Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation Dossiers
Plinth

· Private foundation

Donald T Regan Charitable Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$115k
Granted FY2023
6
Grants FY2023
2
States reached
$50k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2023.

Health$267kArts & Culture$263kEducation$243kAnimals$67kFood & Nutrition$25kHuman Services$20kEnvironment$17kPublic Safety & Disaster$16kOther$0
02FY2023 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2023

  • Under $10k3 grants · $15k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $50k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
$25,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$7k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SARASOTA MEMORIAL HEALTHCARE FOUNDA$50,000
PRESBYTERIAN HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION$25,000
NATIONAL DANCE INSTITUTE$25,000
The Food Depot$5,000
SANTA FE ANIMAL SHELTER$5,000
SOUTHEASTERN GUIDE DOGS INC$5,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–23, $84k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 95% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%ICM FOOD AND CLOTHING BANK: $1k → 11%The Food Depot: $5k → 12%SOUTHEASTERN GUIDE DOGS INC: $35k → 10%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $18k → 14%HOSPICE OF THE VALLEY INC: $2k → 8%BACKPACKS OF LOVE: $2k → 6%WORTHDAYS: $1k → 7%SOUTHEASTERN GUIDE DOGS INC: $10k → 10%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $2k → 14%SOUTHEASTERN GUIDE DOGS INC: $5k → 10%SOUTHEASTERN GUIDE DOGS INC: $4k → 10%SOUTHEASTERN GUIDE DOGS INC: $1k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

NY
CO
VA
AZ
NM
TN
DC
GA
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

90%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$860k · 12 repeat orgs$91k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +74% since the first grant, against +42% for the ones you funded once.

12 repeat relationships — 4 still active in FY2023, 8 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2023 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

12
23

Total granted

$860k
$81k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+74%
+42%

Still filing today

83%
91%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 91% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $10k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23
Human ServicesHealthFood & NutritionEducationInternationalAnimalsOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • ND
    NATIONAL DANCE INSTITUTE NM INC
    7× · 2017–2023 · $252k · revenue +43%
  • TS
    THE STUART HALL SCHOOL FOUNDATION
    3× · 2017–2019 · $222k · revenue +179%
  • PH
    Presbyterian Healthcare Foundation
    2× · 2019–2023 · $75k · revenue +52%

Funded once

  • CF
    CAPTAINS FOR CLEAN WATER INC
    one grant, 2019 · $15k · revenue +11%
  • WM
    WILLIAM & MARY LAW SCHOOL FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2019 · $10k · revenue +15%
  • CI
    COMMUNITIES IN SCHOOLS OF RICHMOND INCgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $5k · revenue +42%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
United Food Bank

United Food Bank unites communities to alleviate hunger.

Food & Nutrition
2
Feeding San Diego

On a mission to connect every person facing hunger with nutritious meals by maximizing food rescue. through direct service and community partnerships, feeding san diego provides more than 26 million meals each year to children, families,…

Food & Nutrition
3
Arizona Food Bank Network

Develop solutions to end hunger through food banking, public policy and innovation.

Food & Nutrition
4
Central Pennsylvania Food Bank

Our mission is to solve hunger in central pennsylvania by ensuring that everyone struggling with hunger has access to enough wholesome food every day. we will achieve this bold goal with the help of our generous donors, volunteers and…

Food & Nutrition
5
Food Forward Inc

Food forward fights hunger and prevents food waste by rescuing fresh surplus produce, connecting this abundance with people experiencing food insecurity, and inspiring others to do the same.

Food & Nutrition
6
Arkansas Foodbank

None

Food & Nutrition
7
Arizona Community Foundation

To lead, serve and collaborate to mobilize enduring philanthropy for a better arizona.

Philanthropy
8
Harvest Hope Food Bank

Harvest hope is on a mission to eliminate hunger and food insecurity in south carolina. we rescue nutritious food from stores throughout the state and distribute it to food pantries, shelters, and soup kitchens. we operate programs that…

Food & Nutrition
9
Banner -University Medical Group

Assist banner health complete its mission to make health care easier so life can be better by providing integrated & coordinated care & population health management.

Health
10
San Francisco Food Bank

To end hunger in san francisco and marin counties by soliciting food donations nationally, distributing this food to qualifying public service agencies and neighborhood pantries, advocating for improved government food programs, and…

—
11
Waste Not Inc

Waste Not cultivates sustainable food systems that help people and the planet flourish. We do this by eliminating food waste and hunger through innovative community partnerships.

Food & Nutrition
12
America's Second Harvest of the Big Bend Inc

To advance change by feeding the hungry and educating and engaging the community in the fight to end hunger.

Food & Nutrition

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Wounded Warrior Project Inc and the most unlike its peers is American Diabetes Association. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyProfessional Ballet Compani…Animal Rescue and AdoptionCommunity Health CentersFood Pantries & AssistanceChild and Family ServicesHospice Care ServicesYouth Sports Booster Organi…Homeless Services & ShelterAffordable Housing Developm…Cancer Support OrganizationsPublic University Foundatio…Veteran Support ServicesLand Conservation Organizat…
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 37 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%0%<5yr14%0%5–10yr19%17%10–20yr16%31%20–35yr13%35%35–55yr16%17%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%0%<5yr14%0%5–10yr19%4%10–20yr16%80%20–35yr13%13%35–55yr16%3%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/33
the rest of the field
13%
240,396/1,819,532

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

33 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 33 of the 37 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
33/33
Grantees still filing
28/33
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

NATIONAL DANCE INSTITUTE NM INC — $252,040 · Arts & CultureNATIONAL DANCE INSTITUTE NM IN…THE STUART HALL SCHOOL FOUNDATION — $222,000 · EducationTHE STUART HALL SCHOOL FOUND…WILLIAM & MARY LAW SCHOOL FOUNDATION — $10,000 · Education+1 more — $6,000 · EducationSARASOTA MEMORIAL HEALTHCARE FOUNDA — $169,740 · OtherSARASOTA MEMORIAL HEALTHCARE…ST PAULS EPISCOPAL CHURCH FOUNDATION — $24,928 · OtherST PAULS EPISCOPAL CHURCH FO…CAPTAINS FOR CLEAN WATER INC — $15,000 · OtherCAPTAINS FOR CLEAN WATER INC+11 more — $33,500 · Other+11 morePresbyterian Healthcare Foundation — $75,000 · HealthPresbyteria…American Diabetes Association — $7,000 · HealthAmerican Di…AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC — $5,000 · HealthAMERICAN CA…American Heart Association Inc — $5,000 · HealthAmerican He…+1 more — $1,000 · HealthSoutheastern Guide Dogs Inc — $54,500 · Human ServicesSoutheaste…WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC — $19,275 · Human ServicesWOUNDED WA…THE FOOD DEPOT — $5,000 · Human ServicesTHE FOOD D…+4 more — $5,500 · Human Services+4 moreWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC — $15,912 · InternationalHABITAT FOR HUMANITY INTERNATIONAL INC — $5,000 · InternationalUNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF — $2,000 · InternationalALL FAITHS FOOD BANK INC — $7,925 · Food & NutritionATLANTA COMMUNITY FOOD BANK INC — $6,000 · Food & NutritionFEED MORE INC — $2,000 · Food & NutritionST MARY'S FOOD BANK ALLIANCE — $1,500 · Food & Nutrition
Arts & Culture$252,040Education$238,000Other$243,168Health$93,000Human Services$84,275International$22,912Food & Nutrition$17,425

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetNATIONAL DANCE INSTITUTE NM INC — $252,040 over 7y, 1.8% of budgetTHE STUART HALL SCHOOL FOUNDATION — $222,000 over 3y, 6.5% of budgetPresbyterian Healthcare Foundation — $75,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetSoutheastern Guide Dogs Inc — $54,500 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC — $19,275 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC — $15,912 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCAPTAINS FOR CLEAN WATER INC — $15,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetWILLIAM & MARY LAW SCHOOL FOUNDATION — $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetALL FAITHS FOOD BANK INC — $7,925 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Diabetes Association — $7,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetATLANTA COMMUNITY FOOD BANK INC — $6,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetST STEPHEN'S AND ST AGNES SCHOOL FOUNDATION — $6,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetCOMMUNITIES IN SCHOOLS OF RICHMOND INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSANTA FE ANIMAL SHELTER AND HUMANE SOCIETY INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE FOOD DEPOT — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetEmergency Shelter Inc — $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHABITAT FOR HUMANITY INTERNATIONAL INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDENVER DUMB FRIENDS LEAGUE — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUMOM NEW DAY CENTERS INC — $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSPECIAL OLYMPICS ARIZONA INC — $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetK9S FOR WARRIORS INC — $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetARIZONA LAND AND WATER TRUST INC — $2,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFEED MORE INC — $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBACKPACKS OF LOVE INC — $2,000 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetUNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF — $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetST MARY'S FOOD BANK ALLIANCE — $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHOSPICE OF THE VALLEY INC — $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBetter2gether RVA — $1,000 over 1y, 1.8% of budgetNOURISHPHX — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetASK CHILDHOOD CANCER FOUNDATION — $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

McKesson Foundation I…The Community Foundat…American Endowment Fo…Dominion Energy Chari…Carmax FoundationMorgan Stanley Global…Enterprise Holdings F…The Bank of America C…Renaissance Charitabl…Charities Aid Foundat…National Philanthropi…Jpmorgan Chase Founda…
McKesson Foundation IncTX16.4× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: McKesson Foundation Inc · The Community Foundation Inc · American Endowment Foundation · Dominion Energy Charitable Foundation · Carmax Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Enterprise Holdings Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Renaissance Charitable Foundation Inc · Charities Aid Foundation America · National Philanthropic Trust · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Donald T Regan Charitable Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • All Faiths Food Bank Inc — 1% of income from government
  • Southeastern Guide Dogs Inc — 0% of income from government
  • Wounded Warrior Project Inc — 0% of income from government
  • K9S for Warriors Inc — 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
9report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 37 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2023, released 2023. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2024) is on record but names no grant recipient in the published copy, so the figures above are from FY2023, the most recent year this funder’s grantee list reached the public record.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home