Skip to content
Cross Timbers Rotary Club Charities Inc at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Community foundation

Cross Timbers Rotary Club Charities Inc

We provide service to others, promote integrity, and advance world understanding, goodwill, and peace through our fellowship of business, professional, and community leaders.

$205k
Granted FY2024still arriving
9
Grants FY2024still arriving
3
States reached
$52k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2022 to 2024.

International$172kHousing & Shelter$35kHealth$32kYouth Development$29kEducation$28kPublic Safety & Disaster$21kFood & Nutrition$20kHuman Services$17kOther$0
02FY2024 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 9 grants below total $118,128, the rows itemized in this filing. The $205,041 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $86,913 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k5 grants · $32k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $35k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $52k
$7,258
Median grant
3
States reached
$65k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Cross Timbers Rotary Club DAF$51,920
PediPlace$13,424
Christian Community Action$11,075
Journey to Dream$10,010
Span Meals on Wheels$7,258
Winning the Fight$6,504
Lovepacs$6,403
Disaster Aid USA$6,294
Rotary International Foundation$5,240
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY22–24, $73k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 9% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%Lovepacs: $6k → 8%Disaster Aid USA: $6k → 11%Span Meals on Wheels: $7k → 8%Span Meals on Wheels: $6k → 8%Journey to Dream: $12k → 8%Journey to Dream: $10k → 8%Journey to Dream: $7k → 8%Cloud 9 Charities: $6k → 8%Cloud 9 Charities: $6k → 8%Cross Timbers Family YMCA: $5k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 52% of Cross Timbers Rotary Club Charities Inc’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.

Cross Timbers Rotary Club Charities Inclessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 4.1% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

41%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$74k · 4 repeat orgs$105k to everyone else

4 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2024, 1 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

4
6

Total granted

$74k
$67k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

-1%
+4%

Still filing today

100%
83%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 39% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $37k went to new ones.

50%100%’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’22’23’24
Human ServicesHealthEducationFood & NutritionCrime & LegalCivil RightsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • THE JOURNEY TO DREAM FOUNDATION
    3× · 2022–2024 · $29k · revenue +13%
  • WT
    WTF-WINNING THE FIGHT
    3× · 2022–2024 · $19k · revenue -22%
  • SI
    SPAN INC
    2× · 2023–2024 · $13k · revenue -1%

Funded once

  • OD
    OUR DAILY BREAD INC
    one grant, 2023 · $24k · revenue +8%
  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF NORTH TEXAS
    one grant, 2022 · $17k
  • Lewisville Education Foundation Inc
    one grant, 2022 · $11k · revenue -3%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Downtown Dallas Inc

Downtown Dallas, Inc. (DDI), is the champion of a clean and safe Downtown and of the economic development and vibrancy of this community of diverse, unique neighborhoods. DDI: Mobilizes and amplifies the services of public agencies.…

—
2
Court Appointed Special Advocates of Collin County Inc

CASA (Court Appointed Special Advocates) of Collin County speaks up for children who have been abused or neglected by empowering the community to volunteer as advocates for them in the court system. When the state steps in to protect a…

Civil Rights
3
Child Protective Services Community Partners Inc

Community Partners of Dallas is a non-profit organization dedicated to providing what abused and neglected children urgently need today to thrive tomorrow. Children access resources via their caseworker, and the agency works closely with…

Human Services
4
Young Texans Against Cancer Dallas

Young Texans Against Cancer is a network of motivated young professionals collectively working together to raise awareness and funds to support the local Dallas cancer community. The Dallas chapter was established in 2007, as part of a…

—
5
The Dallas County System of Services Inc

To unify services across Dallas County, to empower youth, strengthen families and build safe, healthy communities.

Human Services
6
Crisis Assistance Center Inc dba Community Assistance Center

To provide emergency assistance to people in Montgomery County, TX who are in an unexpected crisis.

Human Services
7
Casa of South Texas Inc

Child Advocacy

Human Services
8
Lone Star Casa Inc

Lone Star CASA elevates the voices of children in Kaufman and Rockwall County who have experienced abuse and neglect by providing trained volunteer advocates to work alongside children and families so they can achieve safety and stability…

Civil Rights
9
UnBound North Texas

Unbound North Texas exists to support survivors and resource the community to fight human trafficking through Survivor Advocacy, a 24/7 Drop-In Center, and Prevention and Awareness.

—
10
Raise Texas

RAISE Texas advances equitable policies and programs that foster financial security and economic mobility for low- and moderate-income Texans. We equip, innovate and advocate to reduce disparities, remove barriers and build opportunities…

Human Services
11
Bread for Our Children

Provide nutrition meals for communities in the Dallas/Ft Worth, Texas areas

—
12
Elevate North Texas

Elevate North Texas offers a welcoming and affirming environment for youth 18-24 experiencing homelessness providing short-term housing and case management. Elevate North Texas addresses youth homelessness from two angles: a hotel program…

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Childrens Advocacy Center for North Texas Inc; the most unlike its peers is Wtf-Winning the Fight. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 15 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
14/14
Grantees still filing
10/14
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

THE ROTARY FOUNDATION OF ROTARY INTERNATIONAL: $187,269 · InternationalTHE ROTARY FOUNDATION OF ROTARY INTERNATIONALTHE JOURNEY TO DREAM FOUNDATION: $29,474 · Human ServicesTHE JOURNEY TO DREAM F…SPAN INC: $13,257 · Human ServicesSPAN INCCLOUD NINE CHARITIES INC: $12,079 · Human ServicesCLOUD NINE CHARITIES I…Lovepacs: $6,403 · Human ServicesLovepacsDISASTER AID USA INC: $6,294 · Human ServicesDISASTER AID USA INCYMCA OF METROPOLITAN DALLAS INC: $5,136 · Human ServicesYMCA OF METROPOLITAN D…UNIVERSITY OF NORTH TEXAS: $17,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY O…PEDIPLACE INC: $13,424 · OtherPEDIPLACE IN…CHILDRENS ADVOCACY CENTER FOR NORTH TEXAS INC: $5,205 · OtherCHILDRENS AD…COURT APPOINTED SPECIAL ADVOCATES OF DENTON COUNTY INC: $5,089 · OtherCOURT APPOIN…OUR DAILY BREAD INC: $23,941 · Food & NutritionWTF-WINNING THE FIGHT: $18,918 · HealthCHRISTIAN COMMUNITY ACTION: $11,075 · Housing & ShelterLewisville Education Foundation Inc: $11,000 · Education
International$187,269Human Services$72,643Other$40,718Food & Nutrition$23,941Health$18,918Housing & Shelter$11,075Education$11,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE ROTARY FOUNDATION OF ROTARY INTERNATIONAL: $187,269 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE JOURNEY TO DREAM FOUNDATION: $29,474 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetOUR DAILY BREAD INC: $23,941 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetWTF-WINNING THE FIGHT: $18,918 over 3y, 4.4% of budgetPEDIPLACE INC: $13,424 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetSPAN INC: $13,257 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCLOUD NINE CHARITIES INC: $12,079 over 2y, 1.5% of budgetCHRISTIAN COMMUNITY ACTION: $11,075 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetLewisville Education Foundation Inc: $11,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetLovepacs: $6,403 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetDISASTER AID USA INC: $6,294 over 2y, 2.1% of budgetCHILDRENS ADVOCACY CENTER FOR NORTH TEXAS INC: $5,205 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetYMCA OF METROPOLITAN DALLAS INC: $5,136 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOURT APPOINTED SPECIAL ADVOCATES OF DENTON COUNTY INC: $5,089 over 1y, 0.3% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Coserv Charitable Fou…Communities Foundatio…McKesson Foundation I…Davidson Foundation I…United Way of Denton …Clyde and Pauline Fis…The Henry FoundationTexas Instruments Fou…The Blackbaud Giving …Network for GoodNational Philanthropi…Natl Christian Charit…
Coserv Charitable FoundationTX19.9× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Coserv Charitable Foundation · Communities Foundation of Texas Inc · McKesson Foundation Inc · Davidson Foundation Inc · United Way of Denton County Inc · Clyde and Pauline Fisher Foundation · The Henry Foundation · Texas Instruments Foundation · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Network for Good · National Philanthropic Trust · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Cross Timbers Rotary Club Charities Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Cross Timbers Rotary Club Charities Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Cross Timbers Rotary Club Charities Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Cross Timbers Rotary Club Charities Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 15 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Cross Timbers Rotary Club Charities’ filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home