Skip to content

· Private foundation

Diane and John O'Donnell Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$57k
Granted FY2025still arriving
8
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$20k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2022 to 2025.

Education$162kPhilanthropy$50kYouth Development$30kReligion$30kHealth$27kHousing & Shelter$10kHuman Services$5k
02FY2025 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k6 grants · $27k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $30k
$5,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$45k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
LEO HIGH SCHOOL$20,000
CASA FAMILIA INC$10,000
KELLOGG SCHOOL OF MANAGEMENT$5,000
LOYOLA UNIVERSITY CHICAGO$5,000
CENTER FOR INDEPENDENT FUTURES$5,000
ROOSEVELT UNIVERSITY$5,000
EPILEPSY FOUNDATION OF GREATER CHICAGO$5,000
LEGACY CHARTER SCHOOL$2,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY25–25, $5k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%CENTER FOR INDEPENDENT FUTURES: $5k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

71%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$222k · 7 repeat orgs$92k to everyone else

7 repeat relationships: 5 still active in FY2025, 2 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

7
4

Total granted

$222k
$72k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

-1%
+4%

Still filing today

43%
75%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 65% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $20k went to new ones.

50%100%’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’22’23’24’25
EducationHealthHousing & ShelterHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • LH
    LEO HIGH SCHOOL
    4× · 2022–2025 · $60k
  • LC
    LEGACY CHARTER SCHOOL
    4× · 2022–2025 · $42k · revenue +14%
  • BB
    BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS
    3× · 2022–2024 · $30k

Funded once

  • NM
    NORTHWESTERN MEMORIAL FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2022 · $50k
  • NP
    NATIONAL PKU ALLIANCE INC
    one grant, 2024 · $20k · revenue +4%
  • TJ
    THE JED FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2022 · $1k · revenue -15%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Lehigh University

The university's goal in the coming decade is to advance learning through the integration of teaching, research and service to others. the core of this goal is to prepare graduates to engage with the world and lead lives of meaning. to do…

Education
2
Drexel University

Drexel university fulfills its founder's vision of preparing each new generation of students for productive professional and civic lives while also focusing its collective expertise on solving society's greatest problems. drexel is an…

Education
3
University of Miami

See Form 990, Part I, Line 1, Description of Organization Mission.

Education
4
Palo Alto University Inc

Advancing human understanding through education, research, and practice in behavioral science

Education
5
Saint Xavier University

Saint xavier university, a catholic institution inspired by the heritage of the sisters of mercy, educates persons to search for truth, think critically, communicate effectively and serve wisely and compassionately in support of human…

Education
6
Chicago Psychoanalytic Institute

The chicago psychoanalytic institute transforms the lives of individuals, families and communities, using psychoanalytic knowledge to help them grow and thrive.

Social Science
7
St Catherine University

We educate women to lead and influence. we educate at all degree levels through valuing and integrating the liberal arts and professional education within the catholic intellectual tradition, see schedule oemphasizing scholarly inquiry and…

Education
8
New York University

Nyu is a private university with approximately 60,000 matriculating students in 20 schools and institutes. nyu's primary missions are education, research and scholarship, and patient care.

Education
9
Columbia College Chicago

The organization's mission is to educate students for creative occupations in diverse fields of arts and media.

Education
10
University of Indianapolis

The University of Indianapolis champions lifelong learning through relevant and innovative education that fosters experiential learning, diverse perspectives, service for impact, and a global mindset.

Education
11
Bar Ilan University in Israel Inc

Biu produces students who excel in the sciences, humanities, law, engineering, business & the arts.

—
12
Fielding Graduate University

We provide exemplary interdisciplinary programs for a community of scholar-practitioners within a distributed learning model grounded in student-driven inquiry and leading to enhanced knowledge.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Jed Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Aid for Women Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 14 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
4/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

LEO HIGH SCHOOL: $60,000 · OtherLEO HIGH SCHOOLNORTHWESTERN MEMORIAL FOUNDATION: $50,000 · OtherNORTHWESTERN MEMORIAL FOUNDATIONBIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS: $30,000 · OtherBIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERSOUR LADY OF PERPETUAL HELP: $30,000 · OtherOUR LADY OF PERPETUAL HELPKELLOGG SCHOOL OF MANAGEMENT: $20,000 · OtherKELLOGG SCHOOL OF MANAGEMENTRoosevelt University: $20,000 · OtherRoosevelt University+2 more: $6,000 · OtherLEGACY CHARTER SCHOOL: $42,000 · EducationLEGACY CHARTER SCHOOLLOYOLA UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO: $20,000 · EducationLOYOLA UNIVERSITY OF C…NATIONAL PKU ALLIANCE INC: $20,000 · HealthTHE JED FOUNDATION: $1,000 · HealthCASA FAMILIA INC: $10,000 · Housing & ShelterCENTER FOR INDEPENDENT FUTURES: $5,000 · Human Services
Other$216,000Education$62,000Health$21,000Housing & Shelter$10,000Human Services$5,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetLEGACY CHARTER SCHOOL: $42,000 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetNATIONAL PKU ALLIANCE INC: $20,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetRoosevelt University: $20,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetLOYOLA UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO: $20,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetEPILEPSY FOUNDATION OF GREATER CHICAGO: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE JED FOUNDATION: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAID FOR WOMEN INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds LEGACY CHARTER SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL PKU ALLIANCE INC ↗
  • Who funds Roosevelt University ↗
  • Who funds LOYOLA UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO ↗
  • Who funds CASA FAMILIA INC ↗
  • Who funds EPILEPSY FOUNDATION OF GREATER CHICAGO ↗
  • Who funds CENTER FOR INDEPENDENT FUTURES ↗
  • Who funds THE JED FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds AID FOR WOMEN INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

AbbVie FoundationIL14.2× affinity5 shared granteesties to 10 of 10Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: AbbVie Foundation · The Chicago Community Trust · Arthur J Gallagher Foundation · American Endowment Foundation · Network for Good · National Philanthropic Trust · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Diane and John O'Donnell Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Diane and John O'Donnell Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 53%
  • Casa Familia Inc: 53% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Diane and John O'Donnell Family Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Diane and John O'Donnell Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 14 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Diane and John O'Donnell Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph