Skip to content

· Private foundation

Darrell and Patricia Steagall Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$211k
Granted FY2025still arriving
40
Grants FY2025still arriving
10
States reached
$21k
Largest
01What it funds
0197% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Health$212kEducation$207kReligion$120kFood & Nutrition$83kHuman Services$80kInternational$53kYouth Development$30kHousing & Shelter$24kOther$0
02FY2025 · 40 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k33 grants · $106k
  • $10k–50k7 grants · $105k
$3,000
Median grant
10
States reached
$2.8M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
NCSU FOUNDATION$21,000
HOLY ANGELS$21,000
THE SCHENK SCHOOL$20,000
Individual grant recipient$13,000
THE HOWARD SCHOOL$10,000
VALLEY HOPE FOUNDATION$10,000
Individual grant recipient$10,000
CENTRAL UNITED$8,000
SAMARITAN'S PURSE$8,000
CAROLINA CROSS CONNECTION$8,000
FOOD WELL ALLIANCE$6,000
HOPE OF MOORESVILLE$6,000
Individual grant recipient$5,000
NC STATE STUDENT AID ASSOCIATION$5,000
SALVATION ARMY$4,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–25, $48k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 71% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%FRIENDS OF RAYMOND JAMES: $1k → 12%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $2k → 14%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $1k → 14%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $1k → 14%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $1k → 14%MOORESVILLE CHRISTIAN MISSION: $3k → 9%MOORESVILLE CHRISTIAN MISSION: $3k → 9%MOORESVILLE CHRISTIAN MISSION: $3k → 9%ST CHRISTOPHER'S CHILDREN: $2k → 15%ST CHRISTOPHER'S CHILDREN: $2k → 15%ST CHRISTOPHER'S CHILDREN: $2k → 15%MOORESVILLE CHRISTIAN MISSION: $2k → 9%ST CHRISTOPHER'S CHILDREN: $2k → 15%ST CHRISTOPHER'S CHILDREN: $2k → 15%ST CHRISTOPHER'S CHILDREN: $2k → 15%MOORESVILLE CHRISTIAN MISSION: $2k → 9%MOORESVILLE CHRISTIAN MISSION: $2k → 9%FAMILIES FIRST: $3k → 13%FAMILIES FIRST: $3k → 13%CRISIS ASSISTANCE MINISTRY: $2k → 12%CRISIS ASSISTANCE MINISTRY: $2k → 12%CRISIS ASSISTANCE MINISTRY: $2k → 12%CRISIS ASSISTANCE MINISTRY: $2k → 12%CRISIS ASSISTANCE MINISTRY: $2k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

ME
NY
PA
VA
TN
NC
SC
DC
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

91%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$826k · 50 repeat orgs$81k to everyone else

50 repeat relationships: 37 still active in FY2025, 13 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

50
10

Total granted

$826k
$67k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+40%
+57%

Still filing today

58%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 93% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $14k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHuman ServicesFood & NutritionHousing & ShelterHealthEnvironmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • HA
    HOLY ANGELS INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $110k · revenue +40%
  • NC
    NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $56k · revenue +364%
  • TS
    THE SCHENCK SCHOOL
    3× · 2023–2025 · $45k · revenue +8%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2022 · $30k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2020 · $18k
  • GD
    Georgia Dietetic Foundation Inc
    one grant, 2020 · $6k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Food & Water Watch

Food & water watch conducts extensive research and public education to ensure the food and water we consume is safe, accessible and sustainably produced. so we can all enjoy and trust in what we eat and drink, we help people take charge of…

Food & Nutrition
2
Arbor Research Collaborative for Health

Arbor research collaborative for health is committed to improving patient care through research that shapes medical policies and practice. in particular, arbor research conducts health outcomes research on chronic disease and end-stage…

Health
3
Feeding Southwest Virginia

To provide food and other related products primarily to member agencies for distribution to those in need, and also for direct distribution.

Food & Nutrition
4
The Foundation of Firsthealth Inc

Provide philanthropic support to firsthealth of the carolinas, inc., a healthcare system exempt from income tax under irs section 501c(3) and 170(b)(1)(a)(iii).

—
5
Feed the Hunger Inc

Feeding the spiritual and physical hunger, especially in at-risk children.

—
6
Foundation for Women's Cancer

To support and empower all affected by gynecologic cancers through education, research, and public awareness.

Health
7
Florida Community Health Centers Inc

Florida community health centers, inc. (fchc) is a federally qualified health center serving medically needy populations in south florida, with an emphasis on serving rural and farm worker communities.

—
8
The Georgia Center for Nonprofits

Our mission is to create thriving communities by helping nonprofits succeed. our work revolves around four primary areas of focus.1. we are a hub for social innovation 2. we are a capacity accelerator for organizations and their people3.…

Community Improvement
9
South Carolina Network of Children's Advocacy Centers

Empowering south carolina communities and children's advocacy centers to deliver a best practice response to child abuse

Youth Development
10
Western Carolina Rescue Ministries Inc

Provide food, shelter, rehabilitation and christian ministry to the poor and homeless

Housing & Shelter
11
Acfb Support Organization Inc

Acfb support organization, inc., is operated exclusively for the benefit of, to perform the functions of, or to carry out the purposes and/or activities of atlanta community food bank, inc., a georgia nonprofit corporation.

Food & Nutrition
12
Foundation for Food and Agriculture Research

Foundation for food and agriculture research connects funders, researchers and farmers through public-private partnerships to support audacious research addressing the biggest food and agriculture challenges.

Food & Nutrition
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Holy Angels Inc; the most unlike its peers is Samaritan's Purse. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

36 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 36 of the 63 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
9
Early backer (in before they grew)
36/36
Grantees still filing
27/36
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

HOLY ANGELS INC: $110,000 · OtherHOLY ANGELS INCCENTRAL UNITED: $39,500 · OtherCENTRAL UNITEDSPRINGMONT MONTESSORI SCHOOL: $36,000 · OtherSPRINGMONT MONTESSORI SCHOOLIndividual grant recipient: $32,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient: $30,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient: $30,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientSALVATION ARMY: $26,000 · OtherST JUDES CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL: $21,750 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $19,000 · Other+29 more: $200,850 · Other+29 moreNORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC: $55,500 · EducationNORTH CAROLINA STATE …THE SCHENCK SCHOOL: $45,000 · EducationTHE SCHENCK SCHOOLNC STATE STUDENT AID ASSOCIATION INC: $35,000 · EducationNC STATE STUDENT AID …The Howard School Inc: $15,000 · EducationThe Howard School IncUNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH: $13,500 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF PITTSBU…Georgia Dietetic Foundation Inc: $6,000 · EducationFOOD WELL ALLIANCE: $20,500 · Food & NutritionFEEDNC: $13,650 · Food & NutritionFood For Days: $8,300 · Food & NutritionATLANTA COMMUNITY FOOD BANK INC: $8,000 · Food & NutritionMooresville Area Christian Mission Inc: $14,000 · Human ServicesSt Christophers Children Inc: $12,000 · Human ServicesCrisis Assistance Ministry: $9,500 · Human ServicesFAMILIES FIRST INC: $6,000 · Human ServicesWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $5,000 · Human Services+1 more: $1,000 · Human ServicesCROSS CONNECTION INC: $22,500 · Housing & ShelterHope of Mooresville Inc: $16,250 · Housing & ShelterFAMILIES FIRST INC: $2,500 · Housing & ShelterTHE SHRINERS' HOSPITAL FOR CHILDREN: $16,000 · HealthTHE V FOUNDATION: $13,000 · HealthBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $1,000 · HealthACCESS REPRODUCTIVE CARE - SOUTHEAST: $12,000 · EnvironmentAMERICAN FOREST FOUNDATION: $5,800 · EnvironmentTHE AMERICAN CHESTNUT FOUNDATION: $4,000 · Environment
Other$545,600Education$170,000Food & Nutrition$50,450Human Services$47,500Housing & Shelter$41,250Health$30,000Environment$21,800

