Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Defehr Family Foundation Inc

Its FY2019 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$171k
Granted FY2018
20
Grants FY2018
4
States reached
$100k
Largest

Read this first · the figures below need context

81% of Defehr Family Foundation Inc’s FY2019 grant dollars went to Oklahoma City Community Foundation Inc, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2019 names 13 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it. Everything below is therefore FY2018, the last year Defehr Family Foundation Inc named its own grantees at scale: 10 organizations, $171k. It is dated, not current.

Organizations named directly on the return

7
17
10
18
13
19

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

01What you fund
0189% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172019.

Philanthropy$2.5MArts & Culture$772kHousing & Shelter$46kReligion$39kHuman Services$17kFood & Nutrition$14kHealth$10kEducation$2kOther$0
02FY2018 · 20 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2018

  • Under $10k17 grants · $50k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $21k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $100k
$3,500
Median grant
4
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
STAFFORD AIR AND SPACE MUSEUM$100,000
SWOSU FOUNDATION$11,000
BRANCH 15$10,000
OKC IMPROV FOUNDATION$8,000
Individual grant recipient$5,000
INFINITE GRACE MINISTRIES$4,000
FIRST BAPTIST CHURCH$4,000
WEATHERFORD FOOD AND RESOURCE CENTE$4,000
OETA FOUNDATION$3,500
INFANT CRISIS CENTER$3,500
OKLAHOMA CITY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION$3,500
GIDEONS INTERNATIONAL$3,435
BREVARD RESCUE MISSION$3,000
CITY RESCUE MISSION$2,500
Individual grant recipient$2,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–19, $21k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%STAND IN THE GAP MINISTRIES: $4k → 16%CITY RESCUE MISSION: $3k → 16%WEATHERFORD FOOD AND RESOURCE CENTE: $6k → 16%WEATHERFORD FOOD AND RESOURCE CENTE: $4k → 16%WEATHERFORD FOOD AND RESOURCE CENTE: $4k → 16%JUST JOY ACTIVITY CENTER INC: $1k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

IL
CO
AZ
AR
NC
OK
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

92%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$903k · 13 repeat orgs$77k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +246% since the first grant, against -29% for the ones you funded once.

13 repeat relationships — 13 still active in FY2018, 0 since wound down; 17 grantees were first funded in FY2018 (too recent to call). Read against FY2018, the last year this funder named its own grantees directly; its giving has since run through a sponsor, which reports no donor behind each grant.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

13
2

Total granted

$903k
$29k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+246%
-29%

Still filing today

38%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2019, 95% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $32k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19
Human ServicesArts & CultureHousing & ShelterReligionCommunity ImprovementHealthOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SA
    Stafford Air & Space Museum Foundation
    3× · 2017–2019 · $754k · revenue ×25 · 30% of their budget
  • B1
    Branch 15 Inc
    2× · 2018–2019 · $34k · revenue +360%
  • WF
    Weatherford Food & Resource Center Inc
    3× · 2017–2019 · $14k · revenue +96%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2017 · $28k
  • TH
    TREASURE HOUSE
    one grant, 2017 · $1k · revenue -29%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Independent Opportunties Inc of Oklahoma

Provide the highest quality residential services to people with developmental disabilities. a major part of the mission is to provide opportunities to these individuals based upon their right to a normal daily routine. specifically, it is…

Unclassified
2
Young Womens Christian Association of Oklahoma Ci

Ywca oklahoma city is dedicated to eliminating racism, empowering women and promoting peace, justice, freedom and dignity for all

Human Services
3
The Good Okc

The Good OKC was created to equip and empower the people of OKC to experience the Kingdom of God in the everyday lives. Far too often we seperate our spiritual lives from our actual life. We believe following Jesus is a 24/7 endeavor and…

Religion
4
Earc Inc

To provide a better quality of life and greater independence to adults with developmental disabilities.

Human Services
5
Livefree Okc Inc

Dramatically reduce gun violence in impacted Oklahoma communities through intervention and effective provision of resources.

