Loading…
· Private foundation
DAVIS-MCCULLOUGH FOUNDATION INC
This foundation accepts unsolicited grant applications.
$253k
Granted FY2024
5
Grants
4
Communities
$100k
Largest
01What you fund
0178% classified
What you funded, over time
Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2017–2024.
Health$950kRecreation & Sports$751kEducation$233kHuman Services$156kAnimals$72kOther$603k
02beneath the categories
Past the labels — and the year it shifted
Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.
…and in their own words, year by year
2018
horseswelfarehorserescuechildreneducation
2019
designeducation
2020
—
2021
activitieseducational
2022
operation
2023
operation
Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.
03FY2024 · 5 grants
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k1 grant · $5k
- $10k–50k2 grants · $68k
- $50k–250k2 grants · $181k
$49,823
Median grant
4
States reached
$4.0M
Total assets
Largest grants
- CLYDESDALE EDUCATION FOUNDATION$100,000
- CARIDAD CENTER INC$80,600
- KEVIN BABINGTON FOUNDATION$49,823
- SILVER OAK JUMPER TOURNAMENT LLC$18,000
- DANNY AND RONS RESCUE$5,000
02The need
04
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
show:
Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $156k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10% — the area typically sits at 9%. 74% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
03Your edge
repeat funding
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
72%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$2.0M · 8 repeat orgs$772k to everyone else
8 repeat relationships — 3 still active in FY2024, 5 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Re-uppedFunded once
Organizations
8
15
Total granted
$2.0M
$641k
Median revenue growth · since first grant
+30%
+101%
Still filing today
63%
47%
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 49% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $130k went to new ones.
RenewedFirst-time
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
Human ServicesAnimalsEducationHealthRecreation & SportsOther
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- YSYOUNG SINGERS OF THE PALM BEACHES INC5× · 2017–2021 · $210k · revenue +30%
- TOTHIS OLD HORSE INC2× · 2017–2018 · $40k · revenue +75%
- MCMORRISVILLE COLLEGE FOUNDATION2× · 2020–2021 · $20k · revenue +42%
Funded once
- MEMASS EYE AND EARone grant, 2022 · $351k
- TCTHE CLYDESDALE EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATIONone grant, 2021 · $65k
- TATHE ANIMALS VOICEone grant, 2017 · $36k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
04Your field
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
1
New Hope Farm Inc
Rescue and sanctuary for horses, donkeys, and mules.
—
2
Believe Equine Rescue and Rehabilitation Center Incorporated
Our focus is to provide a safe and loving environment for horses that have suffered abuse, neglect and injury while they regain their strength and begin to trust humans once again. When they have become fully rehabilitated, they can be…
Animals
3
Horse Hugs
—
4
Miracle Horse Rescue Inc
miracle horse rescue is dedicated to the preservation and welfare of abused, neglected and unwanted horses. the organization provides a final home giving them the care they so justly deserve
Animals
5
Evanescent Mustang Rescue and Sanctuary Inc
Animal Rescue
Animals
6
Second Chances Equine Rescue Inc
Second Chances Equine Rescue Inc. is a not for profit organization that will provide a humane alternative for horses and other large animals; provide necessary care and training depending on individual circumstances to increase their…
—
7
Red Bucket Equine Rescue
Animals
8
Farmyard Animal Rescue
We are committed to the rescue and rehabilitation of animals suffering from abuse as well as the successful retirement of working animals. We strive to improve public awareness and knowledge regarding the standards of care necessary to…
Animals
9
Liberty Sanctuary
Liberty sanctuary is a leading equine nonprofit dedicated to protecting americas most vulnerable horses and banning the slaughter of our cherished american equines. we rescue equines from the slaughter pipeline and offer comprehensive…
Animals
10
For the Love of the Hoof Inc
Animal rescue, We rescue equines from the slaughter pipeline and rehabilitate.
Animals
11
American Saddle Horse
To preserve the history of the american saddlebred horse for the purpose of education, presentation, display and dissemination of such related information.
Arts & Culture
12
Ryerss Farm for Aged Equines
Ryerss farm for aged enquines provides shelter and care for aged and abused horses.
—
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Equine Advocates Incorporated and the most unlike its peers is Least Resistance Training Concepts Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network
15 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.
2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/15
Grantees still filing
11/15
Grew since you first funded
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Health$949,545Recreation & Sports$750,500Other$603,163Education$232,500Human Services$155,600Animals$72,496
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds SCHEPENS EYE RESEARCH INSTITUTE ↗
- Who funds THE CLYDESDALE EDUCATION FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds SILVER OAK JUMPER TOURNAMENT LLC ↗
- Who funds YOUNG SINGERS OF THE PALM BEACHES INC ↗
- Who funds CARIDAD CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds THIS OLD HORSE INC ↗
- Who funds EQUUS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds BEAU BIDEN FOUNDATION FOR THE PROTECTION OF CHILDREN ↗
- Who funds MORRISVILLE COLLEGE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds VINCEREMOS RIDING CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds EQUINE ADVOCATES INC ↗
- Who funds DANNY AND RONS RESCUE ↗
- Who funds SELFLESS LOVE FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds BROOKE USA ↗
- Who funds LEAST RESISTANCE TRAINING CONCEPTS INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Baird Foundation IncWI11.4× affinity4 shared granteesties to 9 of 9Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →
Open a dossier: Baird Foundation Inc · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · Network for Good · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organisation DAVIS-MCCULLOUGH FOUNDATION INC funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
2025
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
3get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
05Through Plinth
Through Plinth
Your grantmaking, live and operational
This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: THE CLYDESDALE EDUCATION FOUNDATION.
Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk
Financial management
insufficient risk
Limited financial data in public filings.
Track record & reputation
medium risk
4 years of Form 990 filings, still active.
Legal standing
low risk
US 501(c)(3); EIN 364234010 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.
Governance
Live in Plinth
Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.
Compliance & sanctions
Live in Plinth
OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.
Program capacity
Live in Plinth
Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.
Live · Plinth’s real DD engine
Run the actual assessment on THE CLYDESDALE EDUCATION FOUNDATION, cold from public data.
Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.
Post-award monitoring · continuous checks
- Awaiting reportFinancial stability— Runway not derivable from filings.
- WatchSustained operations— Filing through 2024; revenue contracted over the period.
- WatchReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 100% of their budget — load-bearing; a dependency Plinth would track.
- Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.
What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.
Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing
Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro
How do I get to Davis-McCullough Foundation Inc?
Find your warmest path to Davis-McCullough Foundation Inc through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.
Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.
More from the funding graph
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars pass through an intermediary
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
Strange bedfellows
the named clusters of US funding
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines