Skip to content
Del Mar Global Trust Dtd 121007 at a glance

· Private foundation

Del Mar Global Trust Dtd 121007

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$792k
Granted FY2025still arriving
17
Grants FY2025still arriving
9
States reached
$193k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Environment$1.5MPhilanthropy$478kEducation$70kInternational$53kAnimals$45kFood & Nutrition$20kCivil Rights$15kScience & Tech$8k
02FY2025 · 17 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k4 grants · $20k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $85k
  • $50k–250k8 grants · $687k
$30,000
Median grant
9
States reached
$24M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
DEPLOY US$193,000
HES FOUNDATION$116,250
EARTH JUSTICE$100,000
CLIMATE ACCESS$60,000
CHAPEL & YORK US FOUNDATION INC$60,000
BENNINGTON COLLEGE$55,000
RACHEL'S NETWORK$52,500
ACTION FOR THE CLIMATE EMERGENCY$50,000
EARTH ISLAND INSTITUTE$30,000
WEST SUBURBAN COMMUNITY PANTRY$20,000
SANTA BARBARA ENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE CTR$15,000
OCEAN RESEARCH & CONSERV ASSN$10,000
DOGWOOD ALLIANCE$10,000
LADY LUCK ANIMAL RESCUE$5,000
SOUTH FLORIDA WILDLIFE CENTER$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY20–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 89% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%DEPLOY US: $193k → 16%EARTH ISLAND INSTITUTE: $30k → 10%EARTH JUSTICE: $100k → 10%Citizens Climate Education Corp: $15k → 11%Climate Emergency Fund: $20k → 14%SANTA BARBARA ENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE CTR: $15k → 14%Center for Reproductive Rights: $15k → 17%HES FOUNDATION: $116k → 20%RACHEL'S NETWORK: $60k → 14%TRI COUNTY ANIMAL RESCUE: $5k → 11%SOUTH FLORIDA WILDLIFE CENTER: $5k → 13%OCEAN RESEARCH & CONSERV ASSN: $10k → 13%Earth Justice: $20k → 15%Alliance for Climate Education: $15k → 12%Denver Zoological Foundation Inc: $5k → 12%WEST SUBURBAN COMMUNITY PANTRY: $20k → 7%BENNINGTON COLLEGE: $55k → 11%DEPLOY US: $15k → 16%CLIMATE EMERGENCY FUND: $20k → 14%Intl Planned Parenthood Federation: $15k → 17%Rachel's Network: $53k → 14%Ocean Research & Conserv Assn: $5k → 13%Earth Justice: $10k → 15%Alliance for Climate Education: $15k → 12%Denver Zoological Foundation Inc: $5k → 12%Bennington College: $10k → 11%Deploy US: $15k → 16%Climate Emergency Fund: $20k → 14%RACHEL'S NETWORK: $53k → 14%OCEAN RESEARCH & CONSERV ASSN: $5k → 13%Denver Zoological Foundation Inc: $5k → 12%Bennington College: $5k → 11%Deploy US: $15k → 16%CHAPEL & YORK US FOUNDATION INC: $60k → 17%Rachel's Network: $48k → 14%Deploy US: $15k → 16%Science Friday Initiative: $8k → 17%Rachel's Network: $48k → 14%Deploy US: $15k → 16%Environmental Defense Fund: $25k → 17%Rachel's Network: $42k → 14%ACTION FOR THE CLIMATE EMERGENCY: $50k → 16%Environmental Defense Fund: $25k → 17%United Nations Foundation: $10k → 14%Environmental Defense Fund: $20k → 17%Population Action International: $15k → 14%Environmental Defense Fund: $15k → 17%United Nations Foundation: $10k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

VT
IL
NY
MA
CA
CO
VA
NC
DC
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

83%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.7M · 12 repeat orgs$364k to everyone else

12 repeat relationships: 7 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down; 9 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

12
5

Total granted

$1.7M
$58k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+32%
+62%

Still filing today

83%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 58% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $306k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
EnvironmentAnimalsScience & TechInternationalPublic Safety & DisasterHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CA
    Climate Access Inc
    6× · 2020–2025 · $720k · revenue +64% · 94% of their budget
  • RN
    RACHEL'S NETWORK INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $302k · revenue +32%
  • DI
    DEPLOYUS INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $268k · revenue +672%

Funded once

  • PA
    POPULATION ACTION INTERNATIONAL
    one grant, 2020 · $15k · revenue -69%
  • CC
    CITIZENS CLIMATE EDUCATION CORP
    one grant, 2020 · $15k · revenue -42%
  • THE CENTER FOR REPRODUCTIVE RIGHTS INCgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $15k · revenue +69%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Friends of the Earth

Friends of the earth strives for a more healthy and just world by defendng the environment and human health while advancing social and economic justice by conducting research and education, transforming the economy so it protects the…

Environment
2
Asociacion Interamericana Para La Defensa Del Ambiente

To strenghten people's ability to guarantee their individual and collective right to a healthy environment, via the development, implementation, and effective enforcement of national and international law.

Crime & Legal
3
The Union of Concerned Scientists Inc

The union of concerned scientists puts rigorous, independent science into action, developing solutions and advocating for a healthy, safe, and just future.

International
4
Center for International Environmental Law Inc

To investigate, research, write, publish, present conferences and teach with respect to global, regional, transboundary, and comparative environmental issues and to make the findings from such activities available to the general public; to…

International
5
Wildaid Inc

Wildaid's mission is to inspire change and empower the world to protect wildlife and vital habitats from critical threats.

