· Private foundation
David R Clare & Margaret C Clare Fnd
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).
A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 53% of DAVID R CLARE & MARGARET C CLARE FND’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- $50k–250k1 grant · $160k
- $250k+4 grants · $2.9M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| NORTH COUNTY LIFELINE INC | $970,430 |
| GULF COAST JUNIOR GOLF TOUR | $970,330 |
| DAVID R CLARE JR DAVID CLARE FOUNDATION | $460,000 |
| ROBERT HINTON DRC MCC FAMILY FUND | $460,000 |
| DRC & MCC DONOR ADVISED FUND MATTHEW D HINTON | $160,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY20–25, $11.5M) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +53% since the first grant, against +18% for the ones you funded once.
88 repeat relationships — 2 still active in FY2025, 86 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 64% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1.1M went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
THE SHELTER FOR ABUSED WOMEN & CHILDREN INC5× · 2020–2024 · $4.2M · revenue +65%- NHNEIGHBORHOOD HEALTH CLINIC INC5× · 2020–2024 · $3.0M · revenue +86%
- SMST MATTHEWS HOUSE INC5× · 2020–2024 · $2.8M · revenue +205%
Funded once
- DMDRC & MCC DONOR ADVISED FUNDone grant, 2024 · $1.1M
- HSHAVERFORD SCHOOLone grant, 2024 · $634k · revenue +1%
- CRCRISTO REY JESUIT HS ORANGE COUNTYone grant, 2024 · $250k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…
The organization provides medical care to improve, maintain, and restore the health of the people in the communities we serve.
The mission of south shore charter school is to cultivate students the tenacity, integrity, and curiosity needed to become innovative and socially responsible leaders, ready to face and solve the ever-changing challenges facing our…
We, at ch, humbly join together to bring christ's healing mission and the mission of mercy of the catholic church expressed in catholic health care to our communities.
To serve our communities by provding innovative and compassionate healthcare.
Northeast college of health sciences (the college) is committed to academic excellence, leadership, and professional best practices in the health sciences.
Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.
As the parent entity of a blended health organization, highmark health seeks to improve the health and well-being of the people and communities it serves by providing affordable, accessible and high-quality healthcare.
Engage actively and continuously in medical research, education and training in the practice of medicine in conjunction with the department of family medicine of the indiana university school of medicine and indiana university…
All students learn the academic and personal skills they need to be truly prepared for postsecondary success and able to pursue their dreams.
To make kids better today and healthier tomorrow.
Golden gate university prepares individuals to lead and serve by providing high quality, practice-based educational programs in law, taxation, business and related professions - as a nonprofit institution - in an innovative and challenging…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Shelter for Abused Women & Children Inc and the most unlike its peers is Liberty Science Center. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 36 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
58 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2026, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 58 of the 106 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds THE SHELTER FOR ABUSED WOMEN & CHILDREN INC ↗
- Who funds NEIGHBORHOOD HEALTH CLINIC INC ↗
- Who funds ST MATTHEWS HOUSE INC ↗
- Who funds JF SHEA THERAPEUTIC RIDING CENTER INC FKA FRAN JOSWICK THERAP RIDING CTR INC ↗
- Who funds Southeastern Guide Dogs Inc ↗
- Who funds CHASTAIN HORSE PARK LTD ↗
- Who funds NORTH COUNTY LIFELINE INC DBA LIFELINE COMMUNITY SERVICES ↗
- Who funds HEALTHY SMILES FOR KIDS OF ORANGE COUNTY ↗
- Who funds SPECIAL OLYMPICS GEORGIA INC ↗
- Who funds GULF COAST JUNIOR GOLF TOUR INC DBA THE FIRST TEE OF NAPLES/COLLIER ↗
- Who funds Episcopal Academy ↗
- Who funds CAMP SUNSHINE INC ↗
- Who funds CATERINAS CLUB ↗
- Who funds Illumination Health Home formerly The Illumination Foundation ↗
- Who funds SESAME WORKSHOP ↗
- Who funds STEP 2 INC ↗
- Who funds KATE'S CLUB INC ↗
- Who funds HAVERFORD SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds THE GATHERING PLACE INC ↗
- Who funds University of Notre Dame du Lac ↗
- Who funds WEST CHESTER FOOD CUPBOARD ↗
- Who funds THE GESU SCHOOL INC ↗
- Who funds Naples Therapeutic Riding Center Inc ↗
- Who funds BEYOND BLINDNESS ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Greater Cincinnati Foundation · Johnson Charitable Gift Fund · Collier Community Foundation Inc · Hcs Foundation · Horizon Community Funds of Northern Kentucky · Interact for Health · Fidelity Foundation · Duke Energy Foundation · Synchrony Foundation · Orange County Community Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · American Endowment Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization David R Clare & Margaret C Clare Fnd funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Liberty Science Center — 14% of income from government
- The Shelter for Abused Women & Children Inc — 2% of income from government
- Southeastern Guide Dogs Inc — 0% of income from government
- Youth Haven Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.