· Public charity
Day Care Council of New York Inc
To serve as a voluntary federation of day care sponsoring boards, which operate day care programs in the five boroughs of new york.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 3 grants below total $6,139,692 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $8,404,947 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $2,265,255 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| COMMITTEE FOR HISPANIC CHILDREN AND FAMILIES | $2,109,661 |
| CHINESE AMERICAN PLANNING COUNCIL | $2,078,465 |
| CHILD DEVELOPMENT SUPPORT CORPORATION | $1,951,566 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $48.4M) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +124% since the first grant, against +20% for the ones you funded once.
13 repeat relationships — 3 still active in FY2025, 10 since wound down.
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- CPCHINESE-AMERICAN PLANNING COUNCIL INC9× · 2017–2025 · $22M · revenue +162%
- TCTHE COMMITTEE FOR HISPANIC CHILDREN AND FAMILIES INC9× · 2017–2025 · $21M · revenue +124% · 50% of their budget
- CDCHILD DEVELOPMENT SUPPORT CORPORATION3× · 2023–2025 · $5.2M · revenue +15% · 36% of their budget
Funded once
- CFCenter for Children's Initiatives Incone grant, 2017 · $497k · revenue -100%
- TTTENDER TOTSone grant, 2021 · $218k
- SASHELTERING ARMS CHILDREN AND FAMILY SERVICES INCone grant, 2021 · $171k · revenue 0%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
to operate a daycare center
To provide a secure educational setting in which young children participate in a wide range of learning activities, investigate a large number of developmentally-appropriate materials, and experiment with a variety of stimulating creative…
43rd street kids preschool, inc. is a private, non-profit, parent cooperative preschool, licensed by the nyc health dept. the school provides programs for children ages 9 months to 5 years.
To provide day care to a diverse community in a loving, caring and supportive educational environment focused on the socio-emotional development of children ages 2 - 5.
The Children's Garden Early Learning Center is designed to meet the early care and educational needs for children ages 6 weeks through their 8th birthday. Serving up to 70 children on a full or part time basis through Early Head Start,…
University Plaza Nursery School is a parent run cooperative nursery school that seeks to provide a high quality preschool experience for children in the surrounding community.
University at Buffalo Child Care Center offers care for infants, toddlers, and preschool children throughout the year.
Provide high quality low-cost child care services to working families.
To provide comprehensive childhood development for disadvantaged pre-school children in queens, new york
To provide quality education care for eligible infants, preschool, and school-age children.
The center provides quality care and education to children of working parents and is licensed to care for 44 children from ages 6 weeks to 5 years old.
The sephardic community center is a nonforprofit social service agency, that provides social, cultural, recreational and informal educational programs and activities for both its members and entire community
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Children's Center At Suny Brooklyn Inc and the most unlike its peers is Urban Neighborhood Educational Technology for You Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 26 years old; the field is 13. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 23% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 12% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
18 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 18 of the 156 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds CHINESE-AMERICAN PLANNING COUNCIL INC ↗
- Who funds THE COMMITTEE FOR HISPANIC CHILDREN AND FAMILIES INC ↗
- Who funds CHILD DEVELOPMENT SUPPORT CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds Center for Children's Initiatives Inc ↗
- Who funds SHELTERING ARMS CHILDREN AND FAMILY SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds WEST SIDE MONTESSORI SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds LITTLE MUNCHKINS PLAYGROUP 56 INC ↗
- Who funds CHILDREN'S CENTER AT SUNY BROOKLYN INC ↗
- Who funds 1199 SEIU EMPLOYER CHILD CARE CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds MONTESSORI SCHOOL OF NEW YORK ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Low Income Investment Fund · Robin Hood Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Day Care Council of New York Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Day Care Council of New York Inc?
Find your warmest path to Day Care Council of New York Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.