Skip to content

· Private foundation

Da Capo Fund

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$87k
Granted FY2025still arriving
13
Grants FY2025still arriving
11
States reached
$17k
Largest
01What it funds
0193% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Health$122kInternational$106kArts & Culture$70kCivil Rights$62kScience & Tech$57kEmployment$47kAnimals$45kCrime & Legal$34kOther$0
02FY2025 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k10 grants · $49k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $38k
$6,900
Median grant
11
States reached
$947k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ACLU FOUNDATION$17,300
PRX$10,200
KOSHER EDUCATIONAL MEDIA INC$10,000
HUMANITY NOW$9,500
ELECTRONIC FRONTIER FOUNDATION$8,400
DOCTORS WITHOUT BORDERS USA$7,900
PLANNED PARENTHOOD$6,900
PROPUBLICA$5,200
SKEENA WILD CONSERVATION TRUST$4,300
COMMUNITY FOOD SHARE$2,500
TOUCH A HEART$2,000
INTERNATIONAL RESCUE COMMITTEE$2,000
DANA FARBER CANCER INSTITUTE$700
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–25, $54k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%TOUCH A HEART: $12k → 9%JEWISH SOCIAL SERVICE AGENCY: $4k → 8%TOUCH A HEART: $11k → 9%JEWISH SOCIAL SERVICE AGENCY: $3k → 8%TOUCH A HEART: $10k → 9%JEWISH SOCIAL SERVICE AGENCY HOSPIC: $600 → 8%TOUCH A HEART: $7k → 9%TOUCH A HEART: $6k → 9%TOUCH A HEART: $2k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

VT
MN
NY
MA
OR
CA
CO
MO
VA
MD
NC
DC
HI
AL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

84%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$547k · 19 repeat orgs$103k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +77% since the first grant, against +47% for those funded once.

19 repeat relationships: 9 still active in FY2025, 10 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

19
18

Total granted

$547k
$81k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+77%
+47%

Still filing today

79%
44%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 74% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $23k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
InternationalHuman ServicesArts & CultureCrime & LegalCivil RightsHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $67k · revenue +98%
  • TA
    TOUCH A HEART INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $47k · revenue +55%
  • AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUNDATION INC
    8× · 2018–2025 · $46k · revenue +110%

Funded once

  • SO
    SCHOOL OF LEADERSHIP-AFGHANISTAN INCgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $14k · revenue +73%
  • N
    NPR
    one grant, 2023 · $14k
  • IPAS
    one grant, 2023 · $8k · revenue -6%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Actionaid Usa

Actionaid is an international network building a just, equitable, and sustainable world in solidarity with communities on the frontlines of poverty and injustice. actionaid usa is the u.s. branch of actionaid international, which works in…

Social Science
2
Fajr Scientific

To provide multi-specialty surgical care, humanitarian aid and educational support to people in low- and middle-income countries.

Science & Tech
3
Open Markets Institute

The open markets institute works to help people relearn how to use competition policy to build stronger democracies, more just and equitable societies, more innovative and sustainable economies, and a more secure and peaceful world.

Education
4
Observer Research Foundation America

Organization mission the observer research foundation america orf america is an independent, non-partisan, and nonprofit organization in washington dc dedicated to addressing policy challenges facing the united states, india, and their…

International
5
The Union of Concerned Scientists Inc

The union of concerned scientists puts rigorous, independent science into action, developing solutions and advocating for a healthy, safe, and just future.

International
6
Activate Global Inc

Activate empowers scientists to reinvent the world by bringing their research to market. activate partners with u.s. based funders, research institutions, and other pillars of the hard technology community to help entrepreneurial…

Environment
7
Accion International

Our mission is to create a fair and inclusive economy where underserved people have quality financial choices and opportunities to improve their economic well-being. we find and help build innovative companies with the potential to reach…

International
8
International Life Sciences Institute

Ilsi is a global, nonprofit federation dedicated to generating and advancing emerging science and groundbreaking research to ensure foods are safe, nutritious and sustainable, and that they improve planetary and human health and well-being…

Science & Tech
9
International Aids Vaccine Initiative Inc

A nonprofit scientific research organization that develops vaccines and antibodies for hiv, tuberculosis, and emerging infectious diseases.

International
10
Asociacion Interamericana Para La Defensa Del Ambiente

To strenghten people's ability to guarantee their individual and collective right to a healthy environment, via the development, implementation, and effective enforcement of national and international law.

Crime & Legal
11
International Biomedical Research Alliance

Our mission is to invest in and accelerate the development of the most promising future leaders in biomedical research with global impact.

