· Private foundation
Davita Charitable Fund Inc
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2021–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k7 grants · $33k
- $10k–50k21 grants · $470k
- $50k–250k2 grants · $299k
- $250k+5 grants · $1.6M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| AMERICAN ONLINE GIVING FOUNDATION | $500,000 |
| WESTERN GOVERNOR'S UNIVERSITY | $346,666 |
| AMERICAN DIABETES ASSOCIATION | $300,000 |
| NAACP EMPOWERMENT PROGRAMS | $250,000 |
| KABOOM | $250,000 |
| NATIONAL KIDNEY FOUNDATION | $150,000 |
| YMCA OF THE USA | $149,000 |
| PROJECT ANGEL HEART | $40,000 |
| FOOD BANK OF THE ROCKIES | $40,000 |
| DENVER SCHOLARSHIP FOUNDATION | $35,000 |
| DENTAL LIFELINE NETWORK | $30,000 |
| COLORADO YOUTH FOR A CHANGE | $25,000 |
| FLORENCE CRITTENTON SERVICES | $25,000 |
| GREAT EDUCATION COLORADO | $25,000 |
| BRENT ELEY FOUNDATION | $25,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY24–25, $50k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
23 repeat relationships — 22 still active in FY2025, 1 since wound down; 12 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 78% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $430k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- GLGOD'S LOVE WE DELIVER INC3× · 2022–2024 · $1.7M · revenue +31%
- FBFOOD BANK OF THE ROCKIES2× · 2024–2025 · $80k · revenue +1%
- DSDENVER SCHOLARSHIP FOUNDATION2× · 2024–2025 · $70k · revenue +81%
Funded once
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2023 · $600k
- AOAMERICAN ONLINE GIVING FOone grant, 2022 · $470k
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2024 · $20k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Colorado center on law and policy is an antipoverty organization advancing the rights of every coloradan.
We connect people, ideas, and nonprofits to make good happen. our vision is that all of jeffco is thriving.
The mission of education commission of the states is to advocate for attaining educational excellence for all and to help state leaders identify, develop and implement public policy for education that addresses current and future needs of…
To equip partners and communities in colorado and across the nation with the resources, services and unbiased data needed to improve health and health care. we help communities, organizations and individuals identify opportunities to…
To provide meaningful access to high quality, civil legal services in the pursuit of justice for as many low income persons and members of vulnerable populations throughout colorado as possible.
Central indiana corporate partnership (cicp) is an alliance of indiana's business and research university leaders coming together to foster long-term prosperity for the region. cicp's mission is to transform the economy of indiana in order…
AIA Colorado,is the voice of the architecture profession in Colorado. Through advocacy, leadership development, education and resources for architects, the organization supports architecture professionals in designing a better world where…
Colorado nonprofit association strengthens colorado's nonprofits through education, connection and advocacy.
The colorado children's campaign relentlessly champions the needs of children. we leverage data, research, and relationships to unapologetically advocate for kids, fighting for a brighter, more equitable future for every child in colorado.…
The common application is a not-for-profit membership organization of over 1,100 colleges and universities across the globe committed to access, equity, and integrity in the college admission process. every year, over 1.5 million students…
Prime health advances health justice, equity, access quality and cost through innovation, collaboration, and community building.
Assist banner health complete its mission to make health care easier so life can be better by providing integrated & coordinated care & population health management.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Philanthropy Colorado and the most unlike its peers is American Diabetes Association. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 31 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 3% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
38 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 38 of the 50 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds AMERICAN ONLINE GIVING FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds GOD'S LOVE WE DELIVER INC ↗
- Who funds KABOOM INC ↗
- Who funds American Diabetes Association ↗
- Who funds FOOD BANK OF THE ROCKIES ↗
- Who funds DENVER SCHOLARSHIP FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds PROJECT ANGEL HEART ↗
- Who funds DENTAL LIFELINE NETWORK ↗
- Who funds FLORENCE CRITTENTON SERVICES OF COLORADO ↗
- Who funds Colorado Succeeds ↗
- Who funds DENVER PUBLIC SCHOOLS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds COLORADO YOUTH FOR A CHANGE ↗
- Who funds GREAT EDUCATION COLORADO ↗
- Who funds BRENT ELEY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds GIRLS INCORPORATED OF METRO DENVER ↗
- Who funds CROSSPURPOSE ↗
- Who funds LA CLINICA TEPEYAC ↗
- Who funds ROUNDUP RIVER RANCH ↗
- Who funds PUBLIC EDUCATION & BUSINESS COALITION ↗
- Who funds METRO CARING ↗
- Who funds HIGHVIEW ↗
- Who funds American Heart Association Inc ↗
- Who funds COLORECTAL CANCER ALLIANCE ↗
- Who funds PROGERIA RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds LATIN AMERICAN EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds GREENHOUSE SCHOLARS ↗
- Who funds ETHAN'S SMILE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds WESTERN GOVERNORS UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds PHILANTHROPY COLORADO ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Colorado Gives Foundation · Rose Community Foundation · The Denver Foundation · The Colorado Health Foundation · Boettcher Foundation · Caring for Colorado Foundation · El Pomar Foundation · Denver Broncos Foundation · Xcel Energy Foundation · Mile High United Way Inc · Ima Foundation · Prosperity Denver Fund
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Davita Charitable Fund Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- City Year Inc — 11% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Davita Charitable Fund Inc?
Find your warmest path to Davita Charitable Fund Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.