Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Craig and Barbara Barrett Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$1.5M
Granted FY2024still arriving
57
Grants FY2024still arriving
13
States reached
$330k
Largest
01What you fund
0199% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20202024.

Education$3.0MScience & Tech$1.6MArts & Culture$949kPublic Benefit$786kCivil Rights$198kInternational$164kEnvironment$140kRecreation & Sports$140kOther$0
02FY2024 · 57 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k32 grants · $83k
  • $10k–50k19 grants · $347k
  • $50k–250k4 grants · $490k
  • $250k+2 grants · $605k
$5,000
Median grant
13
States reached
$711k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CARNEGIE INSTITUTION OF WASHINGTON$330,000
CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY$275,000
BASIS CHARTER SCHOOLS INC$180,000
USS ARIZONA LEGACY FOUNDATION$160,000
STANFORD UNIVERSITY$100,000
UNIVERSITY OF MONTANA$50,000
KISKI SCHOOL$33,500
SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION$30,000
AMERICAN POPS ORCHESTRA$25,000
SI SE PUEDE FOUNDATION$25,000
ARIZONA INTERSCHOLASTIC ASSOCIATION$25,000
HORATIO ALGER ASSOCIATION$25,000
SCOTTSDALE MUSEUM OF THE WEST$23,250
ARIZONA SCIENCE CENTER$20,000
GLF GLOBAL LEADERSHIP FOUNDATION$20,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY23–24, $29k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 91% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%BRCC FUND: $3k → 8%SI SE PUEDE FOUNDATION: $25k → 11%CHILDHELP: $1k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

ID
MT
MN
WI
NY
MA
PA
CA
UT
CO
WV
VA
MD
AZ
NM
DC
LA
TX

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 7% of Craig and Barbara Barrett Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another.

Craig and Barbara Barrett Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

92%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$6.5M · 54 repeat orgs$528k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +44% since the first grant, against +31% for the ones you funded once.

54 repeat relationships — 40 still active in FY2024, 14 since wound down; 13 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

54
37

Total granted

$6.5M
$363k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+44%
+31%

Still filing today

70%
62%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 88% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $165k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
EducationArts & CultureInternationalHealthRecreation & SportsPublic BenefitOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • HA
    HORATIO ALGER ASSN OF DISTINGUISHED AMERICANS INC
    5× · 2020–2024 · $1.3M · revenue +12%
  • BC
    BASIS CHARTER SCHOOLS INC
    5× · 2020–2024 · $889k · revenue +19%
  • CI
    CARNEGIE INSTITUTION OF WASHINGTON
    5× · 2020–2024 · $765k · revenue +44%

Funded once

  • HR
    HUMAN RIGHTS FIRST
    one grant, 2021 · $180k · revenue -45%
  • NG
    NATIONAL GEOGRAPHIC SOCIETYgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $44k · revenue +33%
  • SA
    SALVATION ARMY
    one grant, 2020 · $26k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
United States Naval Institute

Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.

2
American Association for the Advancement of Science

Advance science, engineering, and innovation throughout the world for the benefit of all. the world's largest multidisciplinary scientific society and a leading publisher of cutting-edge research through its science family of journals,…

Science & Tech
3
American Academy of Arts & Sciences

Founded in 1780, the american academy of arts and sciences honors excellence and convenes leaders from every field of human endeavor to examine new ideas, address issues of importance to the nation and the world, and work together "to…

Social Science
4
American Museum of Natural History

The museum's mission statement is: "to discover, interpret, and disseminate - through scientific research and education - knowledge about human cultures, the natural world, and the universe."

Arts & Culture
5
Institute for Advanced Study - Louis Bamberger & Mrs Felix Fuld Foundation

The institute for advanced study (the institute) is one of the world's leading centers for theoretical research and intellectual inquiry. see schedule o.

Science & Tech
6
University Corporation for Atmospheric Research

See schedule ouniversity corporation for atmospheric research (ucar), on behalf of, and in cooperation with its member university members, is engaged in the management of long-term atmospheric and related research and educational…

Science & Tech
7
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
8
Arizona Educational Foundation Inc

To celebrate excellence and cultivate opportunity in pk-12th grade arizona public education.

