· Private foundation
The James M and Margaret V Stine Foundation Inc
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k18 grants · $49k
- $10k–50k49 grants · $796k
- $50k–250k3 grants · $200k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| ATLANTIC SALMON FEDERATION INC | $100,000 |
| ICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI | $50,000 |
| MILTON S HERSHEY MEDICAL CENTER | $50,000 |
| DANA FARBER CANCER INSTITUTE INC | $40,000 |
| FEEDING AMERICA | $40,000 |
| AMERICARES FOUNDATION INC | $30,000 |
| DIRECT RELIEF FOUNDATION | $30,000 |
| INTERNATIONAL RELIEF TEAMS | $30,000 |
| SAVE THE CHILDREN FEDERATION INC | $30,000 |
| TURTLE BAY EXPLORATION PARK | $25,000 |
| THERESAS BATTLESHIP FOUNDATION INC | $25,000 |
| COVENANT HOUSE WASHINGTON DC | $20,000 |
| FOOD FOR THE POOR INC | $20,000 |
| FISHER HOUSE FOUNDATION INC | $20,000 |
| ST JUDE CHILDRENS RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC | $20,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $982k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 58% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
101 repeat relationships — 63 still active in FY2024, 38 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 96% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $47k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
ICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI6× · 2019–2024 · $415k · revenue +41%
Atlantic Salmon Federation (US) Inc8× · 2017–2024 · $410k · revenue +278%
Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc8× · 2017–2024 · $300k · revenue +132%
Funded once
- PSPENN STATE UNIVERSITYone grant, 2017 · $135k
- MSMOUNT SINAI SCHOOL OF MEDICINE ON NY UNIVERSITYone grant, 2018 · $100k
- CRCATHOLIC RELIEF SERVICESone grant, 2017 · $75k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The purpose of the water research foundation (wrf) is a definitive research organization to advance the science of all things water to better meet the evolving needs of its subscribers and the water sector. to engage exclusively in…
To help conquer cancer and other diseases through the application of biostatistical principles and innovative data management methods.
Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.
To sustain, restore, and enhance the nation's fish, wildlife, plants, and habitats.
Inspired by the gift of donation from our communities, allosource responsibly provides innovative cellular and tissue allografts to advance patient healing.
Friends of the earth strives for a more healthy and just world by defendng the environment and human health while advancing social and economic justice by conducting research and education, transforming the economy so it protects the…
The fsmb serves as the voice for state medical boards, supporting them through education, assessment, research and advocacy while providing services and initiatives that promote patient safety, quality health care and regulatory best…
To drive transformational adaptation to protect communities across the country from higher seas, stronger storms, and more frequent flooding.
The npr foundation ("foundation") is organized and operated exclusively for the benefit of its sole supported organization, national public radio, inc. ("npr inc."). the foundation supports npr inc. through various activities such as…
Our mission is to invest in and accelerate the development of the most promising future leaders in biomedical research with global impact.
At the internet society foundation, we focus on funding initiatives that strengthen the internet in function and reach so that it can effectively serve all people. our work advances the vision of the internet society (isoc): the internet…
Democratizing societal and economic well-being through digital equity for everyone, increased diversity in the tech sector, innovative education, and technology for the public good
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Make-a-Wish Foundation of America and the most unlike its peers is Friends of the Parker River National Wildlife Refuge. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 36 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 1% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
107 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 107 of the 146 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds ICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI ↗
- Who funds Atlantic Salmon Federation (US) Inc ↗
- Who funds Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc ↗
- Who funds THE MILTON S HERSHEY MEDICAL CENTER ↗
- Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC ↗
- Who funds TURTLE BAY EXPLORATION PARK ↗
- Who funds DIRECT RELIEF FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Save The Children Federation Inc ↗
- Who funds FISHER HOUSE FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds AMERICARES FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds Feeding America ↗
- Who funds FOOD FOR THE POOR INC ↗
- Who funds Habitat for Humanity of Collier County Inc ↗
- Who funds ST MATTHEWS HOUSE INC ↗
- Who funds MARC LUSTGARTEN PANCREATIC CANCER FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds MOORINGS PARK FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds THE OVARIAN CANCER RESEARCH FUND INC ↗
- Who funds THE SCRIPPS RESEARCH INSTITUTE ↗
- Who funds THE CONSERVATION FUND A NONPROFIT CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds Tryall Fund Jamaica ↗
- Who funds DOROBO FUND FOR TANZANIA INC ↗
- Who funds Mercy Health Foundation ↗
- Who funds THE TAFT SCHOOL CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds THERESAS BATTLESHIP FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds Hillside SPCA Inc ↗
- Who funds INTERNATIONAL RELIEF TEAMS ↗
- Who funds COVENANT HOUSE WASHINGTON DC ↗
- Who funds THE MICHAEL J FOX FOUNDATION FOR PARKINSON'S RESEARCH ↗
- Who funds National Foundation For Cancer Research ↗
- Who funds ASSOCIATED CATHOLIC CHARITIES INC ↗
- Who funds KIDS INTERVENTION AND DIAGNOSTIC SERVICE CENTER ↗
- Who funds RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES OF SOUTHWEST FLORIDA INC ↗
- Who funds GIRLS WRITE NOW INC ↗
- Who funds NAPLES BOTANICAL GARDEN INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Community Foundation of Anne Arundel Co · Give Lively Foundation Inc · The United Way of Central Maryland Inc · The Geaton and Joann Decesaris Family Foundation Inc · United Way of Deschutes County · The Jm Kaplan Fund Inc · The Roundhouse Foundation · Baltimore Community Foundation Inc · The Oregon Community Foundation · Creston G Tate and Betty Jane Tate Foundation · America's Charities · William J and Dorothy K O'Neill Foundation Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization The James M and Margaret V Stine Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Save the Children Federation Inc — 30% of income from government
- Chesapeake Conservancy Inc — 27% of income from government
- Boys and Girls Clubs of Bend Inc — 16% of income from government
- The Maryland Food Bank Inc — 11% of income from government
- High Desert Museum — 11% of income from government
- Associated Catholic Charities Inc — 10% of income from government
- Our Neighbors' Table Inc — 8% of income from government
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc — 7% of income from government
- Naples Botanical Garden Inc — 3% of income from government
- Central Oregon Trail Alliance — 1% of income from government
- Sea Turtle Conservancy — 1% of income from government
- Americares Foundation Inc — 0% of income from government
- Steppingstone Foundation Inc — 0% of income from government
- Wounded Warrior Project Inc — 0% of income from government
- Food for the Poor Inc — 0% of income from government
- K9S for Warriors Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.