Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Desantis Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$27k
Granted FY2025still arriving
7
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$14k
Largest
01What you fund
0195% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20202025.

Arts & Culture$86kHealth$16kHuman Services$10kEducation$9kRecreation & Sports$8kAnimals$4kCommunity Improvement$3kFood & Nutrition$1kOther$0
02FY2025 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k6 grants · $13k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $14k
$2,500
Median grant
3
States reached
$4k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SALZBURG FESTIVAL SOCIETY$13,600
FOUNDATION FOR AIDS RESEARCH$4,200
FRIENDS OF AACA$2,700
ANN & ROBERT H LURIE CHILDRENS HOSPITAL$2,500
WOMEN CARE CENTER$2,000
MEALS ON WHEELS$1,000
EVANSTON COMMUNITY FOUNDATION$500
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY23–24, $3k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%CITY KIDS CAMP: $2k → 14%YMCA OF METRO CHICAGO: $500 → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

78%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$109k · 10 repeat orgs$31k to everyone else

10 repeat relationships — 3 still active in FY2025, 7 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

10
11

Total granted

$109k
$23k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+30%
+65%

Still filing today

80%
64%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 70% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $8k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureHealthHuman ServicesYouth DevelopmentEducationHousing & ShelterOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • KP
    KITHARA PROJECT INC
    2× · 2022–2023 · $15k · revenue +179%
  • SM
    Sing Me A Story Foundation
    2× · 2022–2023 · $10k · revenue +11%
  • FO
    Friends of AACA
    3× · 2023–2025 · $10k · revenue +6%

Funded once

  • LO
    LEAGUE OF CHICAGO THEATRES FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2024 · $5k · revenue +26%
  • CL
    CPS LIVES NFPgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $5k · revenue +80%
  • SI
    STRENGTH IN THE CITY FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2024 · $3k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Chamber Opera of Chicago
2
True Chicago
Arts & Culture
3
Chicago Opera Theater

Chicago opera theater expands the tradition of opera as a living art form by engaging lovers of music and storytelling through innovative experiences, predominantly of new and rarely performed works.

Arts & Culture
4
Students Run Chicago
Health
5
The Chicago Innovation Foundation
Philanthropy
6
Classical Music Chicago

Presenting free high-quality classical music performances and music education experiences in the Chicago metropolitan area for people of all ages and degrees of musical awareness so they can experience how music enriches life.

Arts & Culture
7
Chicago Harp Quartet
8
Chicago Toy & Game Foundation
9
Chopin Theatre Productions Nfp

To promote enlightened civic discourse through a diverse range of artistic offerings. We execute our mission by applying prudent business practices without compromising our programming diversity or artistic excellence.

Arts & Culture
10
Museum of the City of New York

The museum of the city of new york fosters understanding of the distinctive nature of urban life in the world's most influential metropolis. it engages visitors by celebrating, documenting, and interpreting the city's past, present, and…

Arts & Culture
11
Women's Project & Productions Inc

Wp theater is the nation's oldest and largest theater company dedicated to developing, producing, and promoting the work of women+ at every stage of their careers. for over four decades we have served as leaders of a global movement…

Arts & Culture
12
Lookingglass Theatre Company

Lookingglass theatre company is a national leader in the creation and presentation of innovative, cutting-edge theatrical work. lookingglass interweaves movement, circus arts and narrative in original and captivating ways. guided by an…

Arts & Culture

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Evanston Community Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Strength in the City Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

18 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 18 of the 25 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
17/18
Grantees still filing
13/18
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

THE SALZBURG FESTIVAL SOCIETY INC — $26,800 · Arts & CultureTHE SALZBURG FESTIVAL SOCIETY INCKITHARA PROJECT INC — $15,000 · Arts & CultureKITHARA PROJECT INCFriends of AACA — $9,635 · Arts & CultureFriends of AACALEAGUE OF CHICAGO THEATRES FOUNDATION — $5,000 · Arts & CultureLEAGUE OF CHICAGO THEATRES FOUNDATIONCPS LIVES NFP — $5,000 · Arts & CultureCPS LIVES NFPCHICAGO HISTORICAL SOCIETY — $2,500 · Arts & Culture+1 more — $1,000 · Arts & CultureSING ALONG FOUNDATION — $11,500 · OtherSING ALONG FOUNDATIONHAMLIN PARK BASEBALL ASSOCIATION — $7,527 · OtherHAMLIN PARK BASEBALL ASS…STRENGTH IN THE CITY FOUNDATION — $2,500 · OtherSTRENGTH IN THE CITY FOU…ANN & ROBERT H LURIE CHILDRENS HOSPITAL — $2,500 · OtherANN & ROBERT H LURIE CHI…Individual grant recipient — $2,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipie…+5 more — $3,500 · Other+5 morePRIORY IN THE USA OF THE MOST VENERABLE ORDER OF THE HOSP / ST JOHN OF JERUSALEM — $9,248 · HealthPRIORY IN THE US…WOMEN'S CARE CENTER INC — $7,500 · HealthWOMEN'S CARE CEN…THE FOUNDATION FOR AIDS RESEARCH — $4,200 · HealthTHE FOUNDATION F…Sing Me A Story Foundation — $10,000 · Youth DevelopmentPOLARIS CHARTER ACADEMY — $8,500 · EducationPAWS CHICAGO — $3,500 · AnimalsCITY KIDS CAMP — $2,000 · Human ServicesThe YMCA of Metropolitan Chicago — $500 · Human Services
Arts & Culture$64,935Other$30,027Health$20,948Youth Development$10,000Education$8,500Animals$3,500Human Services$2,500

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetTHE SALZBURG FESTIVAL SOCIETY INC — $26,800 over 2y, 1.4% of budgetKITHARA PROJECT INC — $15,000 over 2y, 5.3% of budgetSing Me A Story Foundation — $10,000 over 2y, 2.4% of budgetFriends of AACA — $9,635 over 3y, 2.5% of budgetPRIORY IN THE USA OF THE MOST VENERABLE ORDER OF THE HOSP / ST JOHN OF JERUSALEM — $9,248 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetPOLARIS CHARTER ACADEMY — $8,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetWOMEN'S CARE CENTER INC — $7,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetLEAGUE OF CHICAGO THEATRES FOUNDATION — $5,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetCPS LIVES NFP — $5,000 over 1y, 2.4% of budgetPAWS CHICAGO — $3,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCHICAGO HISTORICAL SOCIETY — $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCITY KIDS CAMP — $2,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetTHE TANK LTD — $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetPADS OF ELGIN INC — $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetThe YMCA of Metropolitan Chicago — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

John D and Catherine T Macarthur FoundationIL12.9× affinity4 shared granteesties to 10 of 10Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: John D and Catherine T Macarthur Foundation · The Chicago Community Trust · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · American Endowment Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Desantis Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 10%1%3%6%10%your share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 25 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph