Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Diane and John O'Donnell Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$57k
Granted FY2025still arriving
8
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$20k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20222025.

Education$162kPhilanthropy$50kYouth Development$30kReligion$30kHealth$27kHousing & Shelter$10kHuman Services$5k
02FY2025 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k6 grants · $27k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $30k
$5,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$45k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
LEO HIGH SCHOOL$20,000
CASA FAMILIA INC$10,000
LOYOLA UNIVERSITY CHICAGO$5,000
CENTER FOR INDEPENDENT FUTURES$5,000
EPILEPSY FOUNDATION OF GREATER CHICAGO$5,000
KELLOGG SCHOOL OF MANAGEMENT$5,000
ROOSEVELT UNIVERSITY$5,000
LEGACY CHARTER SCHOOL$2,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY25–25, $5k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%CENTER FOR INDEPENDENT FUTURES: $5k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

71%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$222k · 7 repeat orgs$92k to everyone else

7 repeat relationships — 5 still active in FY2025, 2 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

7
4

Total granted

$222k
$72k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

-1%
+4%

Still filing today

43%
75%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 65% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $20k went to new ones.

50%100%’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’22’23’24’25
EducationHealthHousing & ShelterHuman ServicesOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • LH
    LEO HIGH SCHOOL
    4× · 2022–2025 · $60k
  • LC
    LEGACY CHARTER SCHOOL
    4× · 2022–2025 · $42k · revenue +14%
  • BB
    BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS
    3× · 2022–2024 · $30k

Funded once

  • NM
    NORTHWESTERN MEMORIAL FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2022 · $50k
  • NP
    NATIONAL PKU ALLIANCE INC
    one grant, 2024 · $20k · revenue +4%
  • TJ
    THE JED FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2022 · $1k · revenue -15%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Lehigh University

The university's goal in the coming decade is to advance learning through the integration of teaching, research and service to others. the core of this goal is to prepare graduates to engage with the world and lead lives of meaning. to do…

Education
2
Drexel University

Drexel university fulfills its founder's vision of preparing each new generation of students for productive professional and civic lives while also focusing its collective expertise on solving society's greatest problems. drexel is an…

Education
3
University of Miami

See Form 990, Part I, Line 1, Description of Organization Mission.

Education
4
Palo Alto University Inc

Advancing human understanding through education, research, and practice in behavioral science

Education
5
Saint Xavier University

Saint xavier university, a catholic institution inspired by the heritage of the sisters of mercy, educates persons to search for truth, think critically, communicate effectively and serve wisely and compassionately in support of human…

Education
6
Chicago Psychoanalytic Institute

The chicago psychoanalytic institute transforms the lives of individuals, families and communities, using psychoanalytic knowledge to help them grow and thrive.

Social Science
7
St Catherine University

We educate women to lead and influence. we educate at all degree levels through valuing and integrating the liberal arts and professional education within the catholic intellectual tradition, see schedule oemphasizing scholarly inquiry and…

Education
8
New York University

Nyu is a private university with approximately 60,000 matriculating students in 20 schools and institutes. nyu's primary missions are education, research and scholarship, and patient care.

Education
9
Columbia College Chicago

The organization's mission is to educate students for creative occupations in diverse fields of arts and media.

Education
10
University of Indianapolis

The University of Indianapolis champions lifelong learning through relevant and innovative education that fosters experiential learning, diverse perspectives, service for impact, and a global mindset.

Education
11
Bar Ilan University in Israel Inc

Biu produces students who excel in the sciences, humanities, law, engineering, business & the arts.

12
Fielding Graduate University

We provide exemplary interdisciplinary programs for a community of scholar-practitioners within a distributed learning model grounded in student-driven inquiry and leading to enhanced knowledge.

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Jed Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Aid for Women Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 14 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
4/9
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

LEO HIGH SCHOOL — $60,000 · OtherLEO HIGH SCHOOLNORTHWESTERN MEMORIAL FOUNDATION — $50,000 · OtherNORTHWESTERN MEMORIAL FOUNDATIONBIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS — $30,000 · OtherBIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERSOUR LADY OF PERPETUAL HELP — $30,000 · OtherOUR LADY OF PERPETUAL HELPKELLOGG SCHOOL OF MANAGEMENT — $20,000 · OtherKELLOGG SCHOOL OF MANAGEMENTRoosevelt University — $20,000 · OtherRoosevelt University+2 more — $6,000 · OtherLEGACY CHARTER SCHOOL — $42,000 · EducationLEGACY CHARTER SCHOOLLOYOLA UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO — $20,000 · EducationLOYOLA UNIVERSITY OF C…NATIONAL PKU ALLIANCE INC — $20,000 · HealthTHE JED FOUNDATION — $1,000 · HealthCASA FAMILIA INC — $10,000 · Housing & ShelterCENTER FOR INDEPENDENT FUTURES — $5,000 · Human Services
Other$216,000Education$62,000Health$21,000Housing & Shelter$10,000Human Services$5,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetLEGACY CHARTER SCHOOL — $42,000 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetNATIONAL PKU ALLIANCE INC — $20,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetRoosevelt University — $20,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetLOYOLA UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO — $20,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetEPILEPSY FOUNDATION OF GREATER CHICAGO — $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE JED FOUNDATION — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAID FOR WOMEN INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds LEGACY CHARTER SCHOOL
  • Who funds NATIONAL PKU ALLIANCE INC
  • Who funds Roosevelt University
  • Who funds LOYOLA UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO
  • Who funds CASA FAMILIA INC
  • Who funds EPILEPSY FOUNDATION OF GREATER CHICAGO
  • Who funds CENTER FOR INDEPENDENT FUTURES
  • Who funds THE JED FOUNDATION
  • Who funds AID FOR WOMEN INC

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

AbbVie FoundationIL14.2× affinity5 shared granteesties to 10 of 10Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: AbbVie Foundation · The Chicago Community Trust · Arthur J Gallagher Foundation · American Endowment Foundation · Network for Good · National Philanthropic Trust · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Diane and John O'Donnell Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 53%
  • Casa Familia Inc53% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Diane and John O'Donnell Family Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Diane and John O'Donnell Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 14 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph