· Public charity
Et Cetera Shop Inc
To glorify god by helping those in need through the selling of low-cost donated items.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 20 grants below total $394,500 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $407,495 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $12,995 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2024
- $10k–50k19 grants · $345k
- $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| REGIONAL FOOD BANK OF OKLAHOMA | $50,000 |
| WEATHERFORD PUBLIC SCHOOLS | $30,500 |
| CLINTON PUBLIC SCHOOLS | $30,000 |
| CASA OF WESTERN OKLAHOMA INC | $26,000 |
| STEP UP TRANSITIONAL LIVING | $26,000 |
| THOMAS PUBLIC SCHOOLS | $25,000 |
| HYDRO-EAKLY PUBLIC SCHOOLS | $25,000 |
| CORDELL PUBLIC SCHOOLS | $25,000 |
| HOPE IS ALIVE | $25,000 |
| FIRST CHOICE PREGNANCY CENTER | $21,000 |
| AGAPE CLINIC | $16,000 |
| WEATHERFORD MINISTERIAL ALLIANCE | $15,000 |
| CONNECTIONS FOOD & RESOURCE CENTER | $10,000 |
| CLINTON MINISTERIAL ALLIANCE | $10,000 |
| JUST JOY ACTIVITY CENTER | $10,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $340k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
21 repeat relationships — 20 still active in FY2024, 1 since wound down.
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
REGIONAL FOOD BANK OF OKLAHOMA INC7× · 2018–2024 · $324k · revenue +51%- COCASA OF WESTERN OKLAHOMA CASA OF WESTERN OKLAHOMA8× · 2017–2024 · $212k · revenue +96%
- SUSTEP UP TRANSITIONAL LIVING PROGRAM7× · 2018–2024 · $187k · revenue +44% · 36% of their budget
Funded once
- B1Branch 15 Incgraduatedone grant, 2020 · $35k · revenue +87%
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2018 · $21k
- PPALSone grant, 2021 · $10k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Provide care, assistance, and counseling for abused women. Provide food for needy families.
Provide emergency assistance to those in need of food, lodging and gasoline, and maintain food pantry.
The mission of Hoseas House is to extend the love and compassion of Jesus Christ to women & children in crisis through advocacy education housing community outreach and prayer. Hoseas House guides families in reaching their greatest…
Keturahs Haven is a Christ-centered home to assist homeless pregnant women who need to be loved, nurtured, encouraged and supported during their pregnancy
The rescue missions purpose is to provide food, housing , and transportation in emergency situations to local residents and transients, Those served are spiritually ministered.
Oasis of Northwest Arkansas provides sober housing and resources for women in recovery and their children.
Provide transitional housing for women and children
Feed the homeless
Assisting and housing females in recovery
Hope house rescue mission strives to eliminate homelessness. our mission is "to break the cycle of poverty and despair... one life at a time." we provide physical, emotional, mental and spiritual resources regardless of race, religion or…
To distribute food clothing personal care products and household articles and to provide financial assistance for emergency housing utilities medical services and transportation to the poor and indigent people of Clay County Fl.
We are a faith based non-profit organization that serves and cares for members in our community experiencing homelessness in the East Lancaster corridor of Fort Worth, TX. Every Sunday evening, we provide warm meals, drinks, clothes, hair…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Branch 15 Inc and the most unlike its peers is First Choice Pregnancy Center Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 27 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds REGIONAL FOOD BANK OF OKLAHOMA INC ↗
- Who funds CASA OF WESTERN OKLAHOMA CASA OF WESTERN OKLAHOMA ↗
- Who funds STEP UP TRANSITIONAL LIVING PROGRAM ↗
- Who funds FIRST CHOICE PREGNANCY CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds WEATHERFORD MINISTERIAL ALLIANCE INC ↗
- Who funds HOPE IS ALIVE MINISTRIES INC ↗
- Who funds Weatherford Food & Resource Center Inc ↗
- Who funds Just Joy Activity Center Inc ↗
- Who funds Branch 15 Inc ↗
- Who funds Harleys House Crisis Nursery Association ↗
- Who funds Weatherford Regional Hospital ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Oklahoma City Community Foundation Inc · Defehr Family Foundation Inc · Feed the Children Inc · Renaissance Charitable Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Et Cetera Shop Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.