Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

Delta Montrose Electric Association

We power and unite communities.

$200k
Granted FY2024still arriving
8
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$57k
Largest
01What you fund
0187% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20232024.

Education$129kPhilanthropy$57kRecreation & Sports$57kCommunity Improvement$30kEnvironment$25kArts & Culture$25kYouth Development$20kPublic Safety & Disaster$8kOther$0
02FY2024 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 8 grants below total $171,254 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $200,163 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $28,909 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k1 grant · $8k
  • $10k–50k6 grants · $107k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $57k
$20,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$271M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MONTROSE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION$57,150
MAGIC CIRCLE PLAYERS$25,000
DELTA COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT #50$21,750
GRAND MESA NORDIC COUNCIL INC$20,000
ENERGY OUTREACH COLORADO$18,365
Individual grant recipient$11,366
Individual grant recipient$10,123
NORTH FORK AMBULANCE AUXILLARY$7,500
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY23–23, $30k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%HISPANIC AFFAIRS PROJECT: $30k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Colorado Mountain Bike Association

COMBA is dedicated to protecting and improving mountain biking on the Colorado Front Range.

Recreation & Sports
2
Friends of Mount Evans & Lost Creek Wildernesses

The Friends of Mount Evans & Lost Creek Wilderness (FOMELC) is a 501(c)3 charitable organization founded in November 2005. FOMELC is a 100% volunteer non-profit organization. We offer volunteer opportunities for all ages, physical…

Environment
3
Montrose Childrens Museum

Foster a learning environment by igniting imagination and fueling creativity of children and adults alike. With interactive play in a hands-on learning museum, we will inspire childrens intellect, curiosity, and a life-long love of…

Arts & Culture
4
Estes Park Nonprofit Resource Center Inc

To Support, connect, and Inspire community nonprofits.

Education
5
Colorado Veterans Resource Coalition
Health
6
Conifer Area Chamber of Commerce

Promoting the general business and community interests of Conifer, CO

Community Improvement
7
Columbine Community Foundation

The Grand Foundation is a philanthropic organization serving all of Grand County, Colorado. The Foundation seeks to improve the quality of life in Grand County by proactively addressing current and future needs in the areas of Health &…

Philanthropy
8
The Colorado Parks Foundation Inc
Recreation & Sports
9
Grief Center of Southwest Colorado

Grief support to those who have lost a loved one.

Health
10
Colorado Energy Foundation

The Colorado Energy Foundation was incorporated in 2019 as a 501(c)(3) supporting organization of the Colorado Oil & Gas Association and seeks to amplify existing philanthropic efforts of the oil and gas industry in Colorado and develop…

Community Improvement
11
Gunnison Trails Inc

Gunnison Trails is a non-profit trail advocacy organization established to assist land managers and other organizations in maintaining existing trails, educating users on responsible trail-based recreation, and pursuing opportunities for…

Environment
12
Protect Colorados Vote

To oppose a colorado statewide ballot initiative to join the national popular vote compact

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Energy Outreach Colorado and the most unlike its peers is Peer Kindness Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 13 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
9/10
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Montrose Community Foundation — $114,450 · OtherMontrose Community FoundationMAGIC CIRCLE PLAYERS — $25,000 · OtherMAGIC CIRCLE PLAYERSNFRIA-WSERC CONSERVATION CENTER INC — $25,000 · OtherNFRIA-WSERC CONSERVATION CENTER INCDELTA COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT 50J — $21,750 · OtherDELTA COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT 50JGRAND MESA NORDIC COUNCIL INC — $20,000 · OtherGRAND MESA NORDIC COUNCIL INCIndividual grant recipient — $11,366 · OtherIndividual grant recipient — $10,123 · OtherMASLOW ACADEMY OF APPLIED LEARNING INC — $30,000 · EducationMASLOW ACADEMY …Montrose Veterans Memorial Coalition — $20,000 · EducationMontrose Vetera…ENERGY OUTREACH COLORADO — $36,511 · Recreation & SportsENERGY OUTR…HISPANIC AFFAIRS PROJECT — $30,000 · Human ServicesHISPANIC …Peer Kindness Inc — $20,000 · Youth DevelopmentNORTH FORK AMBULANCE AUXILIARY — $7,500 · Health
Other$227,689Education$50,000Recreation & Sports$36,511Human Services$30,000Youth Development$20,000Health$7,500

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetMontrose Community Foundation — $114,450 over 2y, 3.3% of budgetENERGY OUTREACH COLORADO — $36,511 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHISPANIC AFFAIRS PROJECT — $30,000 over 1y, 3.8% of budgetMASLOW ACADEMY OF APPLIED LEARNING INC — $30,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetMAGIC CIRCLE PLAYERS — $25,000 over 1y, 5.9% of budgetNFRIA-WSERC CONSERVATION CENTER INC — $25,000 over 1y, 7.8% of budgetGRAND MESA NORDIC COUNCIL INC — $20,000 over 1y, 5.2% of budgetMontrose Veterans Memorial Coalition — $20,000 over 1y, 18% of budgetPeer Kindness Inc — $20,000 over 1y, 6.4% of budgetNORTH FORK AMBULANCE AUXILIARY — $7,500 over 1y, 8.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Colorado Health FoundationCO17.3× affinity6 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Colorado Health Foundation · Colorado Gives Foundation · Western Colorado Community Foundation Inc · Temple Hoyne Buell Foundation · Gates Family Foundation · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Delta Montrose Electric Association funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%1%5%11%20%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 13 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph