Skip to content

· Private foundation

Dobson Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$675k
Granted FY2024still arriving
23
Grants FY2024still arriving
3
States reached
$350k
Largest
01What it funds
0194% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2024.

Arts & Culture$934kHealth$821kRecreation & Sports$384kEducation$255kHuman Services$230kEnvironment$100kYouth Development$82kPhilanthropy$75kOther$0
02FY2024 · 23 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k9 grants · $45k
  • $10k–50k12 grants · $180k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $100k
  • $250k+1 grant · $350k
$10,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$9.5M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Mercy Health Foundation$350,000
National Western Heritage Museum$100,000
Oklahoma Golf Hall of Fame$25,000
Scott and Kim Verplank Foundation$25,000
Nature Conservancy of Oklahoma$25,000
UCO Foundation$20,000
Allied Arts of OKC$15,000
Urban League of OKC$10,000
Dinner With Love$10,000
United Way of Central Oklahoma$10,000
Fields and Futures Foundation$10,000
Individual grant recipient$10,000
Peaceful Family Solutions$10,000
Cystic Fibrosis Foundation Sooner$10,000
Oklahoma Medical Research Foundatio$7,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–24, $180k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%Center for Children and Families: $20k → 13%Center for Children and Families: $20k → 13%Center for Children and Families: $10k → 13%Center for Children and Families: $10k → 13%City Care Inc: $15k → 16%City Care Inc: $10k → 16%City Care Inc: $10k → 16%City Care Inc: $5k → 16%City Rescue Mission: $5k → 16%Peaceful Family Solutions: $15k → 16%Peaceful Family Solutions: $10k → 16%Peaceful Family Solutions: $10k → 16%Riversport Foundation: $10k → 16%Peaceful Family Solutions: $10k → 16%Riversport Foundation: $10k → 16%Peaceful Family Solutions: $10k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

88%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.7M · 37 repeat orgs$374k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +44% since the first grant, against +9% for those funded once.

37 repeat relationships: 18 still active in FY2024, 19 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

37
29

Total granted

$2.7M
$352k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+44%
+9%

Still filing today

49%
34%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 97% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $22k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24
Arts & CultureRecreation & SportsHuman ServicesHealthEducationAnimalsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • OG
    OKLAHOMA GOLF HALL OF FAME FOUNDATION
    5× · 2020–2024 · $171k · revenue +317% · 99% of their budget
  • SA
    Stafford Air & Space Museum Foundation
    4× · 2019–2022 · $100k · revenue +632%
  • TC
    THE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL FOUNDATION AT SAINT FRANCIS
    5× · 2019–2023 · $80k · revenue +16%

Funded once

  • NC
    National Cowboy and Western
    one grant, 2019 · $100k
  • OG
    Oklahom Golf Hall of Fame
    one grant, 2019 · $48k
  • PR
    Peppers Ranch Foster Care Community
    one grant, 2019 · $20k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Oklahoma Newspaper Foundation
Arts & Culture
2
Oklahoma Tennis Foundation

Oklahoma Tennis Foundation positively impacts lives by supporting & funding organizations that promote tennis & education throughout the great State of Oklahoma.

Recreation & Sports
3
Ok Foundation

Serving the needs of the whole child, including education, safety, environment, health, and well-being.

Philanthropy
4
Oklahoma City Beautiful Inc

OKC Beautiful's mission is to lead beautification and environmental stewardship through collaboration, education and advocacy. We have been doing this for over 50 years through volunteers and contributing donors. This directly impacts the…

Environment
5
Cowboy Hall of Fame Affiliated Fund of Occf Inc

To support the oklahoma city community foundation by supporting the national cowboy and western heritage museum.

Arts & Culture
6
Will Rogers Memorial Foundation

Support Will Rogers Memorial Museums

Philanthropy
7
Oklahoma Council of Public Affairs Inc

To promote the flourishing of the people of oklahoma by advancing principles and policies that support free enterprise, limited government, personal responsibility, and individual initiative.

Public Safety & Disaster
8
Oklahoma State Chamber of Commerce and Industry Inc

The State Chamber is a statewide membership organization. Our purpose is to be the unified voice of business and the most effective advocacy organization at the State Capitol.

—
9
The State Chamber Research Foundation

The State Chamber Research Foundation strives to support Oklahoma's growth and increase prosperity for all Oklahomans. We create solution orientated programming, advance research and policy, and provide sound data geared to advancing…

Unclassified
10
The Oklahoma United Methodist Foundation

To create and administer permanent charitable endowments to strengthen Methodist ministries in Oklahoma.

—
11
Oklahoma Scholarship Fund Inc
—
12
Opportunity Scholarship Fund

The Opportunity Scholarship Fund is a scholarship granting organization that provides scholarships to Oklahoma prek-12 students to attend accredited private schools in our state. Once a student has received a scholarship, that student and…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is A Chance to Change Foundation; the most unlike its peers is New York Racing Association Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

33 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 33 of the 71 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
10
Early backer (in before they grew)
31/33
Grantees still filing
20/33
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Mercy Health Foundation: $650,000 · OtherMercy Health FoundationNational Western Heritage Museum: $510,000 · OtherNational Western Heritage MuseumUCO Foundation: $150,000 · OtherUCO FoundationNational Cowboy and Western: $100,000 · OtherTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $95,000 · OtherAllied Arts of OKC: $75,000 · Other+45 more: $616,891 · Other+45 moreOKLAHOMA GOLF HALL OF FAME FOUNDATION: $171,000 · Recreation & SportsOKLAHOMA …FIELDS & FUTURES FOUNDATION: $60,000 · Recreation & SportsFIELDS & …WES WELKER FOUNDATION: $20,000 · Recreation & SportsWES WELKE…+2 more: $7,500 · Recreation & SportsStafford Air & Space Museum Foundation: $100,000 · Arts & CultureFRIENDS OF THE MANSION INC: $75,000 · Arts & CultureALLIED ARTS OF OKLAHOMA INC: $15,000 · Arts & Culture+2 more: $7,000 · Arts & CultureCENTER FOR CHILDREN & FAMILIES INC: $60,000 · Human ServicesPEACEFUL FAMILY SOLUTIONS INC: $55,000 · Human ServicesCITY CARE INC: $40,000 · Human ServicesRIVERSPORT FOUNDATION: $20,000 · Human Services+1 more: $5,000 · Human ServicesScott & Kim Verplank Foundation: $125,000 · EducationCameron University Foundation Inc: $12,500 · EducationTHE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL FOUNDATION AT SAINT FRANCIS: $80,000 · HealthOklahoma Medical Research Foundation: $42,500 · HealthUnited Way of Central Oklahoma Inc: $65,000 · Philanthropy
Other$2,196,891Recreation & Sports$258,500Arts & Culture$197,000Human Services$180,000Education$137,500Health$122,500Philanthropy$65,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetOKLAHOMA GOLF HALL OF FAME FOUNDATION: $171,000 over 5y, 99% of budgetScott & Kim Verplank Foundation: $125,000 over 6y, 21% of budgetStafford Air & Space Museum Foundation: $100,000 over 4y, 4.7% of budgetTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $95,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL FOUNDATION AT SAINT FRANCIS: $80,000 over 5y, 1.8% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE MANSION INC: $75,000 over 3y, 2.6% of budgetUnited Way of Central Oklahoma Inc: $65,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetFIELDS & FUTURES FOUNDATION: $60,000 over 6y, 0.5% of budgetDINNER WITH LOVE FOUNDATION: $60,000 over 6y, 16% of budgetCENTER FOR CHILDREN & FAMILIES INC: $60,000 over 4y, 1.2% of budgetPEACEFUL FAMILY SOLUTIONS INC: $55,000 over 5y, 4.5% of budgetOklahoma Medical Research Foundation: $42,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetCITY CARE INC: $40,000 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetSCISSORTAIL PARK FOUNDATION INC: $22,500 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetRIVERSPORT FOUNDATION: $20,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetWhite Fields Inc: $20,000 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetWES WELKER FOUNDATION: $20,000 over 2y, 4.5% of budgetARTSUP INC: $17,500 over 4y, 9.9% of budgetALLIED ARTS OF OKLAHOMA INC: $15,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetCameron University Foundation Inc: $12,500 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetOklahoma State Troopers Foundation Inc: $10,000 over 2y, 17% of budgetOKLAHOMA SHAKESPEARE IN THE PARK INC: $5,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetCOFFEE CREEK RIDING CENTER: $5,000 over 1y, 1.8% of budgetTHOROUGHBRED RETIREMENT FOUNDATION INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetNEW YORK RACING ASSOCIATION FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetRonald McDonald House Charities of Tulsa: $5,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetJIM THORPE ASSOCIATION INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetCITY RESCUE MISSION INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetKEEP OKLAHOMA BEAUTIFUL INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetA CHANCE TO CHANGE FOUNDATION: $3,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetTHE JOCKEY CLUB SAFETY NET FOUNDATION: $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSECRETARIAT CENTER INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetOKLAHOMA HALL OF FAME: $2,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds OKLAHOMA GOLF HALL OF FAME FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Scott & Kim Verplank Foundation ↗
  • Who funds Stafford Air & Space Museum Foundation ↗
  • Who funds THE NATURE CONSERVANCY ↗
  • Who funds THE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL FOUNDATION AT SAINT FRANCIS ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF THE MANSION INC ↗
  • Who funds United Way of Central Oklahoma Inc ↗
  • Who funds FIELDS & FUTURES FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds DINNER WITH LOVE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds CENTER FOR CHILDREN & FAMILIES INC ↗
  • Who funds PEACEFUL FAMILY SOLUTIONS INC ↗
  • Who funds Oklahoma Medical Research Foundation ↗
  • Who funds CITY CARE INC ↗
  • Who funds SCISSORTAIL PARK FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds RIVERSPORT FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds White Fields Inc ↗
  • Who funds WES WELKER FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds ARTSUP INC ↗
  • Who funds ALLIED ARTS OF OKLAHOMA INC ↗
  • Who funds Cameron University Foundation Inc ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

El and Thelma Gaylord FoundationOK40.6× affinity17 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: El and Thelma Gaylord Foundation · American Fidelity Foundation · Inasmuch Foundation · Oklahoma City Community Foundation Inc · Presbyterian Health Foundation · Communities Foundation of Oklahoma · Fred Jones Family Foundation · The Merrick Foundation · Cresap Family Foundation · Bowen Foundation · Crowe & Dunlevy Foundation Inc · Oge Energy Corp Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Dobson Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Dobson Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 160%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →median 31%
  • Oklahoma Medical Research Foundation: 31% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
16get no government money at all
8report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Dobson Family Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Dobson Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 71 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Dobson Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph