Skip to content
Crj Foundation Inc at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Private foundation

Crj Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$115k
Granted FY2025still arriving
17
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$43k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Youth Development$236kEnvironment$160kReligion$138kEducation$99kHealth$68kPhilanthropy$64kFood & Nutrition$56kHuman Services$34kOther$0
02FY2025 · 17 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k13 grants · $42k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $74k
$5,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$508k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF THE PLATEAU INC$42,500
ALL SAINTS EPISCOPAL CHURCH$11,250
ST SIMONS LAND TRUST$10,000
THE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF WESTERN NORTH CAROLINA INC$10,000
HIGHLANDS CASHIERS HEALTH FOUNDATION INC$5,000
AMERICA'S SECOND HARVEST OF COASTAL GEORGIA INC$5,000
SPECIAL OPERATIONS FUND$5,000
SAFE HARBOR CENTER INC$5,000
BLUE RIDGE MOUNTAINS HEALTH PROJECT$5,000
PLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC$4,000
MEDICAL DEBT RESOLUTION INC$3,000
SUMMIT CHARTER SCHOOL FOUNDATION$2,500
GOLDEN ISLES LEADERSHIP FOUNDATION INC$2,000
CCSV GIVES$2,000
BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF SOUTHEAST GEORGIA INC$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–25, $32k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 67% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%RIP MEDICAL DEBT: $6k → 9%MEDICAL DEBT RESOLUTION INC: $3k → 13%SAFE HARBOR CENTER INC: $5k → 14%RIP MEDICAL DEBT: $3k → 9%MEDICAL DEBT RESOLUTION INC: $3k → 13%SAFE HARBOR CENTER INC: $5k → 14%RIP MEDICAL DEBT: $2k → 9%MORNINGSTAR CHILDREN AND FAMILY SERVICES INC: $2k → 14%MORNINGSTAR CHILDREN AND FAMILY SERVICES INC: $2k → 14%MORNINGSTAR CHILDREN AND FAMILY SERVICES INC: $1k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
NY
VA
MD
TN
NC
SC
DC
GA
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$787k · 19 repeat orgs$26k to everyone else

19 repeat relationships: 13 still active in FY2025, 6 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

19
10

Total granted

$787k
$18k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

-2%
+26%

Still filing today

84%
60%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 92% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $8k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationPhilanthropyEnvironmentHuman ServicesHealthRecreation & SportsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BG
    Boys & Girls Club of The Plateau Inc
    8× · 2017–2025 · $227k · revenue +547%
  • AS
    AMERICA'S SECOND HARVEST OF COASTAL GEORGIA INC
    5× · 2021–2025 · $56k · revenue +45%
  • Vanderbilt University
    3× · 2017–2020 · $30k · revenue +74%

Funded once

  • CJ
    CHICAGO JESUIT ACADEMY
    one grant, 2019 · $5k
  • BG
    BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF SE GEORGIA
    one grant, 2023 · $3k
  • FO
    FRIENDS OF PANTHERTOWN INCgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $2k · revenue +26%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Bladen County Hospital Foundation

The mission of the bladen county hospital foundation is to serve the community by building awareness and philanthropic support for bladen county hospital as it provides compassionate, quality healthcare for all its patients.

—
2
The South Fork Conservancy Incorporated

The mission of the South Fork Conservancy is to restore and preserve habitat along the tributaries of Peachtree Creek. We give the community access to these healthy, restored greenspaces by designing, building and maintaining nature trails.

Environment
3
Conestee Foundation Inc

Through responsible stewardship of our unique ecological resource, we provide inclusive opportunities for meaningful connection, discovery, and education in nature.

Environment
4
Gaston Memorial Hospital Foundation Inc

To engage and inspire our community to support caromont health in providing compassionate, exceptional and highly reliable care.

Health
5
Foundation for the Carolinas

Inspiring philanthropy and strengthening our region through innovative community initiatives and quality services to donors and constituents.

Philanthropy
6
Gaston Memorial Hospital Inc

To provide compassionate, exceptional and highly reliable care.

Health
7
The Land Trust for Tennessee Inc

To conserve the unique character of tennessee's natural and historic landscapes and sites for future generations.

Environment
8
Carolina Meadows Foundation Inc

To solicit and receive gifts, grants, bequests and contributions for the support of carolina meadows, inc. in order to enhance or extend its mission, programs, services, and facilities.

Human Services
9
Nantahala Health Foundation

Improving health and well-being for those living in westernmost North Carolina.

Health
10
Three Rivers Land Trust Inc

Protect and conserve land, natural areas, rural landscapes, family farms and historic places within north carolina's heartland

Environment
11
Conway Hospital Community Services

Conway hospital community services provides outpatient health care services to horry county and the surrounding community in conjunction with conway hospital, inc., a non-profit acute care hospital system.

Health
12
Caswell County Partnership for Children Inc

The caswell county partnership for children unites the community to provide families with resources and services to enable all children to reach their fullest potential.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Community Foundation of Western North Carolina Inc; the most unlike its peers is Safe Harbor Center Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

27 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 27 of the 33 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
26/27
Grantees still filing
11/27
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Boys & Girls Club of The Plateau Inc: $226,500 · EducationBoys & Girls Club of The Plateau IncVanderbilt University: $30,000 · EducationVanderbilt UniversityDUKE UNIVERSITY: $23,000 · EducationDUKE UNIVERSITY+3 more: $13,000 · EducationALL SAINTS EPISCOPAL CHURCH: $137,600 · OtherALL SAINTS EPISCOPAL CHURC…LITERACY ACTION INC: $25,000 · OtherLITERACY ACTION INCCFWNCCASHIERS COMMUNITY FUND: $10,750 · OtherCFWNCCASHIERS COMMUNITY FU…COLONY CLUB COMMUNITY FUND INC: $7,000 · Other+9 more: $20,000 · Other+9 moreST SIMONS LAND TRUST INC: $155,000 · EnvironmentST SIMONS LAND TRUST…+2 more: $2,500 · EnvironmentTHE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF WESTERN NORTH CAROLINA INC: $51,000 · PhilanthropyEAST LAKE FOUNDATIONINC: $3,000 · PhilanthropyCCSV GIVES INC: $2,000 · Philanthropy+1 more: $1,000 · PhilanthropyAMERICA'S SECOND HARVEST OF COASTAL GEORGIA INC: $56,000 · Food & NutritionSafe Harbor Center Inc: $29,000 · Human ServicesMEDICAL DEBT RESOLUTION INC: $16,500 · Human ServicesMORNINGSTAR CHILDREN AND FAMILY SERVICES INC: $5,000 · Human ServicesBLUE RIDGE MOUNTAINS HEALTH PROJECT INC: $21,000 · HealthHighlands Cashiers Health Foundation Inc: $18,500 · HealthPLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC: $11,000 · Health
Education$292,500Other$200,350Environment$157,500Philanthropy$57,000Food & Nutrition$56,000Human Services$50,500Health$50,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetBoys & Girls Club of The Plateau Inc: $226,500 over 8y, 1.6% of budgetST SIMONS LAND TRUST INC: $155,000 over 8y, 1.0% of budgetAMERICA'S SECOND HARVEST OF COASTAL GEORGIA INC: $56,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetTHE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF WESTERN NORTH CAROLINA INC: $51,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetVanderbilt University: $30,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSafe Harbor Center Inc: $29,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetLITERACY ACTION INC: $25,000 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetDUKE UNIVERSITY: $23,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetBLUE RIDGE MOUNTAINS HEALTH PROJECT INC: $21,000 over 6y, 0.8% of budgetHighlands Cashiers Health Foundation Inc: $18,500 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetMEDICAL DEBT RESOLUTION INC: $16,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC: $11,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetSummit Charter School Foundation: $7,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetCOLONY CLUB COMMUNITY FUND INC: $7,000 over 5y, 2.5% of budgetMORNINGSTAR CHILDREN AND FAMILY SERVICES INC: $5,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSpecial Operations Fund: $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetGOLDEN ISLES LEADERSHIP FOUNDATION INC: $3,500 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetEAST LAKE FOUNDATIONINC: $3,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF SOUTHEAST GEORGIA INC: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF PANTHERTOWN INC: $2,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetCHATTOOGA CONSERVANCY: $2,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetROBERT W WOODRUFF ARTS CENTER INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGARRISON FOREST SCHOOL INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBLUE RIDGE PARKWAY FOUNDATION: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Davis FoundationFlorence Mauboules Ch…The Community Foundat…The Community Foundat…Leadership Legacy Lif…Tickle Family Foundat…Sarracenia Foundation…Brighton Foundation T…Davis Love III Founda…The Billi Marcus Foun…Robert H & Susan F Ca…Georgia Power Foundat…
The Davis FoundationGA17.9× affinity6 shared granteesties to 10 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Davis Foundation · Florence Mauboules Charitable Trust · The Community Foundation for Greater Atlanta Inc · The Community Foundation of Western North Carolina Inc · Leadership Legacy Life Foundation · Tickle Family Foundation · Sarracenia Foundation Inc · Brighton Foundation Trust Robert D Markley Trustee · Davis Love III Foundation · The Billi Marcus Foundation Inc · Robert H & Susan F Castellini Foundation · Georgia Power Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Crj Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Crj Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 33 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Crj’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home