Skip to content
Day Care Council of New York Inc at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Day Care Council of New York Inc

To serve as a voluntary federation of day care sponsoring boards, which operate day care programs in the five boroughs of new york.

$8.4M
Granted FY2025still arriving
3
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$2.1M
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Human Services$42MCommunity Improvement$22MEducation$3.8MReligion$42kArts & Culture$17kYouth Development$10k
02FY2025 · 3 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 3 grants below total $6,139,692, the rows itemized in this filing. The $8,404,947 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $2,265,255 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.
$2,078,465
Median grant
1
States reached
$10M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
COMMITTEE FOR HISPANIC CHILDREN AND FAMILIES$2,109,661
CHINESE AMERICAN PLANNING COUNCIL$2,078,465
CHILD DEVELOPMENT SUPPORT CORPORATION$1,951,566
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $48.4M) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%THE ST JOHN'S PLACE FAMILY CENTER DCC: $7k → 20%URBAN NEIGHBORHOOD: $11k → 28%CHINESE AMERICAN PLANNING COUNCIL: $6.9M → 17%CHILD DEVELOPMENT SUPPORT CORPORATION: $2.0M → 20%CHINESE AMERICAN PLANNING COUNCIL: $2.6M → 17%CHINESE AMERICAN PLANNING COUNCIL: $2.1M → 17%CHILD DEVELOPMENT SUPPORT CORPORATION: $1.7M → 20%CHINESE AMERICAN PLANNING COUNCIL: $2.1M → 17%CHILD DEVELOPMENT SUPPORT CORPORATION: $1.5M → 20%CHINESE AMERICAN PLANNING COUNCIL: $1.9M → 17%CHINESE AMERICAN PLANNING COUNCIL: $1.6M → 17%CHINESE AMERICAN PLANNING COUNCIL: $1.6M → 17%CHINESE AMERICAN PLANNING COUNCIL: $1.6M → 17%CHINESE AMERICAN PLANNING COUNCIL: $1.6M → 17%1199 SEIUEMPLOYER CHILD CARE CORP: $32k → 28%COMMITTEE FOR HISPANIC CHILDREN AND FAMILIES: $5.3M → 17%IMMANUEL NEW YORK MISSION INC: $24k → 13%COMMITTEE FOR HISPANIC CHILDREN AND FAMILIES: $2.5M → 17%COMMITTEE FOR HISPANIC CHILDREN AND FAMILIES: $2.5M → 17%COMMITTEE FOR HISPANIC CHILDREN AND FAMILIES: $2.1M → 17%COMMITTEE FOR HISPANIC CHILDREN AND FAMILIES: $1.9M → 17%COMMITTEE FOR HISPANIC CHILDREN AND FAMILIES: $1.9M → 17%COMMITTEE FOR HISPANIC CHILDREN AND FAMILIES: $1.7M → 17%COMMITTEE FOR HISPANIC CHILDREN AND FAMILIES: $1.7M → 17%COMMITTEE FOR HISPANIC CHILDREN AND FAMILIES: $1.7M → 17%THE CHILDREN'S CENTER AT SUNY BKLYN INC: $41k → 20%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

94%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$64M · 13 repeat orgs$3.9M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +124% since the first grant, against +20% for those funded once.

13 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2025, 10 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

13
143

Total granted

$64M
$3.9M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+124%
+20%

Still filing today

31%
8%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesEducationArts & CultureYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CP
    CHINESE-AMERICAN PLANNING COUNCIL INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $22M · revenue +162%
  • TC
    THE COMMITTEE FOR HISPANIC CHILDREN AND FAMILIES INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $21M · revenue +124% · 50% of their budget
  • CD
    CHILD DEVELOPMENT SUPPORT CORPORATION
    3× · 2023–2025 · $5.2M · revenue +15% · 36% of their budget

Funded once

  • CF
    Center for Children's Initiatives Inc
    one grant, 2017 · $497k · revenue -100%
  • TT
    TENDER TOTS
    one grant, 2021 · $218k
  • SA
    SHELTERING ARMS CHILDREN AND FAMILY SERVICES INC
    one grant, 2021 · $171k · revenue 0%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Metrokids New York Inc

to operate a daycare center

Human Services
2
Medical Center Nursery School

To provide a secure educational setting in which young children participate in a wide range of learning activities, investigate a large number of developmentally-appropriate materials, and experiment with a variety of stimulating creative…

Education
3
43RD Street Kids Preschool Inc

43rd street kids preschool, inc. is a private, non-profit, parent cooperative preschool, licensed by the nyc health dept. the school provides programs for children ages 9 months to 5 years.

—
4
Park Slope Child Care Collective Inc

To provide day care to a diverse community in a loving, caring and supportive educational environment focused on the socio-emotional development of children ages 2 - 5.

—
5
Childrens Garden Early Learning Center Inc

The Children's Garden Early Learning Center is designed to meet the early care and educational needs for children ages 6 weeks through their 8th birthday. Serving up to 70 children on a full or part time basis through Early Head Start,…

Human Services
6
University Plaza Nursery School

University Plaza Nursery School is a parent run cooperative nursery school that seeks to provide a high quality preschool experience for children in the surrounding community.

—
7
University At Buffalo Child Care Center Inc

University at Buffalo Child Care Center offers care for infants, toddlers, and preschool children throughout the year.

Human Services
8
Bellevue Day Care Center Inc

Provide high quality low-cost child care services to working families.

Human Services
9
Committee for Early Childhood Development Day Care Center Inc

To provide comprehensive childhood development for disadvantaged pre-school children in queens, new york

—
10
Nuestros Ninos Day Care Center Inc

To provide quality education care for eligible infants, preschool, and school-age children.

—
11
East Side Early Learning Center

The center provides quality care and education to children of working parents and is licensed to care for 44 children from ages 6 weeks to 5 years old.

Human Services
12
Sephardic Community Youth Center Inc

The sephardic community center is a nonforprofit social service agency, that provides social, cultural, recreational and informal educational programs and activities for both its members and entire community

Youth Development
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Children's Center At Suny Brooklyn Inc; the most unlike its peers is Urban Neighborhood Educational Technology for You Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

18 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 18 of the 156 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
15/18
Grantees still filing
11/18
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CHINESE-AMERICAN PLANNING COUNCIL INC: $21,920,973 · Human ServicesCHINESE-AMERICAN PLANNING COUNCIL INCTHE COMMITTEE FOR HISPANIC CHILDREN AND FAMILIES INC: $21,184,053 · Human ServicesTHE COMMITTEE FOR HISPANIC CHILDREN AND FAMILIES INCCHILD DEVELOPMENT SUPPORT CORPORATION: $5,160,511 · Human ServicesCHILD DEVELOPMENT SUPPORT CORPORATION+5 more: $114,583 · Human ServicesCHILD DEVELOPMENT SUPPORT CORPORATION: $15,555,093 · OtherCHILD DEVELOPMENT SUPPORT CORPOR…+140 more: $4,050,595 · Other+140 moreLITTLE MUNCHKINS PLAYGROUP 56 INC: $48,601 · EducationMONTESSORI SCHOOL OF NEW YORK: $30,088 · EducationIMMANUEL GENIUS INC: $24,400 · EducationTRABAJAMOS COMMUNITY HEADSTART INC: $21,979 · EducationROCHDALE VILLAGE NURSERY SCHOOL INC: $7,276 · EducationTRILOK FUSION ARTS INC: $16,600 · Arts & CultureYOUNG EXCELLENCE SOCIETY INC: $9,500 · Youth Development
Human Services$48,380,120Other$19,605,688Education$132,344Arts & Culture$16,600Youth Development$9,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCHINESE-AMERICAN PLANNING COUNCIL INC: $21,920,973 over 9y, 14% of budgetTHE COMMITTEE FOR HISPANIC CHILDREN AND FAMILIES INC: $21,184,053 over 9y, 50% of budgetCHILD DEVELOPMENT SUPPORT CORPORATION: $5,160,511 over 3y, 36% of budgetSHELTERING ARMS CHILDREN AND FAMILY SERVICES INC: $170,731 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetWEST SIDE MONTESSORI SCHOOL: $48,800 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetLITTLE MUNCHKINS PLAYGROUP 56 INC: $48,601 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetCHILDREN'S CENTER AT SUNY BROOKLYN INC: $40,802 over 1y, 5.5% of budget1199 SEIU EMPLOYER CHILD CARE CORPORATION: $31,562 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetMONTESSORI SCHOOL OF NEW YORK: $30,088 over 1y, 4.8% of budgetIMMANUEL NEW YORK MISSION INC: $24,400 over 1y, 2.3% of budgetIMMANUEL GENIUS INC: $24,400 over 1y, 1.8% of budgetTRABAJAMOS COMMUNITY HEADSTART INC: $21,979 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetTRILOK FUSION ARTS INC: $16,600 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetURBAN NEIGHBORHOOD EDUCATIONAL TECHNOLOGY FOR YOU INC: $11,169 over 1y, 12% of budgetYOUNG EXCELLENCE SOCIETY INC: $9,500 over 1y, 2.1% of budgetROCHDALE VILLAGE NURSERY SCHOOL INC: $7,276 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetTHE ST JOHN'S PLACE FAMILY CENTER DAY CARE CORPORATION: $6,650 over 1y, 1.4% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds CHINESE-AMERICAN PLANNING COUNCIL INC ↗
  • Who funds THE COMMITTEE FOR HISPANIC CHILDREN AND FAMILIES INC ↗
  • Who funds CHILD DEVELOPMENT SUPPORT CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds Center for Children's Initiatives Inc ↗
  • Who funds SHELTERING ARMS CHILDREN AND FAMILY SERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds WEST SIDE MONTESSORI SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds LITTLE MUNCHKINS PLAYGROUP 56 INC ↗
  • Who funds CHILDREN'S CENTER AT SUNY BROOKLYN INC ↗
  • Who funds 1199 SEIU EMPLOYER CHILD CARE CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds MONTESSORI SCHOOL OF NEW YORK ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Low Income Investment…Robin Hood FoundationNational Philanthropi…American Online Givin…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
Low Income Investment FundCA13.2× affinity6 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Low Income Investment Fund · Robin Hood Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Day Care Council of New York Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Day Care Council of New York Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%3%13%28%50%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    10report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Day Care Council of New York Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Day Care Council of New York Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 156 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Day Care Council of New York’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home