9
Augustana College

Rooted in the liberal arts & sciences & lutheran expression of the christian faith, & is committed to offering a challenging education that develops qualities of mind, spirit, & body necessary for a rewarding life of leadership & service…

Education
10
American Geophysical Union

Agu's mission is to advance and support an inclusive community of earth and space scientists and partners dedicated to discovery and solutions to societal challenges. agu seeks to catalyze discovery and solutions to scientific and societal…

Science & Tech
11
University of Arizona Foundation

The university of arizona foundation is committed to supporting and enhancing the vision, mission and values of the university of arizona through the development and management of private support.

Education
12
Lowell Observatory

The mission of lowell observatory is to pursue the study of astronomy, especially the study of our solar system and its evolution; to conduct pure research in astronomical phenomena; and to maintain quality public education and outreach…

Science & Tech

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Arizona Science Center and the most unlike its peers is Uss Arizona Legacy Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyIndependent K-12 SchoolsLocal History MuseumsYouth Sports ProgramsOrchestra and Ensemble Perf…Equine Therapy ProgramsChristian Missionary Organi…Health Access Advocacy and …Public Library OperationsCancer Support ServicesEnvironmental Conservation …Community College Foundatio…Community FoundationsPolicy Research and Advocacy
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 46 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%2%<5yr14%5%5–10yr19%10%10–20yr16%23%20–35yr13%25%35–55yr16%35%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%0%<5yr14%4%5–10yr19%1%10–20yr16%27%20–35yr13%6%35–55yr16%63%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 2% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/71
the rest of the field
13%
240,396/1,819,494

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

68 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 68 of the 105 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
11
Early backer (in before they grew)
67/68
Grantees still filing
53/68
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

HORATIO ALGER ASSN OF DISTINGUISHED AMERICANS INC — $1,281,230 · EducationHORATIO ALGER ASSN OF DISTINGUISHED AMERICANS INCBASIS CHARTER SCHOOLS INC — $889,000 · EducationBASIS CHARTER SCHOOLS INCCALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY — $475,000 · EducationCALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGYTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY — $300,000 · EducationTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR U…USS ARIZONA LEGACY FOUNDATION — $205,000 · EducationUSS ARIZONA LEGACY FOUNDATION+11 more — $271,279 · Education+11 moreTRIGG - C M RUSSELL FOUNDATION INC — $602,410 · Arts & CultureTRIGG - C M R…SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION — $155,915 · Arts & CultureSMITHSONIAN I…ARIZONA SCIENCE CENTER — $45,000 · Arts & Culture+8 more — $86,097 · Arts & Culture+8 moreRONALD REAGAN PRESIDENTIAL FOUNDATI — $251,000 · OtherRONALD REAGAN PR…SMITHSONIAN NAT'L NATUAL HISTORY MU — $158,500 · OtherSMITHSONIAN NAT'…AMERICAN POPS ORCHESTRA — $62,000 · OtherAMERICAN POPS OR…UNIVERSITY OF MONTANA — $50,000 · OtherFRIENDS OF THE LIBRARY OF CONGRESS — $50,000 · OtherWildlife Conservation Society — $50,000 · Other+56 more — $427,670 · Other+56 moreCARNEGIE INSTITUTION OF WASHINGTON — $765,000 · Science & TechCARNEGIE INST…SOCIETY FOR SCIENCE & THE PUBLIC — $100,000 · Science & TechSOCIETY FOR S…SANDRA DAY O'CONNOR INSTITUTE FOR AMERICAN DEMOCRACY — $471,025 · Community ImprovementHUMAN RIGHTS FIRST — $180,000 · InternationalJUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF ARIZONA — $50,000 · InternationalGLF GLOBAL LEADERSHIP FOUNDATION — $50,000 · InternationalU S-UKRAINE FOUNDATION — $21,050 · InternationalThe American-Scandinavian Foundation — $19,250 · InternationalATLANTIC COUNCIL OF THE UNITED STATES INC — $15,000 · International+4 more — $7,350 · InternationalARIZONA INTERSCHOLASTIC ASSOCIATION INC — $125,000 · Recreation & SportsNATIONAL FOREST FOUNDATION — $124,000 · Recreation & Sports+1 more — $5,350 · Recreation & Sports
Education$3,421,509Arts & Culture$889,422Other$1,049,170Science & Tech$865,000Community Improvement$471,025International$342,650Recreation & Sports$254,350

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetHORATIO ALGER ASSN OF DISTINGUISHED AMERICANS INC — $1,281,230 over 5y, 1.7% of budgetBASIS CHARTER SCHOOLS INC — $889,000 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetCARNEGIE INSTITUTION OF WASHINGTON — $765,000 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetTRIGG - C M RUSSELL FOUNDATION INC — $602,410 over 5y, 5.5% of budgetCALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY — $475,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetSANDRA DAY O'CONNOR INSTITUTE FOR AMERICAN DEMOCRACY — $471,025 over 5y, 9.9% of budgetTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY — $300,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetUSS ARIZONA LEGACY FOUNDATION — $205,000 over 3y, 23% of budgetHUMAN RIGHTS FIRST — $180,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetSMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION — $155,915 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetARIZONA INTERSCHOLASTIC ASSOCIATION INC — $125,000 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetNATIONAL FOREST FOUNDATION — $124,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetSOCIETY FOR SCIENCE & THE PUBLIC — $100,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION FOR A NEW AMERICAN UNIVERSITY — $75,974 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN POPS ORCHESTRA — $62,000 over 4y, 1.2% of budgetWildlife Conservation Society — $50,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetJUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF ARIZONA — $50,000 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetGLF GLOBAL LEADERSHIP FOUNDATION — $50,000 over 3y, 6.0% of budgetARIZONA SCIENCE CENTER — $45,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetNATIONAL GEOGRAPHIC SOCIETY — $44,205 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetALLIANCE FOR CHOICE IN EDUCATION — $40,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTHE KISKI SCHOOL — $33,500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetJOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY — $30,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSCOTTSDALE MUSEUM OF THE WEST INC — $28,250 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetAIR & SPACE FORCES AID SOCIETY INC — $26,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetFirewheel STEM Institute — $25,000 over 1y, 8.7% of budgetCOMPUTER HISTORY MUSEUM — $25,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetMontana State University Foundation Inc — $25,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetU S-UKRAINE FOUNDATION — $21,050 over 2y, 1.4% of budgetThe American-Scandinavian Foundation — $19,250 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetGIRL SCOUTS - ARIZONA CACTUS-PINE COUNCIL INC — $16,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTHE HEARD MUSEUM — $15,905 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetATLANTIC COUNCIL OF THE UNITED STATES INC — $15,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetArizona Academic Decathlon Association Inc — $13,500 over 4y, 3.2% of budgetMOUNTAIN STATES LEGAL FOUNDATION — $12,575 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetCHARLIE RUSSELL RIDERS FOUNDATION INC — $12,000 over 3y, 2.1% of budgetTHE FUND FOR AMERICAN STUDIES — $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBARROW NEUROLOGICAL FOUNDATION — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe Rand Corporation — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetVALLEY LEADERSHIP CORPORATION — $10,000 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetTHE UNIVERSITY OF MONTANA FOUNDATION — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSTOCK FARM GREATER RAVALLI FOUNDATION — $10,000 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetTHE PEREGRINE FUND INC — $7,093 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetMOVE UNITED — $5,350 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSAN DIEGO AIR & SPACE MUSEUM INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHISTORICAL LEAGUE INC — $5,000 over 1y, 8.2% of budgetMuseum of Northern Arizona Inc — $3,905 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetTibet Fund Inc — $3,100 over 2y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Arizona Community FoundationAZ18× affinity8 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Arizona Community Foundation · Virginia G Piper Charitable Trust · The Ayco Charitable Foundation · Helios Education Foundation · Burton Family Foundation · The Kemper & Ethel Marley Fdn · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · Arizona Cardinals Foundation · American Express Foundation · Bny Mellon Charitable Gift Fund · Charities Aid Foundation America · National Philanthropic Trust

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Craig and Barbara Barrett Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%2%6%14%25%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 16%
  • Move United16% of income from government
  • Johns Hopkins University12% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
11report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 105 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph