Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Creston G Tate and Betty Jane Tate Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$132k
Granted FY2020
26
Grants FY2020
2
States reached
$25k
Largest

Read this first · the figures below need context

85% of Creston G Tate and Betty Jane Tate Foundation’s FY2025 grant dollars went to Community Foundation Of Anne Arundel Co, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2025 names 3 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it. Everything below is therefore FY2020, the last year Creston G Tate and Betty Jane Tate Foundation named its own grantees at scale: 14 organizations, $132k. It is dated, not current.

Organizations named directly on the return

8
17
7
18
7
19
14
20
2
22
2
23
1
24
3
25

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

01What you fund
0199% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Health$331kPhilanthropy$328kEducation$87kArts & Culture$47kEmployment$42kRecreation & Sports$16kHousing & Shelter$14kFood & Nutrition$8kOther$0
02FY2020 · 26 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2020

  • Under $10k20 grants · $47k
  • $10k–50k6 grants · $85k
$2,500
Median grant
2
States reached
$1.4M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
BALTIMORE WASHINGTON MEDICAL CNTR$25,000
JOHNS HOPKINS MEDICINE HEART INST$15,000
RAPPAHANNOCK COMMUNITY COLLEGE FND$15,000
ANNE ARUNDEL MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDAT$10,000
BELLO MACHRE$10,000
HOSPICE OF THE CHESAPEAKE FOUNDATIO$10,000
CHESAPEAKE ARTS CENTER$5,000
Individual grant recipient$5,000
ANNE ARUNDEL COUNTY FOOD BANK$5,000
LIVING CLASSROOMS FOUNDATION$4,500
PARTNERS IN CARE$3,500
PROVIDENCE CENTER$2,500
MEALS ON WHEELS OF CENTRAL MD$2,500
CHESAPEAKE BAY FOUNDATION$2,000
HABITAT FOR THE HUMANITY OF THE CHE$2,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY19–25, $20k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 25% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 7%VETERANS MOVING FORWARD: $1k → 4%Baltimore Outreach Services: $5k → 19%BELLO MACHRE: $10k → 6%HOPE FOR ALL: $4k → 6%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

84%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$497k · 16 repeat orgs$92k to everyone else

16 repeat relationships — 11 still active in FY2020, 5 since wound down; 18 grantees were first funded in FY2020 (too recent to call). Read against FY2020, the last year this funder named its own grantees directly; its giving has since run through a sponsor, which reports no donor behind each grant.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

16
5

Total granted

$497k
$10k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+80%
+125%

Still filing today

44%
20%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 69% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $5k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’22’23’24’25
HealthHuman ServicesArts & CulturePhilanthropyFood & NutritionEmploymentOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • HO
    HOSPICE OF THE CHESAPEAKE FOUNDATION INC
    4× · 2017–2020 · $85k · revenue +83%
  • BW
    Baltimore Washington Medical Center Inc
    4× · 2022–2025 · $62k · revenue +4%
  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND BALTIMORE FOUNDATION INC
    2× · 2017–2018 · $50k · revenue +60%

Funded once

  • SS
    SCHOOL SISTERS OF NOTRE DAME
    one grant, 2017 · $5k
  • HF
    HOPE FOR ALL INCgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $4k · revenue +125%
  • CS
    CARSON SCHOLARSHIP FUND
    one grant, 2018 · $500

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Healthcare Access Maryland Inc

We are making maryland healthier by connecting residents to insurance and care, educating the community about healthier living, and advocating a more equitable health care system.

Health
2
The Arc of Southern Maryland Inc

Create opportunities for independence and personal success for people with different abilities in inclusive communities.

3
Owings Mills Senior Housing Inc

The organization is affiliated with Associated Catholic Charities, Inc. (ACC) whose mission is "Inspired by the Gospel mandates to love, serve and teach, Catholic Charities provides care and services to improve the lives of Marylanders in…

Housing & Shelter
4
Caroline Center Inc

None

5
Arundel Community Development Services Inc

See schedule oprovide a vehicle to develop programs, implement strategies and complete projects which further housing and community development goals and advance the common good and general welfare of communities and residents,…

Housing & Shelter
6
Upmc Western Maryland Corporation

The mission of upmc western maryland is to serve our community by providing outstanding patient care and to shape tomorrow's health system through clinical & technological innovation, research and education.

Health
7
CalvertHealth Medical Center Inc

Calverthealth medical center provides quality inpatient and ambulatory health care to the people of southern maryland that is accessible, cost-effective and compassionate. chmc works in partnership with the community to improve the health…

Health
8
Maryland Center On Economic Policy Inc

The maryland center on economic policy advances innovative policy ideas to foster broad prosperity and help our state be the standard-bearer for responsible public policy.

Social Science
9
The Arc Baltimore Inc

The arc baltimore supports people with developmental disabilities to lead fulfilling lives with a sense of belonging, purpose, and meaningful relationships.

Human Services
10
Moveable Feast Inc

Moveable feast's mission is to improve the health of marylanders experiencing food insecurity and chronic illness by preparing and delivering medically tailored meals and providing nutrition education, thereby achieving racial, social, and…

11
Baltimore Area Health Education Center

To eliminate health disparities by educating and strengthening the health care workforce. bahec provides interdisciplinary education programs that bridge academic, healthcare, and community settings to transform the health of underserved…

Health
12
Chesapeake Care Resources Inc

To provide quality services that enhance and improve life for individuals who have a developmental disability

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Providence of Maryland Inc and the most unlike its peers is University of Maryland Baltimore Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 31 years old; the field is 18. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number20%0%<5yr15%5%5–10yr16%14%10–20yr16%38%20–35yr12%29%35–55yr21%14%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value20%0%<5yr15%2%5–10yr16%5%10–20yr16%66%20–35yr12%27%35–55yr21%1%55yr+

The field is 20% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/22
the rest of the field
13%
1,174/8,837

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

20 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 20 of the 40 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
10
Early backer (in before they grew)
20/20
Grantees still filing
18/20
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

HOSPICE OF THE CHESAPEAKE FOUNDATION INC — $85,000 · OtherHOSPICE OF THE CHESAPEAKE FOUNDATION INCANNE ARUNDEL MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDAT — $80,000 · OtherANNE ARUNDEL MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATBALTIMORE WASHINGTON MEDICAL CNTR — $50,000 · OtherBALTIMORE WASHINGTON MEDICAL CNTRANNE ARUNDEL COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUN — $40,000 · OtherANNE ARUNDEL COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNLIVING CLASSROOMS FOUNDATION — $16,500 · OtherCURTIS BAY ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION INC — $15,600 · OtherRAPPAHANNOCK COMMUNITY COLLEGE FND — $15,000 · OtherJOHNS HOPKINS MEDICINE HEART INST — $15,000 · Other+16 more — $42,500 · Other+16 moreCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF ANNE ARUNDEL CO — $309,565 · PhilanthropyCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF ANNE ARUNDEL COPARTNERS IN CARE MARYLAND INC — $18,500 · PhilanthropyPARTNERS IN CARE MARYLAND INC+1 more — $1,000 · PhilanthropyBaltimore Washington Medical Center Inc — $61,500 · HealthBaltimore W…ANNAPOLIS WELLNESS CORPORATION — $15,000 · HealthANNAPOLIS W…CHRYSALIS HOUSE INC — $9,500 · HealthCHRYSALIS H…+1 more — $2,000 · HealthUNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND BALTIMORE FOUNDATION INC — $50,000 · EducationCHESAPEAKE ARTS CENTER INC — $35,000 · Arts & CultureMARYLAND DEAF COMMUNITY CENTER — $10,000 · Arts & CultureBELLO MACHRE INC — $10,000 · Human ServicesBALTIMORE OUTREACH SERVICES INC — $5,000 · Human ServicesHOPE FOR ALL INC — $3,750 · Human ServicesVETERANS MOVING FORWARD INC — $1,000 · Human ServicesANNE ARUNDEL COUNTY FOOD BANK INC — $5,000 · Food & NutritionMEALS ON WHEELS OF CENTRAL MARYLANDINC — $2,500 · Food & Nutrition
Other$359,600Philanthropy$329,065Health$88,000Education$50,000Arts & Culture$45,000Human Services$19,750Food & Nutrition$7,500

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF ANNE ARUNDEL CO — $309,565 over 5y, 0.8% of budgetHOSPICE OF THE CHESAPEAKE FOUNDATION INC — $85,000 over 4y, 1.0% of budgetBaltimore Washington Medical Center Inc — $61,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND BALTIMORE FOUNDATION INC — $50,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCHESAPEAKE ARTS CENTER INC — $35,000 over 4y, 1.2% of budgetPARTNERS IN CARE MARYLAND INC — $18,500 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetANNAPOLIS WELLNESS CORPORATION — $15,000 over 3y, 1.4% of budgetMARYLAND DEAF COMMUNITY CENTER — $10,000 over 1y, 4.1% of budgetBELLO MACHRE INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHRYSALIS HOUSE INC — $9,500 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetANNE ARUNDEL COUNTY FOOD BANK INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBALTIMORE OUTREACH SERVICES INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetPROVIDENCE OF MARYLAND INC — $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMEALS ON WHEELS OF CENTRAL MARYLANDINC — $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetST AGNES FOUNDATION INC — $2,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetOPPORTUNITY BUILDERS INC — $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHESAPEAKE BAY FOUNDATION INC — $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetVETERANS MOVING FORWARD INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetARTS COUNCIL OF ANNE ARUNDEL COUNTY INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF ANNE ARUNDEL CO
  • Who funds HOSPICE OF THE CHESAPEAKE FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds Baltimore Washington Medical Center Inc
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND BALTIMORE FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds CHESAPEAKE ARTS CENTER INC
  • Who funds PARTNERS IN CARE MARYLAND INC
  • Who funds ANNAPOLIS WELLNESS CORPORATION
  • Who funds MARYLAND DEAF COMMUNITY CENTER
  • Who funds BELLO MACHRE INC
  • Who funds CHRYSALIS HOUSE INC
  • Who funds ANNE ARUNDEL COUNTY FOOD BANK INC
  • Who funds BALTIMORE OUTREACH SERVICES INC
  • Who funds HOPE FOR ALL INC
  • Who funds PROVIDENCE OF MARYLAND INC
  • Who funds MEALS ON WHEELS OF CENTRAL MARYLANDINC
  • Who funds ST AGNES FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds OPPORTUNITY BUILDERS INC
  • Who funds CHESAPEAKE BAY FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds VETERANS MOVING FORWARD INC
  • Who funds ARTS COUNCIL OF ANNE ARUNDEL COUNTY INC

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Community Foundation of Anne Arundel CoMD28.1× affinity11 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Community Foundation of Anne Arundel Co · Arundel Community Development Services Inc · William J and Dorothy K O'Neill Foundation Inc · The United Way of Central Maryland Inc · Schuh Family Foundation Inc · The Jm Kaplan Fund Inc · Anne Arundel Economic Development Corporation · Baltimore Community Foundation Inc · The James M and Margaret V Stine Foundation Inc · The John J Leidy Foundation Inc · The Harry and Jeanette Weinberg Foundation Inc · T Rowe Price Program for Charitable Giving Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Creston G Tate and Betty Jane Tate Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 20%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 7%
  • Partners in Care Maryland Inc40% of income from government
  • Arts Council of Anne Arundel County Inc33% of income from government
  • Chesapeake Arts Center Inc7% of income from government
  • University of Maryland Baltimore Foundation Inc3% of income from government
  • Chesapeake Bay Foundation Inc2% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
13report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Creston G Tate and Betty Jane Tate Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Creston G Tate and Betty Jane Tate Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 40 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2020, released 2020. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph