· Private foundation
Davis-McCullough Foundation Inc
Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- $10k–50k4 grants · $108k
- $50k–250k1 grant · $135k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| CLYDESDALE EDUCATION FOUNDATION | $135,000 |
| KEVIN BABINGTON FOUNDATION | $30,016 |
| YOUNG SINGERS OF THE PALM BEACHES FOUNDATION INC | $30,000 |
| DANNY AND RONS RESCUE | $30,000 |
| SILVER OAK JUMPER TOURNAMENT LLC | $18,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $156k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 74% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
10 repeat relationships — 5 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down.
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- CECLYDESDALE EDUCATION FOUNDATION7× · 2017–2025 · $616k · revenue +2% · 100% of their budget
- YSYOUNG SINGERS OF THE PALM BEACHES INC5× · 2017–2021 · $210k · revenue +34%
- DRDANNY & RONS RESCUE3× · 2017–2025 · $45k · revenue +287%
Funded once
- MEMASS EYE AND EARone grant, 2022 · $351k
- CCCaridad Center Incone grant, 2024 · $81k · revenue 0%
- TCTHE CLYDESDALE EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATIONone grant, 2021 · $65k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Save Protect and Rehabilitate Equines
Liberty sanctuary is a leading equine nonprofit dedicated to protecting americas most vulnerable horses and banning the slaughter of our cherished american equines. we rescue equines from the slaughter pipeline and offer comprehensive…
Rescue and sanctuary for horses, donkeys, and mules.
Heart of Gold Sanctuary rescues horses that are otherwise facing export for slaughter. or who are facing euthanasia due to injury, illness or behavioral issues. We work with each horse as an individual to provide shelter, proper diet and…
To rescue and provide care, rehabilitation and adoption services for abused, neglected and abandoned horses.
Nonprofit welfare organization dedicated to the rescue rehabilitation and re-homing of injured neglected abused abandoned or unwanted horses. We provide horses with a safe healthy haven to recover heal and return to good physical and…
Our focus is to provide a safe and loving environment for horses that have suffered abuse, neglect and injury while they regain their strength and begin to trust humans once again. When they have become fully rehabilitated, they can be…
Starry Skies Equine Rescue and Sanctuary is a non-profit organization that takes in and cares for equines that were no longer adequately taken care of by their owners or are being diverted from the slaughter pipeline. The organization…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Equine Advocates Incorporated and the most unlike its peers is Least Resistance Training Concepts Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
17 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 17 of the 25 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Schepens Eye Research Institute Inc ↗
- Who funds CLYDESDALE EDUCATION FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds SILVER OAK JUMPER TOURNAMENT LLC ↗
- Who funds YOUNG SINGERS OF THE PALM BEACHES INC ↗
- Who funds Caridad Center Inc ↗
- Who funds KEVIN BABINGTON FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds DANNY & RONS RESCUE ↗
- Who funds THIS OLD HORSE INC ↗
- Who funds EQUUS FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds OMEGA HORSE RESCUE AND REHABILITATION CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds BEAU BIDEN FOUNDATION FOR THE PROTECTION OF CHILDREN INC ↗
- Who funds MORRISVILLE COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds Vinceremos Riding Center Inc ↗
- Who funds EQUINE ADVOCATES INCORPORATED ↗
- Who funds SELFLESS LOVE FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds BROOKE USA INC ↗
- Who funds LEAST RESISTANCE TRAINING CONCEPTS INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Adikes Family Foundation Co Brosnan & Associates LLP · National Philanthropic Trust · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · Network for Good · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Davis-McCullough Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Caridad Center Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Davis-McCullough Foundation Inc?
Find your warmest path to Davis-McCullough Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.