How much did DAVID KIMMEL FOUNDATION grant in FY2025?

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 75% of DAVID KIMMEL FOUNDATION’s grantee dollars go to organizations outside the IRS cause taxonomy (common for large international and research funders), so a chart would be mostly “unclassified” and misrepresent the portfolio.

02beneath the categories

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.

…and in their own words, year by year

2020

—

2021

pap carcar cancermanhattanlung associiationyouthnyugive back

2022

heartlung associiationparenthood southvbcc youthyouth leadershipnorthwell healthsouth east

2023

pap corpwrestling alumnialsfarmingdale wrestlingadombrowardjewish

2024

greateralumninorthcancersouthradiowpbt

2025

kitchengreateralumnibrowardcancerjewishdog

Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.

03FY2025 · 71 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

Under $10k60 grants · $261k
$10k–50k11 grants · $134k

$5,000

Median grant

States reached

$10M

Total assets

Largest grants

CONCERTS IN MOTION$20,000
LONG ISLAND CARES$18,000
NORTHWELL HEALTH$13,000
CENTER FOR CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS$13,000
AMERICAN FRIENDS OF ARMDI$10,000
PAP COR VP CHAPTER$10,000
JASA$10,000
TEMPLE BETH AM$10,000
VISIONS$10,000
VOLUNTEERS OF LEGAL SERVICE$10,000
FIDF$10,000
PLANNED PARENT SOUTH EAST NORTH FLORIDA$9,000
PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF AMERICA$9,000
FEEDING SOUTH FLORIDA$9,000
PAP COR FOR CANCER$9,000

02The need

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY21–25, $83k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17% — the area typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge

repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

68%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.

$1.5M · 81 repeat orgs$711k to everyone else

81 repeat relationships — 62 still active in FY2025, 19 since wound down; 9 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

Total granted

$1.5M

$659k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+28%

+53%

Still filing today

22%

15%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 87% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $52k went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

Arts & CultureEducationHuman ServicesCrime & LegalHealthInternationalOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

CI
CONCERTS IN MOTION
5× · 2021–2025 · $101k · revenue +123%
VO
VOLUNTEERS OF LEGAL SERVICE
5× · 2021–2025 · $54k · revenue +68%
CF
CENTER FOR CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS
5× · 2021–2025 · $53k · revenue +16%

Funded once

SS
SEE STATEMENT BB
one grant, 2020 · $364k
FI
FLORIDA IMPACT
one grant, 2021 · $10k
AA
ALS ACCOCIATION FLORIDA CHAPTER
one grant, 2023 · $10k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

Long Island Jewish Medical Center

LIJMC strives to improve the health of the communities it serves and is committed to providing the highest quality of care for the community regardless of ability to pay.

Health

The City University of New York School

Support the educational needs of cuny law school

Education

Lenox Hill Hospital

LENOX HILL STRIVES TO IMPROVE THE HEALTH of the communities it serves and is committed to providing the highest quality of care for the COMMUNITY REGARDLESS OF ABILITY TO PAY.

Health

New York University

Nyu is a private university with approximately 60,000 matriculating students in 20 schools and institutes.

Education

Physician Affiliate Group of New York Pc

To offer responsive and quality healthcare to the new york community while fulfilling the educational and entrepreneurial needs of our members.

Health

South Shore University Hospital

South Shore strives to improve the health of the communities it serves and is committed to providing the highest quality clinical care and caring for the entire community.

Health

Metropolitan Jewish Health System Inc

To support the delivery of health care services to patients in the new york metropolitan area.

Health

The Jewish Community Center in

Creates opportunities to connect, grow and learn within an ever-changing jewish landscape.

Human Services

Glen Cove Hospital

Glen Cove strives to improve the health of the communities it serves and is committed to providing the highest quality of care for the community regardless of ability to pay.

Health

Museum of the City of New York

The museum of the city of new york fosters understanding of the distinctive nature of urban life in the world's most influential metropolis. it engages visitors by celebrating, documenting, and interpreting the city's past, present, and…

Arts & Culture

Northern Westchester Hospital Association

Nwh strives to improve the health of the communities it serves and is committed to providing the highest quality of care for the community regardless of ability to pay.

Health

Central Suffolk Hospital

Central suffolk hospital ("csh") is a not-for-profit hospital, a skilled nursing facility, and a certified home care agency.

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Mindleaps and the most unlike its peers is New York Public Radio. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 29 years old; the field is 18. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

The field is 18% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 9% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund

0.0%0/32

the rest of the field

1,828/20,151

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

30 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

29/30

Grantees still filing

25/30

Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Other$1,767,000Arts & Culture$124,500Crime & Legal$94,500Human Services$83,000Education$56,000Civil Rights$53,000Community Improvement$51,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jewish Communal FundNY19.7× affinity10 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jewish Communal Fund · Marty and Dorothy Silverman Foundation · The Ford Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · National Philanthropic Trust · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · Network for Good · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organisation DAVID KIMMEL FOUNDATION funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024

’20’21’22’23’24

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

0get no government money at all

0rely on government for over half their income

⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%

typical government reliance, FY20–24

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Through Plinth

Your grantmaking, live and operational

This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: NEXT GENERATION.

Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk

Financial management

insufficient risk

Limited financial data in public filings.

Track record & reputation

high risk

3 years of Form 990 filings, no recent filing; revenue up 54.7× since.

Legal standing

medium risk

US 501(c)(3); EIN 371954703 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.

Governance

Live in Plinth

Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.

Compliance & sanctions

Live in Plinth

OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.

Program capacity

Live in Plinth

Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.

Live · Plinth’s real DD engine

Run the actual assessment on NEXT GENERATION, cold from public data.

Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.

Post-award monitoring · continuous checks

Awaiting reportFinancial stability— Runway not derivable from filings.
FlagSustained operations— No recent filing on record.
On trackReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 37% of their budget — diversified.
Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.

What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.

Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing

Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro

How do I get to David Kimmel Foundation?

Find your warmest path to David Kimmel Foundation through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.

Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.

DAVID KIMMEL FOUNDATION

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

30 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to David Kimmel Foundation?

More from the funding graph

DAVID KIMMEL FOUNDATION

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

30 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to David Kimmel Foundation?

More from the funding graph