· Private foundation
Doty Family Foundation
Its FY2026 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2026.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2026
- Under $10k68 grants · $168k
- $10k–50k7 grants · $150k
- $50k–250k4 grants · $365k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA | $142,470 |
| A CHANCE FOR LIFE | $97,030 |
| JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY | $75,000 |
| CATHOLIC NEAR EAST WELFARE ASSOCIATION | $50,000 |
| IONA PREPARATORY | $45,829 |
| FORDHAM UNIVERSITY | $19,514 |
| CONVENT OF THE SACRED HEART | $19,425 |
| ST DAVID'S SCHOOL | $19,425 |
| HORACE MANN SCHOOL | $19,425 |
| JAMES WILSON INSTITUTE | $15,000 |
| GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY | $11,100 |
| CITYMEALS ON WHEELS | $9,750 |
| CAMBRIDGE IN AMERICA | $9,300 |
| NAMI WESTCHESTER | $9,000 |
| LOYOLA UNIVERSITY MARYLAND | $7,650 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY22–26, $58k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 93% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +16% since the first grant, against +6% for the ones you funded once.
103 repeat relationships — 63 still active in FY2026, 40 since wound down; 14 grantees were first funded in FY2026 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2026, 84% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $86k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY3× · 2024–2026 · $117k · revenue +1%
GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY5× · 2022–2026 · $58k · revenue +16%- CCITYMEALS-ON-WHEELS5× · 2022–2026 · $58k · revenue +1%
Funded once
- TSTHE SOCIETY FOR THE PROPAGATION OF THE FAITHone grant, 2022 · $89k
- GCGRACE CHURCHone grant, 2022 · $50k
- CNCAHOLIC NEAR EAST WELFARE ASSOCIATIONone grant, 2022 · $50k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To educate students to be ethical and socially responsible leaders in a global community.
The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.
The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…
Research, education and general - princeton university is a private not-for-profit, non-sectarian institution of higher learning with approximately 5,700 undergraduate and 3,300 graduate students. 2,500 students graduated in the 2024-2025…
Nyu is a private university with approximately 60,000 matriculating students in 20 schools and institutes. nyu's primary missions are education, research and scholarship, and patient care.
The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.
Seton hall university is a catholic institution of higher education
Northeast college of health sciences (the college) is committed to academic excellence, leadership, and professional best practices in the health sciences.
Manhattan university is an independent catholic instituion of higher learning that embraces qualified men and women of all faiths, cultures, and traditions. the mission of manhattan university is to provide a contemporary, person-centered…
Education and Research
Dartmouth College educates the most promising students and prepares them for a lifetime of learning and of responsible leadership, through a faculty dedicated to teaching and the creation of knowledge.
Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Fordham University and the most unlike its peers is Right Move Chess Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 44 years old; the field is 18. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 19% startups (under 5 years old) — 2% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 10% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
125 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2026, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 125 of the 200 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA ↗
- Who funds JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds CHANCE FOR LIFE ↗
- Who funds Fordham University ↗
- Who funds WHITE MOUNTAIN YOUTH HOCKEY ↗
- Who funds GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds CITYMEALS-ON-WHEELS ↗
- Who funds JAMES WILSON INSTITUTE FOR NATURAL RIGHTS AND THE AMERICAN FOUNDING ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL ALLIANCE ON MENTAL ILLNESS OF W ESTCHESTER INC ↗
- Who funds HOUR CHILDREN INC ↗
- Who funds CAMBRIDGE IN AMERICA ↗
- Who funds SISTER OF MARY BOYSTOWN AND GIRLSTOWN INC ↗
- Who funds Stem Advantage ↗
- Who funds LIFTING UP WESTCHESTER INC ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL PKU ALLIANCE INC ↗
- Who funds Nutritionfactsorg Inc ↗
- Who funds MCDONOGH SCHOOL INCORPORATED ↗
- Who funds THE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK ↗
- Who funds Horace Mann School ↗
- Who funds PARENTS OF PS 9 INC ↗
- Who funds CONNECTICUT FOODSHARE INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Hyde and Watson Foundation · Jewish Communal Fund · Equitable Foundation Inc · The New York Community Trust · Bristol-Myers Squibb Foundation Inc · Bny Mellon Charitable Gift Fund · The Robert Wood Johnson Foundation · Texas Instruments Foundation · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · Community Foundation of New Jersey · Arthur J Gallagher Foundation · Princeton Area Community Foundation Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Doty Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Mount Carmel Guild of Trenton Nj — 100% of income from government
- Johns Hopkins University — 12% of income from government
- Associated Catholic Charities Inc — 10% of income from government
- Nantucket Maria Mitchell Association in — 9% of income from government
- Homefront Inc — 9% of income from government
- Als Therapy Development Foundation Inc — 8% of income from government
- President and Fellows of Harvard College — 7% of income from government
- Loyola University Maryland Inc — 6% of income from government
- Connecticut Foodshare Inc — 5% of income from government
- Babson College — 3% of income from government
- Trustees of Boston College — 3% of income from government
- President and Fellows of Middlebury College — 1% of income from government
- Connecticut College — 0% of income from government
- Amherst College Trustees — 0% of income from government
- Greenwich Hospital — 0% of income from government
- Mcdonogh School Incorporated — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Doty Family Foundation?
Find your warmest path to Doty Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.