Health
12
Internet Society Foundation

At the internet society foundation, we focus on funding initiatives that strengthen the internet in function and reach so that it can effectively serve all people. our work advances the vision of the internet society (isoc): the internet…

International
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Ipas; the most unlike its peers is Creativity Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

26 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 26 of the 41 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
26/26
Grantees still filing
20/26
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

PLANNED PARENTHOOD: $96,480 · OtherPLANNED PARENTHOODSKEENA WILD CONSERVATION TRUST: $40,000 · OtherSKEENA WILD CONSERVATION TRUST500 WOMEN SCIENTISTS FELLOWSHIP: $28,730 · Other500 WOMEN SCIENTISTS FELLOWSHIPPRX: $24,800 · OtherPRXElectronic Frontier Foundation Inc: $22,400 · OtherElectronic Frontier Foundation IncSCHOOL OF LEADERSHIP-AFGHANISTAN INC: $13,800 · OtherNPR: $13,500 · OtherSOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC: $11,100 · OtherWILD SALMON CENTER: $12,000 · Other+16 more: $56,400 · Other+16 moreMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $66,500 · InternationalMEDECINS SANS FRONTIE…International Rescue Committee INC: $20,680 · InternationalInternational Rescue …SOMOS EMPRENDEDORES: $17,100 · InternationalSOMOS EMPRENDEDORESHumanity Now: $9,500 · InternationalHumanity NowIPAS: $7,800 · InternationalIPAS+1 more: $1,200 · InternationalAMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUNDATION INC: $46,460 · Civil RightsAMERICAN CIV…EQUAL JUSTICE INITIATIVE: $27,030 · Civil RightsEQUAL JUSTIC…TOUCH A HEART INC: $46,800 · Human ServicesTOUCH A H…JEWISH SOCIAL SERVICE AGENCY: $7,200 · Human ServicesJEWISH SO…+1 more: $1,500 · Human ServicesPRO PUBLICA INC: $34,580 · Arts & CulturePublic Radio International Inc: $4,000 · Arts & CultureHOPE CONNECTIONS FOR CANCER SUPPORT INC: $22,980 · Health+1 more: $700 · HealthCREATIVITY FOUNDATION: $17,600 · Philanthropy
Other$319,210International$122,780Civil Rights$73,490Human Services$55,500Arts & Culture$38,580Health$23,680Philanthropy$17,600

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $66,500 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetTOUCH A HEART INC: $46,800 over 6y, 1.7% of budgetAMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUNDATION INC: $46,460 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetPRO PUBLICA INC: $34,580 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetEQUAL JUSTICE INITIATIVE: $27,030 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetHOPE CONNECTIONS FOR CANCER SUPPORT INC: $22,980 over 6y, 0.7% of budgetElectronic Frontier Foundation Inc: $22,400 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetInternational Rescue Committee INC: $20,680 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetCREATIVITY FOUNDATION: $17,600 over 2y, 20% of budgetSOMOS EMPRENDEDORES: $17,100 over 3y, 7.7% of budgetSCHOOL OF LEADERSHIP-AFGHANISTAN INC: $13,800 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetWILD SALMON CENTER: $12,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetSOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC: $11,100 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetHumanity Now: $9,500 over 1y, 6.1% of budgetIPAS: $7,800 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH SOCIAL SERVICE AGENCY: $7,200 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN ASSOCIATION FOR THE ADVANCEMENT OF SCIENCE: $6,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE ANTI-RECIDIVISM COALITION: $4,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetPublic Radio International Inc: $4,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRosalie Rendu Inc: $3,500 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetBLACK FARMER FUND INC: $2,700 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCOMMUNITY FOOD SHARE INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CONSERVATION FUND A NONPROFIT CORPORATION: $1,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetGIVEDIRECTLY INC: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNEW INCENTIVES: $1,200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc: $700 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗
  • Who funds TOUCH A HEART INC ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds PRO PUBLICA INC ↗
  • Who funds EQUAL JUSTICE INITIATIVE ↗
  • Who funds HOPE CONNECTIONS FOR CANCER SUPPORT INC ↗
  • Who funds Electronic Frontier Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds International Rescue Committee INC ↗
  • Who funds CREATIVITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds SOMOS EMPRENDEDORES ↗
  • Who funds SCHOOL OF LEADERSHIP-AFGHANISTAN INC ↗
  • Who funds WILD SALMON CENTER ↗
  • Who funds SOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds Humanity Now ↗
  • Who funds IPAS ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH SOCIAL SERVICE AGENCY ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN ASSOCIATION FOR THE ADVANCEMENT OF SCIENCE ↗
  • Who funds THE ANTI-RECIDIVISM COALITION ↗
  • Who funds Public Radio International Inc ↗
  • Who funds Rosalie Rendu Inc ↗
  • Who funds BLACK FARMER FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY FOOD SHARE INC ↗
  • Who funds THE CONSERVATION FUND A NONPROFIT CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds GIVEDIRECTLY INC ↗
  • Who funds NEW INCENTIVES ↗
  • Who funds Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Silicon Valley Community FoundationCA11.2× affinity4 shared granteesties to 8 of 8Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Silicon Valley Community Foundation · American Endowment Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Da Capo Fund funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Da Capo Fund. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 7%
  • Wild Salmon Center: 49% of income from government
  • Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc: 7% of income from government
  • Jewish Social Service Agency: 1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Da Capo Fund?

Find your warmest path to Da Capo Fund through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 41 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Da Capo’s filings →

More from the funding graph