Animals
6
Conservation International Foundation

Ci works to spotlight and secure the critical benefits that nature provides to humanity.

Environment
7
Environmental Investigation Agency

To establish and promote programs to protect the global climate, forests, wildlife and the natural environment, through research, advocacy, and investigation.

International
8
E3G Third Generation Environmentalism

E3g is a leading international not-for-profit think tank specialising in climate diplomacy harnessing expertise in the politics and economics of climate change.

Environment
9
Rainforest Trust

Rainforest trust saves endangered wildlife and protects our planet by creating rainforest reserves through partnerships, community engagement, and donor support.

International
10
World Wildlife Fund Inc

Wwf's mission is to conserve nature and reduce the most pressing threats to the diversity of life on earth. (continued on schedule o)

Environment
11
World Resources Institute

Wri is committed to creating change that improves people's lives and ensures the natural world can thrive. (see schedule o)wri's bold vision requires a formula for success we call "count it. change it. scale it.":- count it: our work is…

International
12
Rainforest Foundation Inc

The purpose of rainforest foundation us is to support indigenous peoples and forest communities in their efforts to secure their lands, protect their environment, and uphold their rights.

Environment
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Environmental Defense Fund Incorporated; the most unlike its peers is Hes Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

25 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 25 of the 27 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
8
Early backer (in before they grew)
25/25
Grantees still filing
14/25
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Climate Access Inc: $720,000 · Science & TechClimate Access Inc+1 more: $8,000 · Science & TechDEPLOYUS INC: $268,000 · EnvironmentDEPLOYUS INCEARTHJUSTICE: $100,000 · EnvironmentEARTHJUSTICEENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND INCORPORATED: $90,000 · EnvironmentENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND INCORPO…GOODPOWER EDUCATION FUND INC: $80,000 · EnvironmentGOODPOWER EDUCATION FUND INCCLIMATE EMERGENCY FUND: $60,000 · EnvironmentCLIMATE EMERGENCY FUNDEarth Island Institute Inc: $30,000 · Environment+3 more: $30,000 · EnvironmentRACHEL'S NETWORK INC: $301,500 · Public Safety & DisasterRACHEL'S NETWOR…HES FOUNDATION: $116,250 · PhilanthropyHES FOUND…CHAPEL & YORK US FOUNDATION INC: $60,000 · PhilanthropyCHAPEL & …OCEAN RESEARCH & CONSERV ASSN: $35,000 · OtherEarth Justice: $30,000 · OtherWEST SUBURBAN COMMUNITY PANTRY INC: $20,000 · OtherUNITED NATIONS FOUNDATION INC: $20,000 · OtherINTERNATIONAL PLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION WESTERN HEMISPHERE REGION: $17,500 · OtherPOPULATION ACTION INTERNATIONAL: $15,000 · OtherENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE CENTER: $15,000 · OtherTHE CENTER FOR REPRODUCTIVE RIGHTS INC: $15,000 · OtherBENNINGTON COLLEGE CORPORATION: $70,000 · EducationDENVER ZOOLOGICAL FOUNDATION: $30,000 · AnimalsSOUTH FLORIDA WILDLIFE CENTER INC: $5,000 · AnimalsLADY LUCK ANIMAL RESCUE INC: $5,000 · AnimalsTRI COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY: $5,000 · Animals
Science & Tech$728,000Environment$658,000Public Safety & Disaster$301,500Philanthropy$176,250Other$167,500Education$70,000Animals$45,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetClimate Access Inc: $720,000 over 6y, 94% of budgetRACHEL'S NETWORK INC: $301,500 over 6y, 3.8% of budgetDEPLOYUS INC: $268,000 over 6y, 0.7% of budgetEARTHJUSTICE: $100,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND INCORPORATED: $90,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetGOODPOWER EDUCATION FUND INC: $80,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetBENNINGTON COLLEGE CORPORATION: $70,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetCLIMATE EMERGENCY FUND: $60,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetDENVER ZOOLOGICAL FOUNDATION: $30,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetEarth Island Institute Inc: $30,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetUNITED NATIONS FOUNDATION INC: $20,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetWEST SUBURBAN COMMUNITY PANTRY INC: $20,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetINTERNATIONAL PLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION WESTERN HEMISPHERE REGION: $17,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPOPULATION ACTION INTERNATIONAL: $15,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCITIZENS CLIMATE EDUCATION CORP: $15,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE CENTER: $15,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetTHE CENTER FOR REPRODUCTIVE RIGHTS INC: $15,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSCIENCE FRIDAY INITIATIVE INC: $8,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetSOUTH FLORIDA WILDLIFE CENTER INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetAMAZON AID FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 1y, 4.6% of budgetTRI COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jpmorgan Chase Founda…Network for GoodVanguard Charitable E…National Philanthropi…Morgan Stanley Global…Donor Advised Charita…American Online Givin…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
Jpmorgan Chase FoundationNY9.7× affinity4 shared granteesties to 8 of 8Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · Network for Good · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · National Philanthropic Trust · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Del Mar Global Trust Dtd 121007 funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Del Mar Global Trust Dtd 121007. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 30%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Bennington College Corporation: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
3get no government money at all
6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Del Mar Global Trust Dtd 121007?

Find your warmest path to Del Mar Global Trust Dtd 121007 through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 27 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Del Mar Global Trust Dtd 121007’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home