· Public charity
Prosperity Denver Fund
PROSPERITY DENVER FUND invests in denver by financially supporting and partnering with scholarship providers, training providers, and nonprofits to increase the number of denver students who access and complete postsecondary pathways.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2021–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k5 grants · $33k
- $10k–50k14 grants · $289k
- $50k–250k12 grants · $1.4M
- $250k+13 grants · $17M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| DENVER SCHOLARSHIP FOUNDATION | $9,797,590 |
| THEDREAMUS - NEW VENTURE FUND | $1,534,245 |
| COLORADO UPLIFT | $1,134,622 |
| CROSSPURPOSE | $1,132,216 |
| KIDS ABOVE EVERYTHING - RISE 5280 | $457,730 |
| MILE HIGH 360 | $412,569 |
| SAVE OUR YOUTH | $402,768 |
| HIGHVIEW SHERMAN HIGHVIEW | $379,741 |
| PRODIGY VENTURES | $377,518 |
| MINDS MATTER COLORADO | $366,144 |
| DENVER KIDS INC | $338,722 |
| HARRY L AND EVA J PUKSTA FOUNDATION | $280,871 |
| SACHS FOUNDATION | $271,658 |
| SCD ENRICHMENT PROGRAM | $187,325 |
| BREAKTHROUGH AT KENT DENVER | $165,847 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY21–24, $940k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 99% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +23% since the first grant, against +15% for the ones you funded once.
23 repeat relationships — 18 still active in FY2024, 5 since wound down; 24 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 82% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $3.1M went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- DSDENVER SCHOLARSHIP FOUNDATION4× · 2021–2024 · $26M · revenue +91% · 59% of their budget
- CUCOLORADO UPLIFT INC3× · 2022–2024 · $1.2M · revenue +31%
- SFSachs Foundation4× · 2021–2024 · $787k · revenue +47%
Funded once
- HIHIDE IN PLAIN SIGHTone grant, 2021 · $9k · revenue -89%
- MCMARINE CORPS SCHOLARSHIP FOUNDATION INCone grant, 2021 · $7k · revenue +15%
- GAGIRLS ATHLETIC LEADERSHIP SCHOOLS Oone grant, 2022 · $6k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Careerwise's mission is to forge pathways to meaningful careers through bold advocacy, innovative apprenticeships, and industry led partnerships, creating a dynamic talent ecosystem that connects ambition to opportunity for empowered young…
To partner with the community to help children succeed in school and prevent student drop-out for students in greeley evans school district 6.
The university of denver (du) is a higher educational institution, providing both undergraduate and graduate degrees - the mission of the university of denver is to promote learning by engaging with students (continued on schedule o)in…
Education for youth throughout mesa county, co
Denver justice high schools mission is to provide a college preparatory education for all enrolled students. justice high school targets students who are chronically truant who have been unsuccessful in the traditional school setting or…
Scholarships for scienctific students
The Agile Learner Fund is a nonprofit organization of Colorado Succeeds. As a supporting organization, ALF exists for the express purpose of supporting activities that benefit Colorado Succeeds' mission, vision, and core strategies. More…
The mission of the alexander dawson foundation is to establish, operate and maintain an educational organization that will provide students with the highest quality education, nurture future leaders, prepare young adults to excel in…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Denver Kids Inc and the most unlike its peers is Harry L and Eva J Puksta Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 29 years old; the field is 15. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 23% startups (under 5 years old) — 2% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
55 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 55 of the 56 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds DENVER SCHOLARSHIP FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds NEW VENTURE FUND ↗
- Who funds COLORADO UPLIFT INC ↗
- Who funds CROSSPURPOSE ↗
- Who funds Sachs Foundation ↗
- Who funds HARRY L AND EVA J PUKSTA FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds MILE HIGH 360 ↗
- Who funds Kids Above Everything ↗
- Who funds SAVE OUR YOUTH INC ↗
- Who funds HIGHVIEW ↗
- Who funds MINDS MATTER COLORADO INC ↗
- Who funds PRODIGY VENTURES INC ↗
- Who funds DENVER KIDS INC ↗
- Who funds LATIN AMERICAN EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds ACCESS OPPORTUNITY ↗
- Who funds GREENHOUSE SCHOLARS ↗
- Who funds NORTH SIDE HIGH SCHOOL ALUMNI SCHOLARSHIP FOUNDATI ↗
- Who funds SCD ENRICHMENT PROGRAM ↗
- Who funds EVANS SCHOLARS FOUNDATION - COLORADO ↗
- Who funds KENT DENVER COUNTRY DAY SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds PUBLIC EDUCATION & BUSINESS COALITION ↗
- Who funds African American Trade Association ↗
- Who funds COLORADO ACADEMY ↗
- Who funds GIRLS INCORPORATED OF METRO DENVER ↗
- Who funds EVANS SCHOLARS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds LATINAS FIRST FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds COLORADO DREAM FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds DENVER HYBRID COLLEGE ↗
- Who funds THE DENVER FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Forward Steps Foundation ↗
- Who funds PINNACOL FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds THE CHALLENGE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds DENVERWORKS INC ↗
- Who funds CHERRY HILLS COUNTRY CLUB ↗
- Who funds DENVER PLUMBERS JOINT APPRENTICESHIP & JOURNEYMEN COMMITTEE ↗
- Who funds ACTIVATE WORK INC ↗
- Who funds COLLEGE TRACK ↗
- Who funds DENVER KAPPA ALPHA PSI SCHOLARSHIP FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds East High Angel Foundation ↗
- Who funds FOUNDATION FOR EDUCATIONAL EXCELLENCE ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Denver Foundation · Colorado Gives Foundation · Rose Community Foundation · The Colorado Health Foundation · Mile High United Way Inc · Denver Broncos Foundation · Ima Foundation · Adolph Coors Foundation · Schlessman Foundation Inc · Boettcher Foundation · The Anschutz Foundation · Daniels Fund
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Prosperity Denver Fund funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Prosperity Denver Fund?
Find your warmest path to Prosperity Denver Fund through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.