Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Debra Powell Mills Charitable Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$5k
Granted FY2025still arriving
4
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$2k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20192025.

Youth Development$5kAnimals$5kEducation$3kHealth$3kPublic Benefit$3kFood & Nutrition$2kRecreation & Sports$2kPublic Safety & Disaster$1kOther$0
02FY2025 · 4 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$1,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$95k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
KENTUCKY EQUINE ADOPTION CENTER$2,000
YOUNG LIFE$1,000
Individual grant recipient$1,000
TEAM KENTUCKY-STORM RELIEF$500
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY19–19, $500) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 7%LARRY SPEARS FOUNDATION: $500 → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

NY
IA
OH
PA
KY
AZ
DC
HI

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

55%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$14k · 5 repeat orgs$12k to everyone else

5 repeat relationships — 2 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

5
13

Total granted

$14k
$10k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+38%
+56%

Still filing today

80%
54%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 67% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthHousing & ShelterYouth DevelopmentHuman ServicesAnimalsPhilanthropyOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • YL
    YOUNG LIFE
    5× · 2019–2025 · $5k · revenue +38%
  • KE
    KENTUCKY EQUINE HUMANE CENTER INC
    3× · 2023–2025 · $5k · revenue +36%
  • GP
    GOD'S PANTRY FOOD BANK INC
    2× · 2020–2021 · $1k · revenue +41%

Funded once

  • BEREA COLLEGE
    one grant, 2022 · $3k · revenue -13%
  • AU
    ALOHA UNITED WAY INC
    one grant, 2023 · $1k · revenue -15%
  • GP
    GODS PANTRY
    one grant, 2024 · $750

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Refuge of Hope Ministries

Glorify and serve god by providing meals for hungry men, women, and children, emergency shelter and transition to independence for homeless men, and spiritual hope through jesus christ.

Religion
2
Jefferson Street Baptist Center Inc

Re:center ministries reconciles homeless and hurting people to god, family and community by the power of christ in partnership with the local church.

Religion
3
Come to Him Ministries

To help those struggling in a personal crisis find relief and disciple them into a christ-centered lifestyle through a ministry of reconciliation, applying the truth of scripture, working with others and sharing in fellowship with those…

Health
4
Hope House Rescue Mission Inc

Hope house rescue mission strives to eliminate homelessness. our mission is "to break the cycle of poverty and despair... one life at a time." we provide physical, emotional, mental and spiritual resources regardless of race, religion or…

Human Services
5
Lexington Rescue Mission

The organization is a Christ-centered ministry that meets the physical, emotional, and spiritual needs of hurting people in the greater Lexington area. Its activities are focused on rebuilding lives.

Human Services
6
House of Hope of Kentucky Inc

To reach and help women who struggle with alcohol and chemical dependency; to offer assistance and resources to women while going through the rehabilitation process; to provide a safe environment and shelter to homeless women; to provide…

Health
7
Hospice of Southern Kentucky Inc

The hospice mission is to honor life through exceptional service and compassionate care. the organization is primarily engaged in providing care and support that enables the terminally ill to spend their final days in a comfortable and…

8
House of Refuge Ministries

The organization provides transitional and emergency housing in conjuction withsupportive services, case management and life skills training for homeless anddisadvantaged people.

Housing & Shelter
9
Redemption Road Ministries

Redemption road provides housing, re-entry and transition services for men and women coming out of the criminal justice system. the mission is to provide to provide christ centered, bible based recovery from drug and alcohol abuse, damaged…

Religion
10
House of Refuge Inc

Christ centered residential ministry primarily helping african american men overcome their life controlling addictions so they can successfully re enter society as productive citizens

Religion
11
Women's Medical Respite

Providing holistic care in a clean temporary home for medically fragile unsheltered women.

Human Services
12
Shelter of Hope Inc

The shelter of hope's mission is to provide temporary, emergency shelter and permanent housing assistance for individuals and families in need of transitional services leading them to self-sufficiency. provisions are made without…

Housing & Shelter

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Helphopelive Inc and the most unlike its peers is The Larry H Spears Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 20 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/11
Grantees still filing
9/11
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

TEAM KENTUCKY INC — $2,000 · OtherTEAM KENTUCKY INCGOD'S PANTRY FOOD BANK INC — $1,000 · OtherGOD'S PANTRY FOOD BANK INCIndividual grant recipient — $1,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientGODS PANTRY — $750 · OtherGODS PANTRYAMERICAN RED CROSS-STORM RELIEF — $750 · OtherAMERICAN RED CROSS-STORM RELIEFUNIV OF KY COVID-19 SUPPORT FUND — $500 · OtherUNIV OF KY COVID-19 SUPPORT FUNDTEAM KENTUCKY-STORM RELIEF — $500 · OtherTEAM KENTUCKY-STORM RELIEFCCFA — $500 · OtherCCFAMAKE A WISH AMERICA — $500 · OtherMAKE A WISH AMERICAALS ASSOCIATION — $500 · OtherALS ASSOCIATIONYOUNG LIFE — $5,300 · Youth DevelopmentYOUNG LIFEKENTUCKY EQUINE HUMANE CENTER INC — $5,000 · AnimalsKENTUCKY EQUINE HUMAN…BEREA COLLEGE — $3,000 · EducationBEREA COLLEGEREFUGE FOR WOMEN INC — $1,000 · Housing & ShelterTHE HOPE CENTER INC — $500 · Housing & ShelterREFUGE MINISTRIES INC — $500 · HealthSHEPHERD'S HOUSE INC — $500 · HealthHELPHOPELIVE INC — $500 · HealthALOHA UNITED WAY INC — $1,000 · PhilanthropyTHE LARRY H SPEARS FOUNDATION INC — $500 · Human Services
Other$8,000Youth Development$5,300Animals$5,000Education$3,000Housing & Shelter$1,500Health$1,500Philanthropy$1,000Human Services$500

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetYOUNG LIFE — $5,300 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetKENTUCKY EQUINE HUMANE CENTER INC — $5,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetBEREA COLLEGE — $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGOD'S PANTRY FOOD BANK INC — $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetALOHA UNITED WAY INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetREFUGE FOR WOMEN INC — $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetREFUGE MINISTRIES INC — $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE HOPE CENTER INC — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSHEPHERD'S HOUSE INC — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE LARRY H SPEARS FOUNDATION INC — $500 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetHELPHOPELIVE INC — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Blue Grass Community Foundation IncKY15.6× affinity5 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Blue Grass Community Foundation Inc · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Debra Powell Mills Charitable Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 20 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph