Skip to content

· Private foundation

Dorothy & Chester Smith Charitable Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$74k
Granted FY2024still arriving
42
Grants FY2024still arriving
14
States reached
$16k
Largest
01What it funds
0193% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Human Services$526kReligion$153kHealth$88kAnimals$25kEducation$11kScience & Tech$10kCommunity Improvement$10kYouth Development$10kOther$0
02FY2024 · 42 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k40 grants · $43k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $31k
$1,000
Median grant
14
States reached
$1.5M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
LACNETS FOUNDATION$16,000
ALL SAINTS BY THE SEA$15,444
NET RESEARCH FOUNDATION$5,300
SINGLE MOTHERS OUTREACH OF SANTA CL$5,000
ACTON METHODIST CHURCH$2,500
Individual grant recipient$2,000
VELVET ASHES$1,500
Individual grant recipient$1,500
TEAM EXPANSION$1,500
SANTA BARBARA AFE FOUNDATION$1,400
FOOD BANK SANTA BARBARA$1,200
WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN$1,100
DIRECT RELIEF$1,000
PEO FOUNDATION$1,000
SANTA BARBARA RESCUE MISSION$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–24, $20k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 87% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%NORTHAMPTON SURVIVAL CTR: $1k → 12%PIONEER VALLEY WORKERS CTR: $1k → 12%MISSION BRANBURY: $2k → 10%MISSION GRANDBURY: $300 → 10%MISSION GRANDBURY: $300 → 10%SINGLE MOTHERS OUTREACH: $15k → 14%UNITY SHOPPE INC: $1k → 14%LANGE FOUNDATION: $100 → 14%LANGE FOUNDATION: $100 → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
NY
MA
SD
IA
IN
OH
PA
CA
UT
CO
MO
KY
WV
KS
NC
DC
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

94%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$858k · 38 repeat orgs$56k to everyone else

38 repeat relationships: 22 still active in FY2024, 16 since wound down; 20 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

38
24

Total granted

$858k
$41k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+29%
+33%

Still filing today

47%
58%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 79% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $15k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
AnimalsHuman ServicesHealthEducationCivil RightsPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • NT
    NEUROENDOCRINE TUMOR RESEARCH FOUNDATION
    6× · 2017–2022 · $30k · revenue +66%
  • WF
    WOMEN'S FUND OF SANTA BARBARA
    3× · 2022–2024 · $7k · revenue +41%
  • AS
    Animal Shelter Assistance Program
    5× · 2019–2023 · $5k · revenue +130%

Funded once

  • SM
    SINGLE MOTHERS OUTREACH INC
    one grant, 2021 · $15k · revenue +3%
  • SU
    SC UNITED METHODIST CHURCH
    one grant, 2021 · $5k
  • IS
    INTERNATIONAL STUDENT FOUNDATION INCgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $5k · revenue +33%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Santa Barbara Humane Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals

Santa barbara humane operates two campuses located in santa barbara and santa maria providing care for community-owned and homeless animals. both campuses offer affordable high quality veterinary care, compassionate behavior training…

Animals
2
Pet Orphans of Southern California

In addition to rescue and adoption, pet orphans provides a wide range of services including education, medical/financial, spay/neuter, and training assistance.

Animals
3
Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals for Monterey County

The SPCA Monterey County's Mission is assuring compassionate treatment of all animals through rescue, rehabilitation, protection and education. The SPCA shelters homeless, neglected, and abused pets, including dogs, cats, horses, exotic…

Animals
4
Marin Humane Society

Marin humane transforms lives through exceptional animal care, humane education, and advocacy. every day, marin humane inspires compassion and positive relationships between people and animals.

Animals
5
Silicon Valley Pet Project

Silicon valley pet project (svpp) is a 501(c)(3) nonprofit organization committed to saving local at-risk shelter pets through rescue, community involvement and education.

Animals
6
Rancho Coastal Humane Society

See schedule orancho coastal is dedicated to the rescue and shelter of abandoned companion animals. it encourages adoptions into loving homes and provides educational and community outreach programs designed to enhance the human-animal…

Animals
7
Shelter From the Storm Animal Rescue Inc

Reduce the euthanasia rate of healthy and adoptable animals and improve the lives of companion animals by finding permanent homes for animals in need, providing support to communities who do not have access to humane organizations,…

—
8
Humane Society of Southern Arizona

To compassionately serve pets and the people who love them.

Animals
9
Sante Dor Foundation

Sante DOr is a no-kill animal adoption center serving the Los Angeles community, predominantly staffed by volunteers.

Animals
10
Santa Maria Valley Humane Society

The santa maria valley humane society exists to rescue, shelter, heal, place, and train dogs and cats while engaging the central california coastal community to end animal homelessness.

—
11
Shelter Animal Resource Alliance

Shelter Animal Resource Alliance rescues, assists, and advocates for shelter animals in Lane County by developing and implementing programs designed to increase the number of animals adopted into permanent, loving homes and decrease the…

Animals
12
Valley Humane SocietyInc

Valley Humane Society (VHS) creates a brighter future for cats and dogs by encouraging and strengthening the bond between people and pets. VHS rescues and rehabilitates companion animals, champions responsible caretaking, shares pets'…

Animals
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Spca International Inc; the most unlike its peers is Biola University Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

46 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 46 of the 82 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
46/46
Grantees still filing
28/46
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

SINGLE MOTHERS OUTREACH OF SANTA CL: $506,170 · OtherSINGLE MOTHERS OUTREACH OF SANTA CLALL SAINTS BY THE SEA: $104,794 · OtherALL SAINTS BY THE SEALACNETS FOUNDATION: $40,000 · OtherGENERATE POSSIBILITY: $35,812 · Other+44 more: $127,149 · Other+44 moreNEUROENDOCRINE TUMOR RESEARCH FOUNDATION: $30,444 · HealthMICHAEL HOEFFLIN FOUNDATION: $5,000 · HealthTAPESTRY HEALTH SYSTEMS INC: $2,000 · Health+3 more: $2,000 · HealthSINGLE MOTHERS OUTREACH INC: $14,548 · Human ServicesMISSION GRANBURY INC: $2,600 · Human ServicesWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $1,100 · Human ServicesNORTHAMPTON SURVIVAL CENTER INC: $1,000 · Human ServicesPIONEER VALLEY WORKERS CENTER INC: $1,000 · Human ServicesUNITY SHOPPE INC: $1,000 · Human Services+1 more: $200 · Human ServicesAnimal Shelter Assistance Program: $5,150 · AnimalsHumane World for Animals Inc: $3,550 · AnimalsWEST COLUMBIA GORGE HUMANE SOCIETY: $2,500 · AnimalsBREEDER RELEASE ADOPTION SERVICE: $2,000 · AnimalsSECOND CHANCE FARM: $1,300 · AnimalsLOS ANGELES SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS: $1,200 · AnimalsDog Ranch Rescue Inc: $1,000 · AnimalsSANTA BARBARA ZOOLOGICAL FOUNDATION: $950 · Animals+5 more: $1,600 · AnimalsINTERNATIONAL STUDENT FOUNDATION INC: $5,000 · EducationPEO Foundation: $1,500 · EducationALPHA CHI OMEGA FOUNDATION INC: $1,000 · EducationPEO Educational Loan Fund: $500 · Education+1 more: $100 · EducationWOMEN'S FUND OF SANTA BARBARA: $7,050 · Philanthropy+1 more: $200 · PhilanthropySANTA BARBARA RESCUE MISSION: $4,775 · Housing & Shelter
Other$813,925Health$39,444Human Services$21,448Animals$19,250Education$8,100Philanthropy$7,250Housing & Shelter$4,775

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetNEUROENDOCRINE TUMOR RESEARCH FOUNDATION: $30,444 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetSINGLE MOTHERS OUTREACH INC: $14,548 over 1y, 3.2% of budgetWOMEN'S FUND OF SANTA BARBARA: $7,050 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetAnimal Shelter Assistance Program: $5,150 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetMICHAEL HOEFFLIN FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 5y, 1.0% of budgetINTERNATIONAL STUDENT FOUNDATION INC: $5,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetSANTA BARBARA RESCUE MISSION: $4,775 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetHOMEBOY INDUSTRIES: $4,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetHumane World for Animals Inc: $3,550 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetVELVET ASHES INCORPORATED: $3,000 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetMISSION GRANBURY INC: $2,600 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetWEST COLUMBIA GORGE HUMANE SOCIETY: $2,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetBREEDER RELEASE ADOPTION SERVICE: $2,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetTAPESTRY HEALTH SYSTEMS INC: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPEO Foundation: $1,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSECOND CHANCE FARM: $1,300 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetLOS ANGELES SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS: $1,200 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $1,100 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $1,100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDIRECT RELIEF: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCampaign For Southern Equality: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNORTHAMPTON SURVIVAL CENTER INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBLACK AND PINK INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDog Ranch Rescue Inc: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCAMAS-WASHOUGAL HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $1,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetSANTA BARBARA INTERNATIONAL FILM FESTIVAL INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPIONEER VALLEY WORKERS CENTER INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetALPHA CHI OMEGA FOUNDATION INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOALITION FOR HUMANE IMMIGRANT RIGHTS: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTransgender Law Center: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCEDARS-SINAI MEDICAL CENTER: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNITY SHOPPE INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSANTA BARBARA ZOOLOGICAL FOUNDATION: $950 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE SHRINERS' HOSPITAL FOR CHILDREN: $900 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPEO Educational Loan Fund: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSANTA BARBARA BOTANIC GARDEN: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBRIDGE TO HOME SCV: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFRENCH BULLDOG RESCUE NETWORK: $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFRENCH BULLDOG VILLAGE: $500 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetTHE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS: $300 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGOFUNDMEORG: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAUSTIN BOXER RESCUE: $200 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetLANGE FOUNDATION: $200 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetChildren's Hospital Los Angeles: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBIOLA UNIVERSITY INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSPCA INTERNATIONAL INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds NEUROENDOCRINE TUMOR RESEARCH FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds SINGLE MOTHERS OUTREACH INC ↗
  • Who funds WOMEN'S FUND OF SANTA BARBARA ↗
  • Who funds Animal Shelter Assistance Program ↗
  • Who funds MICHAEL HOEFFLIN FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds INTERNATIONAL STUDENT FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds SANTA BARBARA RESCUE MISSION ↗
  • Who funds HOMEBOY INDUSTRIES ↗
  • Who funds Humane World for Animals Inc ↗
  • Who funds VELVET ASHES INCORPORATED ↗
  • Who funds MISSION GRANBURY INC ↗
  • Who funds WEST COLUMBIA GORGE HUMANE SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds BREEDER RELEASE ADOPTION SERVICE ↗
  • Who funds TAPESTRY HEALTH SYSTEMS INC ↗
  • Who funds PEO Foundation ↗
  • Who funds SECOND CHANCE FARM ↗
  • Who funds LOS ANGELES SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS ↗
  • Who funds WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Communities Foundation of Texas IncTX14.2× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Communities Foundation of Texas Inc · Chubb Charitable Foundation · Community Foundation of North Texas (Tax · Texas Instruments Foundation · Network for Good · Boston Foundation Inc · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · Shell USA Company Foundation · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · National Philanthropic Trust · Verizon Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Dorothy & Chester Smith Charitable Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Dorothy & Chester Smith Charitable Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 30%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →median 6%
  • Tapestry Health Systems Inc: 60% of income from government
  • Pioneer Valley Workers Center Inc: 53% of income from government
  • The Shriners' Hospital for Children: 6% of income from government
  • Northampton Survival Center Inc: 3% of income from government
  • Wounded Warrior Project Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
3get no government money at all
7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
2rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Dorothy & Chester Smith Charitable Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Dorothy & Chester Smith Charitable Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 82 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Dorothy & Chester Smith’s filings →

More from the funding graph