First Enterprises Inc · Latino Economic Development Corporation · Max & Victoria Dreyfus Foundation Inc · Dimick Foundation John M Lynham Jr Trustee · Clark-Winchcole Foundation · Nora Roberts Foundation · Greater Washington Community Foundation · The Morris and Gwendolyn Cafritz Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Downtown Business Improvement District Corporation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Downtown Business Improvement District Corporation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 119 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2021, released 2021. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2025) is on record and reports no grant expense, so the figures above are from FY2021, the most recent year this funder made grants.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Downtown Business Improvement District’s filings →

    More from the funding graph