· Private foundation
Daryl and Laure Blume Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2018–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k8 grants · $34k
- $10k–50k9 grants · $127k
- $50k–250k2 grants · $242k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Individual grant recipient | $192,000 |
| FEEDING TAMPA BAY | $50,000 |
| FLORIDA RESURRECTION HOUSE | $27,300 |
| BLUE RIDGE WOMEN IN AGRICULTURE | $20,000 |
| THE DALI MUSEUM | $15,000 |
| ECKERD COLLEGE | $15,000 |
| ESSELSTYN FAMILY FOUNDATION | $10,000 |
| FLORIDA DREAM CENTER | $10,000 |
| BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB | $10,000 |
| STARTING RIGHT NOW INC | $10,000 |
| CATAWBA RIVERKEEPER FOUNDATION INC | $10,000 |
| RAILS TO TRAILS CONSERVANCY | $7,400 |
| PURSUE HEALTH | $6,090 |
| SOUTH MOUNTAIN CHILDREN'S HOME | $5,000 |
| SUNCOAST HOSPICE FOUNDATION | $5,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY23–25, $52k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
16 repeat relationships — 14 still active in FY2025, 2 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 91% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $35k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- FRFLORIDA RESURRECTION HOUSE INC2× · 2023–2025 · $47k · revenue +41%
- BRBLUE RIDGE WOMEN IN AGRICULTURE3× · 2023–2025 · $28k · revenue +21%
- ECEckerd College3× · 2023–2025 · $26k · revenue +4%
Funded once
ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION FOR A NEW AMERICAN UNIVERSITYgraduatedone grant, 2018 · $60k · revenue +125%- SPSHORECREST PREPARATORY SCHOOL INCgraduatedone grant, 2018 · $50k · revenue +68%
COMMUNITY COLLEGE OF RI FOUNDATIONone grant, 2024 · $10k · revenue -43%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Aicr champions the latest and most authoritative scientific research from around the world on cancer prevention and survival through diet, weight and physical activity, so that we can help people make informed lifestyle choices to reduce…
The mission of the foundation is to restore and protect america's everglades through its three programmatic pillars: science, advocacy and education. (continued on schedule o)
The florida state university foundation enhances the academic mission and vision of florida state university through its organized fundraising activities and funds management. the fsu foundation accomplishes its mission by fostering…
Working in partnership with state business leaders to secure florida's future.
To engage and catalyze global seafood supply chains in rebuilding depleted fish stocks and reducing the environmental impacts of fishing and fish farming.
Project drawdown's mission is to drive meaningful climate action by advancing science-based solutions and strategies. project drawdown's work is focused on three pillars: science - advancing science-based climate solutions and strategies;…
We educate the next generation of leaders to improve the health of our society.
To cure cf and provide all people with cf the opportunity to lead long, fulfilling lives by funding research and drug development, partnering with the cf community, and advancing high-quality, specialized care.
To promote, encourage and enhance research activities at the university of south florida.
To enhance the quality of life for all residents now and for future generations; to build permanent endowments, to provide community leadership on relevant issues, and to address needs through grantmaking. as part of our strategic plan,…
Mission statement: advancing evidence-based lifestyle medicine to treat, reverse and prevent non-communicable, chronic disease. vision statement: a nation and world wherein lifestyle medicine is the foundation of health and all healthcare.…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Feeding America Tampa Bay Inc and the most unlike its peers is Blue Ridge Women in Agriculture. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 28 years old; the field is 12. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 27% startups (under 5 years old) — 5% of your grantees by number, and just 2% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 17% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
22 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 22 of the 35 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds FEEDING AMERICA TAMPA BAY INC ↗
- Who funds ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION FOR A NEW AMERICAN UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds SHORECREST PREPARATORY SCHOOL INC ↗
- Who funds FLORIDA DREAM CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds FLORIDA RESURRECTION HOUSE INC ↗
- Who funds BLUE RIDGE WOMEN IN AGRICULTURE ↗
- Who funds Eckerd College ↗
- Who funds STARTING RIGHT NOW ↗
- Who funds The Esselstyn Family Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds SALVADOR DALI MUSEUM INC ↗
- Who funds Physicians Committee for Responsible Med ↗
- Who funds CATAWBA RIVERKEEPER FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY COLLEGE OF RI FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds C2LIFE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds American Heart Association Inc ↗
- Who funds THE V FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds RAILS TO TRAILS CONSERVANCY ↗
- Who funds WESTERN NORTH CAROLINA SCULPTURE CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds UNIFORM FUNDING FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds 24 Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds A KID'S PLACE OF TAMPA BAY INC ↗
- Who funds DONORSCHOOSEORG ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Rays Baseball Foundation Inc · Pinellas Community Foundation · Community Foundation of Tampa Bay Inc · Duke Energy Foundation · Publix Super Markets Charities Inc · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Endowment Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Network for Good · American Online Giving Foundation Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Daryl and Laure Blume Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Feeding America Tampa Bay Inc — 2% of income from government
- Florida Dream Center Inc — 0% of income from government
- Eckerd College — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.