Human Services
6
Family Hope House Inc

Family Hope House empowers families through therapy, education, and advocacy. As Oklahoma's sole adoption competent mental health agency, we support foster and adoptive children for lasting stability and success.

Health
7
Oklahoma City Family Justice Center Inc

The mission of the okcfjc is to provide protection, hope and healing to those impacted by domestic and family violence in the oklahoma city community. the organization provides a centrally located facility which co-locates and coordinates…

Crime & Legal
8
Goodwill Industries of Central Oklahoma Inc

We help people overcome challenges to employment.

Employment
9
La Luz Organization Inc

La Luz Organization helps the underserved Latino population in Oklahoma with culturally and faith based trauma-informed services to victims of domestic violence,sexual assault and stalking.

Human Services
10
It's My Community Initiative Inc

To strengthen communities by building strong, healthy families.

Social Science
11
Oklahoma City University

Inspired by a culture of creativity, Oklahoma City University fosters an immersive, personalized experience that welcomes and prepares students to pursue boundless opportunities.

Education
12
Aid for Individual Development

To provide residential service for the developmentally disabled. to teach the residents daily living skills so with necessary training the residents can obtain the ultimate goal of being independent and having their own apartment.

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Oklahoma City Community Foundation Inc and the most unlike its peers is Oklahoma Educational Television Authority Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

17 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 17 of the 33 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
8
Early backer (in before they grew)
16/17
Grantees still filing
12/17
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

OKLAHOMA CITY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC — $2,508,839 · PhilanthropyOKLAHOMA CITY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INCStafford Air & Space Museum Foundation — $753,500 · Arts & CultureStafford Air & Space Mus…+2 more — $12,000 · Arts & CultureSWOSU FOUNDATION — $31,110 · OtherIndividual grant recipient — $28,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient — $15,000 · OtherINFANT CRISIS CENTER — $11,000 · OtherGIDEONS INTERNATIONAL — $9,723 · OtherOklahoma Educational Television Authority Foundation Inc — $6,500 · OtherGreat Plains Family YMCA Inc — $5,000 · OtherWEATHERFORD REGIONAL HOSPITAL FOUND — $4,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipient — $4,500 · Other+11 more — $17,200 · OtherBranch 15 Inc — $33,500 · Housing & ShelterBrevard Rescue Mission Inc — $10,000 · Housing & Shelter+1 more — $1,000 · Housing & ShelterWeatherford Food & Resource Center Inc — $13,700 · Human ServicesSTAND IN THE GAP INC — $4,000 · Human ServicesCITY RESCUE MISSION INC — $2,500 · Human ServicesJust Joy Activity Center Inc — $1,000 · Human ServicesINFINITE GRACE MINISTRIES INC — $11,500 · ReligionHOPE IS ALIVE MINISTRIES INC — $4,500 · Health
Philanthropy$2,508,839Arts & Culture$765,500Other$132,533Housing & Shelter$44,500Human Services$21,200Religion$11,500Health$4,500

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetOKLAHOMA CITY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC — $2,508,839 over 3y, 4.8% of budgetStafford Air & Space Museum Foundation — $753,500 over 3y, 30% of budgetBranch 15 Inc — $33,500 over 2y, 7.1% of budgetWeatherford Food & Resource Center Inc — $13,700 over 3y, 2.6% of budgetINFINITE GRACE MINISTRIES INC — $11,500 over 3y, 2.9% of budgetBrevard Rescue Mission Inc — $10,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetOklahoma Educational Television Authority Foundation Inc — $6,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetGreat Plains Family YMCA Inc — $5,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetHOPE IS ALIVE MINISTRIES INC — $4,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCITY RESCUE MISSION INC — $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTREASURE HOUSE — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE COLORADO NONPROFIT DEVELOPMENT CENTER — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGIRLS ON THE RUN INTERNATIONAL INC — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Oklahoma City Community Foundation IncOK21.5× affinity8 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Oklahoma City Community Foundation Inc · Tulsa Community Foundation · Et Cetera Shop Inc · Servant Foundation · Renaissance Charitable Foundation Inc · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Defehr Family Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 110%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    11get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 33 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2018, released 2018. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph