Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Crj Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$115k
Granted FY2025still arriving
17
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$43k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Youth Development$236kEnvironment$160kReligion$138kEducation$99kHealth$68kPhilanthropy$64kFood & Nutrition$56kHuman Services$34kOther$0
02FY2025 · 17 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k13 grants · $42k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $74k
$5,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$508k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF THE PLATEAU INC$42,500
ALL SAINTS EPISCOPAL CHURCH$11,250
ST SIMONS LAND TRUST$10,000
THE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF WESTERN NORTH CAROLINA INC$10,000
AMERICA'S SECOND HARVEST OF COASTAL GEORGIA INC$5,000
SPECIAL OPERATIONS FUND$5,000
HIGHLANDS CASHIERS HEALTH FOUNDATION INC$5,000
SAFE HARBOR CENTER INC$5,000
BLUE RIDGE MOUNTAINS HEALTH PROJECT$5,000
PLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC$4,000
MEDICAL DEBT RESOLUTION INC$3,000
SUMMIT CHARTER SCHOOL FOUNDATION$2,500
CCSV GIVES$2,000
GOLDEN ISLES LEADERSHIP FOUNDATION INC$2,000
EASTLAKE FOUNDATION INC$1,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY20–25, $32k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 67% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%RIP MEDICAL DEBT: $6k → 9%MEDICAL DEBT RESOLUTION INC: $3k → 13%SAFE HARBOR CENTER INC: $5k → 14%RIP MEDICAL DEBT: $3k → 9%MEDICAL DEBT RESOLUTION INC: $3k → 13%SAFE HARBOR CENTER INC: $5k → 14%RIP MEDICAL DEBT: $2k → 9%MORNINGSTAR CHILDREN AND FAMILY SERVICES INC: $2k → 14%MORNINGSTAR CHILDREN AND FAMILY SERVICES INC: $2k → 14%MORNINGSTAR CHILDREN AND FAMILY SERVICES INC: $1k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

IL
NY
VA
MD
TN
NC
SC
DC
GA

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$787k · 19 repeat orgs$26k to everyone else

19 repeat relationships — 13 still active in FY2025, 6 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

19
10

Total granted

$787k
$18k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

0%
+26%

Still filing today

84%
60%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 92% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $8k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationPhilanthropyEnvironmentHuman ServicesHealthRecreation & SportsOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BG
    Boys & Girls Club of The Plateau Inc
    8× · 2017–2025 · $227k · revenue +547%
  • AS
    AMERICA'S SECOND HARVEST OF COASTAL GEORGIA INC
    5× · 2021–2025 · $56k · revenue +45%
  • Vanderbilt University
    3× · 2017–2020 · $30k · revenue +74%

Funded once

  • CJ
    CHICAGO JESUIT ACADEMY
    one grant, 2019 · $5k
  • BG
    BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF SE GEORGIA
    one grant, 2023 · $3k
  • FO
    FRIENDS OF PANTHERTOWN INCgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $2k · revenue +26%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Bladen County Hospital Foundation

The mission of the bladen county hospital foundation is to serve the community by building awareness and philanthropic support for bladen county hospital as it provides compassionate, quality healthcare for all its patients.

2
The South Fork Conservancy Incorporated

The mission of the South Fork Conservancy is to restore and preserve habitat along the tributaries of Peachtree Creek. We give the community access to these healthy, restored greenspaces by designing, building and maintaining nature trails.

Environment
3
Conestee Foundation Inc

Through responsible stewardship of our unique ecological resource, we provide inclusive opportunities for meaningful connection, discovery, and education in nature.

Environment
4
Gaston Memorial Hospital Foundation Inc

To engage and inspire our community to support caromont health in providing compassionate, exceptional and highly reliable care.

Health
5
Foundation for the Carolinas

Inspiring philanthropy and strengthening our region through innovative community initiatives and quality services to donors and constituents.

Philanthropy
6
Gaston Memorial Hospital Inc

To provide compassionate, exceptional and highly reliable care.

Health
7
The Land Trust for Tennessee Inc

To conserve the unique character of tennessee's natural and historic landscapes and sites for future generations.

Environment
8
Carolina Meadows Foundation Inc

To solicit and receive gifts, grants, bequests and contributions for the support of carolina meadows, inc. in order to enhance or extend its mission, programs, services, and facilities.

Human Services
9
Nantahala Health Foundation

Improving health and well-being for those living in westernmost North Carolina.

Health
10
Three Rivers Land Trust Inc

Protect and conserve land, natural areas, rural landscapes, family farms and historic places within north carolina's heartland

Environment
11
Conway Hospital Community Services

Conway hospital community services provides outpatient health care services to horry county and the surrounding community in conjunction with conway hospital, inc., a non-profit acute care hospital system.

Health
12
Caswell County Partnership for Children Inc

The caswell county partnership for children unites the community to provide families with resources and services to enable all children to reach their fullest potential.

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Community Foundation of Western North Carolina Inc and the most unlike its peers is Safe Harbor Center Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyLocal Food SystemsHealthcare System SupportHousing & Homelessness Serv…Independent K-12 SchoolsRegional Arts & Culture Org…#12
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 29 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%4%<5yr14%0%5–10yr19%24%10–20yr16%40%20–35yr13%12%35–55yr16%20%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%0%<5yr14%0%5–10yr19%35%10–20yr16%28%20–35yr13%32%35–55yr16%4%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 4% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/29
the rest of the field
13%
240,396/1,819,536

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

27 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 27 of the 33 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
26/27
Grantees still filing
12/27
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Boys & Girls Club of The Plateau Inc — $226,500 · EducationBoys & Girls Club of The Plateau IncVanderbilt University — $30,000 · EducationVanderbilt UniversityDUKE UNIVERSITY — $23,000 · EducationDUKE UNIVERSITY+3 more — $13,000 · EducationALL SAINTS EPISCOPAL CHURCH — $137,600 · OtherALL SAINTS EPISCOPAL CHURC…LITERACY ACTION INC — $25,000 · OtherLITERACY ACTION INCCFWNCCASHIERS COMMUNITY FUND — $10,750 · OtherCFWNCCASHIERS COMMUNITY FU…COLONY CLUB COMMUNITY FUND INC — $7,000 · Other+9 more — $20,000 · Other+9 moreST SIMONS LAND TRUST INC — $155,000 · EnvironmentST SIMONS LAND TRUST…+2 more — $2,500 · EnvironmentTHE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF WESTERN NORTH CAROLINA INC — $51,000 · PhilanthropyEAST LAKE FOUNDATIONINC — $3,000 · PhilanthropyCCSV GIVES INC — $2,000 · Philanthropy+1 more — $1,000 · PhilanthropyAMERICA'S SECOND HARVEST OF COASTAL GEORGIA INC — $56,000 · Food & NutritionSafe Harbor Center Inc — $29,000 · Human ServicesMEDICAL DEBT RESOLUTION INC — $16,500 · Human ServicesMORNINGSTAR CHILDREN AND FAMILY SERVICES INC — $5,000 · Human ServicesBLUE RIDGE MOUNTAINS HEALTH PROJECT INC — $21,000 · HealthHighlands Cashiers Health Foundation Inc — $18,500 · HealthPLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC — $11,000 · Health
Education$292,500Other$200,350Environment$157,500Philanthropy$57,000Food & Nutrition$56,000Human Services$50,500Health$50,500

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetBoys & Girls Club of The Plateau Inc — $226,500 over 8y, 1.6% of budgetST SIMONS LAND TRUST INC — $155,000 over 8y, 1.0% of budgetAMERICA'S SECOND HARVEST OF COASTAL GEORGIA INC — $56,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetTHE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF WESTERN NORTH CAROLINA INC — $51,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetVanderbilt University — $30,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSafe Harbor Center Inc — $29,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetLITERACY ACTION INC — $25,000 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetDUKE UNIVERSITY — $23,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetBLUE RIDGE MOUNTAINS HEALTH PROJECT INC — $21,000 over 6y, 0.8% of budgetHighlands Cashiers Health Foundation Inc — $18,500 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetMEDICAL DEBT RESOLUTION INC — $16,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC — $11,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCOLONY CLUB COMMUNITY FUND INC — $7,000 over 5y, 2.5% of budgetSummit Charter School Foundation — $7,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetMORNINGSTAR CHILDREN AND FAMILY SERVICES INC — $5,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSpecial Operations Fund — $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetGOLDEN ISLES LEADERSHIP FOUNDATION INC — $3,500 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetEAST LAKE FOUNDATIONINC — $3,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF PANTHERTOWN INC — $2,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF SOUTHEAST GEORGIA INC — $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCHATTOOGA CONSERVANCY — $2,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetGARRISON FOREST SCHOOL INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetROBERT W WOODRUFF ARTS CENTER INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBLUE RIDGE PARKWAY FOUNDATION — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Davis FoundationGA17.9× affinity6 shared granteesties to 10 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Davis Foundation · Florence Mauboules Charitable Trust · The Community Foundation for Greater Atlanta Inc · The Community Foundation of Western North Carolina Inc · Leadership Legacy Life Foundation · Tickle Family Foundation · Sarracenia Foundation Inc · Brighton Foundation Trust Robert D Markley Trustee · Davis Love III Foundation · The Billi Marcus Foundation Inc · Robert H & Susan F Castellini Foundation · Georgia Power Foundation Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Crj Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 33 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph