Skip to content
Davis-McCullough Foundation Inc at a glance

· Private foundation

Davis-McCullough Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$243k
Granted FY2025still arriving
5
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$135k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Health$1.5MRecreation & Sports$924kArts & Culture$281kAnimals$176kEducation$85kHuman Services$75kEnvironment$5k
02FY2025 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k4 grants · $108k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $135k
$30,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$1.6M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CLYDESDALE EDUCATION FOUNDATION$135,000
KEVIN BABINGTON FOUNDATION$30,016
YOUNG SINGERS OF THE PALM BEACHES FOUNDATION INC$30,000
DANNY AND RONS RESCUE$30,000
SILVER OAK JUMPER TOURNAMENT LLC$18,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $156k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 74% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%BEAU BIDEN FOUNDATION FOR THE PROTECTION OF CHILDREN: $25k → 10%THIS OLD HORSE INC: $35k → 6%SELFLESS LOVE FOUNDATION INC: $10k → 13%THIS OLD HORSE INC: $5k → 6%CARIDAD CENTER INC: $81k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MN
NY
MA
NV
OH
PA
CT
CA
KY
VA
DE
SC
OK
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

77%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.3M · 10 repeat orgs$692k to everyone else

10 repeat relationships: 5 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

10
15

Total granted

$2.3M
$692k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+21%
+116%

Still filing today

70%
53%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
AnimalsHuman ServicesHealthEducationRecreation & SportsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CE
    CLYDESDALE EDUCATION FOUNDATION
    7× · 2017–2025 · $616k · revenue +2% · 100% of their budget
  • YS
    YOUNG SINGERS OF THE PALM BEACHES INC
    5× · 2017–2021 · $210k · revenue +34%
  • DR
    DANNY & RONS RESCUE
    3× · 2017–2025 · $45k · revenue +287%

Funded once

  • ME
    MASS EYE AND EAR
    one grant, 2022 · $351k
  • CC
    Caridad Center Inc
    one grant, 2024 · $81k · revenue 0%
  • TC
    THE CLYDESDALE EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2021 · $65k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
United States Equine Rescue League

Save Protect and Rehabilitate Equines

Animals
2
Liberty Sanctuary

Liberty sanctuary is a leading equine nonprofit dedicated to protecting americas most vulnerable horses and banning the slaughter of our cherished american equines. we rescue equines from the slaughter pipeline and offer comprehensive…

Animals
3
New Hope Farm Inc

Rescue and sanctuary for horses, donkeys, and mules.

—
4
Horse Hugs
—
5
Stormwalker Ranch Equine
Human Services
6
Heart of Gold Sanctuary

Heart of Gold Sanctuary rescues horses that are otherwise facing export for slaughter. or who are facing euthanasia due to injury, illness or behavioral issues. We work with each horse as an individual to provide shelter, proper diet and…

—
7
Red Bucket Equine Rescue
Animals
8
Equine Rescue Inc

To rescue and provide care, rehabilitation and adoption services for abused, neglected and abandoned horses.

Animals
9
Sundance Horse Rescue Inc

Nonprofit welfare organization dedicated to the rescue rehabilitation and re-homing of injured neglected abused abandoned or unwanted horses. We provide horses with a safe healthy haven to recover heal and return to good physical and…

Animals
10
Believe Equine Rescue and Rehabilitation Center Incorporated

Our focus is to provide a safe and loving environment for horses that have suffered abuse, neglect and injury while they regain their strength and begin to trust humans once again. When they have become fully rehabilitated, they can be…

Animals
11
Golden Monarch Equine Rescue Foundation
Human Services
12
Starry Skies Equine Rescue and Sanctuary

Starry Skies Equine Rescue and Sanctuary is a non-profit organization that takes in and cares for equines that were no longer adequately taken care of by their owners or are being diverted from the slaughter pipeline. The organization…

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Equine Advocates Incorporated; the most unlike its peers is Least Resistance Training Concepts Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

