· Private foundation
Dea Code Family Foundation Inc
Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k16 grants · $24k
- $10k–50k5 grants · $90k
- $50k–250k2 grants · $250k
- $250k+1 grant · $350k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| T1D BREAKTHROUGH | $350,000 |
| CAF AMERICA | $200,000 |
| CLEARY HOCKEY ENDOWMENT DONATION | $50,000 |
| IMET ANGEL INVESTOR (USMF INC) | $25,000 |
| THE SEVERN RIVER ASSOCIATION INC | $25,000 |
| FUND A CURE NAPLES GOLF | $20,000 |
| HARVARD VARSITY HOCKEY FUND | $10,000 |
| LHAAMC FOUNDATION | $10,000 |
| NAVY YOUTH HOCKEY 2025 GOLF TOURNAMENT | $5,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $2,500 |
| BALLET THEATER OF MARYLAND | $2,500 |
| ANNAPOLIS OPERA | $2,500 |
| CRAB | $1,000 |
| BUCKNELL UNIVERSITY SPECIFYING PARENTS FUND | $1,000 |
| ANNE ARUNDEL COUNTY PUBLIC LIBRARY FOUNDATION | $1,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY23–23, $2k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +28% since the first grant, against +1% for the ones you funded once.
37 repeat relationships — 10 still active in FY2025, 27 since wound down; 13 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 7% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $476k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- AFAVASARA FOUNDATION FKA THE LEADERSHIP FOUNDATION OF INDIA4× · 2020–2023 · $200k · revenue ×17 · 27% of their budget
- SSSEVERN SCHOOL INC4× · 2020–2023 · $125k · revenue +100%
- TSTHE SEVERN RIVER ASSOCIATION INC4× · 2022–2025 · $115k · revenue +78%
Funded once
- HCHARVARD CLEARY '56 CLEARY HOCKEY FUNDone grant, 2024 · $500k
- PAPRESIDENT AND FELLOWS OF HARVARD COLLEGE - BILL CLEARY '56 ICE HOCKEY FUNDone grant, 2019 · $98k
- IOINSTITUTE OF MARINE AND ENVIRONMENTAL TECHNOLOGYone grant, 2024 · $50k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.
The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.
Advance science, engineering, and innovation throughout the world for the benefit of all. the world's largest multidisciplinary scientific society and a leading publisher of cutting-edge research through its science family of journals,…
Asco association promotes the common business interests of its members by: (1) advocating for policies that improve the quality of cancer care; (2) maintaining the highest standards of oncology medical care through programs supporting…
American gas association's (the association) mission is to develop and advocate for informed, innovative, and durable policy that fulfills our nation's energy needs, environmental aspirations and economic potential. we are committed to…
See schedule o:asco is a professional oncology society committed to conquering cancer through research, education, and promotion of the highest quality patient care.
The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…
The american astronomical society (aas), established in 1899, is the major organization of professional astronomers in north america. the basic objective of the aas is to promote the advancement of astronomy and closely related branches of…
The university of virginia investment management company (uvimco) is organized to invest funds on behalf of the rector and visitors of the university of virginia (the university or uva) and university-associated organizations (uaos).
The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.
Our mission is to accelerate scientific progress, understand the root causes of disease, and narrow the gap between discoveries and impact on patients.
See schedule oustelecom exists to ensure members can compete, grow and thrive to build a world where families, enterprises and communities are connected through the power of broadband.our member companies have committed a considerable…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Amnesty International of the Usa Inc and the most unlike its peers is Boston Symphony Orchestra Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 33 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
44 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 44 of the 90 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds President and Fellows of Harvard College ↗
- Who funds CHARITIES AID FOUNDATION AMERICA ↗
- Who funds AVASARA FOUNDATION FKA THE LEADERSHIP FOUNDATION OF INDIA ↗
- Who funds SEVERN SCHOOL INC ↗
- Who funds THE SEVERN RIVER ASSOCIATION INC ↗
- Who funds NAVY YOUTH HOCKEY ASSOCIATION INC ↗
- Who funds ANNAPOLIS OPERA COMPANY ↗
- Who funds Ballet Theatre of Maryland Inc ↗
- Who funds THE ANNAPOLIS CHORALE INC ↗
- Who funds PAN-MASSACHUSETTS CHALLENGE INC ↗
- Who funds HIGHSIGHT ↗
- Who funds ASSOCIATION TO PRESERVE CAPE COD INC ↗
- Who funds HOSPICE OF THE CHESAPEAKE INC ↗
- Who funds New York University ↗
- Who funds THE HOTCHKISS SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds PLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC ↗
- Who funds THE CHAMP FOUNDATION ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Community Foundation of Anne Arundel Co · The Jm Kaplan Fund Inc · The Winifred M Gordon Foundation Inc Anne Dierdorff Thomas President · William J and Dorothy K O'Neill Foundation Inc · The United Way of Central Maryland Inc · Franey Family Foundation Inc · The David R Lewis Family Foundation Inc · The Helena Foundation Inc · The Keith Campbell Foundation for the Environment Inc · Ibm International Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Dea Code Family Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Association to Preserve Cape Cod Inc — 100% of income from government
- President and Fellows of Harvard College — 7% of income from government
- Ballet Theatre of Maryland Inc — 6% of income from government
- Chesapeake Bay Foundation Inc — 2% of income from government
- Boston Symphony Orchestra Inc — 0% of income from government
- Pan-Massachusetts Challenge Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Dea Code Family Foundation Inc?
Find your warmest path to Dea Code Family Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.