Skip to content
Crowell Family Foundation 7522-Xxxxxx00058 at a glance

· Private foundation

Crowell Family Foundation 7522-Xxxxxx00058

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$93k
Granted FY2025still arriving
35
Grants FY2025still arriving
14
States reached
$21k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
0186% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Philanthropy$236kEnvironment$106kPublic Safety & Disaster$50kEducation$44kInternational$40kArts & Culture$37kHealth$30kHuman Services$26kOther$0
02FY2025 · 35 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k32 grants · $42k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $51k
$1,000
Median grant
14
States reached
$672k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF JACKSON HOLE$20,598
COLORADO GIVESORG$16,742
COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF$14,000
AMERICAN RED CROSS$7,000
BROOKS SCHOOL$2,500
CHAFFEE COUNTY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION$2,062
SMITH COLLEGE$2,000
AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION$2,000
KENDALL AT HANOVER$2,000
ORGANIC CONSUMERS ASSOCIATION$1,500
UNION OF CONCERNED SCIENTISTS$1,038
Individual grant recipient$1,000
ALZHEIMER'S ASSOCIATION$1,000
350ORG$1,000
CHEWONKI FOUNDATION$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $10k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%WAVES FOR WATER INC: $250 → 14%EMERGENCY FAMILY ASSISTANCE ASSOC: $2k → 12%EMERGENCY FAMILY ASSISTANCE ASSOC: $1k → 12%EMERGENCY FAMILY ASSISTANCE ASSOC: $1k → 12%EMERGENCY FAMILY ASSISTANCE ASSOC: $1k → 12%NRAL PRO CHOICE AMERICA: $500 → 14%EMERGENCY FAMILY ASSISTANCE ASSOC: $500 → 12%NRAL PRO CHOICE AMERICA: $500 → 14%NRAL PRO CHOICE AMERICA: $500 → 14%EMERGENCY FAMILY ASSISTANCE ASSOC: $250 → 12%NRAL PRO CHOICE AMERICA: $500 → 14%NRAL PRO CHOICE AMERICA: $500 → 14%NRAL PRO CHOICE AMERICA: $250 → 14%REPRODUCTIVE FREEDOM FOR ALL: $1k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

ME
VT
NH
ID
MT
MN
IL
NY
MA
WY
IA
OH
PA
CT
CA
UT
CO
VA
MD
AR
DC
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

93%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$480k · 105 repeat orgs$34k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +41% since the first grant, against +26% for those funded once.

105 repeat relationships: 29 still active in FY2025, 76 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

105
49

Total granted

$480k
$30k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+41%
+26%

Still filing today

60%
47%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 94% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $5k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EnvironmentArts & CultureEducationInternationalHealthPublic BenefitOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AD
    ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $15k · revenue +40%
  • MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $14k · revenue +98%
  • BS
    BROOKS SCHOOL
    7× · 2017–2025 · $13k · revenue +25%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2023 · $3k
  • UNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEFgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $2k · revenue +64%
  • IR
    International Rescue Committee INC
    one grant, 2022 · $2k · revenue -4%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Eastern National

Eastern national promotes the public's understanding and support of america's national parks and other public trust partners by providing quality educational experiences, products and services.

Recreation & Sports
2
Environmental Investigation Agency

To establish and promote programs to protect the global climate, forests, wildlife and the natural environment, through research, advocacy, and investigation.

International
3
Rainforest Trust

Rainforest trust saves endangered wildlife and protects our planet by creating rainforest reserves through partnerships, community engagement, and donor support.

International
4
National Association of Clean Water Agencies

Nacwa is the national voice of public clean water utilities, shaping water policy, convening a vibrant peer network, and empowering water leaders.

—
5
The Water Research Foundation

The purpose of the water research foundation (wrf) is a definitive research organization to advance the science of all things water to better meet the evolving needs of its subscribers and the water sector. to engage exclusively in…

Environment
6
American Gas Association

American gas association's (the association) mission is to develop and advocate for informed, innovative, and durable policy that fulfills our nation's energy needs, environmental aspirations and economic potential. we are committed to…

—
7
American Flood Coalition Inc

To drive transformational adaptation to protect communities across the country from higher seas, stronger storms, and more frequent flooding.

Environment
8
Amazon Conservation Association

Amazon conservation unites science, people, and innovation to protect the amazon - the greatest wild forest on earth. as guardians of the most iconic forest on the planet, we bring together the power of the latest science and technology…

Environment
9
Grist Magazine Inc

Grist is an independent, non profit media organization dedicated to reporting on climate change.

Environment
10
National Fish and Wildlife Foundation

To sustain, restore, and enhance the nation's fish, wildlife, plants, and habitats.

Animals
11
The Adirondack Council Inc

The adirondack council ensures the ecological integrity (clean water and air, wildlife habitat, etc.), wild character (solitude, scenic beauty, etc.), and vibrant communities of new york's six-million-acre adirondack park. the adirondack…

Environment
12
Conservation Legacy

Conservation legacy engages future leaders who protect, restore, and enhance our nation's lands through community-based service.in 2024, conservation legacy engaged 2,524 participants who completed over 1.5 million service hours on public…

Youth Development
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Colorado Gives Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Tomales Bay Watershed Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

96 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 96 of the 163 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
15
Early backer (in before they grew)
94/96
Grantees still filing
73/96
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

AMERICAN RED CROSS: $49,000 · OtherAMERICAN RED CROSSCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF: $34,000 · OtherCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OFBBB WISE GIVING ALLIANCE 2014: $24,800 · OtherBBB WISE GIVING ALLIANCE 2014COLORADO GIVESORG: $19,082 · OtherCOLORADO GIVESORG+95 more: $194,402 · Other+95 moreCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF JACKSON HOLE: $138,998 · PhilanthropyCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF JA…INTERNATIONAL COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $7,000 · PhilanthropyCOLORADO GIVES FOUNDATION: $6,142 · Philanthropy+2 more: $5,062 · PhilanthropyChewonki Foundation Inc: $7,500 · EnvironmentChewonki Foun…UPPER VALLEY LAND TRUST INC: $7,300 · EnvironmentUPPER VALLEY …CONSERVATION INTERNATIONAL FOUNDATION: $6,020 · EnvironmentCONSERVATION …NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC: $6,000 · EnvironmentNATURAL RESOU…350ORG: $5,750 · Environment350ORGENVIRONMENTAL WORKING GROUP: $5,000 · EnvironmentENVIRONMENTAL…EARTHJUSTICE: $4,500 · EnvironmentEARTHJUSTICENATIVE PLANT TRUST INC: $4,200 · EnvironmentFRIENDS OF THE EARTH: $4,000 · EnvironmentENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND INCORPORATED: $4,000 · EnvironmentSIERRA CLUB FOUNDATION: $3,706 · EnvironmentECO-CYCLE INC: $3,500 · EnvironmentNATIONAL PARKS CONSERVATION ASSOCIATION: $3,500 · EnvironmentHANOVER CONSERVANCY: $3,000 · Environment+14 more: $15,022 · Environment+14 moreMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $13,500 · InternationalHEIFER INTERNATIONAL FOUNDATION: $6,500 · InternationalCOOPERATIVE FOR ASSISTANCE AND RELIEF EVERYWHERE INC: $5,000 · InternationalTHE UNION OF CONCERNED SCIENTISTS INC: $4,838 · InternationalUNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF: $2,046 · InternationalInternational Rescue Committee INC: $2,000 · InternationalOXFAM-AMERICA INC: $2,000 · InternationalKNEISEL HALL: $4,700 · Arts & CultureOPERA NORTH: $4,700 · Arts & CultureNORTHERN STAGE COMPANY: $4,500 · Arts & CultureNATIONAL TRUST FOR HISTORIC PRESERVATION IN THE UNITED STATES: $3,700 · Arts & CultureNEW HAMPSHIRE PUBLIC RADIO INC: $3,200 · Arts & CultureNEW HAMPSHIRE PUBLIC BROADCASTING: $2,300 · Arts & CultureGRAND TETON ASSOCIATION: $2,000 · Arts & CultureSTORYCORPS INC: $2,000 · Arts & CultureCommunity Gallery Inc: $1,000 · Arts & Culture+1 more: $300 · Arts & CultureBROOKS SCHOOL: $13,000 · EducationTRINITY COLLEGE: $3,500 · EducationWIKIMEDIA FOUNDATION INC: $3,000 · EducationCHILDREN'S LITERACY FOUNDATION: $2,850 · EducationTHE TRUSTEES OF THE SMITH COLLEGE: $2,000 · EducationCARDIGAN MOUNTAIN SCHOOL: $1,300 · EducationTeton County Library Foundation & Friends: $1,000 · Education+2 more: $1,150 · EducationALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC: $15,300 · HealthHANDS ACROSS THE SEA INC: $2,500 · HealthMASCOMA COMMUNITY HEALTHCARE INC: $1,000 · HealthAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $700 · Health+1 more: $455 · Health
Other$321,284Philanthropy$157,202Environment$82,998International$35,884Arts & Culture$28,400Education$27,800Health$19,955

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF JACKSON HOLE: $138,998 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC: $15,300 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $13,500 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetBROOKS SCHOOL: $13,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetKENDAL AT HANOVER I: $8,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetChewonki Foundation Inc: $7,500 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetUPPER VALLEY LAND TRUST INC: $7,300 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetINTERNATIONAL COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $7,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetHEIFER INTERNATIONAL FOUNDATION: $6,500 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetPUTNEY SCHOOL INC: $6,500 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetCOLORADO GIVES FOUNDATION: $6,142 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCONSERVATION INTERNATIONAL FOUNDATION: $6,020 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetNATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC: $6,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budget350ORG: $5,750 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetEMERGENCY FAMILY ASSISTANCE ASSOCIATION: $5,750 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL PARK FOUNDATION: $5,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetENVIRONMENTAL WORKING GROUP: $5,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetGRAFTON CARES INC: $5,000 over 5y, 7.5% of budgetGRANITE UNITED WAY: $5,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetCOOPERATIVE FOR ASSISTANCE AND RELIEF EVERYWHERE INC: $5,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetTHE UNION OF CONCERNED SCIENTISTS INC: $4,838 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetKNEISEL HALL: $4,700 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetOPERA NORTH: $4,700 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetNORTHERN STAGE COMPANY: $4,500 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetEARTHJUSTICE: $4,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetNATIVE PLANT TRUST INC: $4,200 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetOil Change International Inc: $4,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE EARTH: $4,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND INCORPORATED: $4,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetREPRODUCTIVE FREEDOM FOR ALL: $3,750 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetSIERRA CLUB FOUNDATION: $3,706 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL TRUST FOR HISTORIC PRESERVATION IN THE UNITED STATES: $3,700 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetECO-CYCLE INC: $3,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL PARKS CONSERVATION ASSOCIATION: $3,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTRINITY COLLEGE: $3,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetNEW HAMPSHIRE PUBLIC RADIO INC: $3,200 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetWIKIMEDIA FOUNDATION INC: $3,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION BOULDER COUNTY: $3,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHANOVER CONSERVANCY: $3,000 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetCHILDREN'S LITERACY FOUNDATION: $2,850 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetCOMMUNITY FOOD SHARE INC: $2,750 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetGREATER YELLOWSTONE COALITION: $2,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetHANDS ACROSS THE SEA INC: $2,500 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetNEW HAMPSHIRE PUBLIC BROADCASTING: $2,300 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetVermont Public Radio: $2,200 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetCONNECTICUT RIVER WATERSHED COUNCIL INC: $2,200 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetCHAFFEE COUNTY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $2,062 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetUNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF: $2,046 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF JACKSON HOLE ↗
  • Who funds ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC ↗
  • Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗
  • Who funds BROOKS SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds KENDAL AT HANOVER I ↗
  • Who funds Chewonki Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds UPPER VALLEY LAND TRUST INC ↗
  • Who funds INTERNATIONAL COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds HEIFER INTERNATIONAL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds PUTNEY SCHOOL INC ↗
  • Who funds COLORADO GIVES FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds CONSERVATION INTERNATIONAL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC ↗
  • Who funds 350ORG ↗
  • Who funds EMERGENCY FAMILY ASSISTANCE ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL PARK FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds ENVIRONMENTAL WORKING GROUP ↗
  • Who funds GRAFTON CARES INC ↗
  • Who funds GRANITE UNITED WAY ↗
  • Who funds COOPERATIVE FOR ASSISTANCE AND RELIEF EVERYWHERE INC ↗
  • Who funds THE UNION OF CONCERNED SCIENTISTS INC ↗
  • Who funds KNEISEL HALL ↗
  • Who funds OPERA NORTH ↗
  • Who funds NORTHERN STAGE COMPANY ↗
  • Who funds EARTHJUSTICE ↗
  • Who funds NATIVE PLANT TRUST INC ↗
  • Who funds Oil Change International Inc ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

New Hampshire Charita…PatagoniaorgMt Roeschmore Foundat…Mascoma Bank Foundati…Emily Landecker Found…Colorado Gives Founda…The Stannard & Doroth…The Couch Family Foun…Community Foundation …Community Foundation …Ibm International Fou…Lane & Elizabeth C Dw…
New Hampshire Charitable FoundationNH32.8× affinity16 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: New Hampshire Charitable Foundation · Patagoniaorg · Mt Roeschmore Foundation · Mascoma Bank Foundation · Emily Landecker Foundation Inc · Colorado Gives Foundation · The Stannard & Dorothy Dunn Charitable Trust · The Couch Family Foundation · Community Foundation of Jackson Hole · Community Foundation Boulder County · Ibm International Foundation · Lane & Elizabeth C Dwinell Fdn

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Crowell Family Foundation 7522-Xxxxxx00058 funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Crowell Family Foundation 7522-Xxxxxx00058. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 70%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 5%
  • Connecticut River Watershed Council Inc: 40% of income from government
  • Upper Valley Haven: 38% of income from government
  • Advance Transit Inc: 18% of income from government
  • Trustees of Boston University: 12% of income from government
  • Northern Stage Company: 5% of income from government
  • Native Plant Trust Inc: 3% of income from government
  • The Trustees of the Smith College: 1% of income from government
  • Appalachian Mountain Club: 1% of income from government
  • Trinity College: 0% of income from government
  • Oxfam-America Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
7get no government money at all
18report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 163 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Crowell Family Foundation 7522-Xxxxxx00058’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home