17 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 17 of the 25 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
8
Early backer (in before they grew)
15/17
Grantees still filing
12/17
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Schepens Eye Research Institute Inc: $931,545 · HealthSchepens Eye Research Institute IncKEVIN BABINGTON FOUNDATION: $79,839 · HealthKEVIN BABINGTON FOUNDATION+1 more: $18,000 · HealthCLYDESDALE EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $615,500 · Recreation & SportsCLYDESDALE EDUCATION FOUNDATIONSILVER OAK JUMPER TOURNAMENT LLC: $288,000 · Recreation & SportsSILVER OAK JUMPER TOURNAMENT LLCMASS EYE AND EAR: $351,000 · OtherMASS EYE AND EARTHE CLYDESDALE EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION: $65,000 · OtherTHE CLYDESDALE EDUCAT…YOUNG SINGERS OF THE PALM BEACHES FOUNDATION INC: $60,000 · OtherYOUNG SINGERS OF THE …ANIMALS VOICE: $36,340 · OtherANIMALS VOICETHE PALM BEACH MASTERS: $20,000 · Other+3 more: $26,000 · OtherYOUNG SINGERS OF THE PALM BEACHES INC: $210,000 · EducationMORRISVILLE COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC: $20,000 · Education+1 more: $2,500 · EducationCaridad Center Inc: $80,600 · Human ServicesTHIS OLD HORSE INC: $40,000 · Human ServicesBEAU BIDEN FOUNDATION FOR THE PROTECTION OF CHILDREN INC: $25,000 · Human ServicesSELFLESS LOVE FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 · Human ServicesDANNY & RONS RESCUE: $45,000 · AnimalsEQUUS FOUNDATION INC: $35,696 · AnimalsOMEGA HORSE RESCUE AND REHABILITATION CENTER INC: $25,000 · AnimalsEQUINE ADVOCATES INCORPORATED: $16,800 · AnimalsBROOKE USA INC: $5,000 · Animals
Health$1,029,384Recreation & Sports$903,500Other$558,340Education$232,500Human Services$155,600Animals$127,496

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSchepens Eye Research Institute Inc: $931,545 over 2y, 2.0% of budgetCLYDESDALE EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $615,500 over 7y, 100% of budgetSILVER OAK JUMPER TOURNAMENT LLC: $288,000 over 9y, 31% of budgetYOUNG SINGERS OF THE PALM BEACHES INC: $210,000 over 5y, 16% of budgetCaridad Center Inc: $80,600 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetKEVIN BABINGTON FOUNDATION: $79,839 over 2y, 9.4% of budgetDANNY & RONS RESCUE: $45,000 over 3y, 1.0% of budgetTHIS OLD HORSE INC: $40,000 over 2y, 5.0% of budgetEQUUS FOUNDATION INC: $35,696 over 1y, 9.8% of budgetBEAU BIDEN FOUNDATION FOR THE PROTECTION OF CHILDREN INC: $25,000 over 1y, 2.6% of budgetOMEGA HORSE RESCUE AND REHABILITATION CENTER INC: $25,000 over 2y, 2.7% of budgetMORRISVILLE COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC: $20,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetVinceremos Riding Center Inc: $18,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetEQUINE ADVOCATES INCORPORATED: $16,800 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetSELFLESS LOVE FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetBROOKE USA INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Adikes Family Fou…National Philanthropi…Jpmorgan Chase Founda…Network for GoodThe Bank of America C…Vanguard Charitable E…Donor Advised Charita…Fidelity Investments …American Online Givin…Amazonsmile Foundation
The Adikes Family Foundation Co Brosnan & Associates LLPNY13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 9 of 9Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Adikes Family Foundation Co Brosnan & Associates LLP · National Philanthropic Trust · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · Network for Good · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Davis-McCullough Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Davis-McCullough Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 40%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Caridad Center Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
4get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Davis-McCullough Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to Davis-McCullough Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 25 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Davis-McCullough’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home