· Private foundation
Mt Roeschmore Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k19 grants · $49k
- $10k–50k17 grants · $290k
- $50k–250k4 grants · $395k
- $250k+1 grant · $305k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| AMERICAN PRECISION MUSEUM | $305,274 |
| OPERA NORTH | $126,230 |
| UNIVERSITY OF REDLANDS | $112,028 |
| DARTMOUTH COLLEGE | $102,906 |
| MASCOMA COMMUNITY HEALTHCARE | $53,851 |
| AVA GALLERY & ART CENTER | $46,429 |
| NORTHERN STAGE | $39,826 |
| DARTMOUTH-HITCHCOCK | $33,174 |
| CLIF | $30,193 |
| NEW HAMPSHIRE PUBLIC RADIO | $17,500 |
| NEW LONDON BARN PLAYHOUSE | $12,000 |
| HANOVER CONSERVANCY | $11,000 |
| THE FROST PLACE | $10,000 |
| UNIVERSITY OF CA | $10,000 |
| JNSC | $10,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY22–22, $250) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
28 repeat relationships — 24 still active in FY2025, 4 since wound down; 16 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 90% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $94k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- NSNORTHERN STAGE COMPANY4× · 2021–2025 · $526k · revenue +289%
- CGCommunity Gallery Inc7× · 2018–2025 · $440k · revenue +25%
- ONOPERA NORTH4× · 2018–2025 · $387k · revenue +38%
Funded once
- LRLARISSA ROESCH CHARITABLE FUND AT SCHWAB CHARITABLEone grant, 2023 · $50k
- MFMATTIS-ROESCH FAMILY FUND AT FIDELITY CHARITABLEone grant, 2023 · $50k
- RFROESCH FAMILY FUND AT FIDELITY CHARITABLEone grant, 2023 · $50k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Vermont public informs, educates, and entertains through public service journalism and enlightening content rooted in vermont. our storytelling enriches lives and fosters community connection and understanding.
Western new england university, a comprehensive private institution with a tradition of excellence in teaching and scholarship and a commitment to service, awards undergraduate, master's, and doctoral degrees in various departments from…
To improve the health of the people in the communities we serve by integrating patient care, education, and research in a caring environment.
Plan nh, founded in 1989, has a mission to foster excellence in the planning, design and development of new hampshire's built environment. our membership is a multidisciplinary group of architects, engineers, landscape architects,…
Cvph medical center's mission is to provide quality health care for the north country region in upstate new york.
Located in south hadley, massachusetts, mount holyoke college is a highly selective, nondenominational, residential, research liberal arts college for women that is gender-diverse and welcomes applications from female, transgender, and…
Serve as the governing organization for physicians who are employed to provide clinical services to affiliated member hospitals (the "affiliated hospitals") of the university of vermont health network ("uvm health network").
The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…
To promote trails and greenways and to ensure that people will always have access to the landscape of vermont.
Bates is a college of the liberal arts and sciences, and is a coeducational, nonsectarian, residential college with special commitments to academic rigor, and to assuring in all of its efforts the dignity of each individual, and access to…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Hanover Conservancy and the most unlike its peers is Pomona College. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 39 years old; the field is 23. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 16% startups (under 5 years old) — 6% of your grantees by number, and just 2% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 8% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
32 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 32 of the 55 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds NORTHERN STAGE COMPANY ↗
- Who funds Community Gallery Inc ↗
- Who funds Trustees of Dartmouth College ↗
- Who funds OPERA NORTH ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN PRECISION MUSEUM INC ↗
- Who funds UNIVERSITY OF REDLANDS ↗
- Who funds MATILDA JOSLYN GAGE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds NEW LONDON BARN PLAYHOUSE INC ↗
- Who funds CHILDREN'S LITERACY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds UPPER VALLEY LAND TRUST INC ↗
- Who funds NEW HAMPSHIRE PUBLIC RADIO INC ↗
- Who funds MASCOMA COMMUNITY HEALTHCARE INC ↗
- Who funds WEST CENTRAL SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds TWIN PINES HOUSING TRUST ↗
- Who funds LEBANON OPERA HOUSE IMPROVEMENT CORP ↗
- Who funds HANOVER CONSERVANCY ↗
- Who funds NEW HAMPSHIRE HUMANITIES COUNCIL ↗
- Who funds THE PINE PARK ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds NEW HAMPSHIRE LAKES ASSOCIATION INC ↗
- Who funds Moraga Education Foundation ↗
- Who funds UPPER VALLEY HAVEN ↗
- Who funds UPPER VALLEY MUSIC CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds HANOVER ROTARY CHARITIES INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: New Hampshire Charitable Foundation · The Couch Family Foundation · Hypertherm Hope Foundation Inc · Mascoma Bank Foundation · Lane & Elizabeth C Dwinell Fdn · The Vermont Community Foundation · Barrette Family Fund · Crowell Family Foundation 7522-Xxxxxx00058 · Emily Landecker Foundation Inc · Trustees of Dartmouth College · Gulf Coast Community Foundation Inc · The Stannard & Dorothy Dunn Charitable Trust
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Mt Roeschmore Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Upper Valley Haven — 27% of income from government
- Vital Communities Inc — 4% of income from government
- Northern Stage Company — 2% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.