· Private foundation
Cso Inc
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2019–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k12 grants · $63k
- $10k–50k1 grant · $37k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| HABITAT FOR HUMANITY | $36,500 |
| DETROIT RESCUE MISSION MINISTRIES | $9,000 |
| CAMP BARNABAS | $9,000 |
| MACOMB COUNTY ROTATING EMERGENCY SHELTER TEAM | $9,000 |
| LIGHTHOUSE | $9,000 |
| ATLANTA MISSION | $9,000 |
| REVIVAL TABERNACLE | $5,000 |
| DOWNTOWN SOUP KITCHEN HOPE CENTER | $3,000 |
| BRIDGE COMMUNITIES INC | $3,000 |
| BREAKTHROUGH | $2,000 |
| CRU INNER CITY DETROIT (CREATING OPTIONS TOGETHER) | $2,000 |
| ALL WORTHY OF LOVE | $2,000 |
| YOUTH FOR CHRIST | $1,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY19–25, $48k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 96% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +75% since the first grant, against +56% for the ones you funded once.
29 repeat relationships — 12 still active in FY2025, 17 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 98% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- HFHABITAT FOR HUMANITY7× · 2019–2025 · $330k · revenue +127%
- MCMACOMB COUNTY ROTATING EMERGENCY SHELTER TEAM7× · 2019–2025 · $44k · revenue +36%
- MIMALAYKA INTERNATIONAL4× · 2019–2024 · $25k · revenue +2%
Funded once
- RCREVOLUTION CHURCHone grant, 2019 · $5k
GRACE CENTERS OF HOPEgraduatedone grant, 2019 · $5k · revenue +63%- M(MISSIONME (FURTHER CREDIT TO ASAAD FARAJ STATE SPONSORSHIP)one grant, 2020 · $2k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Glorify and serve god by providing meals for hungry men, women, and children, emergency shelter and transition to independence for homeless men, and spiritual hope through jesus christ.
Bringing hope, healing, and recovery to seattle's homeless through a christ-centered approach.
Christian Mission for the United Nations Community is a ministry aimed at leading the head of every nation and other top leaders to faith in Jesus Christ and helping them to walk in dependence upon God as they discharge the…
Miracle hill ministries is committed to life transformation for children and adults experiencing homelessness. more information and program outcomes may be found at www.miraclehill.org.
Time of grace is for people who want more growth and less struggle in their spiritual walk. we share the truth of god's word simply and clearly through television, print, and digital media that people view millions of times each month. we…
Habitat for humanity of northwest metro atlanta, inc. is an affiliate of the americus-based habitat for humanity international. habitat for humanity of northwest metro atlanta, inc. is an ecumenical, christian housing ministry dedicated to…
Transforming lives in the Ville through access to supportive services and efficacy.
Prevent homelessness. promote self-sufficiency and dignity.
Offer freedom from addiction through christ-centered recovery.
To glorify god, show christian love, and experience god's presence as christians share each other's medical bills.
Okaloosa habitat for humanity is a non-profit, christian organization dedicated to eliminating substandard housing in okaloosa county. we provide opportunites for the community to show god's love in action. through partnership with people…
Expressing God's love by reaching out to the hurting and homeless of the Great Lakes Bay Region by providing shelter and care, proclaiming the Gospel of Christ, and establishing Christian disciples among disadvantaged people.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Atlanta Union Mission Corporation and the most unlike its peers is Samaritan's Purse. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
23 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 23 of the 40 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds HABITAT FOR HUMANITY ↗
- Who funds MACOMB COUNTY ROTATING EMERGENCY SHELTER TEAM ↗
- Who funds ATLANTA UNION MISSION CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds Detroit Rescue Mission Ministries ↗
- Who funds MALAYKA INTERNATIONAL ↗
- Who funds BRIDGE COMMUNITIES INC ↗
- Who funds DOWNTOWN SOUP KITCHEN INC ↗
- Who funds SAMARITAN'S PURSE ↗
- Who funds All Worthy Of Love ↗
- Who funds BREAKTHROUGH URBAN MINISTRIES INC ↗
- Who funds TEACH THE STORY ↗
- Who funds GRACE CENTERS OF HOPE ↗
- Who funds SHELTER ASSOCIATION OF WASHTENAW COUNTY ↗
- Who funds COPTIC AMERICAN FRIENDSHIP ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds ALLIANCE DEFENDING FREEDOM ↗
- Who funds CURA FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds INTERNATIONAL JUSTICE MISSION ↗
- Who funds PAUL ANDERSON YOUTH HOME INC ↗
- Who funds NEW HOPE FAMILY SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds HOUSE OF PROVIDENCE ↗
- Who funds FIRST LIBERTY INSTITUTE ↗
- Who funds YOUNG LIFE ↗
- Who funds BEST CHRISTMAS EVER INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · American Endowment Foundation · Network for Good · National Philanthropic Trust · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Cso Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.