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetHOLY ANGELS INC: $110,000 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetNORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC: $55,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetTHE SCHENCK SCHOOL: $45,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetNC STATE STUDENT AID ASSOCIATION INC: $35,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetCROSS CONNECTION INC: $22,500 over 6y, 0.7% of budgetFOOD WELL ALLIANCE: $20,500 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetVIRGINIA HUNTERS WHO CARE INC: $18,000 over 6y, 0.4% of budgetHope of Mooresville Inc: $16,250 over 6y, 0.8% of budgetTHE SHRINERS' HOSPITAL FOR CHILDREN: $16,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetSAMARITAN'S PURSE: $15,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetThe Howard School Inc: $15,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetMooresville Area Christian Mission Inc: $14,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetFEEDNC: $13,650 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH: $13,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetTHE V FOUNDATION: $13,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetSt Christophers Children Inc: $12,000 over 6y, 1.1% of budgetACCESS REPRODUCTIVE CARE - SOUTHEAST: $12,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetSCHIELE MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY AND PLANETARIUM: $12,000 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetSMITH MEDICAL CLINIC INC: $12,000 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetTHE VALLEY HOPE FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetUNITED WAY OF GASTON COUNTY INC: $9,500 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetCrisis Assistance Ministry: $9,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetFood For Days: $8,300 over 6y, 1.5% of budgetATLANTA COMMUNITY FOOD BANK INC: $8,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFAMILIES FIRST INC: $6,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetBAT CONSERVATION INTERNATIONAL: $5,800 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN FOREST FOUNDATION: $5,800 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $5,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTHE AMERICAN CHESTNUT FOUNDATION: $4,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetFURKIDS INC: $3,200 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTHE ATLANTA WOMENS FOUNDATION INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFAMILIES FIRST INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetGASTON LITERACY COUNCIL INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetFriends of Raymond James Inc: $1,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds HOLY ANGELS INC ↗
  • Who funds NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds THE SCHENCK SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds NC STATE STUDENT AID ASSOCIATION INC ↗
  • Who funds CROSS CONNECTION INC ↗
  • Who funds FOOD WELL ALLIANCE ↗
  • Who funds VIRGINIA HUNTERS WHO CARE INC ↗
  • Who funds Hope of Mooresville Inc ↗
  • Who funds THE SHRINERS' HOSPITAL FOR CHILDREN ↗
  • Who funds SAMARITAN'S PURSE ↗
  • Who funds The Howard School Inc ↗
  • Who funds Mooresville Area Christian Mission Inc ↗
  • Who funds FEEDNC ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH ↗
  • Who funds THE V FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds St Christophers Children Inc ↗
  • Who funds ACCESS REPRODUCTIVE CARE - SOUTHEAST ↗
  • Who funds SCHIELE MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY AND PLANETARIUM ↗
  • Who funds SMITH MEDICAL CLINIC INC ↗
  • Who funds THE VALLEY HOPE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds UNITED WAY OF GASTON COUNTY INC ↗
  • Who funds Crisis Assistance Ministry ↗
  • Who funds Food For Days ↗
  • Who funds ATLANTA COMMUNITY FOOD BANK INC ↗
  • Who funds FAMILIES FIRST INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Winston-Salem FoundationNC16.6× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Winston-Salem Foundation · Foundation for the Carolinas · The Carrie E and Lena V Glenn Found · Duke Energy Foundation · Ge Aerospace Foundation · Truist Foundation Inc · The Community Foundation for Greater Atlanta Inc · Hope at the Lake Foundation · Pearl Dixon Balthis Fdn Tua · Cecile G Ebert Charitable Foundation · The David Belk Cannon Foundation · Charities Aid Foundation America

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Darrell and Patricia Steagall Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Darrell and Patricia Steagall Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 6%
  • The Shriners' Hospital for Children: 6% of income from government
  • Wounded Warrior Project Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
9report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 63 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Darrell and Patricia Steagall Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph