· Private foundation
Darrell and Patricia Steagall Family Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).
A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 55% of DARRELL AND PATRICIA STEAGALL FAMILY FOUNDATION’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k33 grants · $106k
- $10k–50k7 grants · $105k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| NCSU FOUNDATION | $21,000 |
| HOLY ANGELS | $21,000 |
| THE SCHENK SCHOOL | $20,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $13,000 |
| THE HOWARD SCHOOL | $10,000 |
| VALLEY HOPE FOUNDATION | $10,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $10,000 |
| CENTRAL UNITED | $8,000 |
| SAMARITAN'S PURSE | $8,000 |
| CAROLINA CROSS CONNECTION | $8,000 |
| FOOD WELL ALLIANCE | $6,000 |
| HOPE OF MOORESVILLE | $6,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $5,000 |
| NC STATE STUDENT AID ASSOCIATION | $5,000 |
| SALVATION ARMY | $4,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY20–25, $48k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 71% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
50 repeat relationships — 37 still active in FY2025, 13 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 93% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $14k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- HAHOLY ANGELS INC6× · 2020–2025 · $110k · revenue +40%
- NCNORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC6× · 2020–2025 · $56k · revenue +364%
- TSTHE SCHENCK SCHOOL3× · 2023–2025 · $45k · revenue +8%
Funded once
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2022 · $30k
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2020 · $18k
- GDGeorgia Dietetic Foundation Incone grant, 2020 · $6k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Food & water watch conducts extensive research and public education to ensure the food and water we consume is safe, accessible and sustainably produced. so we can all enjoy and trust in what we eat and drink, we help people take charge of…
Arbor research collaborative for health is committed to improving patient care through research that shapes medical policies and practice. in particular, arbor research conducts health outcomes research on chronic disease and end-stage…
To provide food and other related products primarily to member agencies for distribution to those in need, and also for direct distribution.
Provide philanthropic support to firsthealth of the carolinas, inc., a healthcare system exempt from income tax under irs section 501c(3) and 170(b)(1)(a)(iii).
Feeding the spiritual and physical hunger, especially in at-risk children.
To support and empower all affected by gynecologic cancers through education, research, and public awareness.
Florida community health centers, inc. (fchc) is a federally qualified health center serving medically needy populations in south florida, with an emphasis on serving rural and farm worker communities.
Our mission is to create thriving communities by helping nonprofits succeed. our work revolves around four primary areas of focus.1. we are a hub for social innovation 2. we are a capacity accelerator for organizations and their people3.…
Empowering south carolina communities and children's advocacy centers to deliver a best practice response to child abuse
Provide food, shelter, rehabilitation and christian ministry to the poor and homeless
Acfb support organization, inc., is operated exclusively for the benefit of, to perform the functions of, or to carry out the purposes and/or activities of atlanta community food bank, inc., a georgia nonprofit corporation.
Foundation for food and agriculture research connects funders, researchers and farmers through public-private partnerships to support audacious research addressing the biggest food and agriculture challenges.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Holy Angels Inc and the most unlike its peers is Samaritan's Purse. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 33 years old; the field is 12. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 26% startups (under 5 years old) — 6% of your grantees by number, and just 5% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 15% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
36 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 36 of the 63 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds HOLY ANGELS INC ↗
- Who funds NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds THE SCHENCK SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds NC STATE STUDENT AID ASSOCIATION INC ↗
- Who funds CROSS CONNECTION INC ↗
- Who funds FOOD WELL ALLIANCE ↗
- Who funds VIRGINIA HUNTERS WHO CARE INC ↗
- Who funds Hope of Mooresville Inc ↗
- Who funds THE SHRINERS' HOSPITAL FOR CHILDREN ↗
- Who funds SAMARITAN'S PURSE ↗
- Who funds The Howard School Inc ↗
- Who funds Mooresville Area Christian Mission Inc ↗
- Who funds FEEDNC ↗
- Who funds UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH ↗
- Who funds THE V FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds SCHIELE MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY AND PLANETARIUM ↗
- Who funds St Christophers Children Inc ↗
- Who funds ACCESS REPRODUCTIVE CARE - SOUTHEAST ↗
- Who funds SMITH MEDICAL CLINIC INC ↗
- Who funds THE VALLEY HOPE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds UNITED WAY OF GASTON COUNTY INC ↗
- Who funds Crisis Assistance Ministry ↗
- Who funds Food For Days ↗
- Who funds ATLANTA COMMUNITY FOOD BANK INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Winston-Salem Foundation · Foundation for the Carolinas · The Carrie E and Lena V Glenn Found · Duke Energy Foundation · Ge Aerospace Foundation · Truist Foundation Inc · The Community Foundation for Greater Atlanta Inc · Hope at the Lake Foundation · Pearl Dixon Balthis Fdn Tua · Cecile G Ebert Charitable Foundation · The David Belk Cannon Foundation · Charities Aid Foundation America
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Darrell and Patricia Steagall Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- The Shriners' Hospital for Children — 6% of income from government
- Wounded Warrior Project Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.